Innovation resources integration pattern in high-tech entrepreneurial enterprises

Article
  • 187 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses the innovation resource intergration pattern of high-tech entrepreneurial enterprises formed through integration of internal and external innovation resources in the face of demand change and continuous competition. The study finds that the core of the high-tech entrepreneurial enterprise’ sustainable growth is the effective integration of internal and external innovation resources, and the effective pattern of innovation resource integration is group polymerisation and chain integration. These two innovation resource integration pattern either substantiates the traditional theory of innovation resource integration and offers a guidance for growth practices of high-tech entrepreneurial enterprises in China.

Keywords

High-tech entrepreneurial enterprises Innovation resources integration Group polymerization Chain integration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is the stage achievement of Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-12-0595), National Nature Science Fundation Project (71303029), Dalian Science and Technology Plan Project (2015D12ZC176) and Dalian Youth Science and Technology Star Breeding Plan Project (2016RQ004). The authors thank for the support of Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, National Nature Science Fundation, Dalian Science and Technology Plan and Dalian Youth Science and Technology Star Breeding Plan.

References

  1. Adegbesan, J. A. (2009). On the origins of competitive advantage: Strategic factor markets and heterogeneous resource complementarity. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Management, 31, 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asare, A. K., Brashear, T. G., Kang, J., Alejandro, T. B., & Yang, J. (2013). The relationship between supplier development and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing process improvement. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(6), 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing:Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baum, J. R. (2003). Entrepreneurs' start-up cognitions and behaviors: Dreams, surprises, shortages, and fast zigzags. Working paper presented at the Babson Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Data_Integrity_Notice.cfm?abid=1783689. Accessed 16 June 2017.
  7. Bicen, P., & Johnson, W. H. A. (2014). How do firms innovate with limited resources in turbulent markets. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 4207–4240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullinger, H. J., Auernhammer, K., & Gomeringer, A. (2004). Managing innovation networks in the knowledge-driven economy. International Journal of Production Research, 42(17), 3337–3353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Choi, J. (2010). Characteristics of network and performance of technology based start-up. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 13(4), 87–108.Google Scholar
  11. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ciabuschi, F., Perna, A., & Snehota, I. (2012). Assembling resources when forming a new business. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination:The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management, 49(3), 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Silva, D. G., & McComb, R. P. (2012). Research universities and regional high-tech firm start-up and exit. Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 112–130.Google Scholar
  16. Dornberger, U. (2009). The locational factors and performance of the high-tech startups in china. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Small Business, 7(3),312–323.Google Scholar
  17. Duysters, G., & Hagedoorn, J. (2000). Core competences and company performance in the world-wide computer industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Echtelt, F. E. A. V., Wynstra, F., Weele, A. J. V., & Duysters, G. (2008). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng, T., Sun, L., & Zhang, Y. (2010). The effects of customer and supplier involvement on competitive advantage: An empirical study in china. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1384–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finney, R. Z., Campbell, N. D., & Powell, C. M. (2005). Strategies and resources: Pathways to success? Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1721–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, C. (1974). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Government, venture capital and the growth of european high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 43(9), 1523–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo, H., Su, Z., & Ahlstorm, D. (2015). Business model innovation: The effects of exploratory orientation, opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial bricolage in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  25. Han, S. S. (2016). Industry structure, technology characteristics, technology marketing and performance of technology-based start-ups: With focus on technology marketing strategy. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(2), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Handfield, R. B., & Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(4), 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henderson, R. (2006). The innovator’s dilemma as a problem of organizational competence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill, C. W., Jones, L., & Gareth, R. (2001). Strategic management: An integrated approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  29. Holcomb, T. R., Ireland, R. D., Holmes Jr., R. M., et al. (2009). Architecture of entrepreneurial learning: Exploring the link among heuristics, knowledge, and action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes, M., Morgan, R. E., Ireland, R. D., & Hughes, P. (2011). Network behaviours, social capital, and organisational learning in high-growth entrepreneurial firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Small Business, 12(3), 257–272.Google Scholar
