Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contesting Citizenship in Post-Handover Hong Kong

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Chinese Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The British colonial rule inscribed a passive citizenship in Hong Kong with its de-politicized and de-nationalized governing strategies. Central to this passive citizenship is a political subject featured by individualism, political apathy and economical self-reliance. Attachment to the nation as well as to the local community was basically absent in the notion of colonial citizenship. The end of colonial rule in 1997 and the reconfiguration of Hong Kong as the Special Administrative Region of China embarked on a political project of redefining citizenship in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong SAR government intended to enhance the national identity of the Hong Kong people. But meanwhile, it also largely inherited the passive citizenship from the colonial rule, discouraging political participation while promoting individualism. Nevertheless, the new political structure of HKSAR has in effect empowered the Hong Kong people. While the public demand for further democratization increases, the tension between the government’s citizenship project and the society’s own preference escalates. Instead of being willingly incorporated into the government citizenship project, the civil society has been actively organizing a counter-movement to articulate a localized and participatory citizenship. The findings indicate that citizenship formation is by no means merely a statist project, especially when the state lacks political legitimacy. Instead, it is an outcome of complex struggles between the state and the society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bond, M.H. 1994. Between the Yin and Yang: The Identity of the Hong Kong Chinese. Chinese University Bulletin (suppl. 31): Professional Inaugural Lecture Series 19.

  2. Cheng, J.Y. 2014. The emergence of radical politics in Hong Kong: causes and impact. China Review 1: 199–232.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi, T.K. 2006. The Protests against the Demolition of the Star Ferry Pier: The Beginning of New Social Movements? (in Chinese). Ming Pao (December 22 2006).

  4. Chu, H.D. 2009. Updates of the anti express railway movements (in Chinese). In-Media, 15 December. Available at: http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1005394 (accessed 10 June 2013).

  5. Ghai, Y. 2001. Citizenship and politics in the HKSAR: the constitutional framework. Citizenship Studies 2: 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haggard, S. 1990. Pathways from the Periphery, Cornell University Press.

  7. Henderson, J.C. 2008. Conserving Hong Kong’s heritage: the case of Queen’s Pier. International Journal of Heritage Studies 6: 540–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho, D.K. 2000. Polite politics: a sociological analysis of an urban protest in Hong Kong. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Isin, E. 2009. Citizenship in flux: the figure of the activist citizen. Subjectivity 29: 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Isin, E., and G.M. Nielsen (eds.). 2008. Acts of citizenship. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joppke, C. 2007. Transformation of citizenship: status, rights, identity. Citizenship Studies 1: 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kastoryano, R. 2002. Negotiating identities: states and immigrants in France and Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. King, A.Y. 1975. Administrative absorption of politics in Hong Kong: emphasis on the grass roots level. Asian Survey 5: 422–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ku, A.S., and N. Pun. 2004. Remaking citizenship in Hong Kong. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuan, H.C., and S.K. Lau. 1995. The partial vision of democracy in Hong Kong: a survey of public opinion. The China Journal 34: 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lam, W.M. 2005. Depoliticization, citizenship, and the politics of community in Hong Kong. Citizenship Studies 3: 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lau, S.K. 1984. Society and politics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 1995. The attentive spectators: political participation of Hong Kong Chinese. East Asia 1: 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 1998. The ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 2000. Partial democratization, “Foundation Moment” and political parties in Hong Kong. The China Quarterly 163: 705–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lau, S.K., and H.C. Kuan. 2002. Hong Kong’s stunted political party system. The China Quarterly 172: 1010–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, E. 1999. Governing post-colonial Hong Kong: institutional incongruity, governance crisis, and authoritarianism. Asian Survey 6: 940–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, F.L. 2006. Collective efficacy, support for democratization, and political participation in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 3: 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lister, R. 2003. Citizenship: feminist perspectives. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lo, S.H. 2001. Citizenship and participation in Hong Kong. Citizenship Studies 2: 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and social class, and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morris, P., and K.K. Chan. 1997. The Hong Kong school curriculum and the political transition: politicisation, contextualisation and symbolic action. Comparative Education 2: 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Morris, P., and A. Sweeting. 1991. Education and politics: the case of Hong Kong from a historical perspective. Oxford Review of Education 3: 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nordberg, C. 2006. Claiming citizenship: marginalised voices on identity and belonging. Citizenship Studies 5: 525.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shils, E. 1961. Centre and periphery. In the logic of personal knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi on His Seventieth Birthday. Illinois: The Free Press: 117–130.

  32. Soysal, Y.N. 1994. Limits of citizenship: migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Anti-XRL Alliance. 2009. Why should we oppose the XRL? (in Chinese). The Angry Railway, 12 December. Available at http://ragingiron.wordpress.com/2009/12/12/1218actio/(accessed on January 12, 2013).

  34. Wong, K.Y. 1997. Civic orientation and national identity: evidence from the post-colonial Hong Kong (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Y. Contesting Citizenship in Post-Handover Hong Kong. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 21, 485–500 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-016-9439-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-016-9439-6

Keywords

Navigation