Abstract
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are wastewater treatment technologies that stand out for their ability to degrade Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs). The literature has extensively investigated these removal processes for different aqueous matrices. Once technically mature, some of these systems have become accredited to be applied on a large scale, and therefore, their systemic performances in the environmental and cost spheres have also become essential requirements. This study proposed corroborating this trend, analyzing the available literature on the subject to verify how experts in the AOP area investigated this integration during 2015–2023. For this purpose, a sample of publications was treated by applying the Systematic Review (SR) methodology. This resulted in an extract of 83 studies that adopted life-cycle logic to estimate environmental impacts and process costs or evaluated them as complementary to the technical dimension of each treatment technology. This analysis found that both dimensions can be used for selecting or sizing AOPs at the design scale. However, the appropriate choice of the impact categories for the environmental assessment and establishing a methodology for cost analysis can make the approach still more effective. In addition, a staggering number of processes would broaden the reality and applicability of the estimates, and adopting multicriteria analysis methodologies could address essential aspects of decision-making processes during the design of the arrangements. By meeting the original purposes, the study broadened the requirements for designing AOPs and disseminating their use in mitigating the discharge of CECs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ARD :
-
Abiotic resource depletion
- AP :
-
Acidification potential
- AOPs :
-
Advanced oxidation processes
- AEP :
-
Aquatic eutrophication potential
- ATZ :
-
Atrazine
- AZO :
-
Azoxystrobin
- BPA :
-
Bisphenol A
- BDD :
-
Boron-doped diamond
- CAPEX :
-
Capital expenditure
- CO 2 :
-
Carbon dioxide
- COD :
-
Chemical oxygen demand
- CPC :
-
Compound parabolic concentrator
- CECs :
-
Contaminants of emerging concern
- CDEO :
-
Diamond-driven electrochemical oxidation
- DFZ :
-
Difenoconazole
- E EO :
-
Electric energy per order
- EO :
-
Electrochemical oxidation
- EPA :
-
Environmental Protection Agency
- EU :
-
European Union
- FO :
-
Forward osmosis
- FWET :
-
Freshwater ecotoxicity
- FATP :
-
Freshwater aquatic toxicity potential
- FU :
-
Functional unit
- GWP :
-
Global warming potential
- HTP :
-
Human toxicity potential
- H 2 O 2 :
-
Hydrogen peroxide
- IMD :
-
Imidacloprid
- kWh :
-
Kilowatt-hours
- LCA :
-
Life Cycle Assessment
- LCIA :
-
Life Cycle Impact Assessment
- LCC :
-
Life cycle costing
- LPRO :
-
Low-pressure reverse osmosis
- MBR :
-
Microbiological membrane reactor
- MF :
-
Microfiltration
- MCDA :
-
Multicriteria decision-making analysis
- NF :
-
Nanofiltration
- NPV :
-
Net present value
- OPEX :
-
Operational expenditure
- ODP :
-
Ozone depletion potential
- PS :
-
Persulfate
- PPCPs :
-
Pharmaceutical and personal care products
- HP :
-
Photocatalysis
- POFP :
-
Photochemical ozone formation potential
- PF :
-
Photo-Fenton
- PED :
-
Primary energy demand
- RO :
-
Reverse osmosis
- SB :
-
Solabox
- SSZ :
-
Sulfasalazine
- SR :
-
Systematic review
- TiO 2 :
-
Titanium dioxide
- TOC :
-
Total organic carbon
- UF :
-
Ultrafiltration
- USA :
-
United States of America
- UFSCar :
-
University of São Carlos
- VUV :
-
Vacuum ultraviolet
- H 2 O :
-
Water
References
Ahangarnokolaei MA, Attarian P, Ayati B, Ganjidoust H, Rizzo L (2021) Life cycle assessment of sequential and simultaneous combination of electrocoagulation and ozonation for textile wastewater treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 9:106251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106251
Ameta R, Chohadia AK, Jain A, Punjabi PB (2018) Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. In: Ameta SR, Ameta R (eds) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: emerging green chemical technology. Academic Press, London, pp 49–87
Arzate S, Pfister S, Oberschelp C, Sánchez-Pérez JA (2019) Environmental impacts of an advanced oxidation process as tertiary treatment in a wastewater treatment plant. Sci Total Environ 694:133572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.378
Azapagic A, Clift R (1999) The application of Life Cycle Assessment to process optimization. Comput Chem Eng 23:1509–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00308-7
