Abstract
The British colonial rule inscribed a passive citizenship in Hong Kong with its de-politicized and de-nationalized governing strategies. Central to this passive citizenship is a political subject featured by individualism, political apathy and economical self-reliance. Attachment to the nation as well as to the local community was basically absent in the notion of colonial citizenship. The end of colonial rule in 1997 and the reconfiguration of Hong Kong as the Special Administrative Region of China embarked on a political project of redefining citizenship in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong SAR government intended to enhance the national identity of the Hong Kong people. But meanwhile, it also largely inherited the passive citizenship from the colonial rule, discouraging political participation while promoting individualism. Nevertheless, the new political structure of HKSAR has in effect empowered the Hong Kong people. While the public demand for further democratization increases, the tension between the government’s citizenship project and the society’s own preference escalates. Instead of being willingly incorporated into the government citizenship project, the civil society has been actively organizing a counter-movement to articulate a localized and participatory citizenship. The findings indicate that citizenship formation is by no means merely a statist project, especially when the state lacks political legitimacy. Instead, it is an outcome of complex struggles between the state and the society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bond, M.H. 1994. Between the Yin and Yang: The Identity of the Hong Kong Chinese. Chinese University Bulletin (suppl. 31): Professional Inaugural Lecture Series 19.
Cheng, J.Y. 2014. The emergence of radical politics in Hong Kong: causes and impact. China Review 1: 199–232.
Choi, T.K. 2006. The Protests against the Demolition of the Star Ferry Pier: The Beginning of New Social Movements? (in Chinese). Ming Pao (December 22 2006).
Chu, H.D. 2009. Updates of the anti express railway movements (in Chinese). In-Media, 15 December. Available at: http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005394 (accessed 10 June 2013).
Ghai, Y. 2001. Citizenship and politics in the HKSAR: the constitutional framework. Citizenship Studies 2: 143–164.
Haggard, S. 1990. Pathways from the Periphery, Cornell University Press.
Henderson, J.C. 2008. Conserving Hong Kong’s heritage: the case of Queen’s Pier. International Journal of Heritage Studies 6: 540–554.
Ho, D.K. 2000. Polite politics: a sociological analysis of an urban protest in Hong Kong. London: Ashgate.
Isin, E. 2009. Citizenship in flux: the figure of the activist citizen. Subjectivity 29: 367–388.
Isin, E., and G.M. Nielsen (eds.). 2008. Acts of citizenship. London: Zed Books.
Joppke, C. 2007. Transformation of citizenship: status, rights, identity. Citizenship Studies 1: 37–48.
Kastoryano, R. 2002. Negotiating identities: states and immigrants in France and Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
King, A.Y. 1975. Administrative absorption of politics in Hong Kong: emphasis on the grass roots level. Asian Survey 5: 422–439.
Ku, A.S., and N. Pun. 2004. Remaking citizenship in Hong Kong. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Kuan, H.C., and S.K. Lau. 1995. The partial vision of democracy in Hong Kong: a survey of public opinion. The China Journal 34: 239–264.
Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lam, W.M. 2005. Depoliticization, citizenship, and the politics of community in Hong Kong. Citizenship Studies 3: 309–322.
Lau, S.K. 1984. Society and politics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 1995. The attentive spectators: political participation of Hong Kong Chinese. East Asia 1: 3–24.
Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 1998. The ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 2000. Partial democratization, “Foundation Moment” and political parties in Hong Kong. The China Quarterly 163: 705–720.
Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 2002. Hong Kong’s stunted political party system. The China Quarterly 172: 1010–1028.
Lee, E. 1999. Governing post-colonial Hong Kong: institutional incongruity, governance crisis, and authoritarianism. Asian Survey 6: 940–959.
Lee, F.L. 2006. Collective efficacy, support for democratization, and political participation in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 3: 297–317.
Lister, R. 2003. Citizenship: feminist perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
Lo, S.H. 2001. Citizenship and participation in Hong Kong. Citizenship Studies 2: 127–142.
Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and social class, and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morris, P., and K.K. Chan. 1997. The Hong Kong school curriculum and the political transition: politicisation, contextualisation and symbolic action. Comparative Education 2: 247–264.
Morris, P., and A. Sweeting. 1991. Education and politics: the case of Hong Kong from a historical perspective. Oxford Review of Education 3: 249–267.
Nordberg, C. 2006. Claiming citizenship: marginalised voices on identity and belonging. Citizenship Studies 5: 525.
Shils, E. 1961. Centre and periphery. In the logic of personal knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi on His Seventieth Birthday. Illinois: The Free Press: 117–130.
Soysal, Y.N. 1994. Limits of citizenship: migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Anti-XRL Alliance. 2009. Why should we oppose the XRL? (in Chinese). The Angry Railway, 12 December. Available at http://ragingiron.wordpress.com/2009/12/12/1218actio/(accessed on January 12, 2013).
Wong, K.Y. 1997. Civic orientation and national identity: evidence from the post-colonial Hong Kong (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xia, Y. Contesting Citizenship in Post-Handover Hong Kong. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 21, 485–500 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-016-9439-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-016-9439-6