Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social Capital in University Business Incubators: dimensions, antecedents and outcomes

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many universities around the world have devoted resources to create University Business Incubators (UBIs), the literature has neglected the study of the social capital acquired by the entrepreneurs located in university incubators. The current work analyses how incubator managers can contribute to the development of both incubator and incubatee social capital as well as the influence of social capital to the success of incubatee businesses. The empirical study is based on survey data collected from incubatees on Spanish and Dutch UBIs. The findings reveal that the entrepreneurial profile of the university and the incubator manager proactivity are critical to build a collective social capital amongst the entrepreneurs. Results indicate that the collective social capital foster the individual social capital. However, only entrepreneurs’ relationships with external agents (bridging social capital) are relevant to their businesses whereas internal relationships (bonding social capital) have not a significant effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarstad, J., Haugland, S. A., & Greve, A. (2010). Performance spillover effects in entrepreneurial networks: Assessing a dyadic theory of social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Kitson, M., & Savona, M. (2010). Policies to enhance the ‘hidden innovation’ in services: Evidence and lessons from the UK. The Service Industries Journal, 30(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, A. J. (2014). A mechanisms-driven theory of business incubation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(4), 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, A. J., & Ingle, S. (2011). Relationships matter: Case study of a university campus incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(6), 626–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48(5), 732–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (2000). Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs' success. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: A longitudinal study. Organization Studies, 24(4), 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (2002). Universities, academics, and spinout companies: Lessons from imperial. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøllingtoft, A. (2012). The bottom-up business incubator: Leverage to networking and cooperation practices in a self-generated, entrepreneurial-enabled environment. Technovation, 32(5), 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—Leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buche, M. W., & Scillitoe, J. L. (2007). Influence of gender and social networks on organizational learning within technology incubators. American Journal of Business, 22(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. L., & Saka, C. (2006). Environmental management accounting applications and eco-efficiency: Case studies from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(14), 1262–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 345–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., & Lau, T. (2005). Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: The good, the bad and the ugly. Technovation, 25(10), 1215–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., Hsu, M., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17(4), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S1), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. E., Hamel, S. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2012). Motivations and obstacles to networking in a university business incubator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 433–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbers, J. J. (2014). Networking behavior and contracting relationships among entrepreneurs in business incubators. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1159–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P., Vilhunen, J., & Voutilainen, K. (2014). Incubation as co-creation: Case study of proactive technology business development. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(5–6), 382–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003). The role of universities in the Europe of knowledge. (No. 58). Brussels, Belgium.

  • European Commission. (2004). The Europe of knowledge 2020: A vision for university-based research and innovation. Leige: DG for Science & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, L., Stam, W., & Takeuchi, R. (2016). Managing the risks of proactivity: A multilevel study of initiative and performance in the middle management context. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1339–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA) (2017). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2016/2017 report. Available at: http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812 Accessed 17 Jan 2018.

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, A., Benassi, M., & Sti, A. D. (2010). Exploring the contributions of human and social capital to productivity. International Review of Sociology, 20(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, P. D. (2005). Incubation policy and practice: Building practitioner and professional capability. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, P. D., & Chaplin, P. (2003). Are incubators good for business? Understanding incubation practice - the challenges for policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(6), 861–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(4), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators: Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzakis, T., Lycett, M., Macredie, R. D., & Martin, V. A. (2005). Towards the development of a social capital approach to evaluating change management interventions. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: The role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B., & Karlsson, T. (2010). Social capital and the modern incubator: A comparison of in-group and out-group social networks. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 23(sup 1), 719–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Ireland, R. D., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Stimulating dynamic value: Social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success. Long Range Planning, 40(2), 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Babson Park: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasrado, V., Sivo, S., Ford, C., O’Neal, T., & Garibay, I. (2016). Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (2009). Social capital and business and management: Setting a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., Harper-Anderson, E., & Molnar, L. (2011). Incubating success. incubation best practices that lead to successful new ventures. Institute for Research on labor employment, and the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2005). Roles of social capital in venture creation: Key dimensions and research implications. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(4), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. S. (2000). Building social capital for sustainable enterprise development in country towns and regions: Successful practices from the United States. First National Conference on the future of Australia’s country towns, la Trobe University, Center for Sustainable Regional Communities, Australia. June.

