Skip to main content
Log in

Jumping in at the deep end! The role of motivational forces in starting a new venture

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entrepreneurial motivation is a decisive factor for new venture creation, yet sometimes high motivation does not translate into corresponding behaviour. Comparing the intention-action gap of nascent entrepreneurs, we find that variances in motivation do not sufficiently explain the decision to not pursue a start-up idea. We propose and show that through applying an enhanced version of expectancy theory (ET), it is possible to identify additional personality factors of nascent entrepreneurs which add explanatory power to answer the question, why, out of a seemingly similarly motivated group, some will found a company and others will not. Through framing our study as an attempt to add to the intention-action gap literature by demonstrating the general applicability of ET, yet the need for further contextualisation of the theory, we contribute to previous studies and advance our knowledge in this important field. Our study provides a conceptual model, tests it using data from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED II) and, finally, offers suggestions regarding future research as well as practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although acknowledging the need to define the terms ‘entrepreneurship’ and ‘entrepreneur’ in the broader sense, as proposed by Shane and Venkataraman (2000) among others, the present paper exclusively defines entrepreneurship as an activity and process which is aimed at founding an enterprise for the purpose of being independent or getting out of unemployment.

References

  • Aalbers, R., Dolfsma, W., & Koppius, O. (2013). Individual connectedness in innovation networks: On the role of individual motivation. Research Policy, 42(3), 624–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, A. F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). Bridging the entrepreneurial intention-behaviour gap: The role of commitment and implementation intention. International Journal Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 25(1), 36–54.

  • Aguinis, H., Cascio, W. F., & Ramani, R. S. (2017). Following the suggestions of science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(6), 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari, N. C. (2006). Intention for entrepreneurship among students in India. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial motivations: What do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A. L., & Johnson, R. W. (1989). Entrepreneurship: A social psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A., Brännback, M., Elfving, J., & Brandt, K. (2009). Motivations: The entrepreneurial mind and behavior. In Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box (pp. 141–166). Eds. A. Carsrud and M. Brännback. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1995). Partial least squares is to LISREL as principal components analysis is to common factor analysis. Technology Studies, 2(2), 315–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collewaert, V., Anseel, F., Crommelinck, F., De Beuckelaer, A., & Vermeire, J. (2016). When passion fades: Disentangling the temporal dynamics of entrepreneurial passion for founding. Journal of Management Studies., 53(6), 966–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Andersson, U., Brannen, M. Y., Nielsen, B., & Reuber, A. R. (2016). From the editors: Can I trust your findings? Ruling out alternative explanations in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8), 881–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, R. (2008). Codebook: Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II. Detroit: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. E., & Shaver, K. G. (2009). Social motives in the PSED II. In P. D. Reynolds & R. T. Curtin (Eds.), New firm creation in the United States: Initial explorations with the PSED II data set (pp. 19–34). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E. J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. F., Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Greene, P. G. (2010). Start-up motivations and growth intentions of minority nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entrialgo, M., & Iglesias, V. (2016). The moderating role of entrepreneurship education on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1209–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., Liñán, F., & Moriano, J. A. (2014). Beyond entrepreneurial intentions. Values and motivations in entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 679–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M. (2009). Toward a psychology of entrepreneurship: An action theory perspective. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(6), 435–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood, E. J., Shaver, K. G., Powers, J. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2002). Entrepreneurial expectancy, task effort, and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gielnik, M. M., Barabas, S., Frese, M., Namatovu-Dawa, R., Scholz, F. A., Metzger, J. R., & Walter, T. (2014). A temporal analysis of howentrepreneurial goal intentions, positive fantasies, and action planning affect starting a new venture and when the effects wear off. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(6), 755–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goethner, M., Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Cantner, U. (2012). Scientists' transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants. Journal Economic Psychology, 33(3), 628–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 69–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. and Nougaim K. (1968). An Examination of Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy in an Organisational Setting. Organisational Behaviour And Human Performance, 3(1), 12-35

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 50(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization., 5(2), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, C., & Stephan, U. (2012). The influence of socio-cultural environments on the performance of nascent entrepreneurs: Community culture, motivation, self-efficacy and start-up success. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(9–10), 917–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kautonen, T., van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibler, E., Kautonen, T., & Matthias, F. (2014). Regional social legitimacy of entrepreneurship: Implications for entrepreneurial intention and start-up behaviour. Regional Studies, 48(6), 995–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolvereid, L., & Isaksen, E. (2006). New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 866–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D., Hornsby, F., & Naffziger, D. W. (1997). An examination of owner’s goals in sustaining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 24–33.

  • Lawler, E. E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., & Suttle, J. L. (1973). Expectancy theory and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(3), 482–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Baum, J. R. (2012). Entrepreneurial motivation. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 93–112). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990a). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990b). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990c). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 57(9), 705–17.

  • Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2004. What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review 29(3), 388–403.

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Diefendorff, J. M., Schmidt, A. M., & Hall, R. J. (2010). Self-regulation at work. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, J., & Castogiovanni, G. (2015). The theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship research. What we know and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 935–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man, T. W., Lau, T., & Chan, K. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, T. S., Carter, N. M., Manev, I. M., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2007). The differential effect of men and women entrepreneurs’ human capital and networking on growth expectancies in Bulgaria. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Person–entrepreneurship fit: Why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect. Social Forces, 74(2), 379–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. R., Friga, P. N., & Mitchell, R. K. (2005). Untangling the intuition mess: Intuition as a construct in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 653–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchelmore, S., & Rowley, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial competencies: A literature review and development agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 16(2), 92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C., & Belghitar, Y. (2006). What happens to nascent entrepreneurs?: An econometric analysis of the PSED. Small Business Economics, 27(1), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perwin, L. (2003). The science of personality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. F. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1369–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., Martínez-Fierro, S., Medina-Garrido, J. A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2015). Global entrepreneurship monitor versus panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Comparing their intellectual structures. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 571–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renko, M., Kroeck, K. G., & Bullough, A. (2012). Expectancy theory and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. (2000). National panel study of U.S. business startups: Background and methodology. In J. Katz (Ed.), Databases for the study of entrepreneurship (pp. 153–227). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., & Curtin, R. T. (2008). Business creation in the United States: Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 155–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23(4), 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robichaud, Y., McGraw, E., & Roger, A. (2001). Toward the development of measuring instrument for entrepreneurial motivation. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schjoedt, L., Karlsson, T., & Schenkel, M. T. (2015). Goal striving in real time among nascent entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 35(16), 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G., Borgia, D., & Schoenfeld, J. (2005). The motivation to become an entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 11(1), 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2012). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programs raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, S., & Linder, C. (2018). Gender-specifics in start-up strategies and the role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P., & Konig, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 889–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eerde, W., & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelderen, M., Kautonen, T., & Fink, M. (2015). From entrepreneurial intentions to actions: Self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2), 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Delmar, F. (2003). What do they think and feel about growth? An expectancy-value approach to small business managers’ attitudes toward growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanakis, S. H., Renko, M., & Bullough, A. (2012). Nascent entrepreneurs and the transition to entrepreneurship: Why do people start new businesses? Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Linder.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Correlations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linder, C., Nippa, M. Jumping in at the deep end! The role of motivational forces in starting a new venture. Int Entrep Manag J 15, 1363–1391 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00598-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00598-1

Keywords

Navigation