Abstract
One of the basic premises of venture capital is leverage, which often means adding money and other resources to speed up growth. As a result, small- to medium-sized venture funded firms are expected to show significant growth at an early stage. Our research examines how equity based-venture funding methods affect SME performance and internationalization. We divide venture capital financing into several categories: incremental financing where firms receive their venture capital funding in portions, lump-sum funding where firms receive their funding in one lump-sum, syndication where two or more external investors participate in a single financing round and non-syndicated financing where one investor participates in a single financing round. The results show that type of equity-based venture capital financing affect performance and internationalization. Annual sales growth rate and annual turnover are used as proxies for performance. Export ratio is used as a proxy for internationalization. Staged financing and financing through a syndicate has a positive effect on performance and internationalization when used separately. We observe a negative effect when syndication and staged financing are used in combination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We wish to thank Anna Husman and Lotta Rahm for their research assistance, especially in the area of data collection.
The random error in the ordered PROBIT regression is assumed to follow a normal distribution.
References
Autio, E., Sapienza, H., & Almeida, J. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. (2001). The resource based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 26(4), 625–642.
Blydenburgh, J. C. (1971). Probit analysis: a method for coping with dichotomous dependent variables. Social Sciences Quarterly, 51(4), 889–899.
Brander, J., Amit, R., & Antweiler, W. (2002). Venture-capital syndication: improved venture selection vs. value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11(3), 423–452.
Carpenter, M., Pollock, T., & Leary, M. (2003). Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking: governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 803–820.
Casamatta, C., & Haritchabalet, C. (2007). Experience, screening and syndication in venture capital investments. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(3), 368–398.
Cassar, G. (2004). The financing of business start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 261–283.
Cook, D., Kieschnick, R., & McCullough, B. (2008). Regression analysis and proportion in finance with self-selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 15, 806–867.
Coviello, N., & McAuley, A. (1999). Internationalization and the small firm: a review of contemporary empirical research. Management International Review, 39(3), 223–256.
Cowling, M. (2004). The growth — profit nexus. Small Business Economics, 22, 1–9.
Cressy, R., & Olofsson, C. (1997). European SME financing: an overview. Small Business Economics, 9, 87–96.
Cumming, D. (2006). Adverse selection and capital structure: evidence from venture capital. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30(2), 155–183.
Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of start-up firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 689–708.
DeClercq, D., & Dimov, D. (2004). Explaining venture capital firms’s syndication behavior: a longitudinal study. Venture Capital, 6(4), 243–256.
Duffner, S. (2003). Principal-agent problems in venture finance. Working Paper, 11/03. University of Basel.
Fan, T., & Phillips, T. (2007). International new ventures: revisiting the influences behind the “Born-Global” firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(7), 1113–1131.
Fu, T., Ke, W., & Huang, Y. (2002). Capital growth, financing source and profitability of small business: evidence from Taiwan small enterprises. Small Business Economics, 18, 257–267.
Gankema, H., Snuif, H., & Zwart, P. (2000). The internationalization process of small and medium-sized enterprises: an evaluation of stage theory. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(4), 15–27.
George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. (2005). Ownership and internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31, 210–233.
Gompers, P. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance L, (5), 1461–1489.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm: four Swedish case studies. Journal of Management Studies, 12, 305–322.
Kaplan, S., & Stromberg, P. (2003). Venture capitalists as economic principals. NBER Reporter, X: 22–25.
Lee, D., & Tsang, E. (2001). The effects of entrepreneurship personality, background and network activity on venture growth. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 583–602.
Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Does venture capital syndication spur employee growth and shareholder value? Evidence from German IPO data. Small Business Economics, 26(5), 455–464.
Lerner, J. (1994). The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management, 23(3), 16–27.
Li, K., & Prabhala, N. (2005). Self-selection models in corporate finance. Working Paper No. RHS-06-020. Robert H. Smith School of Business.
Lockett, A., Wright, M., Burrows, A., Scholes, L., & Paton, D. (2008). The export intensity of venture capital backed companies. Small Business Economics, 31, 39–58.
Lu, J., & Beamish, P. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 565–586.
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neederlandica, 58(2), 127–137.
Mason, C. M., & Harrison, T. (2002). Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 211–236.
Orser, B., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Riding, A. (2000). Performance, firm size and management problem solving. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(4), 42–58.
Osnabrugge, M. (2000). A comparison of business angel and venture capitalists investment procedures: an agency theory-based analysis. Venture Capital, 2(2), 91–109.
Pruthi, S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2003). Do foreign and domestic venture capital firms differ in their monitoring of investees? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(2), 175–204.
Reid, G., Terry, N., & Smith, J. (1997). Risk management in venture capital investor-investee relations. The European Journal of Finance, 3, 27–47.
Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1986). The architecture of economic systems: hierarchies and polyarchies. American Economic Review, 716–727.
Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Ucbasaran, D. (2001). The internationalization of new and small firms: a resource based view. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 333–358.
Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2003). The structure and management alliances: syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management, 40(8), 2073–2102.
Acknowledgment
We would like to acknowledge the help of Lotta Rahm and Ana Husman in collecting the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smolarski, J., Kut, C. The impact of venture capital financing method on SME performance and internationalization. Int Entrep Manag J 7, 39–55 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0128-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0128-1