Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Academic spinoffs: the role of entrepreneurship education

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New ventures depend on the capability of entrepreneurs to transform an idea or a technology into a successful company. The literature on entrepreneurship has recognized that Entrepreneurship Education (EE) plays a key role in this process, but the literature on academic spinoffs has focused on other determinants (e.g., Technology Transfer Offices - TTO, and university research expenditures). This research investigates the role of EE in the creation of academic spinoffs by using a new dataset built around 1262 entrepreneurship courses offered between 2011 and 2014 by 80 US universities included in the Licensing Survey by the Association of University Technology Managers - AUTM). Adopting a Poisson panel regression model, we show that, in addition to TTO size and university research expenditures, EE favours the creation of academic spinoffs. Moreover, we find that practical – rather than theoretical - entrepreneurship courses favour the creation of academic spinoffs. We conclude discussing the theoretical and practical implications for universities, students and scholars interested in entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For instance, despite their limited geographical distance and their belonging to a similar institutional environment, in the US context, the University of South Florida created approximately 38% fewer academic spinoffs than the University of Florida between 2011 and 2014 (data source: Licensing Survey by the AUTM).

  2. Nabi et al. (2017) have recently also used the framework presented by Béchard and Grégoire (2005).

  3. https://autm.net/

  4. We used the word “entre” as a keyword in order to display results containing such terms as entrepreneurship, entrepreneur and entrepreneurial.

  5. Several universities did not report at all the course catalogue, or they did not report enough information to categorize them in the three teaching models we use. For instance, some universities just reported the course ID code and/or the name of the course, making not reliable a categorization about the kind of teaching model the course have adopted. To avoid bias in categorizing courses we chose to discard such universities.

  6. Full-time equivalent (FTE) is the hours worked by one employee on a full-time basis.

  7. The frequency of zeros for our dependent variable is reported in Annex Table 6 .

  8. The negative coefficients can be explained by the fact that better universities show a lower ranking, and this means that the lower the ranking of a university is, the better its quality and the more the spinoffs created.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algieri, B., Aquino, A., & Succurro, M. (2013). Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: The case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 382–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M., & Lehmann, E. (2005). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship and technological diffusion. In G. D. Libecap (Ed.), University entrepreneurship and technology transfer (pp. 69–91). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S., Baker, T., Markham, S., & Kingon, A. (2009). Bridging the valley of death: Lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(3), 370–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia, D., Landoni, P., & Rizzitelli, F. (2017). Organizational structures for external growth of university technology transfer offices: An explorative analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béchard, J. P., & Grégoire. (2005). Understanding teaching models in entrepreneurship for higher education. In D., Kyrö, P., & carrier, C. (Eds.), The dynamics of learning entrepreneurship in a cross-cultural university context. (pp. 104–134). Tampere, Finland: Faculty of Education, University of Tampere.

  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E., & García, J. L. S. (2015). Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation? Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2272–2278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, H., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh, W. F., De-Haan, U., & Strom, R. (2016). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 661–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2014). The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: Evidence from the Italian case. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, C., & Jacques Filion, L. (2013). Spin-off process and the development of academic entrepreneur’s social capital. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(1), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37, 1175–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brescia, F., Colombo, G., & Landoni, P. (2016). Organizational structures of knowledge transfer offices: An analysis of the world’s top-ranked universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, S. M., O’Shea, R. P., & Allen, T. J. (2008). University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data (Vol. 53). Cambridge University Press.

  • Campos, F., Frese, M., Goldstein, M., Iacovone, L., Johnson, H. C., McKenzie, D., & Mensmann, M. (2017). Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa. Science, 357(6357), 1287–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camuffo, A., Cordova, A., Gambardella, A., & Spina, C. (2019). A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Science.

  • Casper, S. (2013). The spill-over theory reversed: The impact of regional economies on the commercialization of university science. Research Policy, 42(8), 1313–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2018a). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International entrepreneurship and management journal, 1-31.

  • Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., Colombelli, A., & Casali, G. L. (2018b). Agglomeration dynamics of innovative start-ups in Italy beyond the industrial district era. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-24.

  • Cho, J. H., & Sohn, S. Y. (2017). Competing risk model for predicting stabilization period of university spin-off ventures. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(3), 777–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civera, A., & Meoli, M. (2018). Does university prestige foster the initial growth of academic spin-offs? Economia e Politica Industriale, 45(2), 111–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civera, A., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2017). Policies for the provision of finance to science-based entrepreneurship. Annals of Science and Technology Policy, 1(4), 317–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civera, A., Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2019). Fostering the creation of academic spinoffs: Does the international mobility of the academic leader matter?. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-27.

  • Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van de Velde, E. (2011). Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spin-off companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1420–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criaco, G., Minola, T., Migliorini, P., & Serarols-Tarrés, C. (2014). “To have and have not”: Founders’ human capital and university start-up survival. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(4), 567–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Este, P., Mahdi, S., Neely, A., & Rentocchini, F. (2012). Inventors and entrepreneurs in academia: What types of skills and experience matter? Technovation, 32(5), 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diánez-González, J. P., & Camelo-Ordaz, C. (2017). The influence of the structure of social networks on academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Marketing Management.

  • Díaz-Casero, J. C., Ferreira, J. J. M., Mogollón, R. H., & Raposo, M. L. B. (2012). Influence of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intention: A comparative study of two countries university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutriaux, J. (1987). Growth pattern of academic entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(4), 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R., Sameeksha, D., & Herrmann, A. J. (2019). 2017 National Report on early-stage entrepreneurship. Kauffman Indicators of Entrepreneurship, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation: Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., Verzat, C., & Wapshott, R. (2016). In quest of legitimacy: The theoretical and methodological foundations of entrepreneurship education research. International Small Business Journal, 34(7), 895–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2004). Truth for its own sake: Academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva, 42(2), 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, M., Ferri, S., Fiorentino, R., Parmentola, A., & Sapio, A. (2018). What drives the growth of academic spin-offs? Matching academics, universities, and non-research organizations. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-27.

  • Ferretti, M., Ferri, S., Fiorentino, R., Parmentola, A., & Sapio, A. (2019). Neither absent nor too present: The effects of the engagement of parent universities on the performance of academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 52(1), 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiet, J. O. (2001). The pedagogical side of entrepreneurship theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, E., Sansone, G., & Paolucci, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship education in a multidisciplinary environment: Evidence from an entrepreneurship Programme held in Turin. Administrative Sciences, 9(1), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryges, H., & Wright, M. (2014). The origin of spin-offs: A typology of corporate and academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Rodríguez, F. J., Gil-Soto, E., Ruiz-Rosa, I., & Sene, P. M. (2015). Entrepreneurial intentions in diverse development contexts: A cross-cultural comparison between Senegal and Spain. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 511–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacomin, O., Janssen, F., Pruett, M., Shinnar, R. S., Llopis, F., & Toney, B. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions, motivations and barriers: Differences among American, Asian and European students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielnik, M., Frese, M., Kahara-Kawuki, A., Katono, I., Kyejjusa, S., Munene, J., et al. (2015). Action and action-regulation in entrepreneurship: Evaluating a student training for promoting entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(1), 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielnik, M. M., Uy, M. A., Funken, R., & Bischoff, K. M. (2017). Boosting and sustaining passion: A long-term perspective on the effects of entrepreneurship training. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 334–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing, V. A., Van Burg, E., & Romme, A. G. L. (2010). Policy principles for the creation and success of corporate and academic spin-offs. Technovation, 30(1), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. (2014). Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems: Evidence from emerging world leaders. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Gras, J. M. G., Lapera, D. R. G., Solves, I. M., Jover, A. J. V., & Azuar, J. S. (2008). An empirical approach to the organisational determinants of spin-off creation in European universities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(2), 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: Evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gümüsay, A. A., & Bohné, T. M. (2018). Individual and organizational inhibitors to the development of entrepreneurial competencies in universities. Research Policy, 47(2), 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, D., Minola, T., Van Gils, A., & Huybrechts, J. (2017). Entrepreneurial education and learning at universities: Exploring multilevel contingencies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(9–10), 945–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, D., Minola, T. & Eddleston, K. (2018). How do scientists contribute to the performance of innovative startups? An imprinting perspective on open innovation. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12418.

  • Hahn, D., Minola, T., Bosio, G., & Cassia, L. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education on university students’ entrepreneurial Skills: A Family Embeddedness Perspective. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00143-y.

  • Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship.

  • Hayter, C. S. (2011). In search of the profit-maximizing actor: Motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 340–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S. (2016). Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 45(2), 475–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S., Lubynsky, R., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1237–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 258–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Piva, E., & Wright, M. (2016). Are researchers deliberately bypassing the technology transfer office? An analysis of TTO awareness. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 589–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, T., Patton, D., Arias-Aranda, D., & Molina-Fernández, L. M. (2017). University spin-off's performance: Capabilities and networks of founding teams at creation phase. Journal of Business Research, 78, 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J. A., Lans, T., Chizari, M., & Mulder, M. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education: A study of Iranian students’ entrepreneurial intentions and opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, F. (2013). The university’s unknown knowledge: Tacit knowledge, technology transfer and university spin-offs findings from an empirical study based on the theory of knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassean, H., Vanevenhoven, J., Liguori, E., & Winkel, D. E. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A need for reflection, real-world experience and action. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(5), 690–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A. (2008). Fully mature but not fully legitimate: A different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 550–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochenkova, A., Grimaldi, R., & Munari, F. (2016). Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: A review of academic literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 407–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger Jr., N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, W., Miane, S., Fayolle, A., Wright, M., Klofsten, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2018). Technology business incubation mechanisms and sustainable regional development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1121–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research Policy, 35(10), 1599–1615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leborgne-Bonassié, M., Coletti, M., & Sansone, G. (2019). What do venture philanthropy organisations seek in social enterprises?. Business Strategy & Development, in press. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.66.

  • Lee, S. M., Chang, D., & Lim, S. B. (2005). Impact of entrepreneurship education: A comparative study of the US and Korea. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(1), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of US university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. A. (2006). Who develops a university invention? The impact of tacit knowledge and licensing policies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maresch, D., Harms, R., Kailer, N., & Wimmer-Wurm, B. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of students in science and engineering versus business studies university programs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, G., Carlesi, A., & Scarfò, A. A. (2018). Academic spinoffs as a value driver for intellectual capital: The case of the University of Pisa. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 202–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H., & Balkin, D. B. (2005). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Research Policy, 34(7), 1058–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzocchi, C., Kitagawa, F., & Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2018). Evolving missions and university entrepreneurship: Academic spin-offs and graduate start-ups in the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-22.

  • Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2017). The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 1–20.

  • Morris, M. H., Webb, J. W., Fu, J., & Singhal, S. (2013). A competency-based perspective on entrepreneurship education: Conceptual and empirical insights. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 352–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K. (2010). Academic spin-off’s transfer speed - analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Research Policy, 39(2), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., Toschi, L., & Villani, E. (2016). Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: A cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1377–1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph. D. Entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation.

  • Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikiforou, A., Zabara, T., Clarysse, B., & Gruber, M. (2018). The role of teams in academic spin-offs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 78–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, C., Byrne, O., & Pandya, D. (2008). How scientists commercialise new knowledge via entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: A conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P. H., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 77–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O'Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161-170.

  • Piperopoulos, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). Burst bubbles or build steam? Entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 970–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirnay, F., & Surlemont, B. (2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodan, I., & Drnovsek, M. (2010). Conceptualizing academic-entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical test. Technovation, 30(5–6), 332–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, D., Huggins, R., & Bristow, G. (2019). The survival of academic spinoff companies: An empirical study of key determinants. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619833540.

  • Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., & Sorheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 782–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2011). The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1314–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43(1), 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., & Hulsink, W. (2015). Putting entrepreneurship education where the intention to act lies: An investigation into the impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial behavior. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2), 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university-based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 329–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.

  • Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, J. C. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, J. C. (2013). The impact of an entrepreneurship education program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer, L. R., Van Hook, B. L., & Hutt, R. W. (1991). Analysis of the use of advisors as information sources in venture startups. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(3), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2016). The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs. Technovation, 50, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. (2007). An examination of entrepreneurship education in the United States. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(2), 168–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2014). Success factors of university-spin-offs: Regional government support programs versus regional environment. Technovation, 34(3), 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • St-Jean, E., & Audet, J. (2012). The role of mentoring in the learning development of the novice entrepreneur. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R. (2000). Entrepreneurial learning and mentoring. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 6(3), 160–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Burg, E., Romme, A. G. L., Gilsing, V. A., & Reymen, I. M. (2008). Creating University spin-offs: A science-based design perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 114–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, C. M., & Versloot, P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanevenhoven, J., & Liguori, E. (2013). The impact of entrepreneurship education: Introducing the entrepreneurship education project. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincett, P. S. (2010). The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, 39(6), 736–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visintin, F., & Pittino, D. (2014). Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies. Technovation, 34(1), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. G., Parboteeah, K. P., & Walter, A. (2013). University departments and self–employment intentions of business students: A cross–level analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), 623–641.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by “Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca” Award “TESUN-83486178370409 finanziamento dipartimenti di eccellenza CAP. 1694 TIT. 232 ART. 6”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuliano Sansone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 6 Descriptive statistics on the number of academic spinoffs per university over the period of study (2011–2014)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sansone, G., Battaglia, D., Landoni, P. et al. Academic spinoffs: the role of entrepreneurship education. Int Entrep Manag J 17, 369–399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00601-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00601-9

Keywords

Navigation