Abstract
Transforming higher education due to digitalization is a critical challenge to ensure adequate capabilities for a more entrepreneurial economy. Studies about digital competence in higher education focus primarily on students’ digital competence. There are few studies regarding educators’ digital capabilities and students’ learning outcomes. Following the economics of education theories and evidence-based education, this novel research is presented. The study aims to identify how educators’ digital competence impacts education results, measured by students’ learning perception and academic performance. Hypotheses are formulated to find evidence of the return on investment in education relevant to educational policies and higher education management. The goal was to find a model to understand how a specific relevant element of the teaching intervention i.e. the digital capabilities of the educators are reflected in students’ learning outcomes. To that end, this study used a validated tool for digital education assessment (DigCompEdu) to collect data through an online self-administered questionnaire. Correlations and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method were used for the analysis. Higher education is essential for the economy and human capital development; therefore, understanding the relevant factors for teaching efficiency is pertinent. Findings show some relationship between professional commitment, digital teaching skills, and student perception of learning. Nevertheless, the analysis does not find a significant link between educators’ digital competence and academic achievement. It is acknowledged that measurements in education are difficult due to the complexity and multidimensionality of this human process. The study’s contribution is due to its novelty in studying a research gap in digital teaching skills and student outcomes. As a preliminary work, it intends to guide future explorations on education-based learning in universities to identify critical elements of students’ achievements that can guide policymakers and university managers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Access to the European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu) https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu_en
Access to the European Framework for Digital Competence for Educator “DigComEdu” https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu_en
References
Abu Saa, A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Factors Affecting Students’ Performance in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Predictive Data Mining Techniques. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(4), 567–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09408-7
Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088
Alam, G. M., Al-Amin, A. Q., Forhad, A. R., & Mubarak, M. S. (2020). Does the private university sector exploit sustainable residential life in the name of supporting the fourth industrial revolution? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120200
Allen, J., & van der Velden, R. (2007). Transitions From Higher Education to Work. In Careers of University Graduates (Vol. 17, pp. 55–78). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5926-1_4
Antonio-Manuel Rodríguez-García, D., Sánchez, F. R., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2019). Digital competence, higher education and teacher training: A meta-analysis study on the Web of Science. Pixel-Bit, Revista De Medios y Educacion, 54, 65–81.
Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Audretsch, D. (2016). Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102(102), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.006
Arens, A. K., & Morin, A. J. S. (2016). Relations between teachers’ emotional exhaustion and students’ educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 800–813. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000105
Bandura, A. (1997). SELF EFFICIENCY. The exercice of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Becker, G. (1994). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. (The University of Chicago Press, Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/human-capital-theoretical-and-empirical-analysis-special-reference-education-third-edition
Begnum, M. E. N., & Foss-Pedersen, R. J. (2017). Digital assessment in higher education Promoting universal usability through requirements specification and universal design quality (UD-Q) reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0513-9
Bejaković, P., & Mrnjavac, Ž. (2020). The importance of digital literacy on the labour market. Employee Relations: THe International Journal, 42(4), 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2019-0274
Benitez-Amado, A. (2020). Las universidades como organizaciones adaptativas: el contexto de la COVID 19 como revulsivo. Retrieved September 19, 2020, from https://www.universidadsi.es/las-universidades-como-organizaciones-adaptativas-el-contexto-de-la-covid-19-como-revulsivo/
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality (W. Longhofer & D. Winchester, Eds.; 1991st ed.). Penguin Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations, 2(4), 13–17.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). December 1). Emergency Remote Teaching in Higher Education: Mapping the First Global Online Semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6.
Cabero-Almenara, J. (2006). Bases pedagógicas del e-learning. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3(1).
Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2022). Validación Del Marco Europeo De Competencia Digital Docente Mediante Ecuaciones Estructurales. Revista Mexicana De Investigacion Educativa, 27(92), 185–208.
