Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of waste management among Industry 4.0 and sustainable development

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study is aimed at investigating the impact of waste management in the context of Industry 4.0 and sustainable development. Data were collected from 257 production managers in the industrial sector using a survey questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS and PLS-SEM. The findings indicated that Industry 4.0 and waste management significantly contribute to achieving sustainable development. The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies and effective waste management practices can help organizations implement sustainable development goals. Practical implications include assisting organizations in implementing Industry 4.0 technologies and waste management strategies based on the 3Rs principle. This can lead to reduced environmental impacts and improved resource efficiency, contributing to sustainable development. Policymakers can also benefit from the study’s insights to address waste management challenges and promote sustainable development. The study’s originality lies in its incorporation of the cyber-physical system and niche theory to explore how Industry 4.0 can facilitate sustainable waste management. It highlights the transformative potential of Industry 4.0 in the industrial sector, particularly in developing countries. Overall, this research offers a unique contribution to understanding waste management within the context of Industry 4.0 and sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and materials used in this research paper are available with authors and will be given to your good journal on demand.

References

  • Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MS (2018) Solid waste issue: sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egypt J Pet 27(4):1275–1290

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo TS, Alola AA (2023) Examining the (non) symmetric environmental quality effect of material productivity and environmental-related technologies in Iceland. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 57:103192

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo TS, Kartal MT, Ağa M, Al-Faryan MAS (2023a) Role of country risks and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: evidence from MINT countries. J Environ Manag 327:116884

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo TS, Ullah S, Kartal MT, Ali K, Pata UK, Ağa M (2023b) Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: the role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. Sci Total Environ 859:160181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Administration, I. T. (2021). Waste Management. Retrieved from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/pakistan-waste-management Accessed 24 Apr 2023

  • Albus H, Ro H (2017) Corporate social responsibility: the effect of green practices in service recovery. J Hosp Tour Res 41(1):41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali QM, Nisar QA, Abidin RZU, Qammar R, Abbass K (2022) Greening the workforce in higher educational institutions: the pursuance of environmental performance. Environ Sci and Pollut Res 1–14

  • Alola AA, Adebayo TS (2023a) Analysing the waste management, industrial and agriculture greenhouse gas emissions of biomass, fossil fuel, and metallic ores utilization in Iceland. Sci Total Environ 887:164115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Adebayo TS (2023b) The potency of resource efficiency and environmental technologies in carbon neutrality target for Finland. J Clean Prod 389:136127

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr S, Gilg AW, Ford NJ (2001) Differences between household waste reduction, reuse and recycling behavior: a study of reported behaviors, intentions, and explanatory variables. Environ Waste Manage 4(2):69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard JB, Green RL (1994) The role of turfgrasses in environmental protection and their benefits to humans. J Environ Qual 23(3):452–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla SH, Silva HR, Terra da Silva M, Franco Gonçalves R, Sacomano JB (2018) Industry 4.0 and sustainability implications: a scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenges. Sustainability 10(10):3740

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2017) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Info Commun Eng 8(1):37–44

  • Carley M, Christie I (2017) Managing sustainable development. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudary S, Zahid Z, Shahid S, Khan SN, Azar S (2016) Customer perception of CSR initiatives: its antecedents and consequences. Soc Responsib J 12(2):263–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Dao V, Langella I, Carbo J (2011) From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework. J Strateg Inf Syst 20(1):63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AG, Dalenogare LS, Ayala NF (2019) Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Econ 210:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke N, Boeve-de Pauw J, Berglund T, Olsson D (2019) The sustainability consciousness questionnaire: the theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development. Sustain Dev 27(1):35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segars AH (2001) Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):185–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Celsi M, Ortinau DJ, Bush RP (2010) Essentials of marketing research (Vol. 2). McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: a global review of solid waste management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood B, Mellor M, O'Brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13(1):38–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Wang X, Kua H, Geng Y, Bleischwitz R, Ren J (2018) Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95(882):137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry, B. s. N. C. o. (2016). Challenges for industry 4.0 in Brazil / National Confederation of Industry. Retrieved from Brazil: https://www.portaldaindustria.com.br/publicacoes/2016/8/challenges-industry-40-brazil/ Accessed 24 Apr 2023

  • Irfan M, Ullah S, Razzaq A, Cai J, Adebayo TS (2023) Unleashing the dynamic impact of tourism industry on energy consumption, economic output, and environmental quality in China: a way forward towards environmental sustainability. J Clean Prod 387:135778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS, Tanaka M (2004) Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystems including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: a review and synthesis. Mar Pollut Bull 48(7-8):624–649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group: Forschungsunion.

  • Keeble BR (1988) The Brundtland report:‘Our common future’. Med War 4(1):17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2007) Transition management is a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14(1):78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Qammar R, Qadri SU, Khan MK, Ma Z, Qadri S, Ahmed H, Mahmood S (2023) Pro-environmental behavior, green HRM practices, and green psychological climate: examining the underlying mechanism in Pakistan. Front Environ Sci

  • Lee, E. A. (2008). Cyber-physical systems: Design challenges. Paper presented at the 2008 11th IEEE international symposium on an object and component-oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC).

