Skip to main content

Once-daily feeding is associated with better health in companion dogs: results from the Dog Aging Project

GeroScience volume 44, pages 1779–1790 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

A variety of diets have been studied for possible anti-aging effects. In particular, studies of intermittent fasting and time-restricted feeding in laboratory rodents have found evidence of beneficial health outcomes. Companion dogs represent a unique opportunity to study diet in a large mammal that shares human environments. The Dog Aging Project has been collecting data on thousands of companion dogs of all different ages, sizes, and breeds since 2019. We leveraged this diverse cross-sectional dataset to investigate associations between feeding frequency and cognitive function (n = 10,474) as well as nine broad categories of health conditions (n = 24,238). Controlling for sex, age, breed, and other potential confounders, we found that dogs fed once daily rather than more frequently had lower mean scores on a cognitive dysfunction scale, and lower odds of having gastrointestinal, dental, orthopedic, kidney/urinary, and liver/pancreas disorders. Therefore, we find that once-daily feeding is associated with better health in multiple domains. Future research with longitudinal data can provide stronger evidence for a possible causal effect of feeding frequency on health in companion dogs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

These data are housed on the Terra platform at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.

Code availability

This study did not use custom code or mathematical algorithms.

References

  1. Weindruch R, Walford RL. The retardation of aging and disease by dietary restriction. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Pub Limited. 1988.

  2. Anderson RM, Weindruch R. The caloric restriction paradigm: implications for healthy human aging. Am J Hum Biol. 2012;24:101–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattison JA, Colman RJ, Beasley TM, et al. Caloric restriction improves health and survival of rhesus monkeys. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14063.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kealy RD, Lawler DF, Ballam JM, et al. Effects of diet restriction on life span and age-related changes in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;220:1315–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawler DF, Larson BT, Ballam JM, et al. Diet restriction and ageing in the dog: major observations over two decades. Br J Nutr. 2008;99:793–805.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee MB, Hill CM, Bitto A, Kaeberlein M. Antiaging diets: separating fact from fiction. Science. 2021;374:eabe7365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mattson MP, Longo VD, Harvie M. Impact of intermittent fasting on health and disease processes. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:46–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Cabo R, Mattson MP. Effects of intermittent fasting on health, aging, and disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2541–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandhorst S, Choi IY, Wei M, et al. A periodic diet that mimics fasting promotes multi-system regeneration, enhanced cognitive performance, and healthspan. Cell Metab. 2015;22:86–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei M, Brandhorst S, Shelehchi M, et al. Fasting-mimicking diet and markers/risk factors for aging, diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aai8700.

  11. Newman JC, Covarrubias AJ, Zhao M, et al. Ketogenic diet reduces midlife mortality and improves memory in aging mice. Cell Metab. 2017;26:547-557.e8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts MN, Wallace MA, Tomilov AA, et al. A ketogenic diet extends longevity and healthspan in adult mice. Cell Metab. 2017;26:539-546.e5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bostock ECS, Kirkby KC, Taylor BVM. The current status of the ketogenic diet in psychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung YB, Cave NJ, Heiser A, et al. Metabolic and immunological effects of intermittent fasting on a ketogenic diet containing medium-chain triglycerides in healthy dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Packer RMA, Law TH, Davies E, et al. Effects of a ketogenic diet on ADHD-like behavior in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;55:62–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hill CM, Kaeberlein M. Anti-ageing effects of protein restriction unpacked. Nature. 2021;589:357–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirzaei H, Raynes R, Longo VD. The conserved role of protein restriction in aging and disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2016;19:74–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell SJ, Bernier M, Mattison JA, et al. Daily fasting improves health and survival in male mice independent of diet composition and calories. Cell Metab. 2019;29:221-228.e3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gill S, Le HD, Melkani GC, Panda S. Time-restricted feeding attenuates age-related cardiac decline in Drosophila. Science. 2015;347:1265–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Longo VD, Panda S. Fasting, circadian rhythms, and time-restricted feeding in healthy lifespan. Cell Metab. 2016;23:1048–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hatori M, Vollmers C, Zarrinpar A, et al. Time-restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet. Cell Metab. 2012;15:848–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez-Lopez N, Tarabra E, Toledo M, et al. System-wide benefits of intermeal fasting by autophagy. Cell Metab. 2017;26:856-871.e5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chaix A, Zarrinpar A, Miu P, Panda S. Time-restricted feeding is a preventative and therapeutic intervention against diverse nutritional challenges. Cell Metab. 2014;20:991–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang F, Chu X, Yin M, et al. mTOR and autophagy in normal brain aging and caloric restriction ameliorating age-related cognition deficits. Behav Brain Res. 2014;264:82–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin BK, Kang S, Da Sol K, Park S. Intermittent fasting protects against the deterioration of cognitive function, energy metabolism and dyslipidemia in Alzheimer’s disease-induced estrogen deficient rats. Exp Biol Med. 2018;243:334–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vasconcelos AR, Yshii LM, Viel TA, et al. Intermittent fasting attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation and memory impairment. J Neuroinflamm. 2014;11:85.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li L, Wang Z, Zuo Z. Chronic intermittent fasting improves cognitive functions and brain structures in mice. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66069.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh R, Lakhanpal D, Kumar S, et al. Late-onset intermittent fasting dietary restriction as a potential intervention to retard age-associated brain function impairments in male rats. Age. 2012;34:917–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stote KS, Baer DJ, Spears K, et al. A controlled trial of reduced meal frequency without caloric restriction in healthy, normal-weight, middle-aged adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:981–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cienfuegos S, Gabel K, Kalam F, et al. Effects of 4- and 6-h time-restricted feeding on weight and cardiometabolic health: a randomized controlled trial in adults with obesity. Cell Metab. 2020;32:366-378.e3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carlson O, Martin B, Stote KS, et al. Impact of reduced meal frequency without caloric restriction on glucose regulation in healthy, normal-weight middle-aged men and women. Metabolism. 2007;56:1729–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Witte AV, Fobker M, Gellner R, et al. Caloric restriction improves memory in elderly humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1255–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Leclerc E, Trevizol AP, Grigolon RB, et al. The effect of caloric restriction on working memory in healthy non-obese adults. CNS Spectr. 2020;25:2–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Qasrawi SO, Pandi-Perumal SR, BaHammam AS. The effect of intermittent fasting during Ramadan on sleep, sleepiness, cognitive function, and circadian rhythm. Sleep Breath. 2017;21:577–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harder-Lauridsen NM, Rosenberg A, Benatti FB, et al. Ramadan model of intermittent fasting for 28 d had no major effect on body composition, glucose metabolism, or cognitive functions in healthy lean men. Nutrition. 2017;37:92–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoffman JM, Creevy KE, Franks A, et al. The companion dog as a model for human aging and mortality. Aging Cell. 2018;17:e12737.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Perri AR, Feuerborn TR, Frantz LAF, et al. Dog domestication and the dual dispersal of people and dogs into the Americas. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2010083118.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee JH, Verma N, Thakkar N, et al. Intermittent fasting: physiological implications on outcomes in mice and men. Physiology. 2020;35:185–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaeberlein M, Creevy KE, Promislow DEL. The dog aging project: translational geroscience in companion animals. Mamm Genome. 2016;27:279–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Creevy KE, Akey JM, Kaeberlein M, et al. An open science study of ageing in companion dogs. Nature. 2022;602:51–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dog Aging Project. Dog Aging Project - 2020 Curated Data Release, version 1.1 [Data file and codebook]. 2021. https://app.terra.bio/. Terra at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.

  42. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Salvin HE, McGreevy PD, Sachdev PS, Valenzuela MJ. The canine cognitive dysfunction rating scale (CCDR): a data-driven and ecologically relevant assessment tool. Vet J. 2011;188:331–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Studzinski C, Christie L, Araujo J, et al. Visuospatial function in the beagle dog: an early marker of cognitive decline in a model of human aging and dementia. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2006;86:197–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Harvey ND. How Old Is My Dog? Identification of rational age groupings in pet dogs based upon normative age-linked processes. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:643085.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Packer RMA, McGreevy PD, Salvin HE, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in naturally occurring canine idiopathic epilepsy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192182.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ogilvie GK, Fettman MJ, Mallinckrodt CH, et al. Effect of fish oil, arginine, and doxorubicin chemotherapy on remission and survival time for dogs with lymphoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1916–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zicker SC, Jewell DE, Yamka RM, Milgram NW. Evaluation of cognitive learning, memory, psychomotor, immunologic, and retinal functions in healthy puppies fed foods fortified with docosahexaenoic acid–rich fish oil from 8 to 52 weeks of age. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;241:583–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brown SA, Brown CA, Crowell WA, et al. Beneficial effects of chronic administration of dietary ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in dogs with renal insufficiency. J Lab Clin Med. 1998;131:447–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Freeman LM, Rush JE, Markwell PJ. Effects of dietary modification in dogs with early chronic valvular disease. J Vet Intern Med. 2006;20:1116–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mueller RS, Fettman MJ, Richardson K, et al. Plasma and skin concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids before and after supplementation with n-3 fatty acids in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Am J Vet Res. 2005;66:868–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hickman MA, Anne Hickman M. Interventional nutrition for gastrointestinal disease. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 1998;13:211–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Fritsch D, Allen TA, Dodd CE, et al. Dose-titration effects of fish oil in osteoarthritic dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2010;24:1020–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Comblain F, Serisier S, Barthelemy N, et al. Review of dietary supplements for the management of osteoarthritis in dogs in studies from 2004 to 2014. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2016;39:1–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hadley KB, Bauer J, Milgram NW. The oil-rich alga Schizochytrium sp. as a dietary source of docosahexaenoic acid improves shape discrimination learning associated with visual processing in a canine model of senescence. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2017;118:10–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Cotman CW, Berchtold NC. Physical activity and the maintenance of cognition: learning from animal models. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:S30–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Milgram NW, Siwak-Tapp CT, Araujo J, Head E. Neuroprotective effects of cognitive enrichment. Ageing Res Rev. 2006;5:354–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.

  60. Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer. 2001;20–24.

  61. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1373–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Regmi P, Heilbronn LK. Time-restricted eating: benefits, mechanisms, and challenges in translation. iScience. 2020;23:101161.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Zlotnick M, Corrigan V, Griffin E, et al. Incidence of health and behavior problems in service dog candidates neutered at various ages. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:334.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Simpson M, Albright S, Wolfe B, et al. Age at gonadectomy and risk of overweight/obesity and orthopedic injury in a cohort of Golden Retrievers. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0209131.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Raghavan M, Glickman N, McCabe G, et al. Diet-related risk factors for gastric dilatation-volvulus in dogs of high-risk breeds. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2004;40:192–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Dog Aging Project thanks study participants, their dogs, and community veterinarians for their important contributions.

Dog Aging Project Consortium Authors

Joshua M. Akey1, Brooke Benton2, Elhanan Borenstein3,4,5, Marta G. Castelhano6, Amanda E. Coleman7, Kate E. Creevy8, Kyle Crowder9,10, Matthew D. Dunbar10, Virginia R. Fajt11, Annette L. Fitzpatrick12,13,14, Unity Jeffrey15, Erica C. Jonlin2,16, Elinor K. Karlsson17,18, Jonathan M. Levine8, Jing Ma19, Robyn L. McClelland20, Daniel E.L. Promislow2,21, Audrey Ruple22, Stephen M. Schwartz13,23, Sandi Shrager24, Noah Snyder-Mackler25,26,27, Silvan R. Urfer2, Benjamin S. Wilfond28,29

1Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

3Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

4Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

5Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA

6Cornell Veterinary Biobank, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

7Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

8Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, USA

9Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

10Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

11Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, USA

12Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

13Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

14Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

15Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, USA

16Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

17Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

18Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

19Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA

20Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

21Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

22Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

23Epidemiology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA

24Department of Biostatistics, Collaborative Health Studies Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

25School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

26Center for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

27School for Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

28Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA

29Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

Funding

The Dog Aging Project is supported by U19AG057377 and R24AG073137 from the National Institute on Aging, a part of the National Institutes of Health, and by additional grants and private donations. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona Canine Cognition Center, School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Emily E. Bray

  2. Canine Companions for Independence, National Headquarters, Santa Rosa, CA, USA

    Emily E. Bray

  3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Zihan Zheng & Kathleen F. Kerr

  4. Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    M. Katherine Tolbert

  5. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Brianah M. McCoy

  6. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Matt Kaeberlein

Authors
  1. Emily E. Bray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zihan Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Katherine Tolbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brianah M. McCoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matt Kaeberlein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kathleen F. Kerr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

Dog Aging Project Consortium

  • Joshua M. Akey
  • , Brooke Benton
  • , Elhanan Borenstein
  • , Marta G. Castelhano
  • , Amanda E. Coleman
  • , Kate E. Creevy
  • , Kyle Crowder
  • , Matthew D. Dunbar
  • , Virginia R. Fajt
  • , Annette L. Fitzpatrick
  • , Unity Jeffrey
  • , Erica C. Jonlin
  • , Elinor K. Karlsson
  • , Jonathan M. Levine
  • , Jing Ma
  • , Robyn L. McClelland
  • , Daniel E. L. Promislow
  • , Audrey Ruple
  • , Stephen M. Schwartz
  • , Sandi Shrager
  • , Noah Snyder-Mackler
  • , Silvan R. Urfer
  •  & Benjamin S. Wilfond

Contributions

All authors contributed to writing — review and editing. E.B.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing — original draft, and project administration. Z.Z.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and visualization. K.T.: conceptualization and data curation. B.M.: data curation. DAP consortium: resources. M.K.: conceptualization, writing — original draft, and funding acquisition. K.K.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing — original draft, visualization, project administration, and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily E. Bray.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11357_2022_575_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file1 Supplementary Information 1: Summary of the inclusion and exclusion criteria for subjects across all analyses, including guidelines for how all relevant variables were coded. (PDF 241 KB)

11357_2022_575_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file2 Supplementary Information 2: Criteria for determining whether or not a dog had a history of training (coded as a binary variable). (PDF 159 KB)

11357_2022_575_MOESM3_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file3 Supplementary Information 3: Regression outputs from the CSLB analysis, as well as the regression outputs from the health outcome analyses (both primary and secondary). (PDF 304 KB)

11357_2022_575_MOESM4_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file4 Supplementary Information 4: Complete list of purebred dogs (n = 76) included in the CSLB analysis, with sample sizes. (PDF 144 KB)

11357_2022_575_MOESM5_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file5 Supplementary Information 5: Complete list of purebred dogs (n = 100) included in analysis of health conditions, with sample sizes. (PDF 147 KB)

11357_2022_575_MOESM6_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file6 Supplementary Information 6: Secondary Analyses of four-level unordered categorical feeding frequency. (PDF 303 KB)

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bray, E.E., Zheng, Z., Tolbert, M.K. et al. Once-daily feeding is associated with better health in companion dogs: results from the Dog Aging Project. GeroScience 44, 1779–1790 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00575-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00575-7

Keywords

  • Canine
  • Canine cognitive dysfunction
  • Feeding frequency
  • Healthy aging
  • Time-restricted feeding