Abstract
This study investigated the effect of ultrasonic (US) pretreatment at three different contact times (30, 45, and 60 min) with a power of 240 W and frequency of 40 kHz on the fate of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and enteric pathogens during anaerobic digestion (AD) of sludge. By using real time-qPCR, three MGEs (int1, int2, and tnpA) and seven ARGs (sul1, sul2, tetW, tetA, tetO, ermF, and aac(6')-lb) were quantified that have serious human health impacts and represent the most widely used antibiotics (tetracycline, sulfonamide, macrolide, and aminoglycoside). Results indicated that US pretreatment under different contact times improved the removal of ARGs and MGEs. Compared to 30 and 45 min of US pretreatment, 60 min of US pretreatment resulted in a higher reduction of ARGs with total ARG reduction of 41.70 ± 1.13%. Furthermore, the relative abundance of ARGs and MGEs after US pretreatment was reduced more effectively in anaerobic reactors than in a control AD without US pretreatment. The total ARGs and MGEs removal efficiency of control AD was 44.07 ± 0.72% and 63.69 ± 1.43%, and if US pretreatment at different times were applied, the total ARGs and MGEs removal efficiency of the whole pretreatment AD process improved to 59.71 ± 2.76–68.54 ± 1.58% and 69.82 ± 2.15–76.84 ± 0.22%. The highest removal of total ARGs (68.54 ± 1.58%) and MGEs (76.84 ± 0.22%) was achieved after AD with US pretreatment at 45 min. However, US pretreatment and AD with US pretreatment were not effective in inactivation of enteric pathogens (total coliforms and E. coli), suggesting that posttreatment is needed prior to land application of sludge to reduce the level of enteric pathogens. There was no detection of the studied ARGs and MGEs in the enteric pathogens after US pretreatment in subsequent AD. According to this study, long contact times of US pretreatment can mitigate ARGs and MGEs in AD processes, offering valuable insight into improving environmental safety and sustainable waste management. Additionally, the study highlights the need to investigate posttreatment techniques for reducing enteric pathogens in AD effluent, a crucial consideration for agricultural use and environmental protection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Ben Y, Fu C, Hu M et al (2019) Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: a review. Environ Res 169:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2018.11.040
Chen X, Tang R, Wang Y et al (2021) Effect of ultrasonic and ozone pretreatment on the fate of enteric indicator bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes, and anaerobic digestion of dairy wastewater. Bioresour Technol 320:124356. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2020.124356
Climent M, Ferrer I, del Baeza M, M, et al (2007) Effects of thermal and mechanical pretreatments of secondary sludge on biogas production under thermophilic conditions. Chem Eng J 133:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2007.02.020
EPA (2003) Environmental regulations and technology, control of pathogens and vector attraction in sewage sludge. Environmental Protection Agency, 625R92013. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=40001LJV.txt
Ergüder TH, Tezel U, Güven E, Demirer GN (2001) Anaerobic biotransformation and methane generation potential of cheese whey in batch and UASB reactors. Waste Manag 21:643–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00114-8
Feng X, Lei H, Deng J et al (2009) Physical and chemical characteristics of waste activated sludge treated ultrasonically. Chem Eng Process 48:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEP.2008.03.012
Gantzer C, Gaspard P, Galvez L et al (2001) Monitoring of bacterial and parasitological contamination during various treatment of sludge. Water Res 35:3763–3770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00105-1
Hegstad K, Mikalsen T, Coque TM et al (2010) Mobile genetic elements and their contribution to the emergence of antimicrobial resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:541–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-0691.2010.03226.X
Higgins MJ, Chen YC, Murthy SN et al (2007) Reactivation and growth of non-culturable indicator bacteria in anaerobically digested biosolids after centrifuge dewatering. Water Res 41:665–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2006.09.017
Hogan F, Mormede S, Clark P, Crane M (2004) Ultrasonic sludge treatment for enhanced anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 50:25–32. https://doi.org/10.2166/WST.2004.0526
Huang J, Liang J, Yang X et al (2020) Ultrasonic coupled bioleaching pretreatment for enhancing sewage sludge dewatering: simultaneously mitigating antibiotic resistant genes and changing microbial communities. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 193:110349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOENV.2020.110349
ISO (2014) ISO 9308–1:2014 - Water quality — enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria — part 1: membrane filtration method for waters with low bacterial background flora. In: International Standardization Organization. https://www.iso.org/standard/55832.html. Accessed 3 Apr 2023
Jiang Y, Dennehy C, Lawlor PG et al (2018) Inactivation of enteric indicator bacteria and system stability during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure. Sci Total Environ 612:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.08.214
Jiang Y, Xie SH, Dennehy C et al (2020) Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 120:109654. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2019.109654
Ju F, Li B, Ma L et al (2016) Antibiotic resistance genes and human bacterial pathogens: co-occurrence, removal, and enrichment in municipal sewage sludge digesters. Water Res 91:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2015.11.071
Kang M, Yang J, Kim S et al (2022) Occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes and multidrug-resistant bacteria during wastewater treatment processes. Sci Total Environ 811:152331. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.152331
Karkman A, Do TT, Walsh F, Virta MPJ (2018) Antibiotic-resistance genes in waste water. Trends Microbiol 26:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIM.2017.09.005
Khanh Nguyen V, Kumar Chaudhary D, Hari Dahal R et al (2021) Review on pretreatment techniques to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Fuel 285:119105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2020.119105
Kim DH, Cho SK, Lee MK, Kim MS (2013) Increased solubilization of excess sludge does not always result in enhanced anaerobic digestion efficiency. Bioresour Technol 143:660–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.06.058
Korres NE, O’Kiely P, Benzie JAH, West JS (2013) Bioenergy production by anaerobic digestion: Using agricultural biomass and organic wastes. Bioenergy Production by Anaerobic Digestion: Using Agricultural Biomass and Organic Wastes 9780203137697:1–442.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137697
Krakat N, Anjum R, Dietz D, Demirel B (2017) Methods of ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion: a review. Water Sci Technol 76:1925–1938. https://doi.org/10.2166/WST.2017.406
Kunte DP, Yeole TY, Chiplonkar SA, Ranade DR (1998) Inactivation of Salmonella typhi by high levels of volatile fatty acids during anaerobic digestion. J Appl Microbiol 84:138–142. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2672.1997.00335.X
Le NT, Julcour-Lebigue C, Delmas H (2015) An executive review of sludge pretreatment by sonication. J Environ Sci 37:139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JES.2015.05.031
Li X, Guo S, Peng Y et al (2018) Anaerobic digestion using ultrasound as pretreatment approach: changes in waste activated sludge, anaerobic digestion performances and digestive microbial populations. Biochem Eng J 139:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2017.11.009
Liu H, Wang X, Qin S et al (2021) Comprehensive role of thermal combined ultrasonic pre-treatment in sewage sludge disposal. Sci Total Environ 789:147862. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.147862
Ma Y, Wilson CA, Novak JT et al (2011) Effect of various sludge digestion conditions on sulfonamide, macrolide, and tetracycline resistance genes and class i integrons. Environ Sci Technol 45:7855–7861. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES200827T/SUPPL_FILE/ES200827T_SI_001.PDF
Ma L, Li AD, Le YX, Zhang T (2017) The prevalence of integrons as the carrier of antibiotic resistance genes in natural and man-made environments. Environ Sci Technol 51:5721–5728. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.6B05887/SUPPL_FILE/ES6B05887_SI_002.XLSX
Martín MÁ, González I, Serrano A, Siles JÁ (2015) Evaluation of the improvement of sonication pre-treatment in the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. J Environ Manag 147:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2014.09.022
McCarthy G, Lawlor PG, Carney KN et al (2015) An investigation into the removal of Salmonella and enteric indicator bacteria from the separated liquid fraction of raw or anaerobically digested pig manure using novel on-farm woodchip biofilters. Sci Total Environ 514:140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2014.12.036
Méndez-Contreras JM, Rendón-Sagardi JA, Ruiz-Espinoza JE et al (2009) Behavior of the mesophilic and termophilic anaerobic digestion in the stabilization of municipal wastewater sludge (Part 1). Rev Mex Ing Quim 8:283–290
Mitraka GC, Kontogiannopoulos KN, Batsioula M et al (2022) A comprehensive review on pretreatment methods for enhanced biogas production from sewage sludge. Energies 15:6536. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15186536
Montusiewicz A, Lebiocka M, Rozej A et al (2010) Freezing/thawing effects on anaerobic digestion of mixed sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 101:3466–3473. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2009.12.125
Morozova I, Nikulina N, Oechsner H et al (2020) Effects of increasing nitrogen content on process stability and reactor performance in anaerobic digestion. Energies 13:1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN13051139
Mortezaei Y, Williams MR, Demirer GN (2023) Effect of temperature and solids retention time on the removal of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion of sludge. Bioresour Technol Rep 21:101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BITEB.2023.101377
Oz NA, Yarimtepe CC (2014) Ultrasound assisted biogas production from landfill leachate. Waste Manag 34:1165–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2014.03.003
Park ND, Helle SS, Thring RW (2012) Combined alkaline and ultrasound pre-treatment of thickened pulp mill waste activated sludge for improved anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy 46:750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2012.05.014
Partridge SR, Kwong SM, Firth N, Jensen SO (2018) Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 31. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00088-17/ASSET/808BB10D-7E85-4717-AE02-F26B28D2DBE2/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZCM0041826370008.JPEG
Pecson BM, Barrios JA, Jiménez BE, Nelson KL (2007) The effects of temperature, pH, and ammonia concentration on the inactivation of Ascaris eggs in sewage sludge. Water Res 41:2893–2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2007.03.040
Pilli S, Bhunia P, Yan S et al (2011) Ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge: a review. Ultrason Sonochem 18:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2010.02.014
Poirel L, Madec J-Y, Lupo A, et al (2018) Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr 6. https://doi.org/10.1128/MICROBIOLSPEC.ARBA-0026-2017
Poirier S, Madigou C, Bouchez T, Chapleur O (2017) Improving anaerobic digestion with support media: Mitigation of ammonia inhibition and effect on microbial communities. Bioresour Technol 235:229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.03.099
Praveenkumarreddy Y, Akiba M, Guruge KS et al (2020) Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in sewage treatment plants of South India. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 10:48–55. https://doi.org/10.2166/WASHDEV.2020.051
Prorot A, Julien L, Christophe D, Patrick L (2011) Sludge disintegration during heat treatment at low temperature: a better understanding of involved mechanisms with a multiparametric approach. Biochem Eng J 54:178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2011.02.016
Redhead S, Nieuwland J, Esteves S et al (2020) Fate of antibiotic resistant E. coli and antibiotic resistance genes during full scale conventional and advanced anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. PLoS One 15:e0237283. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0237283
Reinthaler FF, Posch J, Feierl G et al (2003) Antibiotic resistance of E. coli in sewage and sludge. Water Res 37:1685–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00569-9
Rice EW, Baird RB (2017) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23rd Edition, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC
Ruiz Espinoza JE, Córdova Lizama A, Yañez Palma R et al (2022) Ultrasonic pretreatment of sewage sludge, an effective tool to improve the anaerobic digestion: current challenges, recent developments, and perspectives. Dev Waste Water Trea Res Process: Treatment and Reuse of Sewage Sludge: An Innovative Approach for Wastewater Treatment 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85584-6.00009-1
Rumky J, Kruglova A, Repo E (2022) Fate of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in wastewater treatment plant: Preliminary study on identification before and after ultrasonication. Environ Res 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2022.114281
Shin J, Rhee C, Shin J et al (2020) Determining the composition of bacterial community and relative abundance of specific antibiotics resistance genes via thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 311:123510. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2020.123510
Smith SR, Lang NL, Cheung KHM, Spanoudaki K (2005) Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes. Waste Manag 25:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2005.02.010
Sposob M, Kim DH, Yun GS, Yun YM (2020) Assessment of the relationship between solubilization and biogas production on anaerobic digestion of pretreated lipid-extracted microalgae waste. Biomass Bioenergy 141:105702. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2020.105702
Stedtfeld RD, Guo X, Stedtfeld TM, et al (2018) Primer set 2.0 for highly parallel qpcr array targeting antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94. https://doi.org/10.1093/FEMSEC/FIY130
Tong J, Lu XT, Zhang JY et al (2017) Occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in enterococci and genomic DNA during anaerobic digestion of pharmaceutical waste sludge with different pretreatments. Bioresour Technol 235:316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.03.104
UNEP (2017) Frontiers 2017 Emerging issues of environmental concern. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi
Wang F, Lu S, Ji M (2006) Components of released liquid from ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration. Ultrason Sonochem 13:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2005.04.008
Wang M, Li R, Zhao Q (2019) Distribution and removal of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic sludge digestion with alkaline, thermal hydrolysis and ultrasonic pretreatments. Front Environ Sci Eng 13(3):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11783-019-1127-2
Wang M, Chen H, Liu S, Xiao L (2021a) Removal of pathogen and antibiotic resistance genes from waste activated sludge by different pre-treatment approaches. Sci Total Environ 763:143014. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.143014
Wang Y, Pandey PK, Kuppu S et al (2021b) Degradation of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile gene elements in dairy manure anerobic digestion. PLoS One 16:e0254836. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0254836
WHO (2017) Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, 5th Revision 2016. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512220
Wu Q, Zou D, Zheng X et al (2022) Effects of antibiotics on anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: performance of anaerobic digestion and structure of the microbial community. Sci Total Environ 845:157384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.157384
Xie R, Xing Y, Ghani YA et al (2007) Full-scale demonstration of an ultrasonic disintegration technology in enhancing anaerobic digestion of mixed primary and thickened secondary sewage sludge 6:533–541. https://doi.org/10.1139/S07-013
Xu J, Yuan H, Lin J, Yuan W (2014) Evaluation of thermal, thermal-alkaline, alkaline and electrochemical pretreatments on sludge to enhance anaerobic biogas production. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:2531–2536. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTICE.2014.05.029
Xu X, Cao D, Wang Z et al (2019) Study on ultrasonic treatment for municipal sludge. Ultrason Sonochem 57:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2019.05.008
Yang W, Cai C, Yang D, Dai X (2023) Implications for assessing sludge hygienization: differential responses of the bacterial community, human pathogenic bacteria, and fecal indicator bacteria to sludge pretreatment-anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater 443:130110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2022.130110
Yu J, Xiao K, Yang J et al (2019) Enhanced sludge dewaterability and pathogen inactivation by synergistic effects of zero-valent iron and ozonation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:324–331. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.8B03605
Zhang P, Zhang G, Wang W (2007) Ultrasonic treatment of biological sludge: floc disintegration, cell lysis and inactivation. Bioresour Technol 98:207–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2005.12.002
Zhang T, Yang Y, Pruden A (2015) Effect of temperature on removal of antibiotic resistance genes by anaerobic digestion of activated sludge revealed by metagenomic approach. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:7771–7779. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00253-015-6688-9
Zhang J, Lu T, Shen P et al (2019) The role of substrate types and substrate microbial community on the fate of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere 229:461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2019.05.036
Zhang Z, Li X, Liu H et al (2022a) Advancements in detection and removal of antibiotic resistance genes in sludge digestion: a state-of-art review. Bioresour Technol 344:126197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2021.126197
Zhang Y, Mao Q, Su Y ao et al (2021) Thermophilic rather than mesophilic sludge anaerobic digesters possess lower antibiotic resistant genes abundance. Bioresour Technol 329. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2021.124924
Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Wang T, et al (2022b) Assessment of global health risk of antibiotic resistance genes. Nat Commun 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-022-29283-8
Zhao Q, Liu Y (2019) Is anaerobic digestion a reliable barrier for deactivation of pathogens in biosludge? Sci Total Environ 668:893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.03.063
Zhao Q, Li M, Zhang K et al (2020) Effect of ultrasound irradiation combined with ozone pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion for the biosludge exposed to trace-level levofloxacin: degradation, microbial community and ARGs analysis. J Environ Manag 262:110356. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2020.110356
Zhao K, Zhao S, Song G et al (2023) Ultrasonication-enhanced biogas production in anaerobic digestion of waste active sludge: a pilot scale investigation. Resour Conserv Recycl 192:106902. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2023.106902
Ziemba C, Peccia J (2011) Net energy production associated with pathogen inactivation during mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Res 45:4758–4768. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2011.06.014
Funding
This research was funded by Central Michigan University’s Office of Research and Graduate Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YM: Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, validation, formal analysis, visualization, investigation, writing — original draft. MRW: Resources; methodology; writing, review and editing; supervision, project administration; funding acquisition. GND: Conceptualization; resources; writing, review and editing; supervision; project administration; funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Diane Purchase
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mortezaei, Y., Williams, M.R. & Demirer, G.N. The fate of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with ultrasonic pretreatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 5513–5525 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31558-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31558-6