  • McWilliams A, Parhankangas A, Coupet J, Welch E, Barnum DT (2016) Strategic decision-making for the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 25(3):193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr LA, Webb DJ, Harris KE (2001) Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. J Consum Aff 35(1):45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Naz S, Jamshed S, Nisar QA, Nasir N (2021) Green HRM, psychological green climate and pro-environmental behaviors: an efficacious drive towards environmental performance in China. Curr Psychol:1–16

  • Ohno T, Bodek N (2019) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity press

    Google Scholar 

  • Oztemel E, Gursev S (2020) Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell Manuf 31(1):127–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K.-J., Zheng, R., & Liu, X. (2012). Cyber-physical systems: milestones and research challenges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qamar R, Abidin ZU, Fayyaz S, Ahmad H (2022) The influence of green human resource management practices on employee’s green creativity: the roles of green self-identity & green shared vision. Environ Sol Pollut Res

  • Rasoolimanesh SM, Ali F, Jaafar M (2018) Modeling residents’ perceptions of tourism development: linear versus non-linear models. J Destin Mark Manag 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) Smart pls 2.0 m3, vol 2. University of Hamburg): Book Smart Pls, p M3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon N, Mace GM, Naeem S, Tobias JA, Pigot AL, Cavanagh R et al (2016) Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: prospects and policy. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283(1844):20162094

    Google Scholar 

  • Shariatzadeh N, Lundholm T, Lindberg L, Sivard G (2016) Integration of digital factory with smart factory based on Internet of Things. Procedia CIRP 50:512–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpak N, Odrekhivskyi M, Doroshkevych K, Sroka W (2019a) Simulation of innovative systems under Industry 4.0 conditions. Soc Sci 8(7):202

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpak N, Podolchak N, Karkovska V, Sroka W (2019b) The influence of age factors on the reform of the public service of Ukraine. Cent Eur J Public Policy 13(2):40–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA (2011) Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: a reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria. Health Psychol Rev 5(1):55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Szeremlei AK, Magda R (2015) Sustainable production and consumption. Visegr J Bioecon Sustain Dev 4(2):57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchobanoglous G, Kreith F (2002) Handbook of solid waste management. McGraw-Hill Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Terlau W, Hirsch D (2015) Sustainable consumption and the attitude-behavior-gap phenomenon-causes and measurements towards sustainable development. Int J Food Syst Dyn 6(3):159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • van Straten B, Dankelman J, van der Eijk A, Horeman T (2021) A circular healthcare economy; a feasibility study to reduce surgical stainless-steel waste. Sustain Prod Consum 27:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu LD, Xu EL, Li L (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2941–2962

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Gu S (2021) Industry 4.0 is a revolution that requires technology and national strategies. Complex Intell Syst 7(3):1311–1325

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang X, Adebayo TS, Oladipupo SD, Kirikkaleli D (2023) Asymmetric impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on environmental degradation: designing an SDG framework for developed economy. Environ Technol 44(6):774–791

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zéman Z (2019) New dimensions of internal controls in banking after the GFC. Econ Ann-XXI 176:38–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Jeong E, Olson ED, Evans G (2020) Investigating the effect of message framing on event attendees’ engagement with an advertisement promoting food waste reduction practices. Int J Hosp Manag 89:102589

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu D, Zhang S, Sutton DB (2015) Linking Daly’s Proposition to policymaking for sustainable development: indicators and pathways. J Clean Prod 102:333–341

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rabia Qammar designed the concept of the study. Zain Ul Abidin worked on material preparation. Shrafat Ali Sair collected the data. Rabia Qammar and Zain Ul Abidin performed analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ala’a Zuhair Mansour and Hodifa Farhan Ahmad Abu Owidha. Ijaz Ahmad checked the editing and proof reading of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabia Qammar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Hereby, authors consciously assure that for the manuscript titled “Impact of Waste Management among Industry 4.0 and Sustainable Development” the following is fulfilled:

  1. 1.

    This material is the authors’ own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere.

  2. 2.

    The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

  3. 3.

    The paper reflects the authors’ own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner.

  4. 4.

    The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers.

  5. 5.

    The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research.

  6. 6.

    All sources used are properly disclosed (correct citation).

  7. 7.

    All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper and will take public responsibility for its content.

The violation of the Ethical Statement rules may result in severe consequences. We agree with the above statements and declare that this submission follows the policies as outlined in the Guide for Authors and in the Ethical Statement.

Consent to Participate

We understand that we will not benefit directly from participating in this research. We understand that all information we provide for this study will be treated confidentially. We understand that in any report on the results of this research my identity will remain anonymous.

Consent for publication

All authors whose names appear on the submission (1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work; (2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; (3) approved the version to be published; and (4) agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qammar, ., Abidin, Z.U., Sair, S.A. et al. Impact of waste management among Industry 4.0 and sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 100743–100752 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28987-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28987-8

Keywords

Navigation