Abstract
This study examines the impact of carbon trading pilot policy (CTPP) on carbon emissions (CO2) and air pollution (Ap) using the difference in differences method (DID) utilizing panel data from 30 Chinese areas spanning from 2008 to 2020. The results indicate that CTPP implementation can effectively decrease CO2 and Ap. CTPP can reduce CO2 and Ap through positive incentive effects that promote industrial structure upgrading and drive technological progress. Moreover, CTPP exhibits significant regional variation, with CTPP significantly reducing CO2 in both the eastern and central and western regions. CTPP do not show an effective reduction in Ap in eastern region, while effectively reduce Ap in central and western regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Ambec S, Coria J (2018) Policy spillovers in the regulation of multiple pollutants. J Environ Econ Manag 87:114–134
Aydin M, Degirmenci T, Gurdal T, Yavuz H (2023) The role of green innovation in achieving environmental sustainability in European Union countries: Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Gondwana Res 118:105–116
Cao Q (2020) The driving effect of national-level new districts on regional economic growth–empirical evidence based on 70 large and medium-sized cities. China Indust Econ 12(07):43–60. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2020.07.014
Cao J, Law SH, Samad ARBA, Mohamad WNBW, Wang J, Yang X (2021) Impact of financial development and technological innovation on the volatility of green growth—evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:48053–48069
Cheng B, Dai H, Wang P, Zhao D, Masui T (2015) Impacts of carbon trading scheme on air pollutant emissions in Guangdong Province of China. Energy Sustain Dev 27:174–185
Cheng H, Liu X, Xu Z (2022) Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Market on Regional Urbanization: an Empirical Study Based on a Difference-In-Differences Model. Econ Anal Lett 1:15–21
Chuai X, Feng J (2019) High resolution carbon emissions simulation and spatial heterogeneity analysis based on big data in Nanjing City, China. Sci Total Environ 686:828–837
Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J LawEcon 3:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
Dong Z, Xia C, Fang K, Zhang W (2022) Effect of the carbon emissions trading policy on the co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction and air pollution control. Energy Policy 165:112998
Ercan T, Onat NC, Keya N, Tatari O, Eluru N, Kucukvar M (2022) Autonomous electric vehicles can reduce carbon emissions and air pollution in cities. Transp Res Part d: Transp Environ 112:103472
Fan M, Yang P, Li Q (2022) Impact of environmental regulation on green total factor productivity: A new perspective of green technological innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(35):53785–53800
Fang Z, Razzaq A, Mohsin M, Irfan M (2022) Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China. Technol Soc 68:101844
Gao X, Liu N, Hua Y (2022) Environmental Protection Tax Law on the synergy of pollution reduction and carbon reduction in China: Evidence from a panel data of 107 cities. Sustain Prod Consump 33:425–437
Ge W, Xu Y, Razzaq A, Liu G, Su X, Yang X, Ran Q (2023) What drives the green transformation of enterprises? A case of carbon emissions trading pilot policy in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(19):56743–56758
Hübler M, Voigt S, Löschel A (2014) Designing an emissions trading scheme for China-An up-to-the-minute climate policy assessment. Energy Policy 75:57–72
Jiang J, Xie D, Ye B, Shen B, Chen Z (2016) Research on China’s cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: Overview and outlook. Appl Energy 178:902–917
Jiang W, Sun Y (2023) Which is the more important factor of carbon emission, coal consumption or industrial structure? Energy Policy 176:113508
Lan J, Li W, Zhu X (2022) The road to green development: How can carbon emission trading pilot policy contribute to carbon peak attainment and neutrality? Evidence from China. Front Psychol 13:962084
Li S, Liu J, Wu J, Hu X (2022) Spatial spillover effect of carbon emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: Empirical data from transport industry in China. Cleaner Production 371:133529
Lin BQ, Liu XY (2010) Carbon emissions in China’s urbanization stage: Influencing factors and emission reduction strategies. Econ Res J 45:66–78
Liu H, Lei H, Zhou Y (2022a) How does green trade affect the environment? Evidence from China. J Econ Anal 1(1):1–19
Liu L, Chen C, Zhao Y, Zhao E (2015) China׳s carbon-emissions trading: Overview, challenges and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:254–266
Liu X, Zhang W, Cheng J, Zhao S, Zhang X (2022b) Green credit, environmentally induced R&D and low carbon transition: Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(59):89132–89155
Meng Y, Liu L, Xu Z, Gong W, Yan G (2022) Research on the Heterogeneity of Green Biased Technology Progress in Chinese Industries—Decomposition Index Analysis Based on the Slacks-based measure integrating (SBM). J Econ Anal 1(2):17–34
Pang T, Duan M (2016) Cap setting and allowance allocation in China’s emissions trading pilot programmes: Special issues and innovative solutions. Climate Policy 16(7):815–835
Ran Q, Yang X, Yan H, Xu Y, Cao J (2023) Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: does the digital economy matter? Resour Policy 81:103396
Razzaq A, Yang X (2023) Digital finance and green growth in China: Appraising inclusive digital finance using web crawler technology and big data. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 188:122262
Ren S, Liu Z, Zhanbayev R, Du M (2022) Does the internet development put pressure on energy-saving potential for environmental sustainability? Evidence from China. J Econ Anal 1(1):50–65
Shang Y, Razzaq A, Chupradit S, An NB, Abdul-Samad Z (2022) The role of renewable energy consumption and health expenditures in improving load capacity factor in ASEAN countries: Exploring new paradigm using advance panel models. Renew Energy 191:715–722
Shao S, Li X, Cao J, Yang L (2016) Economic policy choice of haze pollution control in china: based on the perspective of spatial spillover effect. Econ Res J 51(09):73–88
Shen B, Yang X, Xu Y, Ge W, Liu G, Su X, ... Ran Q (2023) Can carbon emission trading pilot policy drive industrial structure low-carbon restructuring: new evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 30(14), 41553–41569
Shi X, Xu Y (2022) Evaluation of China’s pilot low-carbon city program: a perspective of industrial carbon emission efficiency. Atmos Pollut Res 13(6):101446
Shi X, Xu Y, Sun W (2022) Evaluating China’s pilot carbon Emission Trading Scheme: Collaborative reduction of carbon and air pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 1–20
Shi X, Xu Y, Dong B, Nishino N (2023) Mariculture carbon sequestration efficiency in China: Its measurement and socio-economic factor analysis. Sustain Prod Consump. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.06.003
Song M, Zheng H, Shen Z (2023) Whether the carbon emissions trading system improves energy efficiency–Empirical testing based on China’s provincial panel data. Energy 275:127465
Sun Y, Razzaq A, Kizys R, Bao Q (2022) High-speed rail and urban green productivity: the mediating role of climatic conditions in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 185:122055
Tang L, Wu J, Yu L, Bao Q (2017) Carbon allowance auction design of China’s emissions trading scheme: A multi-agent-based approach. Energy Policy 102:30–40
Tong Y, Wang K, Liu J, Zhang Y, Gao J, Dan M, ... Zhao Z (2023) Refined assessment and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions in high-energy intensive industrial sectors in China. Sci Total Environ, 162161
Villoria-Sáez P, Tam VW, del Río Merino M, Arrebola CV, Wang X (2016) Effectiveness of greenhouse-gas Emission Trading Schemes implementation: a review on legislations. J Clean Prod 127:49–58
Wang H, Gu K, Sun H, Xiao H (2023) Reconfirmation of the symbiosis on carbon emissions and air pollution: A spatial spillover perspective. Sci Total Environ 858:159906
Xiao Y, Huang H, Qian XM, Chen L (2023) Can carbon emission trading pilot facilitate green development performance? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Clean Prod 400:136755
Xu H, Pan X, Li J, Feng S, Guo S (2023) Comparing the impacts of carbon tax and carbon emission trading, which regulation is more effective? J Environ Manage 330:117156
Yan Y, Zhang X, Zhang J, Li K (2020) Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story. Energy Policy 138:111282
Yang X, Jiang P, Pan Y (2020) Does China’s carbon emission trading policy have an employment double dividend and a Porter effect? Energy Policy 142:111492
Yang X, Wang W, Wu H, Wang J, Ran Q, Ren S (2022a) The impact of the new energy demonstration city policy on the green total factor productivity of resource-based cities: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Environ Planning Manage 66(2):293–326
Yang X, Su X, Ran Q, Ren S, Chen B, Wang W, Wang J (2022b) Assessing the impact of energy internet and energy misallocation on carbon emissions: new insights from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–25
Yang X, Wang W, Su X, Ren S, Ran Q, Wang J, Cao J (2023) Analysis of the influence of land finance on haze pollution: An empirical study based on 269 prefecture-level cities in China. Growth Chang 54(1):101–134
Yi H, Zhao L, Qian Y, Zhou L, Yang P (2022) How to achieve synergy between carbon dioxide mitigation and air pollution control? Evidence from China. Sustain Cities Soc 78:103609
Yu DJ, Li J (2021) Evaluating the employment effect of China’s carbon emission trading policy: Based on the perspective of spatial spillover. Cleaner Production 292:126052
Yue X, Zhao S, Ding X, Xin L (2022) How the pilot low-carbon city policy promotes urban green innovation: based on temporal-spatial dual perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(1):561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010561
Zhang G, Zhang N (2020) The effect of China’s pilot carbon emissions trading schemes on poverty alleviation: a quasi-natural experiment approach. Management 271:110973
Zhang D, Kong Q, Wang Y, Vigne SA (2023a) Exquisite workmanship through net-zero emissions? The effects of carbon emission trading policy on firms’ export product quality. Energy Economics 123:106701
Zhang H, Duan Y, Yang J, Han Z, Wang H (2023b) Can green finance improve China's haze pollution reduction? The role of energy efficiency. Environ Dev 45:100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100833
Zhang YJ, Shi W (2023) Has China’s carbon emissions trading (CET) policy improved green investment in carbon-intensive enterprises? Comput Ind Eng 180:109240
Zhang W, Yang J, Zhang Z, Shackman JD (2017) Natural gas price effects in China based on the CGE model. J Clean Prod 147:497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.109
Zhao S, Cao Y, Feng C, Guo K, Zhang J (2022a) How do heterogeneous R&D investments affect China’s green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis. Sci Total Environ 825:154090
Zhao S, Tian W, Dagestani AA (2022b) How do R&D factors affect total factor productivity: based on stochastic frontier analysis method. Econ Anal Lett 1:28–34
Zhao XG, Jiang GW, Nie D, Chen H (2016) How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: A perspective of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1229–1245
Zhou B, Zhang C, Song H, Wang Q (2019) How does emission trading reduce China’s carbon intensity? An exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach. Sci Total Environ 676:514–523
Funding
This work was supported by the 2021 Research Programme of Panzhihua Science and Technology Bureau (grant number 2021ZX-5–1); Special Basic Cooperative Research Programs of Yunnan Provincial Undergraduate Universities’ Association (grant numbers 202101AO070272); 2022 Research Programme of Panzhihua Science and Technology Bureau (grant number 2022ZD-S-12; 2022ZD-S-24; 2022ZD-S-26).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yige Qiu: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing—review & editing, Writing—original draft, Software, Visualization, Formal analysis. Mei Zhang: Writing—original draft, Software, Writing—review & editing, Formal analysis. Funding acquisition, Supervision. Shanshan Liu: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Formal analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Validation. Mengjie Fan: Writing—review & editing, Validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V.V.S.S. Sarma
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, Y., Zhang, M., Fan, M. et al. Towards sustainable development: what carbon trading pilot policy has been done for mitigating carbon emissions and air pollution?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 96678–96688 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29246-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29246-6