Baratsas SG, Pistikopoulos EN, Avraamidou SA (2021) Systems engineering framework for the optimization of food supply chains under circular economy considerations. Sci Total Environ 794:148726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148726
Belalcázar-Saldarriaga A, Prato-Garcia D, Vasquez-Medrano R (2018) Photo-Fenton processes in raceway reactors: technical, economic, and environmental implications during treatment of colored wastewaters. J Clean Prod 182:818–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.058
Bhargava N, Bahadur N, Kansal A (2023) Techno-economic assessment of integrated photochemical AOPs for sustainable treatment of textile and dyeing wastewater. J Water Process Eng 56:104302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104302
Bilotta GS, Milner AM, Boyd I (2014) On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies. Environ Sci Policy 42:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010
Boal AK, Rhodes C, Garcia S (2015) Pump-and-Treat groundwater remediation using chlorine/ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes. Ground Monit Rem 35:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12095
Bolton JR, Bircher KG, Tumas W, Tolman CA (1996) Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation processes. J Adv Oxid Technol 1:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/jaots-1996-0104
Boucher V, Beaudon M, Ramirez P, Lemoine P, Volk K, Yargeau V, Segura PA (2021) Comprehensive evaluation of non-catalytic wet air oxidation as a pretreatment to remove pharmaceuticals from hospital effluents. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 7:1301. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EW00203A
Brenes-Peralta L, De Menna F, Vittuari M (2022) Interlinked driving factors for decision-making in sustainable coffee production. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02821-6
Bui DN, Minh TT (2021) Investigation of TNT red wastewater treatment technology using the combination of advanced oxidation processes. Sci Total Environ 756:143852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143852
Çalhan SD, Görmez Ö, Şüküroğlu AA, Saçlı B, Gözmen B (2023) Removal of imipramine using advanced oxidation processes: degradation products and toxicity evolution. J Environ Sci Health A 58:359–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2023.2187186
Chai Y, Chen X, Wang Y, Guo X, Zhang R, Wei H, Jin H, Li Z, Ma L (2023) Environmental and economic assessment of advanced oxidation for the treatment of unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine wastewater from a life cycle perspective. Sci Total Environ 873:162264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162264
Conde JJ, Abelleira S, Estévez S, González-Rodríguez J, Feijoo G, Moreira MT (2023) Improving the sustainability of heterogeneous Fenton-based methods for micropollutant abatement by electrochemical coupling. J Environ Manage 332:117308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117308
Correa-Sanchez S, Peñuela GA (2022) Peracetic acid-based advanced oxidation processes for the degradation of emerging pollutants: a critical review. J Water Process Eng 49:102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102986
Costamagna M, Ciacci L, Paganini MC, Calza P, Passarini F (2020a) Combining the highest degradation efficiency with the lowest environmental impact in zinc oxide based photocatalytic systems. J Clean Prod 252:119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119762
Costamagna M, Gonçalvez NPF, Prevot AB (2020b) Environmental assessment of humic acid-coated magnetic materials used as a catalyst in Photo-Fenton processes. Catalysts 10:771. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10070771
Cunha ILC, Teixeira ACSC (2021) Degradation of pesticides present in tomato rinse water by direct photolysis and UVC/H2O2: optimization of process conditions through sequential Doehlert design. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:24191–24205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13387-7
Cunha ILC, Vieira JGV, Kulay L (2021) A multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate different UVC/H2O2 systems in wastewater treatment. Processes 9:2252. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9122252
Curran MA (2015) Life Cycle Assessment student handbook. Scrivener Publishing LLC, Massachusetts
Da Silva GA, Kulay L (2019) Avaliação do ciclo de vida: um método sistêmico e quantitativo para determinação do desempenho ambiental de atividades antrópicas. In: Júnior AV, Demajorovic J (Org.) Modelos e ferramentas de gestão ambiental: desafios e perspectivas para as organizações. Editora Senac, São Paulo, pp. 257–289.
Das PP, Mondal P, Purkait MK (2022) Treatment of industrial wastewater utilizing standalone and integrated advanced oxidation processes. In: Shah MP, Bera SP, Tore GY (eds) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: an innovative approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–15
De Araújo BRS, León JJL (2018) Electrochemical treatment of cetrimonium chloride with boron-doped diamond anodes: a technical and economical approach. J Environ Manag 214:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.094
Diamond KM, Good CJ, Johnny N, Sakihara TS, Edmiston PL, Faust JA, Schoenfuss TC, Rubin AM, Blob RW, Schoenfuss HL (2022) Assessing occurrence and biological consequences of contaminants of emerging concern on Oceanic Islands. Water 14:275. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030275
Dogan K, Turkmen BA, Babuna FG, Ucun OK, Alaton IA (2023) Merging treatability results and sustainability assessment: a segregated textile dyehouse effluent. Int J Environ Sci Technol 20:11165–11176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05107-0
Domingues S, Laso J, Margallo M, Aldaco R, Rivero MJ, Irabien Á, Ortiz I (2018) LCA of greywater management within a water circular economy restorative thinking framework. Sci Total Environ 621:1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.122
El Golli A, Fendrich M, Bazzanella N, Dridi C, Miotello A (2021) Wastewater remediation with ZnO photocatalysts: green synthesis and solar concentration as an economically and environmentally viable route to application. J Environ Manage 286:112226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112226
Fabbri S, Silva C, Octaviano F, Di Thommazo A, Hernades E, Belgamo A (2016). Improvements in the StArt tool to better support the systematic review process. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE, 2016), ACM, New York, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2915970.2916013.
Feijoo S, Estévez S, Kamali M, Dewil R, Moreira MT (2023) Scale-up modeling and life cycle assessment of electrochemical oxidation in wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 455:140627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.1406275
Feng H, Chen Z, Wang X, Chen S, Crittenden J (2021) Electrochemical advanced oxidation for treating ultrafiltration effluent of a landfill leachate system: impacts of organics and inorganics and economic evaluation. Chem Eng J 413:127492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127492
Fernández-Marchante CM, Souza FL, Millán M, Lobato J, Rodrigo MA (2021a) Does intensification with UV light and US improve the sustainability of electrolytic waste treatment processes? J Environ Manage 279:111597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111597
Fernández-Marchante CM, Souza FL, Millán M, Lobato J, Rodrigo MA (2021b) Improving sustainability of electrolytic wastewater treatment processes by green powering. Sci Total Environ 754:142230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142230
Ferre-Aracil J, Valcárcel Y, Negreira N, López de Alda M, Barceló D, Cardona SC, Navarro-Laboulais J (2016) Ozonation of hospital raw wastewaters for cytostatic compounds removal: kinetic modeling and economic assessment of the process. Sci Total Environ 556:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.202
Fonseca MJC, Da Silva JRP, Borges CP, Da Fonseca FV (2021) Ethinylestradiol removal of membrane bioreactor effluent by reverse osmosis and UV/H2O2: a technical and economic assessment. J Environ Manage 282:111948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111948
Foteinis S, Monteagudo JM, Durán A, Chatzisymeon E (2018) Environmental sustainability of the solar photo-Fenton process for wastewater treatment and pharmaceuticals mineralization at a semi-industrial scale. Sci Total Environ 612:605–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.277
Galindo-Miranda JM, Guízar-González C, Becerril-Bravo E, Moeller-Chávez G, Léon-Becerril E, Vallejo-Rodríguez R (2019) Occurrence of emerging contaminants in environmental surface waters and their analytical methodology: a review. Water Supply 19:1871–1884. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2019.087
Gallego-Schmidt A, Tarpani RRZ, Miralles-Cuevas S, Cabrera-Reina A, Malato S, Azapagic A (2019) Environmental assessment of solar photo-Fenton processes in combination with nanofiltration for the removal of micro-contaminants from real wastewater. Sci Total Environ 650:2210–2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.361
Geissen V, Mol H, Klumpp E, Umlauf G, Nadal M, Van der Ploeg M, Van der Zee SEATM, Ritsema CJ (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 3:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.03.002
Giménez J, Bayarri B, González Ó, Malato S, Peral J, Esplugas S (2015) Advanced oxidation processes at laboratory scale: environmental and economic impacts. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 3:3188–3196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00778
Gímenez J, Esplugas S, Malato S, Peral J (2019) Economic assessment and possible industrial application of a (photo) catalytic process: a case study. In: Marcì G, Palmisano L (Eds.) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: relationships with heterogeneous catalysis and perspectives. Elsevier, United Kingdom, pp. 235–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64015-4.00008-0.
Gopalakrishnan G, Somanathan A, Jeyakumar RB (2019) Combination of solar advanced oxidation processes and biological treatment strategy for the decolourization and degradation of pulp and paper mill wastewater. Desalination Water Treat 158:87–96. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24180
Gravilescu M, Demnerová K, Aamand J, Agathos S, Fava F (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: present and future challenges in biomonitoring, ecological risks, and bioremediation. N Biotechnol 32:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.01.001
Grisales CM, Salazar LM, Garcia DP (2019) Treatment of synthetic dye baths by Fenton processes: evaluation of their environmental footprint through life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:4300–4311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2757-9
Guerra-Rodríguez S, Cuesta S, Pérez J, Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Chueca J (2023) Life Cycle Assessment of sulfate radical based-AOPs for wastewater disinfection. Chem Eng J 474:145427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.145427
He D-Q, Zhang Y-J, Pei D-N, Huang G-X, Liu C, Li J, Yu H-Q (2020) Degradation of benzoic acid in an advanced oxidation process: the effects of reducing agents. J Hazard Mater 382:121090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121090
Heidari Z, Pelalak R, Malekshah RE, Pishnamazi M, Rezakazemi M, Aminabhani TM, Shirazian S (2022) A new insight into catalytic ozonation of sulfasalazine antibiotic by plasma-treated limonite nanostructures: experimental, modeling and mechanism. Chem Eng J 428:131230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131230
Hernandes E, Zamboni A, Fabbri S, Di Thommazo A (2012) Using GQM and TAM to evaluate StArt – a tool that supports Systematic Review. CLEI Electr J 15:3. https://doi.org/10.19153/cleiej.15.1.2.
Holloway RW, Miller-Robbie L, Patel M, Stokes JR, Munakata-Marr J, Dadakis J, Cath TY (2016) Life-cycle assessment of two potable water reuse technologies: MF/RO/UV–AOP treatment and hybrid osmotic membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 507:165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.045
Hu C-L, Wang WF, Hsieh Y-H (2015) Study on 17ß-estradiol (E2) removal in wastewater by continuous-flow advanced treatment and economic benefit evaluation. J Chem Eng Jpn 48:458–462. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.14we282
Huang H, Guo G, Tang S, Li B, Li J, Zhao N (2020) Persulfate oxidation for alternative sludge treatment and nutrient recovery: an assessment of technical and economic feasibility. J Environ Manage 272:111007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111007
Iannou-Ttofa L, Michael-Kordatou I, Fattas SC, Eusebio A, Ribeiro B, Rusan M, Amer ARB, Zuraiqi S, Waismand M, Linder C, Wiesman Z, Gilron J, Fatta-Kassinos D (2017) Treatment efficiency and economic feasibility of biological oxidation, membrane filtration, and separation processes, and advanced oxidation for the purification and valorization of olive mill wastewater. Water Res 114:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.020
Igos E, Mailler R, Guillossou R, Rocher V, Gasperi J (2021) Life cycle assessment of powder and micro-grain activated carbon in a fluidized bed to remove micropollutants from wastewater and their comparison with ozonation. J Clean Prod 287:125067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125067
Innocenzi V, Di Celso GM, Prisciandaro M (2021) Techno-economic analysis of olive wastewater treatment with a closed water approach by integrated membrane processes and advanced oxidation processes. Water Reuse 11:122–135. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2020.066
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006) Environmental management-Life Cycle Assessment: requirements and guidelines, ISO 14044:2006, 1st edn. ISO, Geneva
Jayarathna CP, Agdas D, Dawes L (2023) Exploring sustainable logistics practices toward a circular economy: a value creation perspective. Bus Strat Env 32:704–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3170
Johnson C, Bell SJ (2022) Linking emerging contaminants to production and consumption practices. Wires Water 10:1. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1615
Kang Y-M, Kim T-K, Kim M-K, Zoh K-D (2020) Greenhouse gas emissions from advanced oxidation processes in the degradation of bisphenol A: a comparative study of the H2O2/UV, TiO2/UV, and ozonation processes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:12227–12236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07807-3
Kong X, Garg S, Chen G, Li W, Wang Y, Wang J, Ma J, Yuan Y, Waite TD (2022) Coal Chemical Industry Membrane Concentrates Characterization and Treatment by Ozonation and Catalytic Ozonation Processes 19(4):156–166 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN22042
Kumar PG, Kanmani S (2022) Removal of persistent organic pollutants and disinfection of pathogens from secondary treated municipal wastewater using advanced oxidation processes. Water Sci Technol 86(8):1944–1957. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.308
Kumar P, Pulicharla R, Brar S, Kermanshahi-pour A, Surampalli RY (2019) Simple technoeconomic approach to chlortetracycline removal from wastewater treatment plant. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 23:3. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000441
Lofrano G, Libralato G, Meric S, Vaiano V, Sacco O, Venditto V, Guida M, Carotenuto M (2020). Occurrence and potential risks of emerging contaminants in water. In: Sacco O, Vaiano V (Eds.) Visible light active structured photocatalysts for the removal of emerging contaminants. Elsevier, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818334-2.00001-8.
