Skip to main content
Log in

The dependence and risk spillover between economic uncertainties and the crude oil market: new evidence from a Copula-CoVaR approach incorporating the decomposition technique

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the risk spillover of the oil market in economic uncertainty is of great importance. However, it is difficult to take on a traditional single perspective in describing the risk spillover law of economic uncertainty in the crude oil market on different timescales. In order to fill the research gap resulting from such difficulty, this paper incorporates empirical mode decomposition into the time-varying Copula-CoVaR model, and for the first time explores the risk spillover path of economic uncertainty on the two international crude oil pricing benchmarks—Brent and West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices—using different timescales. The empirical results not only verify the necessity of research from the perspective of different timescales, but also reveal the heterogeneity of the risk spillover paths of different types of economic uncertainty on crude oil prices. The research in this paper provides a multi-perspective interpretation for understanding the complex risk spillovers between various economic uncertainties and the crude oil market, as well as providing meaningful information to support stakeholders in making rational decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Aboura S, Chevallier J (2013) Leverage vs. feedback: which effect drives the oil market? Financ Res Lett 10:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Adrian T, Brummermeier MK (2016) CoVaR. Am Econ Rev 7:1705–1741

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloui R, Gupta R, Miller SM (2016) Uncertainty and crude oil returns. Energy Econ 55:92e100

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2014) Dynamic spillovers of oil price shocks and economic policy uncertainty. Energy Econ 44:433–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakas D, Triantafyllou A (2018) The impact of uncertainty shocks on the volatility of commodity prices. J Int Money Financ 87:96–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2016) Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Q J Econ 131:1593–1636

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrero JM, Bloom N, Wright, I (2016) Short and long run uncertainty. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2807456.

  • Basu S, Bundick B (2017) Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand. Econometrica 85:937–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal O, Gnabo JY, Guilmin G (2016) Economic policy uncertainty and risk spillovers in the Eurozone. J Int Money Financ 65:24–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin MH, Gozgor G, Karabulut G (2015) The impact of world energy price volatility on aggregate economic activity in developing Asian economies. Singap Econ Rev 60:613–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom N (2009) The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77:623–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econom. 31(3):307–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouri E, Chen Q, Lien D, Lv X (2017) Causality between oil prices and the stock market in China: the relevance of the reformed oil product pricing mechanism. Int Rev Econ Financ 48:34–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan WH, Maheu JM (2002) Conditional jump dynamics in stock market returns. J Bus Econ Stat 20(3):377–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang KL (2012) The time-varying and asymmetric dependence between crude oil spot and futures markets: evidence from the Mixture copula-based ARJI-GARCH model. Econ Model 29(6):2298–2309

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng IH, Kirilenko A, Xiong W (2015) Convective risk flows in commodity futures markets. Rev Financ 19:1733–1781

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong XL, Liu XH, Xiong X (2019) Measuring tail risk with GAS time varying copula, fat tailed GARCH model and hedging for crude oil futures. Pacific Basin Finance J 55:95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Glosten L, Jagannathan R, Runkle D (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility on the nominal excess returns on stocks. J Financ 48(5):1779–1801

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MLC, Shih HH, Zheng QN, Yen NC, Tung C, Liu CHH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng 454:903–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, An H, Gao X, Hao X (2016) Unveiling heterogeneities of elations between the entire oil-stock interaction and its components across time scales. Energy Econ 59:70–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Q, Fan Y (2016) Modelling the joint dynamics of oil prices and investor fear gauge. Res Int Bus Financ 37:242–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Q, Liu BY, Nehler H, Uddin GS (2018) Uncertainties and extreme risk spillover in the energy markets: a time-varying copula-based CoVaR approach. Energy Econ 76:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Joets M, Mignon V, Razafindrabe T (2017) Does the volatility of commodity prices reflect macroeconomic uncertainty? Energy Econ 68:313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang W, Ratti RA (2013) Structural oil price shocks and policy uncertainty. Econ Model 35(5):314–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YY, Yan C, Ren XH (2023) Do uncertainties affect clean energy markets? Comparisons from a multi-frequency and multi-quantile framework. Energy Econ 121:106679

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu BY, Ji Q, Fan Y (2017) Dynamic return-volatility dependence and risk measure of CoVaR in the oil market: a time-varying mixed copula model. Energy Econ 68:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ML, Ji Q, Fan Y (2013) How does oil market uncertainty interact with other markets: an empirical analysis of implied volatility index? Energy 55:860e868

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu YJ, Tuo SW, Wei Y, Yang M (2021) Time-varying effects of global economic policy uncertainty shocks on crude oil price volatility: new evidence. Resour Policy 70:101943

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghyereh AI, Awartani B, Bouri E (2016) The directional volatility connectedness between crude oil and equity markets: new evidence from implied volatility indexes. Energy Econ 57:78e93

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei DX, Zeng Q, Cao X, Diao XH (2019) Uncertainty and oil volatility: New evidence. Physica A 525:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensi W, Vo XV, Kang SH (2023) Quantile spillovers and connectedness analysis between oil and African stock markets? Econ Anal Policy 78:60–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheitrum DP, Carter CA, Revoredo-Giha C (2018) WTI and Brent futures pricing structure. Energy Econ 72:462–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Syed QR, Bouri E (2021) Spillovers from global economic policy uncertainty and oil price volatility to the volatility of stock markets of oil importers and exporters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(11):15603–15613

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng JL, Li JC, Yang J, Wang YF, Li JY (2023) High-dimensional CoVaR risk spillover network from oil market to global stock markets—lessons from the Kyoto Protocol. Front Environ Sci 11:1103625

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunc A, Kocoglu M, Aslan A (2022) Time-varying characteristics of the simultaneous interactions between economic uncertainty, international oil prices and GDP: a novel approach for Germany. Res Policy 77:102658

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XJ, Xu WK, Zhong ZD (2019) Economic policy uncertainty, CDS spreads, and CDS liquidity provision. J Futur Mark 39:461–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Wang J (2020) Energy futures and spots prices forecasting by hybrid SW-GRU with EMD and error evaluation. Energy Econ 90:104827

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu RR, Qin ZF, Liu BY (2022) A systemic analysis of dynamic frequency spillovers among carbon emissions trading (CET), fossil energy and sectoral stock markets: evidence from China. Energy. 254:124176

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao CZ, Liu C, Ju WJ (2020) Multifractal analysis of the WTI crude oil market, US stock market and EPU. Phys A: Stat Mech 550:124096

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin L, Han L (2014) Macroeconomic uncertainty: does it matter for commodity prices? Appl Econ Lett 21:711–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CG, Liu F, Yu DL (2018) Dynamic jumps in global oil price and its impacts on China’s bulk commodities. Energy Econ 70:297–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ, Wu YB (2019) The time-varying spillover effect between WTI crude oil futures returns and hedge funds. Int Rev Econ Financ 61:156–169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 71973028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tingting Zhang: methodology, data curation, visualization, and writing—original draft preparation. Zhenpeng Tang: guide research, writing—reviewing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenpeng Tang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

We do not have any person’s data in any form.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

This section shows the specific forms of five Copula functions: Gaussian-Copula, Clayton-Copula, Frank-Copula, Gumbel-Copula and t-Copula. Different types of Copula functions have their own emphasis when describing the tail dependencies between variables. Gaussian-Copula function is the most commonly used copula function. Due to its obvious symmetry, the Gaussian-Copula function can better describe the symmetric relationship and linear correlation between variables, but it cannot describe the asymmetric relationship between variables. The t-Copula function takes into account the skew and peak of the data, and is more sensitive to the change of the tail correlation coefficient, so the correlation structure of the tail can be described more accurately. The tail of the Clayton copula function is asymmetric, which can more sensitively capture the change of the lower tail’s correlation coefficient. Frank copula function has been widely used because of its relatively simple and effective structure.

  1. 1.

    Gaussian-Copula

Gaussian-Copula function, one of the most widely used Copula functions, has good upper and lower tail symmetry. For random variables (u, v), the expressions of the distribution function and density function of the Gaussian-Copula function are as follows:

$$C\left(u,v;\rho \right)={\int}_{-\infty}^{\varnothing^{-1}(u)}{\int}_{-\infty}^{\varnothing^{-1}(v)}\frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{1-{\rho}^2}}\exp \left(\frac{-\left({r}^2+{s}^2-2\rho rs\right)}{2\left(1-{\rho}^2\right)}\right) drds$$
(1)
$$c\left(u,v;\rho \right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-{\rho}^2}}\exp \left(-\frac{\varnothing^{-1}{(u)}^2+{\varnothing}^{-1}{(v)}^2-2\rho {\varnothing}^{-1}(u){\varnothing}^{-1}(v)}{2\left(1-{\rho}^2\right)}\right)\exp \left(-\frac{\varnothing^{-1}{(u)}^2{\varnothing}^{-1}{(v)}^2}{2}\right)$$
(2)
  1. 2.

    Clayton-Copula

The binary Clayton-Copula function describes the asymmetric binary correlation. Unlike the binary Gumbel-Copula function, the binary Clayton-Copula function can capture the lower tail correlation square more accurately, and its distribution function expression is as follows:

$$C\left(u,v;\theta \right)={\left({u}^{-\theta }+{v}^{-\theta }-1\right)}^{-\frac{1}{\theta }}$$
(3)
  1. 3.

    Frank-Copula

Although Frank copula is also suitable for describing symmetric data, it has the special advantage of being able to describe the negative correlation between variables, unlike the Clayton copula and Gumbel copula. The binary Frank copula distribution function is expressed as follows:

$$C\left(u,v;\lambda \right)=-\frac{1}{\lambda}\ln \left(1+\frac{\left({e}^{-\lambda u}-1\right)\Big(\left({e}^{-\lambda v}-1\right)}{e^{-\lambda }-1}\right)$$
(4)
  1. 4.

    Gumbel-Copula

Compared with the Gaussian-Copula and t-Copula functions, the Gumbel-Copula function is asymmetric, with the upper tail being higher and the lower tail being lower, making it more sensitive and accurate in catching the relationship between the upper tail and the lower tail. The distribution function expression of the Gumbel-Copula is as follows:

$$C\left(u,v;\alpha \right)=\exp \left(-{\left[{\left(-\ln u\right)}^{\frac{1}{\alpha }}+{\left(-\ln v\right)}^{\frac{1}{\alpha }}\right]}^{\alpha}\right)$$
(5)
  1. 5.

    t-Copula

Compared with the binary Gaussian-Copula function, the binary t-Copula function can not only describe the binary phase-dependent structure with symmetric distribution, but also can describe the degree of tail correlation between variables in a more detailed way. The specific expression of its function is as follows:

$$C\left(u,v;\rho, v\right)={\int}_{-\infty}^{T_v^{-1}(u)}{\int}_{-\infty}^{T_v^{-1}(v)}\frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{1-{\rho}^2}}\left[1+\frac{t^2+{s}^2-2\rho st}{v\left(1-{\rho}^2\right)}\right] dsdt$$
(6)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, ., Tang, Z. The dependence and risk spillover between economic uncertainties and the crude oil market: new evidence from a Copula-CoVaR approach incorporating the decomposition technique. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 104116–104134 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29624-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29624-0

Keywords

Navigation