Chalmers, D. (2012). University teaching in focus: A learning–centred approach. University Teaching in Focus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079690
Chang, T., Lin, H., & Song, M. (2011). University faculty members’ perceptions of their teaching efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.543770
De Obesso, M., & Nuñez-Canal, M. (2021). El modelo educativo híbrido: una respuesta necesaria de la enseñanza universitaria a partir de la Covid-19. In L. Sanchez Santamaria, José; Tosina (Ed.), COVID-19 imperativo para el cambio (pp. 105–119). Tiran Lo Blanch. Retrieved from https://editorial.tirant.com/es/libro/covid-19-imperativo-para-el-cambio-jose-sanchez-santamaria-9788418534546?busqueda=covid&
De Obesso, M., Núñez-Canal, M., & Pérez-Rivero, C. A. (2023). How do students perceive educators’ digital competence in higher education? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122284
Del Pozo Andrés, M. (2009). El proceso de Bolonia en las aulas universitarias: una perspectiva europea. Cuestiones Pedagógicas. Revista de Ciencias de La Educación, 0(19), 55–73.
DeShields, O. W., Jr., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (2005). Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg’s two-factor theory. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(2), 128–139.
Dima, A. M., Busu, M., & Vargas, V. M. (2022). The mediating role of students’ ability to adapt to online activities on the relationship between perceived university culture and academic performance. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1253–1281. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.036
Downey, D. B., & Condron, D. J. (2016). Fifty Years since the Coleman Report. Sociology of Education, 89(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040716651676
Elçicçek, M., & Erdemci, H. (2021). Investigation of 21st-Century Competencies and E-Learning Readiness of Higher Education Students on the Verge of Digital Transformation. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(17), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.835877
European Commission. (2014). Digital Agenda for Europe - Rebooting Europe’s Economy. European Commission, 8. https://doi.org/10.2775/41229
European Council. (2000). Lisbon European Council. 23 and 24 March.
European Council. (2018). Recomendación del Consejo, relativa a las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE de 22 de mayo de 2018 (2018/C 189/01).
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Ferrari, A., Brecko, B. N., & Punie, Y. (2014). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. eLearning Papers Tra (Vol. Special Ed).
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(1), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Fuentes, A., López, J., & Pozo, S. (2019). Analysis of the digital teaching competence: Key factor in the performance of active pedagogies with augmented reality. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educacion, 17(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.2.002
González-Betancor, S. M., Fernández-Monroy, M., Galván-Sánchez, I., & López-Puig, A. J. (2022). Academic performance of first-year university students: modelling the role of reading competence. Higher Education Research and Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2142534
Gorard, S. (2020). Getting evidence into education: Evaluating the routes to policy and practice. Getting Evidence into Education: Evaluating the Routes to Policy and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290343
Greenhow, C., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. 57(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203/FULL/XML
Hanushek, E. A. (2013). Economic growth in developing countries: The role of human capital. Economics of Education Review, 37(April), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.005
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607–668. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.3.607
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
He, T., Huang, Q., Yu, X., & Li, S. (2021). Exploring students’ digital informal learning: The roles of digital competence and DTPB factors. Behaviour and Information Technology, 40(13), 1406–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1752800
Hervás-Gómez, C., Díaz-Noguera, M. D., De la Calle-Cabrera, A. M., & Guijarro-Cordobés, O. (2021). Perceptions of University Students towards Digital Transformation during the Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(11), 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11110738
Holford, W. D. (2019). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, 105(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.002
Kafel, T., Wodecka-Hyjek, A., & Kusa, R. (2021). Multidimensional public sector organizations’ digital maturity model. Administratie Si Management Public, (37), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2021.37-02
Krishnamurthy, S. (2020). The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 117, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
Lassibille, G., & Navarro Gómez, M. L. (2012). Un compendio de investigaciones en economía de la educación. Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 2(67), 9–28. Retrieved from http://www.ief.es/documentos/recursos/publicaciones/revistas/presu_gasto_publico/67_01.pdf
Liesa-Orús, M., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Vázquez-Toledo, S., & Sierra-Sánchez, V. (2020). The technological challenge facing higher education professors: Perceptions of ICT tools for developing 21st Century skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135339
Lynam, S., Cachia, M., & Stock, R. (2022). An evaluation of the factors that influence academic success as defined by engaged students. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2052808
Marcelo, C., & Yot-Domínguez, C. (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: Changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584
