Advertisement

Surviving in a high-tech manufacturing industry: the role of innovative environment and proximity to metropolitan industrial portfolio

  • Alexandra TsvetkovaEmail author
  • Tessa Conroy
  • Jean-Claude Thill
Article
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

Building on recent developments in the evolutionary economics combined with a more traditional spillovers perspective, we conceptualize regional knowledge environment as consisting of two components, the base and the radical knowledge. Empirically approximating the components with proximity to regional industrial portfolio and patenting intensity, respectively, we explore how a cohort of U.S. computer and electronic product manufacturing companies with different absorptive capacity levels were able to benefit from different types of knowledge available regionally. The results suggest reinforcing dynamics between proximity to metropolitan industry mix and metropolitan patenting intensity in promoting survival of non-patenting companies. Establishments that patent, on the other hand, are mostly insensitive to these two factors.

Keywords

Industrial proximity Industrial cohesion Knowledge spillovers Business survival 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work on this paper was principally completed while Alexandra Tsvetkova was at the Ohio State University; she appreciates the partial support of the USDA AFRI grant #11400612 “Maximizing the Gains of Old and New Energy Development for America’s Rural Communities”; Tessa Conroy acknowledges support provided by the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Wisconsin – Madison and the University of Wisconsin – Extension. The opinions expressed in this paper are solely of the authors and under no circumstances can be interpreted as reflecting the official position of the OECD and its member countries.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Varga, A. (2002). Geography, endogenous growth, and innovation. International Regional Science Review, 25(1), 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31, 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Armington, C., & Zhang, T. (2007). The determinants of new-firm survival across regional economies. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, J. D., & Jaffe, A. (1996). Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND Journal of Economics, 27(4), 700–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agarwal, R., & Gort, M. (2002). Products and firm life cycles and firm survival. American Economic Review, 92(2), 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Laham, A., Tzabbar, D., & Amburgey, T. L. (2011). The dynamics of knowledge stocks and knowledge flows: Innovation consequences of recruitment and collaboration in biotech. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(2), 555–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amin, A., & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Learning, proximity and industrial performance: An introduction. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Andersson, M. (2006). Co-location of manufacturing and producer services: A simultaneous equations approach. In C. Karlsson, B. Johansson, & R. Stough (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and dynamics in the knowledge economy (pp. 94–124). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Andersson, M., & Lööf, H. (2011). Agglomeration and productivity: Evidence from firm-level data. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Antonietti, R., & Cainelli, G. (2011). The role of spatial agglomeration in a structural model of innovation, productivity and export: A firm-level analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Arvanitis, S., & Woerter, M. (2009). Firms’ transfer strategies with universities and the relationship with firms’ innovation performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1067–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. (2003). Innovation and spatial externalities. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D., & Mahmood, T. (1995). New firm survival: New results using a hazard function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Audretsch, D., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (1999). Start-up size and industrial dynamics: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 965–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, 38(2), 318–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., & Strumsky, D. (2007). Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy, 36, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Betz, M. R., Farren, M., Lobao, L., & Partridge, M. (2015). Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resource curse. Energy Economics, 50, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. BLS. (2011). Career guide to industries, 2010–2011. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review, 47(4), 687–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Box, M. (2008). The death of firms: Exploring the effects of environment and birth cohort on firm survival in Sweden. Small Business Economics, 31, 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Braunerhjelm, P., Ding, D., & Thulin, P. (2018). The knowledge spillover theory of intrapreneurship. Small Business Economics, 51(1), 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9928-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Buddelmeyer, H., Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E. (2009). Innovation and the determinants of company survival. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(2), 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Calvo, G. A., & Wellisz, S. (1978). Supervision, loss of control, and the optimum size of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 943–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cassia, L., Colombelli, A., & Paleari, S. (2009). Firms' growth: Does the innovation system matter? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20(3), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2005). A matter of life and death: Innovation and firm survival. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firm’s survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cleves, M., Gutierrez, R., Gould, W., & Marchenko, Y. (2010). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  31. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37, 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–751.Google Scholar
  33. DeVol, R., Wong, P., Bedroussian, A., Hynek, C. F., and Rice, D. (2009). Manufacturing 2.0: A more prosperous California. Retrieved from Santa Monica, CA: http://www.milkeninstitute.org/publications/view/394. Accessed 15 Mar 2013.
  34. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dunne, T., Roberts, M., & Samuelson, L. (1989). The growth and failure of U.S. manufacturing plants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 671–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Essletzbichler, J. (2015). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49(5), 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Esteve-Pérez, S., & Mañez-Castillejo, J. (2008). The resource-based theory of the firm and firm survival. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Esteve-Perez, S., Sanchis-Llopis, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2010). A competing risks analysis of firms’ exit. Empirical Economics, 38(2), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Evangelista, R., Lucchese, M., & Meliciani, V. (2015). Business services and the export performances of manufacturing industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(5), 959–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Faggian, A., & McCann, P. (2008). Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fallah, B., Partridge, M., & Rickman, D. S. (2014). Geography and high-tech employment growth in US counties. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(4), 683–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Feldman, M. P., & Audretsch, D. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ferragina, A. M., & Mazzotta, F. (2014). FDI spillovers on firm survival in Italy: Absorptive capacity matters! The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(6), 859–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A, 43(6), 1248–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Frenken, K., van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. (2008). Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(0), S29-S47.Google Scholar
  49. Guerrieri, P., & Meliciani, V. (2005). Technology and international competitiveness: The interdependence between manufacturing and producer services. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(4), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32, 1365–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. He, C., Yan, Y., and Rigby, D. (2018). Regional industrial evolution in China. Papers in Regional Science, 97, 173–198.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12246.
  52. Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Helper, S., Krueger, T., & Wial, H. (2012). Why does manufacturing matter? Which manufacturing matters? A policy framework. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions.Google Scholar
  54. Helsley, R. W., & Strange, W. C. (2011). Entrepreneurs and cities: Complexity, thickness and balance. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(6), 550–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208–224.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Houseman, S. N., Bartik, T., & Sturgeon, T. (2015). Measuring manufacturing: How the computer and semiconductor industries affect the numbers and perceptions. In S. N. Houseman & M. Mandel (Eds.), Measuring globalization: Better trade statistics for better policy (Vol. 1, pp. 151–193). Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  58. Howells, J. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39(5–6), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ibrahim, S. E., Fallah, M. H., & Reilly, R. R. (2009). Localized sources of knowledge and the effect of knowledge spillovers: an empirical study of inventors in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(3), 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  61. Johnson, P. (2005). Targeting firm births and economic regeneration in a lagging region. Small Business Economics, 24(5), 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kaniovski, S., & Peneder, M. (2008). Determinants of firm survival: A duration analysis using the generalized gamma distribution. Empirica, 35(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kirchhoff, B. A., Newbert, S. L., Hasan, I., & Armington, C. (2007). The influence of university R&D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Knoben, J. (2009). Localized inter-organizational linkages, agglomeration effects, and the innovative performance of firms. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 757–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Koch, A., & Strotmann, H. (2008). Absorptive capacity and innovation in the knowledge intensive business service sector. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(6), 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Koo, J. (2005). Technology spillovers, agglomeration, and regional economic development. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kueng, L., Yang, M.-J., and Hong, B. (2014). Sources of firm life-cycle dynamics: Differentiating size vs. age effects. NBER Working Paper No. 20621October 2014Google Scholar
  71. Littunen, H. (2000). Networks and local environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms. Small Business Economics, 15, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. López-Bazo, E., Vayá, E., & Artís, M. (2004). Regional externalities and growth: Evidence from European regions. Journal of Regional Science, 44(1), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Maliranta, M., Mohnen, P., & Rouvinen, P. (2009). Is inter-firm labor mobility a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from a linked employer–employee panel. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1161–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Marshall, J. (1982). Linkages between manufacturing industry and business services. Environment and Planning A, 14(11), 1523–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Martín-de Castro, G. (2015). Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mata, J., Portugal, P., & Guimaraes, P. (1995). The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mazzola, F., & Bruni, S. (2000). The role of linkages in firm performance: Evidence from southern Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43(2), 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nelson, A. (2009). Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 38, 994–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M., & Boekema, F. (2001). On spatial embeddedness of innovation networks: An exploration of the proximity effect. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 92, 59–76.Google Scholar
  81. Parente, S. (2001). The failure of endogenous growth. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 13(4), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pianta, M. (2005). Innovation and employment. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Piva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2005). Innovation and employment: Evidence from Italian microdata. Journal of Economics, 86(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Poncet, S., & de Waldemar, F. S. (2013). Product relatedness and firm exports in China. The World Bank Economic Review, 29(3), 579–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Qian, H., & Acs, Z. J. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Renski, H. (2011). External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Papers in Regional Science, 90(3), 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Richard, O. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164–177.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1556374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, part 2: The problem of development: A conference of the Institute for the Study of free Enterprise systems), S71-S102.Google Scholar
  90. Roper, S., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2015). Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data. Research Policy, 44(7), 1327–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Scott, A. (2006). Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development: Geography and the creative field revisited. Small Business Economics, 26(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Segarra, A., & Callejón, M. (2002). New firms' survival and market turbulence: New evidence from Spain. Review of Industrial Organization, 20(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sorensen, J., & Stuart, T. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science parks: Seedbeds of innovation? A duration analysis of firms’ patenting activity. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Strotmann, H. (2007). Entrepreneurial survival. Small Business Economics, 28(1), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Trippl, M., & Maier, G. (2010). Knowledge spillover agents and regional development. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 229–233.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00302.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tsvetkova, A. (2012). External effects of innovation on firm survival: evidence from computer and electronic product manufacturing, and healthcare. (doctoral dissertation), University of North Carolina - Charlotte.Google Scholar
  99. Tsvetkova, A. (2015). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and metropolitan economic performance: Empirical test of recent theoretical propositions. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4), 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tsvetkova, A., & Partridge, M. (2017). The shale revolution and entrepreneurship: An assessment of the relationship between energy sector expansion and small business entrepreneurship in US counties. Energy, 141, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tsvetkova, A., Thill, J.-C., & Strumsky, D. (2014a). External effects of metropolitan innovation on firm survival: Non-parametric evidence from computer and electronic product manufacturing, and healthcare. In K. Kourtit, P. Nijkamp, & R. Stimson (Eds.), Applied regional growth and innovation models. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  102. Tsvetkova, A., Thill, J.-C., & Strumsky, D. (2014b). Metropolitan innovation, firm size, and business survival in a high-tech industry. Small Business Economics, 43(3), 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tsvetkova, A., Partridge, M., & Betz, M. R. (2019). Self-employment effects on regional growth: A bigger bang for a buck? Small Business Economics, 52(1), 27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9988-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. van der Panne, G. (2004). Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. van Stel, A. J., & Nieuwenhuijsen, H. R. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and economic growth: An analysis using data of Dutch regions in the period 1987–1995. Regional Studies, 38(4), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Watson, J. (2007). Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 852–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Williamson, O. E. (1967). Hierarchical control and optimum firm size. Journal of Political Economy, 75(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zachariadis, M. (2003). R&D, innovation, and technological progress: A test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(3), 566–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spatial Productivity LaboratoryOECD Trento Centre for Local DevelopmentTrentoItaly
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.University of North Carolina – CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations