Skip to main content
Log in

From entrepreneurship potential in culture and creative industries to economic development: the situation of UK and southern European countries

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research proposes a model to evaluate the way entrepreneurship potential (EP) defined by environmental factors (EF) and psychological factors (PF) influence entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) results in Culture and Creative Industries (CCIs), and analyzes how country cultural contexts may influence these patterns, comparing the situation in UK and EU Med countries (Portugal, Spain and Greece). Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) applied to a sample of 123 CCIs from these countries, provides the results for the global model and for the two sub-sets of countries considered (UK and EU Med countries). Confirmation of proposed patterns of entrepreneurship potential that influence entrepreneurial self-efficacy, improves previous theoretical research on this field, allows a systemic assessment of entrepreneurs’ outlook, and paves the way for complimentary oriented quantitative research for a better conception of entrepreneurship’s public policies, as well as the definition of different support programs to promote the development of ESE in CCIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apetrei, A., Ribeiro, D., Roig, S., & Mas Tur, A. (2013). El emprendedor social–una explicación intercultural. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 78, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Thurik, A. R., Verheul, I., & Wennekers, S. (2002). Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European-US comparison. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baily, M.N., Dynan, K., & Elliott, D.J. (2010). The future of small business entrepreneurship: jobs generator for the U.S. economy, policy brief, June 2010, 175, Brookings Edu, Washington, available online at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/pb_175.pdf. Accessed 08 Jun 2017.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., & Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurship intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T. M., & Tan, W.-L. (2001). The socio-cultural environment for entrepreneurship: a comparison between East Asian and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 537–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, M., Jones, P., & Pickernell, D. (2016). Country-level investigation of innovation investment in manufacturing: paired fsQCA of two models. Journal of Business Research, 69, 5401–5407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, C. (2007). Management and creativity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A taxonomy of business star-up reasons and their impact on firm grow and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. A., Hart, M., & Wainwright, T. (2013). Small business performance: business, strategy, and owner-manager characteristics. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 8–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., Thurik, R., van der Zwan, P., & Walter, S. (2013). Business takeover or new venture? Individual and environmental determinants from a cross-country study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1099–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, R., Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., de Propris, L., & Sánchez, D. (2010). The geography of creative industries in Europe: Comparing France, Great Britain, Italy and Spain, 50th Anniversary European Congress of the Regional Science Association International. In Sustainable regional growth and development in the creative knowledge economy (pp. 19–23), Jonkoping, Sweden.

