Advertisement

Explaining nation-wide differences in entrepreneurial activity: a legitimacy perspective

  • Francisco Díez-MartínEmail author
  • Alicia Blanco-González
  • Camilo Prado-Román
Article

Abstract

The present study applies the lens of Institutional Theory to analyze the impact of a country’s entrepreneurial legitimacy on its entrepreneurial activity as well as on entrepreneurs’ access to financing. By creating a structural equation model of entrepreneurship in innovation-driven countries, the authors show that countries with greater entrepreneurial legitimacy have more entrepreneurial activity. The model was tested over a 5-year period, from 2009 to 2013. Results suggest that innovation-driven countries with more entrepreneurial legitimacy obtain greater rates of entrepreneurial activity. Further distinguishing among legitimacy types, cognitive legitimacy is shown to exert a stronger influence than regulative or normative legitimacy. The model also confirms a positive relationship between a country’s entrepreneurial legitimacy and access to financing. This occurs principally through regulative legitimacy. This study enlarges our knowledge of the existing differences in entrepreneurial activity among countries. It contributes to the literature on the country-level determinants of entrepreneurship, such as institutional conditions or financial access.

Keywords

Legitimacy Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial activity Cross-national Institutional theory Financial access 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Professor Luis Tomás Díez de Castro for his valuable comments and suggestions to improve the paper and the participants of the research seminar at the Fundación Camilo Prado on 24th April 2014.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations: Technology, Governance Globalization, 1(1), 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J. (2008). Foundations of high impact entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(6), 535–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. (2008). Private firms in China: building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aidis, R. (2005). Institutional barriers to small- and medium-sized enterprise operations in transition countries. Small Business Economics, 25(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: a comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins, eds. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.Google Scholar
  10. Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2007). Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: a meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254.Google Scholar
  12. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barroso, C., Cepeda, G., & Roldan, J. L. (2010). Applying maximum likelihood and PLS on different sample sizes: Studies on SERVQUAL model and employee behaviour model. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 427–447). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baum, J. A. C. J., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baum, J., & Oliver, C. (1992). Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Sociological Review, 57(4), 540–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Baumol, W. J., & Strom, R. J. (2007). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931–2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to firm growth: does size matter? Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2008). Financing patterns around the world: are small firms different? Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bosma, N., Coduras, A., Litovsky, Y., & Seaman, J. (2012). GEM Manual. A report on the design, data and quality control of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved from www.gemconsortium.org
  24. Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown, A. D., & Toyoki, S. (2013). Identity work and legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(7), 875–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bruton, G. D., & Alhstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.Google Scholar
  29. Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Carayannis, E. G., Evans, D., & Hanson, M. (2003). A cross-cultural learning strategy for entrepreneurship education: outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the US. Technovation, 23(9), 757–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Carree, M. A., Thurik, A. R., Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (Vol. 5, pp. 557–594). Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Cetindamar, D., Gupta, V. K., Karadeniz, E. E., & Egrican, N. (2012). What the numbers tell: the impact of human, family and financial capital on women and men’s entry into entrepreneurship in Turkey. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(1–2), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen, X.-P., Yao, X., & Kotha, S. (2009). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: a persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (Vol. 295, pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655–690). Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2014). Por qué se institucionalizan las organizaciones. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 23(1), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cruz-Suarez, A., Prado-Román, A., & Prado-Román, M. (2014). Cognitive legitimacy, resource access, and organizational outcomes. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54(5), 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cull, R., Davis, L. E., Lamoreaux, N. R., & Rosenthal, J.-L. (2006). Historical financing of small- and medium-size enterprises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 3017–3042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Davidsson, P. (1995). Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. De Clercq, D., Danis, W. M., & Dakhli, M. (2010). The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. De Clercq, D., Meuleman, M., & Wright, M. (2012). A cross-country investigation of micro-angel investment activity: the roles of new business opportunities and institutions. International Business Review, 21(2), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Deeds, D. L., Mang, P. Y., & Frandsen, M. L. (2004). The influence of firms’ and industries’ legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In K. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Desai, V. M. (2008). Constrained Growth: How Experience, Legitimacy, and Age Influence Risk Taking in Organizations. Organization Science.Google Scholar
  48. Dickson, P. H., & Weaver, K. M. (2008). The role of the institutional environment in determining firm orientations towards entrepreneurial behavior. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013a). Beyond legitimacy: legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Román, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013b). Efecto del plazo de ejecución estratégica sobre la obtención de legitimidad organizativa. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19(2), 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. El-Namaki, M. S. S. (1988). Encouraging entrepreneurs in developing countries. Long Range Planning, 21(4), 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79(3), 519.Google Scholar
  57. Fayolle, A., Liñán, F., & Moriano, J. A. (2014). Beyond entrepreneurial intentions: values and motivations in entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 679–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Fernández-Serrano, J., & Romero, I. (2014). About the interactive influence of culture and regulatory barriers on entrepreneurial activity. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 781–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T., & Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 16(3), 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gatewood, E. J., Shaver, K. G., & Gartner, W. B. (1995). A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5), 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), iii–A7.Google Scholar
  63. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., & Mena, J. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations: density, legitimation, and competition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Hayton, J. C., & Cacciotti, G. (2013). Is there an entrepreneurial culture? A review of empirical research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(9–10), 708–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: a review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(4), 33–52.Google Scholar
  68. Higgins, M., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: the effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Higgins, M., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: the effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Sirmon, D. G., & Trahms, C. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating value for individuals, organizations and society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ho, Y. P., & Wong, P. K. (2007). Financing, regulatory costs and entrepreneurial propensity. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hofstede, G., et al. (2004). Culture’s role in entrepreneurship: Self-employment out of dissatisfaction. In T. E. Brown & J. M. Ulijn (Eds.), Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture (pp. 162–203). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  74. Hopp, C., & Stephan, U. (2012). The influence of socio-cultural environments on the performance of nascent entrepreneurs: community culture, motivation, self-efficacy and start-up success. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(9–10), 917–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Jeng, L. A., & Wells, P. C. (2000). The determinants of venture capital funding: evidence across countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(3), 241–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Jennings, P. D., Greenwood, R., Lounsbury, M. D., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Institutions, entrepreneurs, and communities: a special issue on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kannan-Narasimhan, R. (2014). Organizational ingenuity in nascent innovations: gaining resources and legitimacy through unconventional actions. Organization Studies, 35(4), 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kibler, E., & Kautonen, T. (2014). The moral legitimacy of entrepreneurs: an analysis of early-stage entrepreneurship across 26 countries. International Small Business Journal. doi: 10.1177/0266242614541844.Google Scholar
  80. Kistruck, G. M., Webb, J. W., Sutter, C. J., & Bailey, A. V. G. (2015). The double-edged sword of legitimacy in base-of-the-pyramid markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(3), 436–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Krueger, N., & Carsrud, A. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5(4), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Krueger, N., Liñán, F., & Nabi, G. (2013). Cultural values and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(9–10), 703–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kwon, S.-W., & Arenius, P. (2010). Nations of entrepreneurs: a social capital perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263Google Scholar
  87. Lewellyn, K. B., & Bao, S. R. (2014). A cross-national investigation of IPO activity: the role of formal institutions and national culture. International Business Review, 23(6), 1167–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lin, S., & Si, S. (2014). Factors affecting peasant entrepreneurs’ intention in the Chinese context. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 803–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Liñán, F., Santos, F. J., & Fernández, J. (2011a). The influence of perceptions on potential entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(3), 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Liñán, F., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011b). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(3–4), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Liñán, F., Nabi, G., & Krueger, N. (2013). British and Spanish entrepreneurial intentions: a comparative study. Revista de Economia Mundial, 33, 73–103.Google Scholar
  92. Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 545–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.Google Scholar
  94. Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 203–218.Google Scholar
  95. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mitchell, R. K., Smith, J. B., Morse, E. A., Seawright, K. W., Peredo, A. M., & McKenzie, B. (2002). Are entrepreneurial cognitions universal? Assessing entrepreneurial cognitions across cultures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 9–32.Google Scholar
  97. Mitter, C., & Kraus, S. (2011). Entrepreneurial finance – issues and evidence, revisited. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14(2–3), 132–150.Google Scholar
  98. Morales Urrutia, D., & Rodil Marzábal, Ó. (2015). Explanatory factors of business creation in ten European countries: a proposal from the institutional perspective. Revista de Economía Mundial, 40, 91–122.Google Scholar
  99. Naudé, W., Gries, T., Wood, E., & Meintjies, A. (2008). Regional determinants of entrepreneurial start-ups in a developing country. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  102. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pissarides, F. (1999). Is lack of funds the main obstacle to growth? EBRD’s experience with small- and medium-sized businesses in central and eastern Europe. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(5–6), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pissarides, F., Singer, M., & Svejnar, J. (2003). Objectives and constraints of entrepreneurs: evidence from small and medium size enterprises in Russia and Bulgaria. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 503–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: a systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939.Google Scholar
  107. Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. Steenkamp, & M. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems (pp. 193–221). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  110. Ruebottom, T. (2013). The microstructures of rhetorical strategy in social entrepreneurship: building legitimacy through heroes and villains. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ruef, M., & Scott, W. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schwab, K. (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–14. World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  113. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations (p. 178). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  114. Shane, S. (1996). Explaining variation in rates of entrepreneurship in the United States: 1899–1988. Journal of Management, 22(5), 747–781.Google Scholar
  115. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Shane, S., & Foo, M.-D. (1999). New firm survival: institutional explanations for new franchisor mortality. Management Science, 45(2), 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  118. Simcic Brønn, P., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2008). Corporate motives for social initiative: legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Singh, J., Tucker, D., & House, R. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Starr, J. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 79–92.Google Scholar
  121. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.Google Scholar
  123. Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Thornton, P., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: an overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tornikoski, E. T., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: a legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., Kreiner, G. E., & Bishop, D. G. (2014). Legitimating the legitimate: a grounded theory study of legitimacy work among ethics and compliance officers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Überbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of new ventures: a review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 667–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Valliere, D. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial framework conditions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., & Bosma, N. (2006). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Veciana, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wennberg, K., Pathak, S., & Autio, E. (2013). How culture moulds the effects of self-efficacy and fear of failure on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(9–10), 756–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wennekers, S., van Wennekers, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Wold, H. (1985). Systems analysis by partial least squares. In P. Nijkamp, H. Leitner, & N. Wrigley (Eds.), Measuring the unmeasurable (pp. 221–251). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Yu, J., Zhou, J. X., Wang, Y., & Xi, Y. (2013). Rural entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: reading institutional perspectives from entrepreneur stories. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(2), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Zimmerman, M., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Economics DepartmentRey Juan Carlos UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations