Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Networks in family business: a multi-rational approach

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current research on networks in family businesses has approached the topic from a mono-rational perspective where the family, business and social networks are each considered in relative isolation. This paper argues that multi-rational approaches, which accept that the three groups of networks interact and overlap, offer a useful alternative perspective. In proposing the case for multiple rationalities as a framework within which family business networking can be viewed – and in putting forward an initial model – the paper allows the interaction of the different networks within the family business to be more fully acknowledged. Evidence from the literature is presented as a basis for further exploration using empirical approaches and it is emphasised that further and empirical approaches are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcorn, P. (1982). Success and survival in the family owned business. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Jack, S. L., & Drakopolou-Dodd, S. (2005). The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review, 18, 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Jack, S. and Drakopolou-Dodd, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship as a Nexus of change: The syncretistic production of the future Lancaster University Management School Working Paper 2007/002.

  • Bagwell, S. (2008). Transnational family networks and ethnic minority business development. The case of Vietnamese Nail-shops in the UK. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14(6), 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg, D., & Johansson, J. (1992). Managing network connections in international business. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R., & Kouvalein, A. (2008). Researching small firm entrepreneurship: past present and future. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(2), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J., Chrisman, J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, S. (2000). Entrepreneurship – a Learning Process: the experiences of Asian female entrepreneurs and women in business. Education and Training, 42(8), 445–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, S., & Kangis, P. (2006). Asians in the UK: gender, generations and enterprise. Equal Opportunities International, 25(2), 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maggio, P. (1992). Nabel’s paradox revisited: relational and cultural aspects of organisational structure. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organisations: Structure, form and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Pres.

  • Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filion, L. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial performance, networking, vision and relations. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D. (2002a). Understanding the small family business Routledge studies in small business. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D. (2002b). A network perspective of cultural organising and professional management in the small family business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9(4), 400–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayen, K., McQuaid, R., & Raeside, R. (2010). Social networks, age cohorts and employment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 30(5/6), 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, D., Carlsen, J., & Morrison, A. (2004). The family business in hospitality and tourism. Cambridge: CABI Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. (1993). Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. (1977). An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes. Organization Studies, 18(6), 897–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gura, T. C. (2011). Appeasement entrepreneurship: Family conflict as a source of new business opportunities. In M. Nordqvist, G. Marzanno, E. R. Brenes, G. Jiménez, M. Fonseca-Paredes, & in Association with the Global Step Project (Eds.), Understanding entrepreneurial family businesses in uncertain environments. Opportunities and resources in Latin America. Gloucester: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (2002). Towards an understanding of strategy processes in small family businesses: A multi-rational perspective. In D. E. Fletcher (Ed.), Understanding the small family business (pp. 32–45). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., & Evans, R. (1995). Forgotten sources of capital for the family-owned business. Family Business Review, 8(3), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1992). Structural alignments, individual strategies and managerial action: elements towards a network theory of getting things done. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organisations: Structure forms and action. Boston: Harvard University Press.

  • IFB (2008). The UK family business sector an institute for family business report by capital economics February 2008.

  • INSNA (2010). International Network for Social Network Analysis http://www.insna.org/.

  • Irava, W. J., & Moores, K. (2010). Clarifying the strategic advantage of familieness: unbundling its dimensions and clarifying its paradoxes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(3), 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. I., & Greve, A. (2002). Does the degree of redundancy in social networks influence the success of business start-ups? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 8(5), 254–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B. (1987). Beyond process and structure: social exchange networks. International Studies of Management and Organisation, XVII(1), 3–23.

  • Jones, C.D., Makri, M. and Gomez-Majia (2008). Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded, family controlled firms: The case of diversification Baylor University 1042–2587

  • Kenyon-Rouvinez, D., & Ward, J. (2005). Family business: Key issues. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M., Carlock, R. S., & Florent-Treacy, E. (2007). Family business on the couch: A psychological perspective. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., & Kellerman, F. W. (2008). Guest editorial: understanding the non-economic motivated factors in family firms. An Introduction Family Business Review, XXI(2), 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klyver, K. (2007). Shifting family involvement during the entrepreneurial process. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 13(5), 258–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klyver, K. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurial networking and participation. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

  • Knoke, D., & Kulinski, J. H. (1991). Network analysis: Basic concepts. In G. Thomson, J. Frances, R. Levack, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Hierarchies and networks: The coordination of social life. London: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C., McCracken, M., & McQuaid, R. (2003). Unemployment duration and employability in remote rural labour markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C., Greig, M., & McQuaid, R. (2005). Alternative job search strategies sin remote rural and peri-urban labour markets: the role of social networks. Sociologica Ruralis, 45(1/2), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levent, T., Masurel, E., & Nijkamp, P. (2003). Diversity in entrepreneurship: ethnic and female roles in urban economic life. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(11), 1131–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, D., Foley, M. and Lemmon, J. (1996). The Potential of accommodation consortia in the highlands and islands of Scotland Proceedings of the IAHMS Spring Symposium Leeds Metropolitan University UK 55–60.

  • McGregor, J., & Tweed, D. (2002). Profiling a new generation of female small business owners in New Zealand: networking, mentoring and growth gender. Work & Organization, 9, 420–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuaid, R. W. (1996). Social networks, entrepreneurship and regional development. In M. Danson (Ed.), Small firm formation and regional economic development (pp. 118–131). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A., Gilmore, A., Cummins, D., & Carson, D. (2001). The network construct in entrepreneurship research: a review and critique. Management Decision, 39(9), 749–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G., & Jaeger, A. M. (1978). Type Z organisation: stability in the midst of mobility. Academy of Management Review, 3, 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G., & Johnston, J. B. (1978). Types of organisational control and their relationship to emotional well-being. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutziouris, Z. P., Smyrnios, K. X., & Klein, B. S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of research on family business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutziouris, Z. P. (2009). Plural rationalities in family business strategy paper to the ESRC workshop on family business. London: The British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenkert, F., & Hallen, L. (2006). Conceptualising, delineating and analysing business networks. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3–4), 384–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M. (1994). Unravelling social networks in ethnic minority firms. International Small Business Journal, 12(3), 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M. and Jones, T. (1998). Ethnic minorities in business small business research trust report Milton Keynes.

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J., & Chua, J. (1996a). A review and annotated bibliography of family business studies. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J., & Chua, J. (1996b). Strategic management of the family business: past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 1, 1–35.

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepek, M. (2008). Comments on ‘Kitchen Table Baggage’ Personal Communication.

  • Szarka, J. (1990). Networking and small firms. International Small Business Journal, 8(2), 10–22.

  • Travers, C., Pemberton, C., & Stevens, S. (1997). Women’s networking across boundaries: recognising different cultural agendas. Women in Management Review, 12(2), 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK

    Claire Seaman

  2. Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

    Ronald McQuaid

  3. Employment Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University, Craiglockhart Campus, Edinburgh, EH14 1DJ, UK

    Mike Pearson

Authors
  1. Claire Seaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald McQuaid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mike Pearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Seaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seaman, C., McQuaid, R. & Pearson, M. Networks in family business: a multi-rational approach. Int Entrep Manag J 10, 523–537 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0297-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0297-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation