Abstract
Large amounts of mercury (Hg) were consumed and emitted into the atmosphere during the process of amalgam electrolysis used to produce chlorine and caustic soda since the nineteenth century. In Europe, amalgam electrolysis has been gradually replaced by advanced Hg-free technologies. In this work, we describe changes in atmospheric Hg and bulk Hg wet deposition during the phasing out of an amalgam electrolytic production line of a chlor-alkali plant in Neratovice, Czech Republic, central Europe. Bulk wet deposition Hg near the chlor-alkali plant was low at 3.6 ± 0.8 μg m−2 year−1 due in part to low annual precipitation amounts (486 ± 97 mm) in the period 2015–2021. Nevertheless, Hg deposition was elevated relative to a nearby reference site both before and after decommissioning of the electrolytic line. Switching off the amalgam electrolytic line did not notably affect bulk wet deposition Hg near the chlor-alkali plant. Levels of gaseous elemental Hg (GEM) and particle-bound Hg (PBM) monitored seasonally four times per year over 24-h time periods indicated rapid declines in four nearby settlements set in cardinal directions from the Hg emission source. Mean atmospheric GEM and PBM concentrations decreased rapidly from 9.0 ± 2.1 ng m−3 and 243 ± 255 pg m−3 in the period 2013–2017 when amalgam electrolysis was operating to 3.3 ± 0.4 ng m−3 and 32 ± 6 pg m−3 in the period 2018–2021 after its decommissioning in November 2017. Seasonal changes of GEM coincided with changes in temperature with the highest concentrations in summer, while PBM air levels were lowest in summer due to the highest seasonal precipitation amount. GEM concentrations at the four monitored settlements at Neratovice remained elevated at 2.8 ng m−3 with respect to regional background, but PBM levels decreased to background levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aas W, Bohlin-Nizzetto P (2021) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2019. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller-Norway
Aas W, Bohlin-Nizzetto P (2020) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2018. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller-Norway
Aas W, Bohlin-Nizzetto P (2018) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2016. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller-Norway
Aas W, Bohlin-Nizzetto P (2017) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2015. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller-Norway
Aas W, Bohlin-Nizzetto P (2015) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2013. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller-Norway
Aas W, Bohlin-Nizzetto P (2014) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2012. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller-Norway
Aas W, Breivik K, Bohlin-Nizzetto P et al (2019) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2017. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller-Norway
Aas W, Pfaffhuber KA, Bohlin-Nizzetto P (2016) Heavy metals and POP measurements, 2014. Kjeller-Norway
Acquavita A, Biasiol S, Lizzi D et al (2017) Gaseous elemental mercury level and distribution in a heavily contaminated site: the ex-chlor alkali plant in Torviscosa (Northern Italy). Water Air Soil Pollut 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3234-z
Åkerblom S, Meili M, Bishop K (2015) Organic matter in rain: an overlooked influence on mercury deposition. Environ Sci Technol Lett 2:128–132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00009
Anonymous (2022) Systém evidence kontaminovaných míst (Contaminated Sites Database System). Adm by Minist Environ Czech Repub. https://www.sekm.cz/. Accessed 11 Nov 2023
ATSDR (2017) Appendix a. Atsdr Minimal Risk Levels and Worksheets 1–32
Bajgar L (2004) Studie zátěže lidské populace žijící v okolí Spolany Neratovice - atestační práce z oboru Veřejné zdravotnictví (The study of load on inhabitants in vicinity of Spolana Neratovice - attestation work in program of Public health). Praha
CHMI (2022) Měsíční a roční data dle zákona 123/1998 Sb. (Monthly and annual data availiable according to the Czech law 123/1998 Sb.). https://www.chmi.cz/historicka-data/pocasi/mesicni-data/mesicni-data-dle-z.-123-1998-Sb. Accessed 10 Nov 2023
Crook J, Mousavi A (2016) The chlor-alkali process: a review of history and pollution. Environ Forensics 17:211–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2016.1177755
Custódio D, Pfaffhuber KA, Spain TG et al (2022) Odds and ends of atmospheric mercury in Europe and over the North Atlantic Ocean: temporal trends of 25 years of measurements. Atmos Chem Phys 22:3827–3840. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3827-2022
Davis K, Bailey M (2011) Chlor-alkali partnership. In: Poster at International Conference on Mercury as a Global Polluant. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of International and Tribal Affairs, Halifax
Doubek V (2000) Století chemie na Neratovicku (A century of chemistry at Neratovice area). Spolana Neratovice a.s, Neratovice
Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM et al (2013) Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environ Sci Technol 47:4967–4983. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305071v
Eckley CS, Parsons MT, Mintz R et al (2013) Impact of closing Canada’s largest point-source of mercury emissions on local atmospheric mercury concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 47:10339–10348. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401352n
EMEP (2021) Database of the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP). http://www.ceip.at. Accessed 11 Nov 2023
Esbrí JM, López-Berdonces MA, Fernández-Calderón S et al (2015) Atmospheric mercury pollution around a chlor-alkali plant in Flix (NE Spain): an integrated analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4842–4850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3305-x
Euro Chlor (2001) Chlorine industry review 2000-2001. Euro Chlor, Brussels, pp 24
Euro Chlor (2011) Chlorine industry review 2010-2011. Euro Chlor, Brussels, pp 60
Euro Chlor (2018) Chlor-alkali industry review 2017-2018. Euro Chlor, Brussels, pp 11
Euro Chlor (2019) Chlor-alkali industry review 2018-2019. Euro Chlor, Brussels, pp 33
Fantozzi L, Guerrieri N, Manca G et al (2021) An integrated investigation of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury transport and dispersion around a chlor-alkali plant in the ossola valley (Italian central alps). Toxics 9:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9070172
Fu X, Feng X, Sommar J, Wang S (2012) A review of studies on atmospheric mercury in China. Sci Total Environ 421–422:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.089
Gibičar D, Horvat M, Logar M et al (2009) Human exposure to mercury in the vicinity of chlor-alkali plant. Environ Res 109:355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.01.008
Grangeon S, Guédron S, Asta J et al (2012) Lichen and soil as indicators of an atmospheric mercury contamination in the vicinity of a chlor-alkali plant (Grenoble, France). Ecol Indic 13:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.024
Guédron S, Grangeon S, Jouravel G et al (2013) Atmospheric mercury incorporation in soils of an area impacted by a chlor-alkali plant (Grenoble, France): Contribution of canopy uptake. Sci Total Environ 445–446:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.084
Guney M, Kumisbek A, Akimzhanova Z et al (2021) Environmental partitioning, spatial distribution, and transport of atmospheric mercury (HG) originating from a site of former chlor-alkali plant. Atmosphere (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020275
Holoubek I, Cupr P, Jech L et al (2003) PCDDs/Fs contamination of the surroundings of Spolana Neratovice before and after floods 2002. In: 7th HCH and Pesticide Forum. Kiev, Ukraine, pp 39–40
Horowitz HM, Jacob DJ, Amos HM et al (2014) Historical mercury releases from commercial products: global environmental implications. Environ Sci Technol 48:10242–10250. https://doi.org/10.1021/es501337j
Hudec IP (2010) Chemie v Neratovicích (Chemistry in Neratovice) (In Czech). University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague
Hylander LD, Meili M (2003) 500 years of mercury production: global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions. Sci Total Environ 304:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00553-3
Hylander LD, Meili M (2005) The rise and fall of mercury: converting a resource to refuse after 500 years of mining and pollution. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 35:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380490492485
Ilyin I, Rozovskaya O, Travnikov O, Strijkina I (2020) Assessment of heavy metal and POP pollution on global, regional and national scales. Part I - Supplementary materials for heavy metals. Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East. Moscow, pp 70. Retrieved from https://www.msceast.org/reports/
IRZ (2017) Czech Integrated Register of Pollution. http://www.irz.cz. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
IRZ (2022) Czech Integrated Register of Pollution. http://www.irz.cz. Accessed 10 Nov 2023
Kuncová H, Petrlík J, Stávková M (2007) Chlorine production – a large source of mercury releases (The Czech Republic Case Study). Arnika – Toxics and Waste Programme, Prague
Libiseller C, Grimvall A (2002) Performance of partial Mann-Kendall tests for trend detection in the presence of covariates. Environmetrics 13:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.507
Lodenius M (1998) Dry and wet deposition of mercury near a chlor-alkali plant. Sci Total Environ 213:53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00073-4
Lyman SN, Cheng I, Gratz LE et al (2020) An updated review of atmospheric mercury. Sci Total Environ 707:135575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135575
Maršálek P, Svobodová Z, Randák T (2006) Total mercury and methylmercury contamination in fish from various sites along the Elbe river. Acta Vet Brno 75:579–585. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200675040579
Maxson P (2004) Mercury flows in Europe and the world: The impact of decommissioned chlor-alkali plants. European Commission, DG Environment - D.3, Brussels, pp 81
Maxson P (2004) Mercury flows in Europe and the world: The impact of decommissioned chlor-alkali plants. European Commission, DG Environment - D.3. Brussels, pp 81
McLagan DS, Mitchell CPJ, Huang H et al (2016) A high-precision passive air sampler for gaseous mercury. Environ Sci Technol Lett 3:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00319
McLagan DS, Mitchell CPJ, Steffen A et al (2018b) Global evaluation and calibration of a passive air sampler for gaseous mercury. Atmos Chem Phys 18:5905–5919. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5905-2018
McLagan DS, Monaci F, Huang H et al (2019) Characterization and quantification of atmospheric mercury sources using passive air samplers. J Geophys Res Atmos 124:2351–2362. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029373
Navrátil T, Nováková T, Roll M et al (2019) Decreasing litterfall mercury deposition in central European coniferous forests and effects of bark beetle infestation. Sci Total Environ 682:213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.093
Navrátil T, Nováková T, Shanley JB et al (2021a) Distribution and pools of mercury in forest soils near recent and historical mercury emission sources in the central Czech Republic. J Geochemical Explor 226:106782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2021.106782
Navrátil T, Nováková T, Shanley JB et al (2018) Larch tree rings as a tool for reconstructing 20th century central European atmospheric mercury trends. Environ Sci Technol 52:11060–11068. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02117
Navrátil T, Shanley JB, Rohovec J et al (2021b) Mercury cycling during acid rain recovery at the forested Lesní potok catchment, Czech Republic. Hydrol Process 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14255
Navrátil T, Šimeček M, Shanley JB et al (2017) The history of mercury pollution near the Spolana chlor-alkali plant (Neratovice, Czech Republic) as recorded by Scots pine tree rings and other bioindicators. Sci Total Environ 586:1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.112
Nováková T, Navrátil T, Schütze M et al (2022) Reconstructing atmospheric Hg levels near the oldest chemical factory in central Europe using a tree ring archive. Environ Pollut 304:119215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119215
Novotna K, Svobodova Z, Harustiakova D, Mikula P (2020) Spatial and temporal trends in contamination of the Czech part of the Elbe River by mercury between 1991 and 2016. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 105:750–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-03005-6
OSPAR Commission (2001) Mercury Losses from the Chlor-Alkali Industry in 1999. OSPAR Commission. London, pp 51
Oyarzun R, Higueras P, Esbrí JM, Pizarro J (2007) Mercury in air and plant specimens in herbaria: a pilot study at the MAF Herbarium in Madrid (Spain). Sci Total Environ 387:346–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.034
Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Pirrone N (2001) European emissions of atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in 1995. Atmos Environ 35:2987–2996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00102-9
Pacyna JM, Pacyna EG, Aas W (2009) Changes of emissions and atmospheric deposition of mercury, lead, and cadmium. Atmos Environ 43:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.066
Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X et al (2010) Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmos Chem Phys 10:5951–5964. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010
Potter BB, Wimsatt JC (2005) Method 415.3. Measurement of total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon and specific UV absorbance at 254 nm in source water and drinking water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC
Schmittinger P, Florkiewicz T, Curlin LC et al (2000) Chlorine. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley, p 96
Schroeder WH, Munthe J (1998) Atmospheric mercury—an overview. Atmos Environ 32:809–822
Siudek P, Kurzyca I, Siepak J (2016) Atmospheric deposition of mercury in central Poland: sources and seasonal trends. Atmos Res 170:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.004
Song Z, Li P, Ding L et al (2018) Environmental mercury pollution by an abandoned chlor-alkali plant in Southwest China. J Geochemical Explor 194:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.07.017
Spolana (2020) Rtuť ze starých výrobních provozů definitivně mizí ze Spolany (Mercury from the old processing facilities removed for good from the Spolana premises) (In Czech). In: Svaz Chem. průmyslu (Association Chem. Ind. https://www.schp.cz/info/rtut-ze-starych-vyrobnich-provozu-definitivne-mizi-ze-spolany. Accessed 10 Nov 2023
Sprovieri F, Pirrone N, Bencardino M et al (2017) Five-year records of mercury wet deposition flux at GMOS sites in the Northern and Southern hemispheres. Atmos Chem Phys 17:2689–2708. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2689-2017
Suchara I, Sucharová J (2008) Mercury distribution around the Spolana chlor-alkali plant (central Bohemia, Czech Republic) after a catastrophic flood, as revealed by bioindicators. Environ Pollut 151:352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.029
Synek V, Baloch T, Hrdličková E et al (2011) Sledování koncentrací rtuti v ovzduší v Ústí nad Labem Monitoring of mercury concentrations in the air in Ústí nad Labem Metodika Metoda stanovení rtuti. Stud Oecologica 5(1):54–72
UNEP (2018) Global Mercury Assessment
US EPA (2002) Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC
Váňa M, Dvorská A (2014) Košetice observatory-25 years. Czech Hydrometeorological Institute
Váňa M, Smejkalová AH, Svobodová J, Machálek P (2020) Long-term trends of air pollution at national atmospheric observatory Košetice (ACTRIS, EMEP, GAW). Atmosphere (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050537
Wängberg I, Barregard L, Sällsten G et al (2005) Emissions, dispersion and human exposure of mercury from a Swedish chlor-alkali plant. Atmos Environ 39:7451–7458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.054
Wängberg I, Edner H, Ferrara R et al (2003) Atmospheric mercury near a chlor-alkali plant in Sweden. Sci Total Environ 304:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00554-5
Weigelt A, Ebinghaus R, Manning AJ et al (2015) Analysis and interpretation of 18 years of mercury observations since 1996 at Mace Head, Ireland. Atmos Environ 100:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.050
WHO (2000) Air quality guidelines for Europe. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe
Wohlgemuth L, Osterwalder S, Joseph C et al (2020) A bottom-up quantification of foliar mercury uptake fluxes across Europe. Biogeosciences Discuss 2020:1–25. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-289
Zhang H, Fu X, Wang X, Feng X (2019a) Measurements and distribution of atmospheric particulate-bound mercury: a review. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 103:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-019-02663-5
Zhang H, Wang Z, Wang C, Zhang X (2019b) Concentrations and gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric reactive mercury at an urban site in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 249:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.064
Zhang L, Wong MH (2007) Environmental mercury contamination in China: sources and impacts. Environ Int 33:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.022
Zhang L, Zhou P, Cao S, Zhao Y (2019c) Atmospheric mercury deposition over the land surfaces and the associated uncertainties in observations and simulations: a critical review. Atmos Chem Phys 19:15587–15608. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15587-2019
Zhao L, Xu L, Wu X et al (2018) Characteristics and sources of mercury in precipitation collected at the urban, suburban and rural sites in a city of Southeast China. Atmos Res 211:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.04.019
Zhou H, Zhou C, Hopke PK, Holsen TM (2018) Mercury wet deposition and speciated mercury air concentrations at rural and urban sites across New York state: temporal patterns, sources and scavenging coefficients. Sci Total Environ 637–638:943–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.047
Zhu W, Li Z, Li P et al (2018) Re-emission of legacy mercury from soil adjacent to closed point sources of Hg emission. Environ Pollut 242:718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.002
Acknowledgements
We thank Martin Šimeček for his work in the initial stages of this research and Světlana Hubičková for field sampling, sample processing, and database upkeep. We are also thankful to the Lach-Ner company for supporting the bulk precipitation field sampling.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Funding
This work was supported by Czech Science Foundation Project No. 20-14292S and by institutional project RVO67985831.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TN—study design, field work, data collection, writing of manuscript draft, funding; JR and MŠ—methods, analytical works, data quality assurance, writing—review and editing; JBS data curation, visualization, writing—review and editing; TerN—field work, data collection, writing—review and editing; AHŠ and RP—data acquisition, data collection, visualization, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent for participation
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Disclaimer
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 174 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Navrátil, ., Rohovec, J., Shanley, J. et al. Atmospheric mercury and its deposition during the phasing out of an amalgam electrolysis plant: temporal, seasonal, and spatial patterns. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 123586–123602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30784-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30784-2