Advertisement

Sino-Western Cognitive Differences and Western Liberal Biases in Chinese Political Studies

  • Baogang Guo
RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Many scholarly publications in the field of Chinese political studies show a strong Western liberal bias. Very often we find their descriptions and predictions on China to be inaccurate or false. To probe the problem of Western liberal bias, this study uses a multidisciplinary approach to analyze the Sino-Western cognitive habits and the cultural and historical roots of these differences. We find that there are some important cognitive differences between Chinese and Western people. These differences may derive from their linguistic, psychological, and genetic variations, and are closely associated with their different political values, preferences, and behavior patterns. The implication of these finding suggests that some of the Western liberal ideas may not be congruent with Chinese culture which emphasizes social harmony, rule of ethics, and respect to authority. Effort to promote Western liberal democracy as a universal value does not take into consideration of these important cognitive and cultural differences.

Keywords

Political psychology Western liberal bias Liberal democracy Chinese cognitive pattern Binary thinking Sinicization Socialism with Chinese characters Asian values 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the East Asia Institute of the National University Singapore for supporting his research on the topic during his visit in summer 2014. He also wants to thank Nele Noesselt, He Li and Melissa Guo for their comments on the earlier draft of this paper. [46]

References

  1. 1.
    Apter, D. 1965. The politics of modernization, 17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azar, Beth. 2010. Your brain on culture. Monitor on Psychology 41 (10): 44–46.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, D., et al. 1995. Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1–16, 36–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buchanan, A. 2002. Political legitimacy and democracy. Ethics 112 (4): 689–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chee, M.W.L., et al. 2011. Brain structure in young and old east Asians and westerners: Comparisons of structural volume and cortical thickness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (5): 1065–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, F. 1997. The dilemma of eudemonic legitimacy in post Mao China. Polity 29 (3): 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cherry, K.M. 2009. The problem of polity: Political participation and Aristotle's best regime. Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1406–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiao, Joan Y., and Katherine D. Blizinsky. 2010. Culture–gene coevolution of individualism– Collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biological Science 277 (1): 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chua, H.F., J.E. Boland, and R.E. Nisbett. 2005. Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. U.S.A. 102 (35): 12629–12633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de la Chevalerien, François. 2017. Is the Chinese identity crumbling? China: Daily.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deng, Xiaoping. 1987. Accelerate Reform Steps. Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping 3: 240–241 In Chinese.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickson, B.J. 2016. The Dictator’s dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s strategy for survival. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dorothy, M. 2017. Americans have grown more negative towards China over the past decade. PEW Research Center. Available online, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  14. 14.
    Feldman, M., and L. Cavalli-Sforna. 1976. Cultural and biological evolutionary processes, selection for a trait under complex transmission. Theoretical Population Biology 9: 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feng, Y. 2000. History of Chinese philosophy, 90. Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chuban She.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Friedberg, A.L. 1993–1994. Ripe for rivalry: Prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International Security 18 (3): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fu, Sinian. 2017. The assessment of Chinese and Western Civilizations. Fu Sinian Wenji [Collected Work of Fu Sinian] (zhonghua Shuju) in Chinese.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fukuyama, F. 1989. The end of history? The National Interest 16: 3–18.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ge, J., et al. 2015. Cross-language differences in the brain network subserving intelligible speech. Proceeding of the National Academic of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (10): 2972–2977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goh, J. O., et al. 2010. Culture differences in neural processing of faces and houses in the ventral visual cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5 (2–3): 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gull, G. 2017. Either/Or Thinking. Available online, https://forprogressnotgrowth.com/2010/10/20/eitheror-thinking/. Accessed 25 Nov 2017.
  22. 22.
    Guo, B.G. 2003. Political legitimacy in China’s transition. Journal of Chinese Political Studies 8 (1–2): 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo, B.G. 2010. China’s quest for political legitimacy: The new equity-enhancing politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield-Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guo, B.G. 2014. Virtue, law and Chinese political tradition. Journal of Chinese Political Science 19 (2): 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He, B.G. 2008. Democratic theory: Dilemma and approaches, 6. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirshberg, M.S. 1993. Consistency and change in American perceptions of China. Political Behavior 15 (3): 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hood, S.J. 1998. Myth of Asian-style democracy. Asian Survey 38 (9): 853–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huntington, S.P. 1969. Political order in changing societies, 5–7. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jacques, M. 2012. When China rules the world: The end of the western world and the birth of a new global order. New York: Penguin Books. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kay, P., and W. Kempton. 1984. What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist 86 (1): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kissinger, H. 2012. On China. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Knight, N., and R.E. Nisbett. 2007. Culture, class and cognition: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Cognition and Culture 7 (3–4): 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kochunov, P., et al. 2003. Localized morphological brain differences between English speaking Caucasian and Chinese speaking Asian populations: New evidence of anatomical plasticity. Neuroreport 14 (7): 961–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li, S.Z. 1998. Yeyao tuidong zhengzhi gaige. [promoting political reform too], Dangdai Zhongguo yanjiu [modern China Studies], 17–19.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li, M.H. 2005. Confucian political ideas [Rujia Shiyexiade Zhengzhi Sixiang], 28. Beijing: Beijing University Press. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li, H. 2015. Political thought and China’s transformation: Ideas shaping reform in post-Mao China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li, X. & He, S. 2009. Impact of Sino-Western linguistic differences on scientific cognition. Journal of Donghua University 1. Available online, http://www.cssn.cn/zhx/zx_zhyj/201406/t20140604_1197309.shtml. Accessed 11 Nov 2017.
  38. 38.
    Liu, X., and J. Fan. 2014. The study of the Chinese people’s inductive inclination in communication. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5 (4): 786–790.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mao, Z.D. 1991. On New Phase. Political report to the sixth session of the 6th CCP National Congress, Selected Documents of Central Party Archive, Vol. 11. Central Party School Publisher, 658–659.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Maya & Shi, T.J. 2011. An empirical report on Chinese democracy values. Phoenix Weekly. Available onlinew, http://www.21bcr.com/a/shiye/renwusixiang/2011/0215/2311.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2017.
  41. 41.
    Naisbitt, J., and D. Naisbitt. 2009. China’s megatrend: The 8 pillars of a new society [Zhonghuo da sushi]. Beijing: Zhonghua Gongshanglian Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Neher, C.D. 1994. Asian style democracy. Asian Survey 34 (11): 949–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nisbett, R. E. 2004. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently ... and Why. New York: Free Press. Reprinted edition.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nisbett, R.E., and Y. Miyamoto. 2005. The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (10): 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nisbett, R.E., K. Peng, I. Choi, and A. Norenzayan. 2001. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 109 (2): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Petras, J. 2000. Cultural imperialism in the late 20th century. Global Policy Forum. Available online, https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/154/25597.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2018.
  47. 47.
    Pye, Lucian W. 1988. Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, vii.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ringen, S. 2015. Is Chinese autocracy outperforming western democracy? openDemcoracy. Available online: https://www.opendemocracy.net/stein-ringen/is-chinese-autocracy-outperforming-western-democracy. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  49. 49.
    Ringen, S. 2016. The Perfect Dictatorship, China in the 21st Century. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press, viii.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roberson, D., I. Davies, and J. Davidoff. 2000. Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence in favor of linguistic relativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (3): 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sen, A. 1999. Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy 10 (3): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shambaugh, D. 2008. China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shambaugh, D. 2015. The coming Chinese crackup. The Wall Street Journal. Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shih, C.Y. 1999. Collective democracy: Political and legal reform in China. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Simons, K. China’s government may be communist, but its people embrace capitalism. Available online: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/10/10/chinas-government-may-be-communist-but-its-people-embrace-capitalism/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  56. 56.
    Suh, E., E. Diener, S. Oishi, and H. Triandis. 1998. The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (2): 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sun, Y.S. Five lectures of civil rights. Available online: http://zh.wikisource.org/zh. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  58. 58.
    Tomasello, M. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wan, Enoch. 2003. Exploring Sino-spirituality. Global Missiology English 1(1). Available on line, http://ojs.globalmissiology.org/index.php/english/article/view/440/1135. Accessed 9 July 2014.
  60. 60.
    Wang, H. 2009. Zhongguo chuantong zhengzhi de wang dao he bao dao [Wang dao and ba dao in traditional Chinese politics]. Journal: of Wuhan University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition 62 (1): 128–132.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Way, B.M., and D.L. Matthew. 2010. Is there a genetic contribution to cultural differences? Collectivism, individualism and genetic markers of social sensitivity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5 (2–3): 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, culture, and cognition: Human concepts in culture-specific configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Xie, T. 2015. Why do people keep predicting China's collapse? The Diplomat. Available online: https://thediplomat.com/2015/03/why-do-people-keep-predicting-chinas- collapse/. Accessed 5 Dec 2017.
  64. 64.
    Yang, G.B. 2017. Initial study of Xijinping’s political thoughts [Xijinpin de Sixiang Tixi Chutan]. Xuehai 4 in Chinese.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Yu, B. 2008. China’s rise and the West’s bias. Asia Policy 6: 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yu, N. 2009. The Chinese HEART in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language, 2. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zhang, W. 2012. YinYang bipolar atom—An eastern road toward quantum gravity. Journal of Modern Physics 3 (9A): 1261–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhang, Zhidong. Quan Xue Pian. Available at: http://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&res=2460&remap=gb. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  69. 69.
    Zhao, R., and F. Jing. Chinese version available online: https://www.douban.com/group/topic/20041781/. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
  70. 70.
    Zheng, Y. 2010. The Chinese Communist Party as organizational emperor: Culture, reproduction, and transformation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Zheng, Y. 2016. China model: Experience and challenge. Beijing: Citic Publishing House, revised edition in Chinese.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zhu, Y., L. Zhang, J. Fan, and S. Han. 2007. Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. Neuro Image 34 (3): 1310–1316.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesDalton State CollegeDaltonUSA

Personalised recommendations