The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction

Abstract

The main argument of the presentation of this special issue is that entrepreneurship research based on institutional theory is a promising field of research. After a brief explanation of the nature, scope and philosophical foundation of institutional theory and the distinction between old and new institutionalism, an attempt is made to justify why entrepreneurship research using the institutional approach is promising. A reference to some previous research in this field illustrates not only its potential but also the long tradition in institutional economics. A brief reference to the content of each of the articles included in this special issue closes this presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aponte, M. (2002). Factores condicionantes de la creación de empresas en Puerto Rico: Un enfoque institucional. Doctoral thesis. Departament d’Economia de l’Empresa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

  2. Autio, E., Keeley, R. H., Klofsen, M., & Ulfsedt, T. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: testing an intent model in Asia, Scandinavia, and USA. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Massachusetts: Babson College.

  3. Ayres, C. E. (1952). The industrial economy. Boston: Houhgton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ayres, C. E. (1962). The theory of economic progress (2nd ed.). New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bosma, N., Jones, K., Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2008). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2007 Executive Report. London: London Business School.

  6. Brautigam, D. (1997). Substituting for the state: Institutions and industrial development in Eastern Nigeria. World Development, 25(7), 1063–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Busenitz, L. W., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institucional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Review, 43(5), 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carree, M., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennerkers, S. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: an analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19, 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carree, M., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2007). The relationship between economic development and business ownership revised. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 10, 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll, J. (1965). The Filipino manufacturing entrepreneur: Agent and product of change. New York: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica N.S., 4, 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cochran, T. C. (1960). Cultural factors in economic growth. Journal of Economic History, 20(4), 515–530.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Commons, J. R. (1924). The legal foundations of capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dana, L. D. (1987). Entrepreneurship and venture creation—An international comparison of five commonwealth nations. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Massachusetts: Babson College.

  15. Dana, L. D. (1990). Saint Martin/Sint Maarten: A case study of the effects of culture on economic development. Journal of Small Business Management, 28(4), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson, P. (1991). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Derrida, J. (2001). Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In J. Derrida (Ed.) Writing and difference. Florence: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Díaz, J. C. (2003). La Creación de Empresas en Extremadura. Un Análisis Institucional. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Extremadura.

  19. Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Foucault, D. E. (2005). The archeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (1991). The new institutional economics: An assessment. In E. G Furubotn, & R. Richter (Eds.) The new institutional economics. College Station, Texas: A & M Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (1997). Institutions and economic theory. The contribution of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Genescà, E., & Veciana, J. M. (1984). Actitudes hacia la creación de empresas. Información Comercial Española, 611, 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gruchy, A. G. (1972). Contemporary economic thought. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jacoby, S. M. (1990). The new institutionalism: What can it learn from the old? Industrial Relations, 29(2), 316–359.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jeremy, D. (1984). Anatomy of the British business elite, 1860–1980. Business History, 26, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Korsgaard, S. (2007). Rewriting the opportunity theory. Paper presented at RENT XXI, Cardiff.

  30. Kostova, T. (1997). Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Academy of Management Proceedings, pp 180–184.

  31. Litwack, J. M. (1993). Issues in the creation of fiscal legality in the economies of the former USSR. Eastern Economic Journal, 19(3), 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey, & E. Amonson (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology (pp. 137–230, 3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nee, V. (1992). Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nee, V., & Young, F. W. (1991). Peasant entrepreneurs in China’s second economy: An institutional analysis. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39(2), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  36. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  38. North, D. C. (1993). Prize lecture. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, Stockholm, December 9.

  39. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Royle, N. (2003). Jacques Derrida. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rubio, E. A., Cordon, E., & Agote, A. L. (1999). Actitudes hacia la creación de empresas un modelo explicativo. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(3), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rutherford, M. (1995). The old and the new institutionalism: Can bridges be built? Journal of Economic Issues, 29(2), 443–451.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rutherford, M. (2000). Understanding institutionalism between the wars. Journal of Economic Issues, 22, 277–308.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schmölders, G. (1971). Der Unternemher im Ansehen der Wlet. Bergisch Gladbach: Gustav Lübke.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutions and organizations. Towards a theoretical synthesis. In W. R. Scott, & J. W. Meyer (Eds.) Institutional environments and organizations. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenhalm: Edgar Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Singh, S. (1985). Relevance of social factors in entrepreneurial growth. Journal of Sociological Studies, 4, 72–85.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stanfield, J. R. (1999). The scope, method, and significance of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 13(2), 231–255.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stephen, F., Urbano, D., & Van Hemmen, S. (2005). The impact of institutions on entrepreneurial activity. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 413–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Takyi-asiedu, S. (1993). Some socio-cultural factors retarding entrepreneurial activity in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tiessen, J. H. (1997). Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Urbano, D. (2003). Factores condicionantes de la creación de empresas en Catalunya. Un enfoque institucional. Doctoral thesis. Departament d’Economia de l’Empresa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. An abridged English version has been published under the title “New business creation in Catalonia: support measures and attitudes towards entrepreneurship”. Barcelona: Col.lecció d’estudis CIDEM.

  55. Veblen, T. B. (1914). The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts. Reprint. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Veblen, T. B. (1898/1961). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? In The place of science in modern civilisation (pp 56–81). New York: Russell and Russell.

  57. Veblen, T. B. (1967). Absentee ownership and business enterprise in recent times. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Veciana, J. M. (1999). Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(3), 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Veciana, J. M. (2006). The RENT conferences over the last 20 years. Highlights and Research Trends. Keynote Speech at RENT XX, Brussels, 22–24 November.

  60. Veciana, J. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship as a scientific research programme. In A. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro, & S. Roig (Eds.) Entrepreneurship: Concepts, theory and perspective (pp. 23–71). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M., & Urbano, D. (2005). University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: A two countries comparison. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Weber, M. (1964). Asketischer Protestantismus und Kapitalistischer Geist. In M. Weber (Ed.) Soziologie, Welgeschiichliche Analysen, Politik. Stuttgart: Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24, 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José María Veciana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veciana, J.M., Urbano, D. The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction. Int Entrep Manage J 4, 365–379 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0081-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Institutional theory
  • institutional economics
  • entrepreneurship research.