Marinoni, G., Land, H. V., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. International Association Universities Global Survey Report. Paris. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT5nt5FGVklxrtUHinF_LFA
Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727703
McCabe, A., & O’Connor, U. (2014). Student-centred learning: The role and responsibility of the lecturer. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860111
Mills, C., Heyworth, J., Rosenwax, L., Carr, S., & Rosenberg, M. (2009). Factors associated with the academic success of first year health science students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 205–217.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006).Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge, 108, Teachers College Record, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/technological-pedagogical-content-knowledge-a-framework-for-teach
Morselli, D. (2019). The Assessment of Entrepreneurial Education. In D. Morselli (Ed.), The Change Laboratory for Teacher Training in Entrepreneurship Education: A New Skills Agenda for Europe (pp. 17–36). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02571-7_2
Nascimbeni, F., Alonso, J., Sanz, O., & Burgos, D. (2019). Read, Watch, Do: Developing Digital Competence for University Educators. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1091, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31284-8_7
Núñez-Canal, M., de Obesso, M. D. L. M., & Pérez-Rivero, C. A. (2022). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174(October 2021), 121270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121270
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-Centred Learning: What Does it Mean for Students and Lecturers? Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching.
OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. OECD Education. Available in https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/definitionandselectionofcompetenciesdeseco.htm
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills Education 2030. OECD Education. Available in https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Pérez, K. V. P., & Torelló, O. M. (2012). The Digital Competence as a Cross-cutting Axis of Higher Education Teachers’ Pedagogical Competences in the European Higher Education Area. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(December), 1112–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.257
Pérez-Rivero, C. A., de Obesso, M., & de la M., & Núñez-Canal, M. (2022). Digital competence among university professors: Analysis of the impact of the COVID crisis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2155859
Ramli, N. A., Latan, H., & Solovida, G. T. (2019). Determinants of capital structure and firm financial performance—A PLS-SEM approach: Evidence from Malaysia and Indonesia. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 71, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.07.001
Redecker, C. (2020). Marco europeo para la Competencia digital de los educadores DIGCOMEDU. Fundación Universia y Ministerio de Educación y formación Profesional de España.
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digital Competence of Educators:DigCompEdu. Retrieved from https://moodle.ktu.edu/pluginfile.php/428841/mod_resource/content/1/pdf_digcomedu_a4_final.pdf
Reyero, D. (2014). La excelencia docente universitaria. Análisis y propuestas para una mejor evaluación del profesorado universitario. Educación XX1, 17(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17.2.11482
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. OECD Definition and Selection of Competencies Final Report. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2012.712997
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Portfolio Penguin.
Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., & Davies, M. N. O. (2000). The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Love me, love my lectures? Related papers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 397–405.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
Sorgner, A. (2017). The automation of jobs: A threat for employment or a source of new entrepreneurial opportunities? Foresight and STI Governance, 11(3), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.3.37.48
Swinson, J. (2012). Visable learning for teachers maximizing impact on learning. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(2), 215–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2012.693677
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
Torrato, J. B., Prudente, M. S., & Aguja, S. E. (2020). Technology Integration, Proficiency and Attitude. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (pp. 70–75). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377571.3377624
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tuomi, I., Cachia, R., & Villar Onrubia, D. (2023). On the Futures of Technology in Education : Emerging Trends and Policy Implications. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/079734
Van Der Velden, R., & Allen, J. (2007). Transitions From Higher Education to Work Roa school-leavers survey View project TRANSITIONS FROM HIGHER EDUCATION TO WORK, 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5926-1_4
Yao, H., Lian, D., Cao, Y., Wu, Y., & Zhou, T. (2019). Predicting academic performance for college students: A campus behavior perspective. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 10(3), 1–21.
Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 168(April), 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Canal, M.N., de las Mercedes de Obesso, M. & Rivera, C.A.P. Does educators’ digital competence improve entrepreneurial students’ learning outcomes?. Int Entrep Manag J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00921-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00921-x