Advertisement

Do patents affect VC financing? Empirical evidence from the nanotechnology sector

  • Federico Munari
  • Laura ToschiEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes the importance given by Venture Capital firms (VCs) to the patent portfolios of start-up companies in their financing decisions. In particular, the contributions presented are twofold. First, we determine whether the amount of VC financing is associated with three elements related to technological portfolios: number of patent, patent scope and number of “core technology” patents (i.e., those patents related to core technological capabilities of the company). Second, we examine whether the relevance of patents for the financing decisions varies across different types of VC firms, depending on their industry specialization and affiliation. We provide empirical evidence from a sample of 332 VC-backed companies in the nanotechnology sector for the period 1985–2006. Our results confirm the importance of core technology patents in the VC investment decisions, especially for specialized VCs, when compared with generalist VCs. However, no differences are found between corporate and independent VCs.

Keywords

Venture capital Patent portfolios Nanotechnology VC Specialization VC Affiliation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the EIBURS programme of the European Investment Bank (EVPAT Project, “The Economic Valuation of Patents”) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, C. B. (1994). New directions in research on venture capital finance. Financial Management, 23(3), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum, J. A. C., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertoni, F., Colombo, M. G. & Grilli, L. (2006). Venture capital financing and the growth of new technology-based firms: A longitudinal analysis on the role of the type of investor. Working Paper, Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering.Google Scholar
  7. Bertoni, F., Colombo, M. G., & Croce, A. (2010a). The effect of venture capital financing on the sensitivity to cash flow of firm’s investments. European Financial Management, 16(4), 528–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertoni, F., Croce, A., & D’Adda, D. (2010b). Venture capital investments and patenting activity of high-tech start-ups: a micro-econometric firm-level analysis. Venture Capital An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 12(4), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, J., De Vries, G., & Sandner, P. (2012). Venture capital and the financial crisis: An empirical study across industries and countries. In: D. Cumming (Ed.), Oxford handbook of venture capital, chapter 2. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bolivar Ramos, M., Garcia Morales, V. J., & Garcia Sanchez, E. (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boocock, G., & Woods, M. (1997). The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: evidence from a UK venture fund. International Small Business Journal, 16(1), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brav, A., & Gompers, P. (1997). Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offering: evidence from venture and non-venture-backed companies. Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1791–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brody, P., & Ehrlich, D. (1998). Can big companies become successful venture capitalists? McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 50–63.Google Scholar
  14. Brusoni, S., Prencpe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Busenitz, L. W., James, O. F., & Douglas, D. M. (2004). Reconsidering the venture capitalists’ “value added” proposition: an interorganizational learning perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6), 787–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1977). Regression analysis by examples. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Chemmanur, T. J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2010). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. SSRN working paper.Google Scholar
  18. Chesbrough, H. W. (2000). Designing corporate ventures in the shadow of private venture capital. California Management Review, 42, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conti, A., Thursby, M. C., & Rothaermel, F. (2013). Show me the right stuff: Signals for high tech startups. NBER Working Paper 17050.Google Scholar
  20. Cressy, R., Munari, F., & Malipiero, A. (2007). Playing to their strengths? Evidence that specialization in the private equity industry confers competitive advantage. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 647–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cressy, R., Munari, F., & Malipiero, A. (2012). Does VC fund diversification pay off? An empirical investigation of the effectsof VC portfolio diversification and fund performance. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 13, 647–669.Google Scholar
  22. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence and partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.Google Scholar
  23. Dimov, D., & Gedajlovic, E. (2010). A property rights perspective on venture capital investment decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1248–1271.Google Scholar
  24. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenok, M. J. (2005). When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26, 947–965.Google Scholar
  25. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 753–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dushnitsky, G., & Shapira, Z. (2010). Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 990–1017.Google Scholar
  27. Freund, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1998). Regression analysis: Statistical modelling of a response variable. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Gambardella, A., & Torrisi, S. (1998). Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27, 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gompers, P. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 50, 1461–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gompers, P. (2002). Corporations and the financing of innovation: The corporate venturing experience. Economic Review of Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta fourth quarter.Google Scholar
  31. Gompers, P., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2005). Venture capital investment cycles: The role of experience and specialization. NBER Working paper, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Gompers, P. A., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2009). Specialization and success: evidence from venture capital. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(3), 817–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gorman, M., & Sahlman, W. A. (1989). What do venture capital do? Journal of Business Venturing, 4(4), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core” competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gruber, M., Heinemann, F., Brettel, M., & Hungeling, S. (2010). Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(12), 1337–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guo, B., Lou, Y., & Perez Castrillo, D. (2012). Investment, duration, and exit strategies for corporate and independent venture capital-backed start-ups. Working paper 895.12: http://hdl.handle.net/2072/204084.
  37. Gupta, A. K., & Sapienza, H. J. (1992). Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investment. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haeussler, C., Harhoff, D., & Mueller, E. (2009). To be financed or not… - The role of patents for venture capital financing. ZEW Discussion Paper no. 09–003.Google Scholar
  39. Hall, B. H. (2004). Exploring the patent explosion. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hirukawa, M., & Ueda, M. (2008). Venture capital and innovation: which is first? Pacific Economic Review, 16(4), 421–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hsu, D. H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy, 36, 722–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hsu, D. H. & Ziedonis, R. H. (2013). Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  44. Huang, C., Notten, A., & Rasters, N. (2011). Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ivanov, W., & Xie, F. (2010). Do corporate venture capitalists add value to start-up firms? Evidence from IPOs and acquisitions of VC-backed companies. Financial Management, 39(1), 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jain, B. A., & Kini, O. (1995). Venture capitalist participation and the post- issue operating performance of IPO firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16(6), 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaplan, S., & Stromberg, P. (2004). Contracts, characteristics, and actions: evidence from venture capitalist analyses. Journal of Finance, 59, 2173–2206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Knill, A. (2009). Should venture capitalists put all their eggs in one basket? Diversification versus pure-play strategies in venture capital. Financial Management, 38(3), 441–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knockaert, M., Wright, M., Clarysse, B., & Lockett, A. (2010). Agency and similarity effects and the VC’s attitude towards academic spin-out investing. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31(4), 674–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krishnan, C. N. V., Ivanov, V. I., Masulis, R. W., & Singh, A. K. (2011). Venture capital reputation, post-IPO performance, and corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(5), 1295–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lemley, M. (2005). Patenting nanotechnology. Stanford Law Review, 58, 601–630.Google Scholar
  54. Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. The Rand Journal of Economics, 25, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lerner, J. (2002). Boom and bust in the venture capital industry and the impact on innovation. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review Fourth Quarter, 2002, 25–39.Google Scholar
  56. Lockett, A., Thompson, S., & Morgenstern, U. (2009). Reflections on the development of the RBV. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. MacMillan, I. C., Siegel, R., & Narasimha, P. N. S. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Macmillan, I. C., Kulow, D. M., & Khoylian, R. (1989). Venture capitalists involvement in their investments - extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Manigart, S., Waele, D., Wright, M., Robbie, K., Desbrières, P., Sapienza, H., & Beckman, A. (2002). Determinants of required Return in venture capital investments: a five-country study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mann, R. J., & Sager, T. W. (2007). Patents, venture capital and software start-ups. Research Policy, 36, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin de Castro, G., Delgado Verde, M., Lopez Saez, P., & Navas-Lopez, J. (2011). Towards ‘an intellectual capital-based view of the firm’: origins and nature. Journal of Busines Ethics, 98, 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Martín Rojas, R., García Morales, V. J., & García Sánchez, E. (2011). The influence on corporate entrepreneurship of technological variables. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(7), 984–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Matusik, S. F., & Fitza, M. A. (2012). Diversification in the venture capital industry: leveraging knowledge under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Merges, R., & Nelson, R. R. (1990). On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review, 90, 839–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Munari, F., & Toschi, L. (2011). Do venture capitalists have a bias against investment in academic spinoffs? Evidence from the micro and nanotechnology sector in the UK. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(2), 397–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Munari, F., & Toschi, L. (2013). Running ahead in the patent gold rush. Strategic patenting in emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  67. Munari, F., Odasso, C., & Toschi, L. (2011). IP-backed finance. In F. Munari & R. Oriani (Eds.), The economic valuation of patents. Methods and applications. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited di Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Muzyka, D., Birley, S., & Leleux, B. (1996). Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Norton, E., & Tenenbaum, B. (1993). Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). Technological competencies in the world’s largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not too much variety. Research Policy, 23, 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Technological competencies in the world’s largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competencies of the firm. Harvard Business Review, 439–465.Google Scholar
  73. Real, J. C., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2006). Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competencies. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sapienza, H. J., Manigart, S., & Vermeir, W. (1996). Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(6), 439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scheu, M., Veefkind, V., Verbandt, Y., Molina Galan, E., Absalom, R., & Forster, W. (2006). Mapping nanotechnology patents: the EPO approach. World Patent Information, 28(3), 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Smolarski, J., & Kut, C. (2011). The impact of venture capital financing method on SME performance and internationalization. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Streletzki, J.-G., & Schulte, R. (2012). Which venture capital selection criteria distinguish high-flyer investments? Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 15(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Toschi, L., Munari, F., & Nightingale, P. (2012). Mix and match: corporate diversification and CVC portfolio strategies. Paper presented at the DRUID Society Conference 2012 on Innovation and competitiveness, Copenhagen, 19–21 June 2012.Google Scholar
  80. Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 30(9), 1051–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2003). The structure and management of alliances: syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 2073–2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wu, W. W. (2009). Exploring core competencies for R&D technical professionals. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 9574–9579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations