Abstract
To mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the wastewater treatment industry, it is crucial to explore GHG emission patterns and propose useful measures. In this study, we use the Kaya model and LMDI decomposition method to analyze the changes in GHG emissions from urban domestic wastewater treatment at the provincial level and further explore the distribution characteristics and driving factors of urban domestic wastewater treatment GHG emissions across various years and regions. The results indicate the following: (1) In the temporal dimension, urban domestic wastewater treatment GHG emissions are increasing, from 21.0 MtCO2 in 2011 to 27.1 MtCO2 in 2020, with an average annual growth rate of 2.88%. The spatial distribution is high in the southeast and low in the northwest. There is variability in the spatial evolution trend of GHG emissions by province, with the growth rate becoming slower or even negative in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and North China, while the average annual growth rate exceeds 25% in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang. (2) According to the decomposition results of driving factors, economic scale is the dominant positive driver, and the positive contributions of TI and the population effect are limited. The sludge disposal structure is the main negative driver, and the EEI and technology have restricted negative contributions. (3) Based on the decomposition results, for major coastal GHG emitters, such as Guangdong and Shandong, it is necessary to invest capital and technology to continuously upgrade the wastewater treatment process and reduce non-CO2 emissions. Along with adopting circular economy schemes, local governments in the northwestern region should transform the traditional sludge disposal structure and optimize the power supply structure to increase carbon offset and reduce CO2 emissions. The findings suggest a low-carbon transformation path to support the industry’s dual carbon goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Alves MR, Moutinho V (2013) Decomposition analysis and innovative accounting approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996–2009 in Portugal. Energy 57:775–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.036
Ang BW (2005) The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Policy 33(7):867–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.010
Ang BW, Zhang FQ, Choi KH (1998) Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition. Energy 23(6):489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(98)00016-4
Bashiri R, Farhadian M, Asadollahi MA, Jeihanipour A (2016) Anaerobic digested sludge: a new supplementary nutrient source for ethanol production. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(3):763–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0925-8
Chung JH, Lai HY, Joo JH (2009) Assessing the “revive the northeast” (zhenxing dongbei) programme: origins, policies and implementation. China Quarterly 197:108–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030574100900006x
Dar JA, Asif M (2018) Does financial development improve environmental quality in Turkey? An application of endogenous structural breaks based cointegration approach. Manag Environ Qual 29(2):368–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-02-2017-0021
Dong KY, Jiang HD, Sun RJ, Dong XC (2019) Driving forces and mitigation potential of global CO2 emissions from 1980 through 2030: evidence from countries with different income levels. Sci Total Environ 649:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.326
Du M, Zhu Q, Wang X, Li P, Yang B, Chen H, Peng C (2018a) Estimates and predictions of methane emissions from wastewater in China from 2000 to 2020. Earths Future 6(2):252–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000673
Du MX, Zhu Q, Wang XG, Li P, Yang B, Chen H, Peng CH (2018b) Estimates and predictions of methane emissions from wastewater in China from 2000 to 2020. Earths Future 6(2):252–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000673
Fang YR, Li S, Zhang Y, Xie GH (2019a) Spatio-temporal distribution of sewage sludge, its methane production potential, and a greenhouse gas emissions analysis. J Clean Prod 238:117895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117895
Fang YR, Li SB, Zhang YX, Xie GH (2019b) Spatio-temporal distribution of sewage sludge, its methane production potential, and a greenhouse gas emissions analysis. J Clean Prod 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117895
Feng HY, Sun FY, Liu YY, Zeng P, Deng LZ, Che Y (2021) Mapping multiple water pollutants across China using the grey water footprint. Sci Total Environ 785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147255
Fesenfeld LP, Schmidt TS, Schrode A (2018) Climate policy for short- and long-lived pollutants. Nat Clim Chang 8(11):934–936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0328-1
Gao L, Zheng YW, Yang DT, Zhu L, Li S, Jin HG (2021) Criterial equation of carbon neutrality for power systems. Chin Sci Bull 66(31):3932–3936. https://doi.org/10.1360/tb-2021-0509
Geng Y, Wei J, Wang X, Zhang J, Xie H, & Zhang Z CN114897224-A
Hua H, Jiang S, Yuan Z, Liu X, Zhang Y, Cai Z (2022) Advancing greenhouse gas emission factors for municipal wastewater treatment plants in China. Environ Pollut 295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118648
Jeong K, Kim S (2013) LMDI decomposition analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in the Korean manufacturing sector. Energy Policy 62:1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.077
Jin L, Zhang G, Tian H (2014) Current state of sewage treatment in China. Water Res 66:85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.014
Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA (2022) Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Front Energy Res 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114
Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Saunois M, Canadell JG, Dlugokencky EJ, Zeng G (2013) Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat Geosci 6(10):813–823. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955
Lai HYH (2002) China’s western development program - its rationale, implementation, and prospects. Modern China 28(4):432–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/009770040202800402
Liu BB, Wei Q, Zhang B, Bi J (2013) Life cycle GHG emissions of sewage sludge treatment and disposal options in Tai Lake Watershed, China. Sci Total Environ 447:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.019
Liu HT, Kong XJ, Zheng GD, Chen CC (2016) Determination of greenhouse gas emission reductions from sewage sludge anaerobic digestion in China. Water Sci Technol 73(1):137–143. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.472
Ma Z-Y, Feng P, Gao Q-X, Lu Y-N, Liu J-R, Li W-T (2015) CH4 emissions and reduction potential in wastewater treatment in China. Adv Clim Chang Res 6(3):216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2015.11.006
Ma R, Hu Z, Zhang J, Ma H, Jiang LP, Ru DY (2017) Reduction of greenhouse gases emissions during anoxic wastewater treatment by strengthening nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation process. Biores Technol 235:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.094
Mannina G, Ekama G, Caniani D, Cosenza A, Esposito G, Gori R, Olsson G (2016) Greenhouse gases from wastewater treatment - a review of modelling tools. Sci Total Environ 551:254–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.163
Mannina G, Ekama GA, Capodici M, Cosenza A, Di Trapani D, Odegaard H, van Loosdrecht MMC (2018) Influence of carbon to nitrogen ratio on nitrous oxide emission in an Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge Membrane BioReactor plant. J Clean Prod 176:1078–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.222
Mousavi B, Lopez NSA, Biona JBM, Chiu ASF, Blesl M (2017) Driving forces of Iran’s CO2 emissions from energy consumption: An LMDI decomposition approach. Appl Energy 206:804–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.199
O’Mahony T, Zhou P, Sweeney J (2012) The driving forces of change in energy-related CO2 emissions in Ireland: a multi-sectoral decomposition from 1990 to 2007. Energy Policy 44:256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.049
Ocko IB, Sun TY, Shindell D, Oppenheimer M, Hristov AN, Pacala SW, Hamburg SP (2021) Acting rapidly to deploy readily available methane mitigation measures by sector can immediately slow global warming. Environ Res Lett 16(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abf9c8
Roinioti A, Koroneos C (2017) The decomposition of CO2 emissions from energy use in Greece before and during the economic crisis and their decoupling from economic growth. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:448–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.026
Short MD, Daikeler A, Wallis K, Peirson WL, Peters GM (2017) Dissolved methane in the influent of three Australian wastewater treatment plants fed by gravity sewers. Sci Total Environ 599:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.152
Suh YJ, Rousseaux P (2002) An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios. Resour Conserv Recycl 35(3):191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-3449(01)00120-3
Tang X, Wang XY, Feng L (2021) The driving force of water resource stress change based on the STIRPAT model: take Zhangye City as a case study. Sci Cold Arid Reg 13(4):337–348. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.J.1226.2021.20093
Wang WW, Li M, Zhang M (2017) Study on the changes of the decoupling indicator between energy-related CO2 emission and GDP in China. Energy 128:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.004
Wang D, Ye WL, Wu GX, Li RQ, Guan YR, Zhang W, Hubacek K (2022) Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment facilities in China from 2006 to 2019. Sci Data 9(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01439-7
Wei J, Hao XD, van Loosdrecht MCM, Li J (2018) Feasibility analysis of anaerobic digestion of excess sludge enhanced by iron: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 89:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.042
Xiang XW, Ma X, Ma ZL, Ma MD, Cai WG (2022) Python-LMDI: a tool for index decomposition analysis of building carbon emissions. Buildings 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010083
Xu CQ, Chen W, Hong JL (2014) Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge treatment in China. J Clean Prod 67:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.002
Yan X, Han YP, Li QL, Sun JH, Su XF (2016) Impact of internal recycle ratio on nitrous oxide generation from anaerobic/anoxic/oxic biological nitrogen removal process. Biochem Eng J 106:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.11.005
Yan X, Qiu DZ, Zheng SK, Cheng K, Han YP, Sun JH, Su XF (2019) Spatial and temporal distribution of greenhouse gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants in China from 2005 to 2014. Earths Future 7(4):340–350. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ef001058
Yang G, Zhang GM, Wang HC (2015a) Current state of sludge production, management, treatment and disposal in China. Water Res 78:60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.002
Yang X, Yuan CY, Xu J, Zhang WJ (2015b) Potential method for gas production: High temperature co-pyrolysis of lignite and sewage sludge with vacuum reactor and long contact time. Biores Technol 179:602–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.104
Yang X, Teng F, Xi XQ, Khayrullin E, Zhang Q (2018) Cost-benefit analysis of China’s Intended Nationally Determined Contributions based on carbon marginal cost curves. Appl Energy 227:415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.016
Yang J, Cai W, Ma M, Li L, Liu C, Ma X, Chen X (2020a) Driving forces of China’s CO2 emissions from energy consumption based on Kaya-LMDI methods. Sci Total Environ 711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134569
Yang J, Cai W, Ma MD, Li L, Liu CH, Ma X, Chen XZ (2020b) Driving forces of China’s CO2 emissions from energy consumption based on Kaya-LMDI methods. Sci Total Environ 711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134569
Zeng LX, Yang RQ, Zhang QH, Zhang HD, Xiao K, Zhang HY, Jiang GB (2014) Current levels and composition profiles of emerging halogenated flame retardants and dehalogenated products in sewage sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants in China. Environ Sci Technol 48(21):12586–12594. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503510q
Zeng SY, Chen X, Dong X, Liu Y (2017) Efficiency assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants in China: considering greenhouse gas emissions. Resour Conserv Recycl 120:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.005
Zhai H, Gu B, Zhu K, Huang C (2023) Feasibility analysis of achieving net-zero emissions in China?s power sector before 2050 based on ideal available pathways. Environ Impact Assess Rev 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106948
Zhang QH, Yang WN, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Jin PK, Dzakpasu M, Ao D (2016) Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China. Environ Int 92–93:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.024
Zhang L, Pang JX, Chen XP, Lu ZMN (2019) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from the agricultural sector of China’s main grain-producing areas. Sci Total Environ 665:1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.162
Zhang CJ, Wu YS, Yu Y (2020) Spatial decomposition analysis of water intensity in China. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.01.002
Zhao X, Jin XK, Guo W, Zhang C, Shan YL, Du MX, Li YP (2019) China’s urban methane emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plant. Earths Future 7(4):480–490. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ef001113
Zhao Y, Yang Z, Niu J, Du Z, Federica C, Zhu Z, Emmanuel M (2023) Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction. J Environ Sci 128:224–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.038
Zhuang H, Guan J, Leu S-Y, Wang Y, Wang H (2020) Carbon footprint analysis of chemical enhanced primary treatment and sludge incineration for sewage treatment in Hong Kong. J Clean Prod 272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122630
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Central University Project (2022CDJSKPY07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by Yue Xiao and Yuan Liu. Material preparation and the first draft of the manuscript were written by Yue Xiao and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V.V.S.S. Sarma
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, Y., Liu, Y. & Cai, W. Spatial and temporal evolution and drivers of GHG emissions from urban domestic wastewater treatment in China: a review at the provincial level. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 21028–21043 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32358-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32358-2