  • Lyons, T. S. (2002). Building social capital for rural enterprise development: Three case studies in the United States. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2007). Building futures or stealing secrets? Entrepreneurial cooperation and conflict within business incubators. International Small Business Journal, 25(4), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2008). A preliminary investigation into networking activities within the university incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 14(4), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in university science park incubators: The relationship between the start-up's lifecycle progression and use of the incubator's resources. Technovation, 28(5), 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouira, S., Klofsten, M., & Dahlstrand, Å. L. (2005). The logic of the entrepreneur: Implications of the entrepreneur's perception of early-stage financing. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6(2), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Griffis, S. E., & Autry, C. W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakis, P. E. (2012). Entrepreneurship, university research, and growth: European north vs. south. In T. Burger-Helmchen (Ed.), Entrepreneurship-born, made and educated (pp. 127–158). Rijeka: InTech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone, the collapse and revival of civic America. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redondo, M., David, F., & van der Sijde, P. (2014). Development of “business logics” in novice entrepreneurs in an academic incubator. Academic Proceedings of the 2014 University-Industry Interaction Conference: Challenges and Solutions for Fostering Entrepreneurial Universities and Collaborative Innovation (pp. 117–128). Barcelona.

  • Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. P., Fetters, M. L., & Greene, P. G. (2014). University-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: A global study of six educational institutions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(5–6), 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). Smart PLS 3 (computer software). available at: www.smartpls.com Accessed 22 Aug 2017.

  • Rubalcaba, L., Gallego, J., & Hertog, P. D. (2010). The case of market and system failures in services innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 30(4), 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, V. (2006). The early growth of academic spin offs: factors influencing the early growth of Dutch spin-offs in life sciences, ICT and consulting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Netherlands: Wageningen University.

  • Scillitoe, J. L., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2010). The role of incubator interactions in assisting new ventures. Technovation, 30(3), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilor, R. W., & Gill, M. D. J. (1986). The new business incubator: Linking talent, technology, capital, and know-how. Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship.

  • Studdard, N. L. (2006). The effectiveness of entrepreneurial firm’s knowledge acquisition from a business incubator. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(2), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J. (2009). Innovation in the experience economy: A taxonomy of innovation organisations. The Service Industries Journal, 29(4), 431–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamásy, C. (2002). Are there too many innovation centres in Germany? In L. Schätzl & J. R. Diez (Eds.), Technological change and regional development in Europe (pp. 112–131). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tötterman, H., & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups business incubation and social capital. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • UKBI (UK Business Incubation). (2012). Best practice in business incubation. Birmingham: UKBI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Un, C. A., & Montoro-Sánchez, A. (2010). Public funding for product, process and organisational innovation in service industries. The Service Industries Journal, 30(1), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderstraeten, J., & Matthyssens, P. (2012). Service-based differentiation strategies for business incubators: Exploring external and internal alignment. Technovation, 32(12), 656–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedel, B., & Gabarret, I. (2014). The role of trust as mediator between contract, information and knowledge within business incubators. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 23(4), 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Regional Government of Castilla y León (Spain) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [project reference VA112P17] and by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (Spain) [project reference ECO2017-86628-P].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Marketing, Faculty of Commerce, University of Valladolid, Plaza del Campus Universitario 1, 47011, Valladolid, Spain

    María Redondo

  2. Department of Business and Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Valladolid, Avenida del Valle Esgueva, 6, 47011, Valladolid, Spain

    Carmen Camarero

Authors
  1. María Redondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmen Camarero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Redondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Redondo, M., Camarero, C. Social Capital in University Business Incubators: dimensions, antecedents and outcomes. Int Entrep Manag J 15, 599–624 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0494-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0494-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation