Independent directors and family firm performance: does one size fit all?
- 327 Downloads
How will the presence of independent directors affect family business performance? This question is still theoretically debated and empirically inconclusive. Because family businesses are a group of heterogeneous companies with different levels of family involvement in the business, the purpose of this paper is to empirically explore how the combination of different family business governance structures jointly shape the effect of independent directors on family business performance in an understudied Collectivist cultural setting. Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) on a sample of 74 Lebanese family firms this study finds that, depending on the family firm governance structure, the presence of independent directors on the board can lead to either positive or negative firm performance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
KeywordsCollectivism Corporate governance Family Business heterogeneity Independent directors Performance
The authors are grateful for the valuable contributions of the participants of the 6th Rhetoric and Narratives in Management Research Conference.
This research is supported by the Generalitat de Cataluña (SUR of the DEC) and by the European Social Fund through the research grant 2016FI_B 00335 given to Georges Samara.
- Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.Google Scholar
- Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
- Basco, R., & Voordeckers, W. (2015). The relationship between the board of directors and firm performance in private family firms: A test of the demographic versus behavioral approach. Journal of Management and Organization, 21(4), 411.Google Scholar
- Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004b). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
- Economist. (2015). Winds of change. The prospects for shaking up Japanese firms have never looked so good. The Economist, 415(8941), 51–53.Google Scholar
- Forbes Middle East. (2014). Top private Arab companies making an impact in the Arab world. Retrieved from: http://www.forbesmiddleeast.com/en/list/top-companies-in-the-arab-world-2015-top-private-arab-companies-making-an-impact-in-the-arab-world/. Accessed 8 Jan 2016.
- Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
- Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In Building methodological bridges (pp. 201–235). Emerald Group publishing limited.Google Scholar
- Longest, K. C., & Vaisey, S. (2008). Fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata. Stata Journal, 8(1), 79–104.Google Scholar
- Martin, G., Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Berrone, P., & Makri, M. (2016). Conflict between controlling family owners and minority shareholders: Much ado about nothing? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. doi: 10.1111/etap.12236.
- Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Mills, M., Van de Bunt, G. G., & De Bruijn, J. (2006). Comparative research: Persistent problems and promising solutions. International Sociology, 21(5), 619–631.Google Scholar
- Quine, W. V. (1952) The problem of simplifying truth functions. The American Mathematical Monthly, 59(8), 521.Google Scholar
- Ragin, C. C. (2010). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Irvine, California: Department of Sociology, University of California.Google Scholar
- Salloum, C., Bouri, E., & Samara, G. (2013b). Impact of family involvement in ownership management and direction on financial performance of the Lebanese firms. International Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 30–41.Google Scholar
- Samara, G., & Arenas D. (2017) Practicing fairness in the family business workplace. Business Horizons. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.008.
- Suppiah, V., & Singh Sandhu, M. (2011). Organisational culture’s influence on tacit knowledge-sharing behaviour. Journal of knowledge management, 15(3), 462–477.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder: Westview press.Google Scholar
- Wu, P. L., Yeh, S. S., & Woodside, A. G. (2014). Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1647–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zahra, S. A., & Stanton, W. W. (1988). The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management, 5(2), 229–236.Google Scholar