  31. Humphery-Jenner, M., & Suchard, J. A. (2013). Foreign venture capitalists and the internationalization of entrepreneurial companies: Evidence from china. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6), 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnsen, T. E. (2009). Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: Taking stock and looking to the future. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 15(3), 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2013). Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 42(8), 1457–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim, B. K. (2017). The dominant factors affecting the performance of technology-based start-ups in the Korean business incubators. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 12(1), 35–67.Google Scholar
  35. Kraaijenbrink, J. (2012). Integrating knowledge and knowledge processes: A critical incident study of product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 1082–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kristensson, P., Magnusson, P. R., & Matthing, J. (2002). Users as a hidden resource for creativity: Findings from an experimental study on user involvement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kwun, M., & Jeong, H. (2012). The effect of entrepreneurs’ characteristic, technological capabilities and network on firm performance of technology based start-ups. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lansiti, M., & West, J. (1997). Technology integration: Turning great research into great products. Harvard Business Review on managing high-tech industries, 75, 1–29.Google Scholar
  39. Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 15(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, H., Kim, E., & Kim, Y. (2012). A study of the patent-related activities affecting the early stage company performance of technology-based start-ups. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu, L., Wang, B., & Pan, X. (2012). Capability evolution and development of S&T start-up enterprises: A case study of Guangyang corporation. Science Research Management, 33(6), 16–23.Google Scholar
  42. Ma, X., Zhou, Z., & Fan, X. (2015). The process of dynamic capability emergence in technology start-ups – An exploratory longitudinal study in china. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(6), 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Miozzo, M., & Divito, L. (2016). Growing fast or slow?: Understanding the variety of paths and the speed of early growth of entrepreneurial science-based firms. Research Policy, 45(5), 964–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field researchon change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramanathan, U., Bentley, Y., & Gu, P. (2014). The role of collaboration in the uk green supply chains: An exploratory study of the perspectives of suppliers, logistics and retailers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70(5), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sager, B., & Dowling, M. (2009). Strategic marketing planning for opportunity exploitation in young entrepreneurial companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(1), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Senyard, J., Baker, T., & Davidson, P. (2009). Entrepreneurial bricolage: Towards systematic empirical testing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Resource, 29(5), 1–14.Google Scholar
  49. Senyard, J. M., Baker, T., Steffens, P. R., et al. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A new venture's cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13), 1375–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sirmon, D. G., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2008). Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: The effects of resource bundling and deployment. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 919–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, andlife cycle effects. Journal of Management: Official Journal of the Southern Management Association, 37(5), 1390–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Song, M., & Benedetto, C. D. (2008). Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Song, L. Z., Song, M., & Parry, M. E. (2010). Perspective: Economic conditions, entrepreneurship, first-product development, and new venture success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steffens, P. R., et al. (2009). Linking resource acquisition and development processes to resource-based advantage: Bricolage and the resource-based view. Adelaide:6th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Resource Exchange, 14(2).Google Scholar
  58. Strehle, F., Katzy, B. R., & Davila, T. (2010). Learning capabilities and the growth of technology-based new ventures. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(1/2), 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taji, N. (2013). Resource acquisition in global strategy of high-tech startups: Case studies of Cambridge region. Working paper presented at the Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) & IEEE International Technology Management Conference. http://innovate.ieee.org/innovate/35675?LT=XPLLG_XPL_Bold728x90_Q3.16_FT_Subpage. Accessed 13 June 2017.
  60. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2008). External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsai, Y. H., Joe, S. W., Ding, C. G., & Lin, C. P. (2013). Modeling technological innovation performance and its determinants: An aspect of buyer–seller social capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1211–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). The effectiveness of alliances and acquisitions: The role of resource combination activities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Winter, S. G., & Nelson, R. R. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zahra, S. A. (2000). Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 289–321.Google Scholar
  66. Zhang, Y., & Si, C. (2008). The impacts of external factors on the growth of chinese entrepreneurial enterprises: An empirical study. Journal of Small Business & Enterprise Development, 15(4), 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiongfeng Pan
    • 1
  • Jing Zhang
    • 1
  • Malin Song
    • 2
  • Bowei Ai
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of management and EconomicsDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.School of Statistics and Applied MathematicsAnhui University of Finance and EconomicsBenbuChina

Personalised recommendations