Advertisement

Corporate entrepreneurship in Switzerland: evidence from a case study of Swiss watch manufacturers

  • Kayhan Tajeddini
  • Stephen L. Mueller
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which Swiss companies engage in corporate entrepreneurship. To that end, a case study was undertaken to better understand how corporate entrepreneurship is practiced in the watch-making industry. Using a stratified sampling method, 18 corporate-level managers of Swiss watch manufacturers were interviewed over a 5-month period to determine their perception of their firm’s entrepreneurial orientation in terms of proactiveness, risk taking, innovativeness, competitive aggressiveness, and autonomy. Findings were mixed. As anticipated, given the conservative nature of Swiss culture and tradition, the executives reflected corporate values that inhibit proactiveness, risk-taking, and competitive aggressiveness. On the positive side, these executives espoused values that support a corporate culture of innovativeness and autonomy reflecting a resurgence of innovativeness in an otherwise mature industry.

Keywords

Corporate entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial orientation Qualitative research Case study Swiss watch industry 

References

  1. Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). Strategic innovation, corporate entrepreneurship and matching outside-in to inside out approaches to strategy research. British Journal Management, 6(Special Issue), S3–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, J. A. (1989). Discovering the future series: The business of paradigms. Burnsville: Charthouse International Learning Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, M. E. (2000). Time marches on: the worldwide watch industry. Thunderbird International Business Review, 42(3), 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barringer, B. R., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 421–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaver, G., & Prince, C. (2004). Management, strategy and policy in the UK small business sector: a critical review. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beer, M., Eisenstat, R., & Spector, B. (1990). The critical path to corporate renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birley, S. (1989). Female entrepreneurs: are they really any different? Journal of Small Business Management, 27(1), 32–38.Google Scholar
  10. Brockhaus, R. H. S. (1982). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In Kent et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 39–57). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burgelman, R. A. (1984). Design for corporate entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 26(2), 154–166.Google Scholar
  13. Cadogan, J. W., Diamantopoulos, A., & Mortanges, C. (1999). A measure of export market orientation: scale development and cross-cultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4), 689–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354–359.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, M. J., & Hambrick, D. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: how small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christensen, K. S. (2006). Losing innovativeness: the challenge of being acquired. Management Decision, 44(9), 1161–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7, No. January/February, 53–68Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, R., & Evans, M. (2006). Breaking from tradition: market research, consumer needs, and design futures. Design Management Review, 17(1), 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Covin, J. G., & Covin, T. J. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(2), 35–50.Google Scholar
  20. Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47–63.Google Scholar
  21. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 16(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  23. Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  24. Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on organizational innovation: distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Darling, J., Gabrielsson, M., & Seristo, H. (2007). Enhancing contemporary entrepreneurship: a focus on management leadership. European Business Review, 19(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Jong, A., de Ruyter, K., & Lemmink, J. (2003). The adoption of information technology by self-managing service teams. Journal of Service Research, 6, 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dess, G. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dickson, P. R. (1992). Toward a general theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56, No. January, 69–83.Google Scholar
  30. Donze, P.-Y. (2007). Joint venture companies and technology transfer from the West to Japan: Citizen Watch Co and the Swiss watchmakers (1890–1940). In Editor (ed)^(eds), Book Joint venture companies and technology transfer from the West to Japan: Citizen Watch Co and the Swiss watchmakers (1890–1940)Google Scholar
  31. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  32. Eckert, H. (2005). Switzerland needs entrepreneurs again. Swiss Review, 4(4), 18–19.Google Scholar
  33. Ferreira, J. (2001). Corporate entrepreneurship: a strategic and structural perspective. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 59–71.Google Scholar
  34. Ferreira, J. (2002). Corporate entrepreneurship: a strategic and structural perspective, International Council for Small Business, 47th World Conference San Juan Puerto Rico, June 16–19.Google Scholar
  35. Flamholtz, E. G. (1983). Accounting, budgeting and control systems in their organisational context: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 8, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gul, F. A., Tsui, J. S. L., Fong, S. C. C., & Kwok, H. Y. L. (1995). Decentralization as a moderating factor in the budgetary participation-performance relationship: some Hong Kong evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 25, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gürol, Y., & Atsan, N. (2006). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education and Training, 48(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hagon, T. (1994). Putting the logistics manager in the driving seat. Logistics Information Management, 7(5), 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hayek, N. G., & Taylor, W. (1993). Message and muscle: an interview with Swatch Titan Nicolas Hayek. Harvard Business Review, 10, No. March–April, 98–110.Google Scholar
  41. Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Herbig, P., Golden, J. E., & Dunphy, S. (1994). The relationship of structure to entrepreneurial and innovative success. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 12(9), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, R., & Butler, J. E. (1992). Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship: an agency theory perspective. Journal of Management, 18(4), 733–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kandampully, J., & Duddy, R. (1999). Competitive advantage through anticipation, innovation and relationship. Management Decision, 37(1), 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Khan, A. M., & Manopichetwattana, V. (1989). Innovative and noninnovative small firms: types and characteristics. Management Science, 35(5), 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knight, G. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koh, H. C. (1996). Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(3), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krasna, B. (2003). Start-ups: life after the boom. Interview with Beth Krasna, CEO of Albert-Inc SA In: Vision, l (August), 16–22Google Scholar
  49. Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 934–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38(4), 45–56.Google Scholar
  51. Lieberman, M., & Montgomery, D. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lodato, M. W. (2006). Market definition is a multi-dimensional process. Integrated Sales Process Management: A Methodology for Improving Sales, Author house, http://www.businessprocesstrends.com/publicationfiles/06-06-ART-MarketDefinition-Lodato.pdf accessed date 12.3.2009.
  53. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  54. Lucas, B. (2005). Structured interviews. Performance Improvement, 44(8), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  56. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. MacMillan, I. C., & Day, D. L. (1987). Corporate ventures into industrial markets: dynamics of aggressive entry. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Martin, W. L., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2003). From entrepreneurial orientation to “family orientation:” Generational differences in the management of family businesses. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 309–321). Babson Park: Babson College.Google Scholar
  59. McFadzean, E., O’Loughlin, A., & Shaw, E. (2005). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 1: the missing link. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 350–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Megginson, L. C., Mosley, D. C., & Pietri, P. H., Jr. (1989). Management: Concepts & applications. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  61. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strategic Management Journal, Summer, 221–235.Google Scholar
  64. Milliken, J. (2001). Qualitative research and marketing management. Management Decision, 39(1), 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mitchell, V.-W., & Papavassiliou, V. (1997). Exploring consumer confusion in the watch market. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 15(4), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Morris, H., & Paul, G. W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. OECD Economic Surveys. (2006). What are the main challenges for the Swiss Innovation System? Source OECD, 2006(1), 1–156.Google Scholar
  68. Pang, M. (1999). The employment situation of young Chinese adults in the British labour market, vol. 28(1/and West Yorkshire 2): Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
  69. Park, J. S. (2005). Opportunity recognition and product innovation in entrepreneurial hi-tech start-ups: a new perspective and supporting case study. Technovation, 25(7), 739–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pavlovich, K., & Corner, P. D. (2006). Knowledge creation through co-entrepreneurship. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 1(1/2), 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rafiq, M., & Saxon, T. (2000). R&D and marketing integration in NPD in the pharmaceutical industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roland, G. (2004). Law and economics workshop: Entrepreneurship: First results from Russia. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  73. Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rowe, J. (2008). Studying strategy. Ventues Publishibg ApS.Google Scholar
  75. Sabaratnam, J. S. (1996). Planning the library of the future—The Singapore experience, 62nd IFLA General Conference—Conference Proceedings—August 25–31.Google Scholar
  76. Sathe, V. (1989). Fostering entrepreneurship in the large, diversified firm. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schlegelmilch, B., Diamantopoulos, A., & Kreuz, P. (2003). Strategic innovation: the constructs, its drivers and its strategic outcomes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(11), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Schumpeter, J. (1949). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history, change and the entrepreneur, pp. 63–84, reprinted in Schumpeter, J. (1989) Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles and the evolution of capitalism. In R. V. Clemence (Ed.), New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, pp. 253–231.Google Scholar
  80. Schumpeter, J. A. (1951). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In R. V. Clemence (Ed.), Essays on economic topics of Joseph Schumpeter. Port Washington: Kennikat.Google Scholar
  81. Segal, G., Borgia, D., & Schoenfeld, J. (2005). The motivation to become an entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Serrin, W. (1982). Impact on job market: divided predictions. The New York Times, Vol. March 28, No. http://www.nytimes.com/1982/03/28/jobs/impact-on-job-market-divided-predictions.html accessed date 12.5.2009.
  83. Slater, S., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). Intelligence generation and superior customer value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sloane, P. (2006). Break the rules to produce radical innovations. RealInnovation.com, http://www.realinnovation.com/content/c070611a.asp accessed 2.10.2009.
  86. Smart, D. T., & Conant, J. S. (1994). Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing competencies and organisational performance. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(3), 28–38.Google Scholar
  87. Srnka, K. J., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2007). From words to numbers: how to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. SBR, pp. 29–57.Google Scholar
  88. Stokes, D. (2000). Putting entrepreneurship into marketing: the processes of entrepreneurial marketing. Journal of Research in Marketing & Entrepreneurship, 2 (1,) Spring.Google Scholar
  89. Subramaniam, N., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2001). The effect of organizational culture perceptions on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial job-related outcomes. Australian Journal of Management, 26(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tajeddini, K. (2009). Perceptions of learning among Swiss watch managers. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(7), 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tajeddini, K., & Mueller, S. (2009). Entrepreneurial characteristics in Switzerland and the UK: a comparative study of techno-entrepreneurs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tajeddini, K., & Trueman, M. (2008). The potential for innovativeness: a tale of the Swiss watch industry. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1–2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tajeddini, K., Trueman, M., & Larsen, G. (2006). Examining the effect of market orientation on innovativeness. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(5–6), 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tan, J. (2008). Breaking the “bamboo curtain” and the “glass ceiling”: the experience of women entrepreneurs in high-tech industries in an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 547–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment-strategy co-evolution and co alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Taylor, M. J. (1987). Chinese pupils in Britain: A review of research into the education of pupils of Chinese origin. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  97. Taylor, W. (1993). Message and muscle: an interview with Swatch titan Nicolas Hayek. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 99–110.Google Scholar
  98. Thomas, A., & Mueller, S. A. (2000). Case for comparative entrepreneurship: assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tiessen, J. H. (1997). Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: a framework for international comparative research. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tixier, M. (1994). Management and communication styles in Europe: can they be compared and matched. Journal: Employee Relations, 16(1), 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Uttinger, H. W., & Papera, D. R. (1965). Threats to the Swiss Watch Cartel. Western Economic Journal (Economic Inquiry), 3(2), 200–216.Google Scholar
  102. Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an explorative study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zahra, S. A. (1999). The changing rules of global competitiveness in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Huse, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26(5), 947–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and ManagementLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.School of ManagementRitsumeikan Asia Pacific UniversityBeppuJapan
  3. 3.Northern Kentucky University, Haile/US Bank College of BusinessHighland HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations