Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 257–282 | Cite as

Political Compromises: The Privatization of Small- and Medium-Sized Public Enterprises in China

Research Article

Abstract

One important feature of China’s privatization process is that insider privatization prevailed, and that outsiders could hardly gain access to buying state enterprises. Why was a majority of small- and medium-sized public enterprises sold to the firms’ former managers (and workers)? How did the tightened regulatory environment affect local privatization in China? Building on insights into institutional change, I argue that the choice of a specific privatization strategy results from political compromises among local officials, workers, and managers of public enterprises under specific regulatory constraints. Local officials’ incentives for privatization and their reactions to the changing regulatory environment had a great impact on the dynamics of local privatization.

Keywords

Privatization Bargaining Regulatory Constraints Political Compromises Insider Privatization 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author acknowledges the financial support of the Social Science Research Council and the Institute of Humane Studies for her field research in China from 2005 to 2006.

References

  1. 1.
    Boycko, M., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1995. Privatizing Russia. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cai, Y. 2002. The resistance of Chinese laid-off workers in the Reform Period. The China Quarterly 170: 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cai, Y. 2006. State and laid-off workers in reform China: the silence and collective action of the retrenched. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao, Y., Y. Qian, and B.R. Weingast. 1999. From federalism, Chinese style, to privatization, Chinese style. Economics of Transition 7(1): 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, B., H. Zhang, and Y. Li. 2004. Shuaixian tansou de jincheng yu sikao: Shanghai guozi guanlitTizhi gaige huigu yu qianzhan. (The leading exploratory process and thinking: the review and forecast of Shanghai state assets management system reform). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chong, A., and F. Lopez-De-Silanes. 2005. The truth about privatization in Latin America. In Privatization in Latin America: myths and reality, ed. A. Chong and F. López-De-Silanes. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edin, M. 2003. State capacity and local agent control in China: CCP Cadre management from a township perspective. China Quarterly 173: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frydman, R., C. Gray, M. Hessel, and A. Rapaczynski. 1999. When does privatization work? The impact of private ownership on corporate performance in the transition economies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4): 1153–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garnaut, R., L. Song, S. Tenev, and Y. Yao. 2005. China’s ownership transformation: process, outcomes, prospects. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holz, C. 2001. Economic reforms and state sector bankruptcy in China. The China Quarterly 166: 342–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howell, J. 1993. China opens its doors: the politics of economic transition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Howell, J. 2000. The political economy of Xiamen special economic zone. In Fujian: a coastal province in transition and transformation, ed. Y.M. Yeung and D.K.Y. Chu, 119–142. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurst, W. 2004. Understanding contentious collective action by Chinese laid-off workers: the importance of regional political economy. Studies in Comparative International Development 39(2): 94–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knight, J. 1992. Institutions and social conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Megginson, W.L., and J.M. Netter. 2001. From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2): 321–389.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oi, J.C. 2005. Patterns of corporate restructuring in China: political constraints on privatization. The China Journal 53: 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2005. OECD Economic Surveys: China.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peck, M.J., and T.J. Richardson (eds.). 1991. What is to be done?: Proposals For the soviet transition to the market. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sachs, J. 1993. Poland’s jump to the market economy: based on the Lionel Robbins Memorial lectures delivered at the London School of Economics, January 1991. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, S.C., B.-C. Cin, and M. Vodopivec. 1997. Privatization incidence, ownership forms, and firm performance: evidence from Slovenia. Journal of Comparative Economics 25(2): 158–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stark, D.C., and L. Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist pathways: transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Solinger, D.J. 2002. Labor market reform and the plight of the laid-off proletariat. The China Quarterly 170: 304–326.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Solinger, D.J. 2003. State and society in urban China in the wake of the 16th Party Congress. The China Quarterly 176: 943–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tenev, S., C. Zhang, and L. Brefort. 2002. Corporate governance and enterprise reform in China: building the institutions of modern markets. Washington: World Bank; International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walder, A. 2003. Elite opportunity in transitional economies. American Sociological Review 68(6): 899–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yusuf, Shahid, Kaoru Nabeshima, and Dwight H. Perkins. 2006. Under new ownership: privatizing China’s state-owned enterprises. Palo Alto, CA; Washington DC: Stanford University Press; The World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Whiting, S.H. 2001. Power and wealth in rural China: the political economy of institutional change. Cambridge Modern China Series. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics and International RelationsFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations