Although prior research has investigated a number of conditions under which shared leadership in teams may improve team performance, team composition variables have been left unexplored. Using a sample of 144 teams in a technology incubator in China, this study explored the moderating effects of personality diversity on the relationship between shared leadership and entrepreneurial team performance. Results indicate that shared leadership improves entrepreneurial team performance; the strength of the relationship, however, depends on the level of team personality diversity. More specifically, when relationship-oriented personality diversity is high, the shared leadership—team performance relationship is stronger. These findings advance research in entrepreneurship, groups and teams, and shared leadership, and provide practical implications as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Avolio, B. J., Jung, D., Murry, W., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership process, efficacy, trust, and performance. In D. A. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (pp. 173–209). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Bantel, K. A., & Finkelstein, S. (1991). The determinants of top management teams. Miami: Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377–391.
Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20, 31–47.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118.
Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741–758.
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595–615.
Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: a review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251–269.
Bryant, T. A. (2004). Entrepreneurship. In G. R. Goethals, G. J. Sorensen, & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (Vol. 1, pp. 442–448). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Buchko, A. (1992). Employee ownership, attitudes, and turnover: an empirical assessment. Human Relations, 45, 711–733.
Cable, D. M., & Shane, S. (1997). A prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, 22, 142–176.
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234.
Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 727–746.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Colomb, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122.
Cooper, A. C., Woo, C. Y., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1989). Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 317–332.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R. Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Cox, T. J., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827.
Cox, J. F., Pearce, C. L., & Perry, M. L. (2003). Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process: How shared leadership can enhance new product development team dynamics and effectiveness. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 48–76). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
Day, D., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857.
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. Acad Manag Ann, 1–73.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of a five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. Semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504–529.
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 365–386.
Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217–231.
Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2006). What you are is what you like - similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 802–826.
Greer, L. L., & van Kleef, G. A. (2010). Equality versus differentiation: the effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1032–1044.
Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W., & Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness: an integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research, 36(1), 83–105.
Hambrick, D. C., & Abrahamson, E. (1995). Assessing managerial discretion across industries: a multimethod approach. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1427–1441.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107.
Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. (2005). Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 509–522.
Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 359–369.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.
Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., & Busenitz, L. W. (2014). New venture teams: a review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Management, 40(1), 226–255.
Lechler, T. (2001). Social interaction: a determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16, 263–278.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407.
Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859–876.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 174–214.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Mehra, A., Smith, B., Dixon, A., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: the network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232–245.
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Research, 34(6), 651–677.
Moynihan, L. M., & Peterson, R. S. (2001). A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 327–378). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.
Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group and Organizational Management, 24(2), 28–45.
O’Leary Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1285–1301.
Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47–57.
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2000). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 7, pp. 115–139). Amsterdam: JAI.
Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership on the longitudinal effectiveness of change management teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172–197.
Pearce, C., Manz, C., & Sims, H. (2009). Where do we go from here? Is shared leadership the key to success? Organizational Dynamics, 38(3), 234–238.
Peeters, M. A., Van Tuijl, H. F., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. (2006). Personality and team performance: a meta‐analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 377–396.
Peterson, R. S., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V., & Owens, P. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 795–808.
Pitcher, P., & Smith, A. D. (2001). Top management team heterogeneity: personality, power, and proxies. Organization Science, 12(1), 1–18.
Prewett, M. S., Walvoord, A. G., Stilson, F. R. B., Rossi, M. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2009). The team personality-team performance relationship revisited: the impact of criterion choice, pattern of workflow, and method of aggregation. Human Performance, 22, 273–296.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325.
Stewart, D. W. (2006). Continuing the investigation into personality traits and work-family conflict. Dallas: Poster presented at the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: a multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37, 185–222.
Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133.
Tamir, M., Robinson, M. D., & Solberg, E. C. (2006). You may worry, but can you recognize threats when you see them? Neuroticism, threat identifications, and negative affect. Journal of Personality, 74, 1481–1506.
Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1994). An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the united kingdom. London: HMSO.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271.
Zhou, W., Vredenburgh, D., & Rogoff, E. G. (2013). Informational diversity and entrepreneurial team performance: moderating effect of shared leadership. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–17.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, W. When does shared leadership matter in entrepreneurial teams: the role of personality composition. Int Entrep Manag J 12, 153–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0334-3
- Team diversity
- Entrepreneurial teams
- Shared leadership