Entrepreneurs or employees: a cross-cultural cognitive analysis



This study examines the influence of the cultural-cognitive dimension - measured through creativity, risk taking and independence - on the probability of becoming an entrepreneur or an employee. Institutional economics is used as theoretical framework of the research. The empirical research uses binomial and multinomial probit models, when controlling for socio-demographic factors and macro variables. Data was obtained from the World Values Survey, for the period 2005-2008, considering a sample of 41 countries and 56,875 individuals. The main findings demonstrate that creativity, risk taking and independence increase the probability of becoming entrepreneur, and decrease the probability of becoming employee. Given that these characteristics facilitate the birth of new ideas, processes, products, and services, it is crucial to learn from entrepreneurs, and to foster such characteristics within organizations. The results have contributions for both researchers and policymakers on new firm creation (entrepreneurship) and on the generation of innovation within organisations (intrapreneurship).


Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial behavior Creativity Risk taking Independence Institutional economics 


  1. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: a comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, C., & Urbano, D. (2011). Environmental factors and entrepreneurial activity in Latin America. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 48, 126–139.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, C., Urbano, D., Coduras, A., & Ruiz, J. (2011). Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: a regional comparison in Spain. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovations in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123–167). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, A. R., Dodd, S. D., & Jack, S. L. (2012). Entrepreneurship as connecting: some implications for theorising and practice. Management Decision, 50(5), 958–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armstrong, S. J., & Hird, A. (2009). Cognitive Style and Entrepreneurial Drive of New and Mature Business Owner-Managers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. (2012). Entrepreneurship research. Management Decision, 50(5), 755–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BarNir, A. (2012). Starting technologically innovative ventures: reasons, human capital, and gender. Management Decision, 50(3), 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Battistella, C., Biotto, G., & De Toni, A. (2012). From design driven innovation to meaning strategy. Management Decision, 50(4), 718–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bird, B., & Brush, C. (2002). A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(3), 41–65.Google Scholar
  13. Blanchflower, D. G. (2004). Self-employment: More may not be better, NBER Working Paper No.10286. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  14. Brenner, O. C., Pringle, C. D., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1991). Perceived fulfillment of organizational employment versus entrepreneurship: work values and career intentions of business college graduates. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(3), 62–74.Google Scholar
  15. Brockhaus, R.H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509–520.Google Scholar
  16. Bruton, G., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital in dustry. Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burke, A. E., FitzRoy, F. R., & Nolan, M. A. (2002). Self-employment wealth and job creation: the roles of gender, non-pecuniary motivation and entrepreneurial ability. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Busenitz, L. W., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caird, S. (1991). The enterprising tendency of occupational groups. International Small Business Journal, 9(4), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carree, M., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2007). The relationship between economic development and business ownership revisited. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(3), 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Caulkins, D., & Peters, C. (2002). Grid-group analysis, social capital, and entrepreneurship in North American immigrant groups. Cross-Cultural Research, 36(1), 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cavalcante, S., Kesting, P., & Ulhoi, J. (2011). Business model dynamics and innovation: (re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, 49(8), 1327–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chang, Y. Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chaston, I., & Scott, G. J. (2012). Entrepreneurship and open innovation in an emerging economy. Management Decision, 50(7), 1161–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coate, S., & Tennyson, S. (1992). Labor market discrimination, imperfect information and self employment. Oxford Economic Paper, 44, 272–288.Google Scholar
  28. Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1988). The influence of organizational structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cromie, S., & O’Donoghue, J. (1992). Assessing entrepreneurial inclinations. International Small Business Journal, 10(2), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multicountry study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1997). Time and entrepreneurial risk behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(2), 69–88.Google Scholar
  32. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2001). Strategic risk behavior and its temporalities: between risk propensity and decision context. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 515–534.Google Scholar
  33. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Devanna, M. A., & Tichy, N. (1990). Creating the competitive organization of the 21st century: the boundary less corporation. Human Resource Management, 29, 445–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dinur, A. R. (2011). Common and un-common sense in managerial decision making under task uncertainty. Management Decision, 49(5), 694–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Douglas, E., & Shepherd, D. A. (1999). Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ekelund, J., Johansson, E., Järvelin, M. R., & Lichtermann, D. (2005). Self-employment and risk aversion - evidence from psychological test data. Labour Economics, 12, 649–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Evans, D., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Evans, D., & Leighton, L. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.Google Scholar
  41. Gatewood, E. J., Shaver, K. G., & Gartner, W. B. (1995). A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5), 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: the role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goktan, A. B., & Miles, G. (2011). Innovation speed and radicalness: are they inversely related? Management Decision, 49(4), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gomez-Haro, S., Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Cordon-Pozo, E. (2011). Differentiating the effects of the institutional environment on corporate entrepreneurship. Management Decision, 49(10), 677–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hamilton, B. (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay?,An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 604–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hartup, W.W. (1963). Dependence and independence, In H.W. Stevenson; J. Kagan; C. Spiker; N.B. Henry; H.G. Richey (Eds.), Child psychology: The sixty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (333–363).Google Scholar
  48. Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hotho, S., & Champion, K. (2011). Small businesses in the new creative industries: innovation as a people management challenge. Management Decision, 49(1), 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Huarng, K. H., & Yu, T. H. K. (2011). Entrepreneurship, process innovation and value creation by a non-profit SME. Management Decision, 49(2), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Idris, A., & Tey, L. S. (2011). Exploring the motives and determinants of innovation performance of Malaysian offshore international joint ventures. Management Decision, 49(10), 1623–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Inglehart, R. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy”. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (88–120). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Inglehart, R. (2000). World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys 1981–1984, 1990–1993, 1995–1997. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  55. Inglehart, R. (2004). World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1999–2001: User Guide and Codebook. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  56. Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1999). Measuring postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. (2000). Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jafari, M., Rezaeenour, J., Mazdeh, M. M., & Hooshmandi, A. (2011). Development and evaluation of a knowledge risk management model for project-based organizations: A multi-stage study. Management Decision, 49(3), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kihlstrom, R. E., & Laffont, J. J. (1979). A general equilibrium theory of firm formations based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87(4), 719–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kirby, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: can business schools meet the challenge? Education and Training, 46(8/9), 510–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kirby, D. A., & Ibrahim, N. (2011). Entrepreneurship education and the creation of an enterprise culture: provisional results from an experiment in Egypt. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
  63. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review, 87(2), 333–338.Google Scholar
  64. Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The Entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38(8), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee, S. M., Lim, S. B., & Pathak, R. D. (2011). Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: a multi-country study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lee, S. M., Hwang, T., & Choi, D. (2012a). Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management Decision, 50(1), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lee, S. M., Olson, D. O., & Trimi, S. (2012b). Co-innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Levesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behaviour. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. March, J., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mousa, F. T., & Wales, W. (2012). Founder effectiveness in leveraging entrepreneurial orientation. Management Decision, 50(2), 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nielsen, S. L., & Lassen, A. H. (2012). Images of entrepreneurship: towards a new categorization of entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Olson, H., & Currie, M. (1992). Female entrepreneurs: personal value systems and business strategies. Journal of Small Business Management, 30(1), 49–57.Google Scholar
  79. Orser, B., & Hogarth-Scott, S. (2002). Opting for growth: gender dimensions of choosing enterprise development. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(3), 284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  81. Reed, R., Storrud-Barnes, S., & Jessup, L. (2012). How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage: trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention. Management Decision, 50(1), 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Renko, M., Shrader, R. C., & Simon, M. (2012). Perception of entrepreneurial opportunity: a general framework. Management Decision, 50(7), 1233–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Reynolds, P, Camp, S, Bygrave, W, Autio, E., & Hay, M. (2001). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2001 Executive Report, Babson College, London Business School, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  84. Reynolds, P., Bygrave W., Autio, E., Cox, L., & Hay, M. (2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2003. Executive Report, Kansas City.Google Scholar
  85. Rocha, H. O. (2004). Entrepreneurship and development: the role of clusters. Small Business Economics, 23, 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2ª ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shapero, A. (1975). The Displaced, Uncomfortable Entrepreneur”. Psychology Today, 9(6), 83–88.Google Scholar
  90. Solomon, G. T., & Winslow, E. (1988). Towards a descriptive profile of the entrepreneur. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 22, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stephen, F., Urbano, D., & van Hemmen, S. (2009). The responsiveness of entrepreneurs to working time regulations. Small Business Economics, 32, 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thornton, P., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural and entrepreneurial activity: an overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Timmons, J. A. (1989). The Entrepreneurial Mind. Andover: Brick House Publishing.Google Scholar
  94. Veciana, J. M., & Urbano, D. (2008). The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. An Introduction, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vinogradov, E., & Kolvereid, L. (2007). Cultural background, human capital and self-employment rates among immigrants in Norway. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(4), 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ward, T. B. (2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Welbourne, T. M., Neck, H., & Meyer, G. D. (2012). The entrepreneurial growth ceiling: using people and innovation to mitigate risk and break through the growth ceiling in initial public offerings. Management Decision, 50(5), 778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Welter, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial behavior in differing environments”. In D. B. Audretsch, H. Grimm, & C. W. Wessner (Eds.), Local Heroes in the Global Village Globalization and the New Entrepreneurship Policies (93–112), International Studies in Entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  99. Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behaviour in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wennekers, S., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Whiting, B. G. (1988). Creativity and entrepreneurship: how do they relate? Journal of Creative Behavior, 22(3), 178–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.Google Scholar
  103. Yang, T. T., & Li, C. R. (2011). Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development: the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and competitiveness. Management Decision, 49(9), 1444–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessPoint Park UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Business Economics DepartmentAutonomous University of BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  3. 3.University of MedellinMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations