Work context and employee behaviour as antecedents for intrapreneurship

Article

Abstract

Intrapreneurial employees and intrapreneurial projects are considered to be an important driver of innovation and strategic renewal within companies. While many studies addressed the top-down implementation of innovative projects, analyses of employee initiatives in promoting innovation within companies are scarce. This paper therefore takes a bottom-up approach and focuses on employee behaviour and how it can be stimulated towards intrapreneurship. We propose and test a two-step model where formal and informal work context affects employees’ intrapreneurial behaviour, which then provides the basis for bottom-up initiated intrapreneurial projects. Our empirical data consist of questionnaire responses of 176 employees in six Dutch companies. The results of structural equation model estimations indicate that formal organisational factors (horizontal participation, resource availability) affect employees’ intrapreneurial behaviour, but also highlight informal factors such as trust in the direct manager. We also find that innovativeness and personal initiative, but not risk taking, play a role for an effective translation of employees’ behaviour into intrapreneurial projects.

Keywords

Intrapreneurship Corporate entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial orientation Social exchange theory Trust in manager Organisational structure 

References

  1. Alexander, J. W., & Randolph, W. A. (1985). The fit between technology and structure as a predictor of performance in nursing subunits. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 844–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). AMOS 16 user’s guide. Chicago SPSS.Google Scholar
  4. Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 73(3), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bijlsma, K., & Van de Bunt, G. G. (2003). Antecedents of trust in managers: a “bottom up” approach. Personnel Review, 32(5), 638–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2000). Correlates of trust in a general hospital. In A. Rahim, R. T. Golembiewski, & K. D. MacKenzie (Eds.), Current topics in management (pp. 141–166). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bijlsma-Frankema, K., de Jong, B., & van de Bunt, G. (2008). Heed, a missing link between trust, monitoring and performance in knowledge intensive teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, P. M. (1967). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Bosma, N., Wennekers, S., Amorós, J. E. (2012). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011 Extended Report: Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurial Employees Across the Globe (pp. 1–239): Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.Google Scholar
  10. Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns, P. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship: Building the entrepreneurial organisation (Vol. 2 edn ed). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  12. Byrne, D. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Carrier, C. (1996). Intrapreneurship in small businesses: an exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
  14. Chisholm, T. A. (1987). Intrapreneurship and bureaucracy. Advanced Management Journal, 52(3), 36–40.Google Scholar
  15. Commission, E. (2003). SME definition: Commission recommendation of 06 May 2003. Brussels: EU Commission.Google Scholar
  16. Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. (1989). Strategic management in small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Day, D. L. (1994). Raising radicals: different processes for championing innovative corporate ventures. Organisation Science, 5(2), 148–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2005). Determinanten van Innovatief Gedrag: Een Onderzoek onder Kenniswerkers in het MKB (Determinants of Innovative Behavior: An Investigation among Knowledge workers in SMEs). Gedrag & Organisatie, 18, 235–259.Google Scholar
  21. De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Jong, J. P. J., Parker, S. K., Wennekers, S., & Wu, C. (2011). Corporate entrepreneurship at the individual level: Measurement and determinants (H201108). Zoetemeer: EIM Research Reports.Google Scholar
  23. De Vaus, D. A. (2002). Analysing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., Zahra, S. A., Floyd, S. W., Janney, J. J., & Lane, P. J. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 351–378.Google Scholar
  25. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surves: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. Donaldson, L. (1995). American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. D’Souza, P., & Mulla, R. (2011). Can an entrepreneurial personality compensate for a boring job? : the influence of proactive personality and job characteristics on employee engagement levels. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 20(2), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognition model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical and policy perspectives. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publischers.Google Scholar
  30. Folger, R. (1993). Justice, motivation, and performance beyond role requirements. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: differences between East and West Germany. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 70(2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gambetta, D. G. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. G. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–237). New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Gertz, D., & Baptista, J. (1996). Grow to be great. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ginsberg, A., & Hay, M. (1994). Confronting the challenges of corporate entrepreneurship: guidelines for venture managers. European Management Journal, 12(4), 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodale, J. C., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1–2), 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. E. (2007). Multivariate data analysis: sixth edition (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hayton, J. C., & Kelley, D. J. (2006). A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hisrich, R. (1990). Entrepreneurship/Intrapreneurship. American Psychologist, 45(2), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holt, D. T., Rutherford, M. W., & Clohessy, G. R. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical look at individual characteristics, context, and process. Journal of Leadership & Organisational Studies, 13(4), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hornsby, J. S., Naffziger, D. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Montagno, R. V. (1993). An Interactive model of the corporate entrepreneurship process. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 17(2), 29–37.Google Scholar
  43. Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Montagno, R. V. (1999). Perception of internal factors for corporate entrepreneurship: a comparison of Canadian and U.S. managers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2), 9–24.Google Scholar
  44. Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Shepherd, D. A., & Bott, J. P. (2009). Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions: examining perception and position. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kanter, R. M. (1985). Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organisation. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 10, 169–211.Google Scholar
  49. Kemelgor, B. H. (2002). A comparative analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation between selected firms in the Netherlands and the USA. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirby, D. (2006). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Klepper, S. (2001). Employee startups in high tech Industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 639–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knight, R. M. (1987). Corporate innovation and entrepreneurship: a Canadian study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(4), 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kraus, S., Rigtering, J. P. C., Hughes, M., & Hosman, V. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation and the business performance of SMEs: a quantitative study from the Netherlands. Review of Managerial Science, 6(2), 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kuratko, D. F., & Goldsby, M. G. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurs or rogue middle managers? A framework for ethical corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2005). A model of middle-level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(6), 699–716.Google Scholar
  56. Leifer, R., & Huber, G. P. (1977). Relations among perceived environmental uncertainty, organisation structure, and boundary-spanning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(2), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lindsay, R. M. (1993). Incorporating statistical power into the test of signifcance procedure: a methodological and emprical inquiry. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 211–236.Google Scholar
  58. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  59. Marvel, M. R., Griffin, A., Hebda, J., & Vojak, B. (2007). Examining the technical corporate entrepreneurs’ motivation: voices from the field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5), 753–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Menzel, H. C., Aaltio, I., & Ulijn, J. M. (2007). On the way to creativity: engineers as intrapreneurs in organisations. Technovation, 27(12), 732–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organisations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  63. Möllering, G. (2005). Retional, Institutional and Active Trust: Just Do It!? In K. M. Bijlsma-Frankema & R. J. A. Klein Woolthuis (Eds.), Trust under pressure: Emperical investigations of trust and trust building in uncertain circumstances (pp. 17–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  64. Monsen, E., & Boss, W. (2009). The impact of strategic entrepreneurship inside the organisation: examining job stress and employee retention. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(1), 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moriano, J., Molero, F., Topa, G., & Lévy Mangin, J.-P. (2011). The influence of transformational leadership and organisational identification on intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–17.Google Scholar
  66. Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation (2nd ed.). Mason: Thomson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  67. Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parker, J. D. A., Taylor, G. J., & Bagby, R. M. (2003). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia scale: III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55(3), 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pinchot, G. (1986). Intrapreneuring. Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. New York: Perennial Library.Google Scholar
  70. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organisational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 761–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: a comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(4), 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organisations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rutherford, M. W., & Holt, D. T. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical look at the innovativeness dimension and its antecedents. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 20(3), 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(3), 11–27.Google Scholar
  77. Stam, E., Bosma, N., Van Witteloostuijn, A., De Jong, J., Bogaert, S., Edwards, N., et al. (2012). Ambitious entrepreneurship: A review of the academic literature and directions for public policy (pp. 1–162). Den Haag: Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy.Google Scholar
  78. Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 17–27.Google Scholar
  79. Sun, L.-Y., & Pan, W. (2009). Market orientation, intrapreneurship behavior, and organisational performance: Test of a structural contingency model. Journal of Leadership & Organisational Studies.Google Scholar
  80. Vesper, K. H. (1984). Three faces of corporate entrepreneurship: A pilot study. In J. A. Hornaday, F. Tarpley Jr., & J. A. Timmons (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley: Babson College.Google Scholar
  81. Wakkee, I., Elfring, T., & Monaghan, S. (2010). Creating entrepreneurial employees in traditional service sectors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wales, W., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organisational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 895–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organisational strategies. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  84. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configuration approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang, C.-W. (2008). The relationships among leadership styles, entrepreneurial orientation, and business performance. Managing Global Transitions, 6(3), 257–275.Google Scholar
  86. Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zahra, S. A. (1995). Corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: the case of management leveraged buyouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3), 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zampetakis, L. A., Beldekos, P., & Moustakis, V. S. (2009). “Day-to-day” entrepreneurship within organisations: the role of trait emotional intelligence and perceived organisational support. European Management Journal, 27(3), 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utrecht University School of EconomicsUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.School of Management, Economics and LawWindesheim University of Applied SciencesZwolleThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute for Management ResearchRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations