Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Formal and informal networks in small businesses in the media industry

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the formal and informal networks in small businesses in the media industry. Networks are important to small firms and are an integral part of the structure of the media industry. Technological changes and the proliferation of new channels have changed the nature of the television industry and this paper examines the role of networks in meeting these challenges. The research was based on questionnaires followed up with interviews. This study found that the social and cultural factors were important in the establishment and maintenance of both formal and informal networks. Low barriers to entry in terms of investment in fixed assets and powerful customers have meant that formal and informal networks play an important role in the survival and profitability of small firms in the media industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baines, S., & Robson, L. (2001). Being self-employed or being enterprising? The case of creative work for the media industry. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(4), 349–362. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnatt, C., & Starkey, K. (1994). The emergence of flexible networks in the UK Television Industry. British Journal of Management, 5, 251–260. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00077.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J., & Dutton, J. (1996). The embeddedness of strategy. In P. Shrivastava, A. S. Huff, & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management, vol. 13 (pp. 3–40). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, J., Hill, S., Munday, M., & Roberts, A. (2000). Assessing the role of the arts and the cultural industries in a local economy. Environment & Planning A, 32, 1391–1408. doi:10.1068/a32168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., Gabbay, S. M., Holt, G., & Moran, P. (1994). Contingent organization as a network theory: the culture-performance contingency function. Acta Sociologica, 34, 345–370. doi:10.1177/000169939403700404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante, E. (2004). Cultural Industries in the Digital Age: some provisional conclusions. Media, Culture and Society, Col., 26(6), 803–820. doi:10.1177/0163443704047027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capo-Vicedo, J., Exposito-Langa, M., & Molina-Morales, F. X. (2008). Improving SME competitiveness reinforcing interorganisational networks in industrial clusters. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (1998). Strategy process, content, context. London: International Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Media, Culture and Sport (2004). Creative industries economic estimates: Statistical bulletin. London: Department for Media, Culture and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). Managing through networks: some issues and implications for the NHS. British Journal of Management, 7(1), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller-love, N., & Thomas, E. (2004). Networks in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(2), 244–253. doi:10.1108/14626000410537182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M. (1992). Alliance capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, S. A., & Fleck, V. (1987). Business strategies in small high technology companies. Long Range Planning, 20(2), 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 291–309. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with your Competitors—and Win. Harvard Business Review, January/February, 133–139.

  • Hirsch, P. M. (2000). Cultural industries revisited. Organization Science, 11(3), 356–361. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.3.356.12498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41. doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, R. E., & Johnsen, T. E. (1999). International market development through networks: The case of the Ayrshire knitwear sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 5(6), 297–312. doi:10.1108/13552559910306114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., Comfort, D., Eastwood, I., & Hillier, D. (2004). Creative industries: Economic contributions, management challenges and support initiatives. Management Research News, 27(11/12), 134–141. doi:10.1108/01409170410784644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1994). Collaborative advantage: the art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, July/August, 96–108.

  • Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G. M., & Choi, C. J. (1999). Increasing returns and social contagion in cultural industries. British Journal of Management, 10, S61–S72. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.10.s1.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners. California Management Review, 37(Spring), 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, K., & Farmer, D. (1979). Redefining the boundaries of the firm. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 277–285. doi:10.2307/2098322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moensted, M. (2007). Strategic networking in small high tech firms. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 3, 15–27. doi:10.1007/s11365-006-0019-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saundry, R. (1998). The limits of flexibility: the case of UK Television. British Journal of Management, 9, 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., Barnatt, C., & Tempest, S. (2000). Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. Television Industry. Organization Science, 11(3), 299–305. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.3.299.12500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(No.1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. (1988). Network analysis for cooperative interfirm relationships. In F. Contractor, & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 227–240). Lexington, KY: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbaum, M., & Hughes, S. (1996). The Bamboo Network: How expatriate Chinese entrepreneurs are creating a new economic superpower in Asia. New York: Martin Kessler Books.

  • Welter, F., & Kautonen, T. (2005). Trust, social networks and enterprise development: exploring evidence from East and West Germany. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 367–379. doi:10.1007/s11365-005-2601-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. (1997). Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 366–394. doi:10.2307/2393924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. (1997). Shadows and substance. Llandysul, Ceredigion: Gomer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis of antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nerys Fuller-Love.

Additional information

This research was funded by the Economic and Social Science Research Council, award number R000221667.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuller-Love, N. Formal and informal networks in small businesses in the media industry. Int Entrep Manag J 5, 271–284 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0102-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0102-3

Keywords

Navigation