Lopes JVM, Bresciani AE, Carvalho KM, Kulay LA, Alves RMB (2021) Multi-criteria decision approach to select carbon dioxide and hydrogen sources as potential raw materials for the production of Chemicals. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 151:111542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111542
Lutterbeck CA, Colares GS, Dell’osbel N, Da Silva FP, Kist LT, Machado ÊL, (2020) Hospital laundry wastewaters: a review on treatment alternatives, life cycle assessment and prognosis scenarios. J Clean Prod 73:122851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122851
Machado MLO, Paz EC, Pinheiro VS, De Souza RAS, Neto AMP, Gaubeur I, Dos Santos MC (2022) Use of WO2.72 nanoparticles/Vulcan® XC72 GDE electrocatalyst combined with the photoelectro-Fenton process for the degradation of 17α-Ethinylestradiol (EE2). Electrocatalysis 13:457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-022-00724-8
Mainardis M, Buttazzoni M, De Bortoli N, Mion M, Goi D (2020) Evaluation of ozonation applicability to pulp and paper streams for a sustainable wastewater treatment. J Clean Prod 258:120781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120781
Malnes D, Ahrens L, Köhler S, Forsberg M, Golovko O (2022) Occurrence and mass flows of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in Sweden’s three largest lakes and associated rivers. Chemosphere 294:133825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133825
Maniakova G, López MIP, Oller I, Malato S, Rizzo L (2023) Ozonation vs sequential solar driven processes as simultaneous tertiary and quaternary treatments of urban wastewater: a life cycle assessment comparison. J Clean Prod 413:137507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137507
Marson EO, Paniagua CES, Júnior OG, Gonçalves BR, Silva VM, Ricardo IA, Starling MCVM, Amorim CC, Trovó AG (2022) A review toward contaminants of emerging concern in Brazil: occurrence, impact, and their degradation by advanced oxidation process in aquatic matrices. Sci Total Environ 836:155605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155605
Meijer E (2021) Making LCA results count. https://pre-sustainability.com/articles. Accessed 31 May 2023
Menezes NA, Cunha ILC, Dos Santos MT, Kulay L (2022) Obtaining bioLPG via the HVO route in Brazil: a prospect study based on Life Cycle Assessment approach. Sustainability 14:15734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315734
Mesquita I, Borges CP, Da Fonseca FV (2022) Membrane bioreactor, reverse osmosis and UV/H2O2 process integration for ethinylestradiol removal: a cost-benefit analysis. J Environ Manage 310:114760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114760
Mierzwa JC, Rodrigues R, Teixeira ACSC (2018) UV-hydrogen peroxide processes. In: Ameta SC, Ameta R (eds) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: emerging green chemical technology. Elsevier, London, pp 13–48
Miklos DB, Remy C, Jekel M, Linden KG, Drewes JE, Hübner U (2018) Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – a critical review. Water Res 139:118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042
Miralles-Cuevas S, Oller I, Agüera A, Sánchez Pérez JA, Malato S (2017a) Strategies for reducing cost by using solar photo-Fenton treatment combined with nanofiltration to remove microcontaminants in real municipal effluents: toxicity and economic assessment. Chem Eng J 318:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.031
Miralles-Cuevas S, Darowna D, Wanag A, Mozia S, Malato S, Oller I (2017b) Comparison of UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82-, solar/Fe (II)/H2O2 and solar/Fe (II)/S2O82- at pilot plant scale for the elimination of micro-contaminants in natural water: an economic assessment. Chem Eng J 310:514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.121
Miranda DS, Kulay L (2023) A prospective study on the environmental feasibility of supplying electricity to the Brazilian Amazon through biogas power generation. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 55:102962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102962
Mohammadzadeh S, Olya ME, Arabi AM, Shariati A, Nikou MRK (2015) Synthesis, characterization, and application of ZnO-Ag as a nanophotocatalyst for organic compounds degradation, mechanism, and economic study. J Environ Sci 35:194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.030
Moore CCS, Kulay L (2019) Effect of the implementation of carbon capture systems on the environmental, energy, and economic performance of the Brazilian electricity matrix. Energies 12:331–348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020331
Morita AM, Moore CCS, Nogueira AR, Kulay L, Ravagnani MASS (2020) Assessment of potential alternatives for improving environmental trouser jeans manufacturing performance in Brazil. J Clean Prod 247:119156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119156
Mukherjee A, Mullick A, Vadthya P, Moulik S, Roy A (2020) Surfactant degradation using hydrodynamic cavitation based hybrid advanced oxidation technology: a techno-economic feasibility study. Chem Eng J 398:125599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125599
Nahim-Granados S, Rivas-Ibáñez G, Pérez JAS, Oller I, Malato S, Polo-López MI (2020) Fresh-cut wastewater reclamation: techno-economical assessment of solar driven processes at pilot plant scale. Appl Catal B 278:119334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119334
Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Renzulli PA, Di Capua R, Astuto F, Mascolo G, Murgolo S, De Ceglie C, Curri ML, Comparelli R, Dell’Edera M (2023) Life Cycle Assessment of UV-C based treatment systems for the removal of compounds of emerging concern from urban wastewater. Sci Total Environ 857:159309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159309
Park H, Kim T-Y, Woo D, Cho Y-S (2015) Comparison of O3 + GAC, O3 + H2O2 +GAC, and GAC unit operation on natural organic matter and taste and odor causing compounds removal using a pilot plant study. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 15:1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.102
Patel RK, Shankar R, Khare P, Mondal P (2022) Ultrasonication coupled electrochemical treatment of sugar industry wastewater: optimization, and economic evaluation. Korean J Chem Eng 39:1821–1830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-1046-3
Pesqueira JFJR, Pereira MFR, Silva AMT (2021) A life cycle assessment of solar-based treatments (H2O2, TiO2 photocatalysis, circumneutral photo-Fenton) for the removal of organic micropollutants. Sci Total Environ 761:143258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143258
Pesqueira JFJR, Marugán J, Pereira MFR, Silva AMT (2022) Selecting the most environmentally friendly oxidant for UVC degradation of micropollutants in urban wastewater by assessing life cycle impacts: hydrogen peroxide, peroxymonosulfate, or persulfate? Sci Total Environ 808:152050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152050
Peyrelasse C, Jacob M, Lallement A (2022) Multicriteria comparison of ozonation, membrane filtration, and activated carbon for the treatment of recalcitrant organics in industrial effluent: a conceptual study. Environ Process 9:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-022-00563-1
Pipil H, Yadav S, Chawla H, Taneja S, Verma M, Singla N, Haritash AK (2022) Comparison of TiO2 catalysis and Fenton’s treatment for rapid degradation of Remazol Red Dye in textile industry effluent. Rend Lincei Sci Fis Nat 33:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-021-01040-x
Priyadarshini M, Das I, Ghangrekar MM, Blaney L (2022) Advanced oxidation processes: performance, advantages, and scale-up of emerging technologies. J Environ Manage 316:115295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115295
Priyadarshini M, Ahmad A, Das I, Ghangrekar MM, Dutta BK (2023) Efficacious degradation of ethylene glycol by ultraviolet activated persulphate: reaction kinetics, transformation mechanisms, energy demand, and toxicity assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:85071–85086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27596-9
Pryce D, Khalil AME, Memon FA (2022) Investigating the environmental costs of utilizing graphene-based adsorbents and pulsed power oxidation for the removal of emerging contaminants from urban wastewater. Sci Total Environ 817:152985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152985
Rahman SM, Eckelman MJ, Onnis-Hayden A, Gu AZ (2018) Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of advanced wastewater treatment processes for removal of chemicals of emerging concern. Environ Sci Technol 52:11346–11358. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00036
Ramesh K, Gnanamangai BM, Mohanraj R (2021) Investigating techno-economic feasibility of biologically pretreated textile wastewater treatment by electrochemical oxidation process towards zero sludge concept. J Environ Chem Eng 9:106289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106289
Ramírez-Díaz R-C, Prato-Garcia D (2021) Can thermal intensification be considered a sustainable way for greening Fenton processes? J Environ Manage 289:112551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112551
Roccamante M, Samerón I, Ruiz A, Oller I, Malato S (2020) New approaches to solar advanced oxidation processes for elimination of priority substances based on electrooxidation and ozonation at pilot plant scale. Catal Today 355:844–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.04.014
Rodríguez R, Espada JJ, Pariente MI, Melero JA, Martínez F, Molina R (2016) Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) study of heterogeneous and homogenous Fenton processes for the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. J Clean Prod 124:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.064
Roth C, Wünsch R, Dinkel F, Hugi C, Wülser R, Antes R, Thomann M (2022) Micropollutant abatement with UV/H2O2 oxidation or low-pressure reverse osmosis? A comparative life cycle assessment for drinking water production. J Clean Prod 336:130227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130227
Sadat H, Guettai N, Berkani M, Hoang HY, Shanmuganathan R, Pugazhendhi A, Kadmi Y (2022) Recent advances in photochemical-based nanomaterial processes for mitigation of emerging contaminants from aqueous solutions. Appl Nanosci 13:3905–3924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02627-y
Saha J, Gupta SK (2018) The production and quantification of hydroxyl radicals at economically feasible tin-chloride modified graphite electrodes. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3991–3998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.05.049
Salazar LM, Grisales CM, Garcia DP (2019) How does intensification influence the operational and environmental performance of photo-Fenton processes at acidic and circumneutral pH. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:4367–4380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2388-1
Salomone R (2003) Life Cycle Assessment applied to coffee production: investigating environmental impacts to aid decision making for improvements at company level. J Food Agric Environ 1:295–300
Samal K, Bandyopadhyay R, Dash RR (2022) Biological treatment of contaminants of emerging concern in wastewater: a review. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 26:04022002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000685
San-Román MF, Solá-Gutiérrez C, Schröder S, Laso J, Margallo M, Vázquez-Rowe I, Ortiz I, Irabien A, Aldaco R (2020) Potential formation of PCDD/Fs in triclosan wastewater treatment: an overall toxicity assessment under a life cycle approach. Sci Total Environ 707:135981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135981
Santos AV, Couto CF, Lebron YAR, Moreira VR, Foreaux AFS, Reis EO, Santos LVS, De Andrade LH, Amaral MCS, Lange LC (2020) Occurrence and risk assessment of pharmaceutically active compounds in water supply systems in Brazil. Sci Total Environ 746:141011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141011
Sathe SM, Chakraborty I, Cheela VRS, Chowdhury S, Dubey BK, Ghangrekar MM (2021) A novel bio-electro-Fenton process for eliminating sodium dodecyl sulphate from wastewater using dual chamber microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 341:125850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125850
Sbardella L, Gala IV, Comas J, Carbonell SM, Rodríguez-Roda I, Gernjak W (2020) Integrated assessment of sulfate-based AOPs for pharmaceutical active compound removal from wastewater. J Clean Prod 260:121014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121014
Shi Q, Xiong Y, Kaur P, Sy ND, Gan J (2022) Contaminants of emerging concerns in recycled water: fate and risks in agroecosystems. Sci Total Environ 814:152527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152527
Shukla N, Remya N (2019) Microwave photo-oxidation with diverse oxidants for Congo red degradation: effect of oxidants, degradation pathway, and economic analysis. Environ Technol 42:1482–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1670737
Sinha S, Nigam S, Syed M (2022) Insight into advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment. In: Shah MP, Bera SP, Tore GY (eds) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: an innovative approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 101–116
Soares PA, Silva TFCV, Arcy AR, Souza SMAGU, Boaventura RAR, Vilar VJP (2016) Assessment of AOPs as a polishing step in the decolorization of bio-treated textile wastewater: technical and economic considerations. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 317:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.10.017
Starling MCVM, Amorim CC, Leão MMD (2019) Occurrence, control, and fate of contaminants of emerging concern in environmental compartments in Brazil. J Hazard Mater 372:17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.043
Stirling R, Walker WS, Westerhoff P, Garcia-Segura S (2020) Techno-economic analysis to identify key innovations required for electrochemical oxidation as point-of-use treatment systems. Electrochim Acta 338:135874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135874
Suart C, Suart TN, Graham K, Truant R (2021) When the labs closed: graduate students’ and postdoctoral fellows’ experiences of disrupted research during the COVID-19 pandemic. FACETS 6:966–997. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0077
Sun B, Wang Y, Xiang Y, Shang C (2020) Influence of pre-ozonation of DOM on micropollutant abatement by UV-based advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater 391:122201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122201
Tejera J, Miranda R, Hermosilla D, Urra I, Negro C, Blanco Á (2019) Treatment of a mature landfill leachate: comparison between homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton with different pretreatments. Water 11:1849. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091849
Teutli-Sequeira A, Vasquez-Medrano R, Prato-Garcia D, Ibanez JG (2020) Solar photo-assisted degradation of bipyridinium herbicides at circumneutral pH: a Life Cycle Assessment approach. Processes 8:1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091117
Thanikkal MP, Antony SP (2021) Integrated electro-Fenton and membrane bioreactor system for matured landfill leachate treatment. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 25:1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000556
Torres-Socías E, Prieto-Rodríguez L, Zapata A, Fernández-Calderero I, Oller I, Malato S (2015) Detailed treatment line for a specific landfill leachate remediation. Brief Economic Assessment Chem Eng J 261:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.103
Turan NB, Erkan HS, Engin GO (2022) Emerging contaminants. In: Shah MP, Bera SP, Tore GY (eds) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: an innovative approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 27–37
Vafaee M, Olya ME, Drean J-Y, Hekmati AH (2017) Synthesize, characterization and application of ZnO/W/Ag as a new nanophotocatalyst for dye removal of textile wastewater: kinetic and economic studies. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 000:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.07.025
Valladares-Linares R, Li Z, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Ghaffour N, Amy G, Leiknes T, Vrouwenvelder JS (2016) Life cycle cost of a hybrid forward osmosis e low-pressure reverse osmosis system for seawater desalination and wastewater recovery. Water Res 88:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.017
Wadley S, Waite TD (2004) Fenton processes. In: Parsons S (ed) Advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment. IWA Publishing, London, pp 111–136
Wang T, Zhao C, Meng L, Li Y, Wang D, Wang C-C (2023) Fe-O-P bond in MIL-88A(Fe)/BOHP heterojunctions as a highway for rapid electron transfer to enhance photo-Fenton abatement of enrofloxacin. Appl Catal B 334:122832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122832
Yu Y, Chen Z, Guo Z, Liao Z, Yang L, Wang J, Chen Z (2015) Removal of refractory contaminants in municipal landfill leachate by hydrogen, oxygen, and palladium: a novel approach of hydroxyl radical production. J Hazard Mater 287:349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.01.070
Zhao Z, Dong W, Wang H, Chen G, Wang W, Liu Z, Gao Y, Zhou B (2017) Advanced oxidation removal of hypophosphite by O3/H2O2 combined with sequential Fe (II) catalytic process. Chemosphere 180:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.003
Acknowledgements
We express our thanks to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brazil (CAPES), grant number 88887.610344/2021-00. We also thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). The support of this funding agency was essential for this study to be concluded.
Funding
This study was financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brazil (CAPES), grant number 88887.610344/2021–00, and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.L.C.C.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing original draft. P.G.M.: methodology, software, validation, proper analysis, investigation, and writing original draft. C.O.R.: validation, writing original draft, writing, review, editing, and supervision. L. K.: conceptualization, validation, writing original draft, writing, review, editing, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ricardo A. Torres-Palma
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Clímaco Cunha, I.L., Machado, P.G., de Oliveira Ribeiro, C. et al. Bibliometric analysis of Advanced Oxidation Processes studies with a focus on Life Cycle Assessment and Costs. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 22319–22338 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32558-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32558-w