Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 177–197 | Cite as

China and International Order: The Limits of Integration

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

What does the rise of China mean for the international order, especially the liberal institutional order? Despite of the enormous scholarly attention paid to this important question, there has been no systematic effort to map out this order and how China relates to it. We examine the international institutional order using an original dataset, the Multilateral Agreements and Protocols (MAP). We further develop a new metric of a country’s embeddedness in the international institutional order. Our analysis leads us to reconsider prominent conjectures about China’s evolving relationship to the current international liberal order. We find that, relative to the global average, China is less inclined towards deep commitment to the current international institutional order. Indeed, China’s wariness about this order seems in contrast to the growing global appetite for deep commitment. Furthermore, China seems less embedded in some issue areas that are central to the international liberal order. These findings suggest that the integration of China into the current Western liberal order may not be as automatic as some have suggested and reinforce concerns over the future of global governance.

Keywords

China International Order Agreements Protocols International Institutions 

References

  1. 1.
    Bergsten, C. Fred. 2008. China’s rise: Challenges and opportunities. Peterson Institute.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carr, E. H., and Michael Cox (2001). The twenty years’ crisis 1919–1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan, Gerald, and Pak K Lee. 2013. China engages global governance: A new world order in the making? (Hardback) - Routledge. Text.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dai, Xinyuan. 2005. Why comply? The domestic constituency mechanism. International Organization 59(02): 363–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dai, Xinyuan. 2015. Who defines the rules of the game in East Asia? The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the strategic use of international institutions. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 15(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foot, Rosemary, and Andrew Walter. 2010. China, the United States, and global order.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glaser, Charles. 2011. Will China’s rise lead to war? Foreign Affairs 90(2): 80–91.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruber, Llyod. 2000. Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of supranational institutions. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ikenberry, G. John. 2000. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ikenberry, G. John. 2008. The rise of China and the future of the west.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. The future of the liberal world order.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacques, Martin. 2012. When China rules the world: The rise of the middle kingdom and the end of the western world [Greatly updated and expanded]. Penguin Books Limited.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennedy, Scott. 2016. China & global governance: The dragon’s learning curve. English. Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. 2001. The rational design of international institutions. International Organization 55(04): 761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International regimes. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lampton, David M. 2008. The three faces of Chinese power: Might, money, and minds. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Landler, Mark. 2014. U.S. and China reach climate accord after months of talks. In: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahbubani, Kishore. 2009. The New Asian hemisphere: The irresistible shift of global power to the east. Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin, Lisa L., and Beth A. Simmons. 1998. Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. International Organization 52(04): 729–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mearsheimer, John J. 2014. China’s unpeaceful rise. In: The realism reader 105.690, p. 464.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell, Ronald B. 1994. Regime design matters: intentional oil pollution and treatycompliance. International Organization 48(03): 425–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nye, Joseph S. 2015. Is the American century over? Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qin, Yaqing, and Ling Wei. 2008. Structures, processes, and the socialization of power: East Asian community-building and the rise of China. In: China’s ascent: Power, security,and the future of international politics, pp. 115–40.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Risse, Thomas, Stephen Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (2013). The persistent power of human rights.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ropp, Stephen C., Kathryn Sikkink, and Thomas Risse (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ross, Robert S., and Zhu Feng. 2008. China’s ascent: Power, security, and the future of international politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schweller, Randall L., and Xiaoyu Pu. 2011. After unipolarity: China’s visions of international order in an era of U.S. decline. In: International security 36.1, pp. 41–72.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Starobin, Paul. 2009. After America: Narratives for the next global age. Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Swaine, Michael D. 2011. America’s challenge: Engaging a rising China in the twenty-first century. Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    To, Henry. 2015. Investing in the potential of new Asian infrastructure investment bank.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Xuetong, Yan. 2006. The rise of China and its power status. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 1(1): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Young, Oran R. 1989. International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zakaria, Fareed. 2008. The post-American world. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zeng, Ka, and Wei Liang. 2013. China and global trade governance: China’s first decade in the world trade organization. Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDrive UrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations