Advertisement

The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction

Abstract

The main argument of the presentation of this special issue is that entrepreneurship research based on institutional theory is a promising field of research. After a brief explanation of the nature, scope and philosophical foundation of institutional theory and the distinction between old and new institutionalism, an attempt is made to justify why entrepreneurship research using the institutional approach is promising. A reference to some previous research in this field illustrates not only its potential but also the long tradition in institutional economics. A brief reference to the content of each of the articles included in this special issue closes this presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aponte, M. (2002). Factores condicionantes de la creación de empresas en Puerto Rico: Un enfoque institucional. Doctoral thesis. Departament d’Economia de l’Empresa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

  2. Autio, E., Keeley, R. H., Klofsen, M., & Ulfsedt, T. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: testing an intent model in Asia, Scandinavia, and USA. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Massachusetts: Babson College.

  3. Ayres, C. E. (1952). The industrial economy. Boston: Houhgton Mifflin.

  4. Ayres, C. E. (1962). The theory of economic progress (2nd ed.). New York: Schocken.

  5. Bosma, N., Jones, K., Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2008). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2007 Executive Report. London: London Business School.

  6. Brautigam, D. (1997). Substituting for the state: Institutions and industrial development in Eastern Nigeria. World Development, 25(7), 1063–1080.

  7. Busenitz, L. W., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institucional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Review, 43(5), 994–1003.

  8. Carree, M., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennerkers, S. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: an analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19, 271–290.

  9. Carree, M., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2007). The relationship between economic development and business ownership revised. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 10, 281–291.

  10. Carroll, J. (1965). The Filipino manufacturing entrepreneur: Agent and product of change. New York: Cornell University.

  11. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica N.S., 4, 386–405.

  12. Cochran, T. C. (1960). Cultural factors in economic growth. Journal of Economic History, 20(4), 515–530.

  13. Commons, J. R. (1924). The legal foundations of capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

  14. Dana, L. D. (1987). Entrepreneurship and venture creation—An international comparison of five commonwealth nations. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Massachusetts: Babson College.

  15. Dana, L. D. (1990). Saint Martin/Sint Maarten: A case study of the effects of culture on economic development. Journal of Small Business Management, 28(4), 91–98.

  16. Davidson, P. (1991). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 405–429.

  17. Derrida, J. (2001). Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In J. Derrida (Ed.) Writing and difference. Florence: Routledge.

  18. Díaz, J. C. (2003). La Creación de Empresas en Extremadura. Un Análisis Institucional. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Extremadura.

  19. Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  20. Foucault, D. E. (2005). The archeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.

  21. Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (1991). The new institutional economics: An assessment. In E. G Furubotn, & R. Richter (Eds.) The new institutional economics. College Station, Texas: A & M Press.

  22. Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (1997). Institutions and economic theory. The contribution of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press.

  23. Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95–111.

  24. Genescà, E., & Veciana, J. M. (1984). Actitudes hacia la creación de empresas. Información Comercial Española, 611, 147–155.

  25. Gruchy, A. G. (1972). Contemporary economic thought. London: Macmillan.

  26. Jacoby, S. M. (1990). The new institutionalism: What can it learn from the old? Industrial Relations, 29(2), 316–359.

  27. Jeremy, D. (1984). Anatomy of the British business elite, 1860–1980. Business History, 26, 3–23.

  28. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  29. Korsgaard, S. (2007). Rewriting the opportunity theory. Paper presented at RENT XXI, Cardiff.

  30. Kostova, T. (1997). Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Academy of Management Proceedings, pp 180–184.

  31. Litwack, J. M. (1993). Issues in the creation of fiscal legality in the economies of the former USSR. Eastern Economic Journal, 19(3), 335–345.

  32. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey, & E. Amonson (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology (pp. 137–230, 3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

  33. Nee, V. (1992). Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 1–27.

  34. Nee, V., & Young, F. W. (1991). Peasant entrepreneurs in China’s second economy: An institutional analysis. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39(2), 293–310.

  35. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.

  36. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  37. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.

  38. North, D. C. (1993). Prize lecture. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, Stockholm, December 9.

  39. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: University Press.

  40. Royle, N. (2003). Jacques Derrida. London: Routledge.

  41. Rubio, E. A., Cordon, E., & Agote, A. L. (1999). Actitudes hacia la creación de empresas un modelo explicativo. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(3), 37–52.

  42. Rutherford, M. (1995). The old and the new institutionalism: Can bridges be built? Journal of Economic Issues, 29(2), 443–451.

  43. Rutherford, M. (2000). Understanding institutionalism between the wars. Journal of Economic Issues, 22, 277–308.

  44. Schmölders, G. (1971). Der Unternemher im Ansehen der Wlet. Bergisch Gladbach: Gustav Lübke.

  45. Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutions and organizations. Towards a theoretical synthesis. In W. R. Scott, & J. W. Meyer (Eds.) Institutional environments and organizations. California: Sage.

  46. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. California: Sage.

  47. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.

  48. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenhalm: Edgar Elgar.

  49. Singh, S. (1985). Relevance of social factors in entrepreneurial growth. Journal of Sociological Studies, 4, 72–85.

  50. Stanfield, J. R. (1999). The scope, method, and significance of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 13(2), 231–255.

  51. Stephen, F., Urbano, D., & Van Hemmen, S. (2005). The impact of institutions on entrepreneurial activity. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 413–419.

  52. Takyi-asiedu, S. (1993). Some socio-cultural factors retarding entrepreneurial activity in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 91–98.

  53. Tiessen, J. H. (1997). Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 367–384.

  54. Urbano, D. (2003). Factores condicionantes de la creación de empresas en Catalunya. Un enfoque institucional. Doctoral thesis. Departament d’Economia de l’Empresa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. An abridged English version has been published under the title “New business creation in Catalonia: support measures and attitudes towards entrepreneurship”. Barcelona: Col.lecció d’estudis CIDEM.

  55. Veblen, T. B. (1914). The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts. Reprint. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

  56. Veblen, T. B. (1898/1961). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? In The place of science in modern civilisation (pp 56–81). New York: Russell and Russell.

  57. Veblen, T. B. (1967). Absentee ownership and business enterprise in recent times. Boston: Beacon.

  58. Veciana, J. M. (1999). Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(3), 11–36.

  59. Veciana, J. M. (2006). The RENT conferences over the last 20 years. Highlights and Research Trends. Keynote Speech at RENT XX, Brussels, 22–24 November.

  60. Veciana, J. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship as a scientific research programme. In A. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro, & S. Roig (Eds.) Entrepreneurship: Concepts, theory and perspective (pp. 23–71). Heidelberg: Springer.

  61. Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M., & Urbano, D. (2005). University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: A two countries comparison. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165–182.

  62. Weber, M. (1964). Asketischer Protestantismus und Kapitalistischer Geist. In M. Weber (Ed.) Soziologie, Welgeschiichliche Analysen, Politik. Stuttgart: Kröner.

  63. Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24, 293–309.

  64. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to José María Veciana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veciana, J.M., Urbano, D. The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction. Int Entrep Manage J 4, 365–379 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0081-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Institutional theory
  • institutional economics
  • entrepreneurship research.