  • Bolton, B., & Thompson, J. (2004). Entrepreneurs – talent, temperament, technique (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Acs, Z.J., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. (2008). Global entrepreneurship monitor, executive report. Boston: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research Consortium, Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, M., Kriesi, I., & Sacchi, S. (2009). Labour market, job opportunities and transition to self-employment: evidence from Switzerland from the mid 1960s to the 1980s. European Sociological Review, 25, 56–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, A., Renko, M., & Myatt, T. (2014). Danger zone entrepreneurs: the importance of resilience and self-efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 473–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, L., & Mata, J. (2003). On the evolution of the firm size distribution: facts and theory. American Economic Review, 93, 1075–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2010). The impact of risk attitudes on entrepreneurial survival. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship motivations: what do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapain, C., & Comunian, R. (2010). Enabling and inhibiting the creative economy: the role of the local and regional dimensions in England. Regional Studies, 44(6), 717–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I. (2008). Small creative industry firms: a development dilemma? Management Decision, 46(6), 819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Entrepreneurial cognition, entrepreneurial orientation and firm capability in the creative industries. British Journal of Management, 23, 415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-H., Chang, Y.-Y., & Lee, C.-Y. (2015a). Creative entrepreneurs’ guanxi networks and success: information and resource. Journal of Business Research, 68, 900–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-H., Chang, Y.-Y., & Lo, Y.-H. (2015b). Creativity cognitive style, conflict, and career success for creative entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 68, 906–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromie, S. (2000). Assessing entrepreneurial inclinations: some approaches and empirical evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Lim, D. K., & Oh, C. H. (2013). Individual-level resources and new business activity: the contingent role of institutional context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. E., & Sheperd, D. A. (1999). Entrepreneurship as a utility maximising response. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC – European Commission. (2014). INTERREG IVC analysis report - creative industries. Brussels: European Union, Interreg Joint Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. F., Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Greene, P. G. (2010). Start-up motivations and growth intentions of minority nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 48, 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estay, C., Durrieu, F., & Akhter, M. (2013). Entrepreneurship: from motivation to start-up. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 11, 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2014). About the interactive influence of culture and regulatory barriers on entrepreneurial activity. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 781–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foord, J. (2008). Strategies for creative industries: an international review. Creative Industries Journal, 1(2), 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, L., & Kelly, S. (2009). Identifying entrepreneurial potential? An investigation of the identifiers and features of entrepreneurship. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEM. (2014). Global entrepreneurship monitor. London: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak, M., Morelli, M., & Sjöströn, T. (2007). Entrepreneurial income, occupational choice, and tricle-up policies. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 472–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohmann, S. F. (2012). Institutions, latent entrepreneurship, and self-employment: an international comparison. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, R. C., & Hamilton, C. (2010). Re-spatializing the creative industries: a relational examination of underground scenes, and professional and organizational lock-in. Creative Industries Journal, 3(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heebels, B., & van Aalst, I. (2010). Creative clusters in Berlin: entrepreneurship and the quality of place in Prenzlauder Berg and Kreuzberg. Human Geography, 92(4), 347–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoftede, G., Noorderhaven, N. G., Thurik, A. R., Uhlamer, L. M., Wennekers, A. M., Hotho, S., & Champion, K. (2011). Small business in the new creative industries: innovation as a people management challenge. Management Studies, 49(1), 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, E., & Lusardi, A. (2004). Liquidity constrains, household wealth and entrepreneurship. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 319–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, L. A., & Wells, P. C. (2000). The determinants of venture capital funding: evidence across countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(3), 241–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K., & Tsai, W. D. (2006). Entrepreneurship and risk aversion. Small Business Economics, 26, 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, P. M., Mariano, E. A., Dickson, P., & Weaver, K. M. (2010). Cultural influences on entrepreneurial orientation: the impact of national culture on risk taking and proactiveness in SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 959–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. K., Morse, E. A., Mitchell, R. K., & Seawright, K. K. (2010). Institutional environment and entrepreneurial cognitions: a comparative business systems perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markin, E., Swab, R. G., & Marshall, D. R. (2017). Who is driving the bus? An analysis of author and institution contributions to entrepreneurship research. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 2(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, W. C., Harris, M. L., & Geho, P. R. (2016). Longevity in small business: the effect of maturity on strategic focus and business performance. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1904–1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D. R., & Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 875–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. (2013). Development dynamics within creative industries: the case of television and digital media in Wales. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 5(4), 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K. (2006). Include us out: economic development and social policy in the creative industries. Cultural Trends, 15, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olugbola, S. A. (2017). Exploring entrepreneurial readiness of youth and startup success components: entrepreneurship training as a moderator. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 2(3), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, R. C., & Littrel, M. A. (2002). Craft retailers’ criteria for success and associated business strategies. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(4), 314–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Markou, F. (2015). Entrepreneurial ventures in the creative industries: a case study approach. Paper presented at the 27th annual EAEPE conference 2015. Scuola Politecnica of the University of Genova, Genova, 17–19.

  • Román, C., Congregado, E., & Millán, J. M. (2013). Start-up incentives: entrepreneurship policy or active labour market programmed? Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambharya, R., & Musteen, M. (2014). Institutional environment and entrepreneurship:an empirical study across countries. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 314–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinberg, S., & MacMillan, I. (1988). An 11 country study of motivations to start a business. In B. A. Kirchoff et al. (Ed.) Paper presented at Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference (pp. 669–687). Wellesley, Massachusetts: Babson College.

  • Shane, S. (2005). A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward F. Edgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E., Thurik, A. R., & Van der Zwan, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1109–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. (2010). Performance-based vs. socially-supportive culture: a cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1347–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J. (2011). Creative artist and entrepreneurship. In K. Hindle & K. Klyver (Eds.), Handbook of research in new venture creation (pp. 328–343). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. P. (2001). Self-employment and windfall gains in Britain: evidence from panel data. Economica, 68, 539–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. (2000). Entrepreneurship: assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, R., Audretsch, D., Carree, M., & Van Stel, A. (2008). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. (2003). Cities, clusters and creative industries: the case of film and television in Scotland. European Planning Studies, 11(5), 549–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdez, M. E., & Richardson, J. (2013). Institutional determinants of macro-level entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1149–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., Wennekers, A. M., Audrestch, D., & Thurick, R. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions, and culture. In D. B. Audrestsch et al. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in an European-US comparison (pp. 11–81).

  • Verreynne, M., & Meyer, D. (2010). Small business strategy and the industry life cycle. Small Business Economics, 35(4), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N. C., & Stokes, D. (2005). Managing creativity and innovation: the challenge for cultural entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(3), 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to José António Porfírio or Tiago Carrilho Mendes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porfírio, J.A., Mendes, T.C. & Felício, J.A. From entrepreneurship potential in culture and creative industries to economic development: the situation of UK and southern European countries. Int Entrep Manag J 14, 329–343 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0501-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0501-z

Keywords

Navigation