Abstract
Carbon footprint (CF) research has received increasing attention in recent years, as evidenced by a rise in publications and citations, reflecting a growing concern for the environmental impact of human activities. However, the alignment of this scientific literature with the three dimensions of sustainability performance provided by the TBL paradigm (people, planet, and profit) has received limited attention. This study addresses this research gap by undertaking a large-scale bibliometric analysis of 9032 Web of Science (WoS) publications from 1992 to 2020. At the macro (journals) and micro (papers) levels, a methodology approach to classify research publications according to TBL dimensions was designed. The results indicate that the output and impact of CF research are balanced with respect to the environmental (planet) and economic (prosperity/profit) dimensions, while the social impact is balanced with respect to the people+profit dimensions. Other than that, “Affordable and Clean Energy” (3761 publications) and “Climate Action” (3091 publications) are the most frequently represented (and interconnected) objectives. The results obtained contribute to a greater understanding of the contribution of CF research to the attainment of the SDGs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data set is available upon request.
References
Alhaddi H (2015) Triple bottom line and sustainability: a literature review. Bus Manag Stud 1(2):6–10. https://doi.org/10.11114/bms.v1i2.752
Bautista-Puig N, Mañana-Rodríguez J, Serrano-López AE (2021) Role taxonomy of green and sustainable science and technology journals: exportation, importation, specialization and interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics 126:3871–3892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03939-6
Bautista-Puig N, Lozano R, Barreiro-Gen M (2022) Developing a sustainability implementation framework: insights from academic research on tools, initiatives and approaches. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02516-y
Chancel L (2022) Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019. Nat Sustain 5:931–938. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00955-z
Chen R, Zhang R, Han H (2021) Where has carbon footprint research gone? Ecol Indic 120:106882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106882
Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36(2):90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746
Farooq Q, Fu P, Liu X, Hao Y (2021) Basics of macro to microlevel corporate social responsibility and advancement in triple bottom line theory. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 28(3):969–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2069
He J, Yang Y, Liao Z, Xu A, Fang K (2022) Linking SDG 7 to assess the renewable energy footprint of nations by 2030. Appl Energy 317:119167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119167
International Council for Science (2015) Review of the sustainable development goals: the science perspective. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU)
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: synthesis report. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 104. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr/. Accessed 27 Feb 2023
Karmakar M, Banshal SK, Singh VK (2021) A large-scale comparison of coverage and mentions captured by the two altmetric aggregators: Altmetric.com and PlumX. Scientometrics 126:4465–4489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03941-y
Li Z, Chen Z, Yang N, Wei K, Ling Z, Liu Q, Chen G, Ye BH (2021) Trends in research on the carbon footprint of higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2010-2019). J Clean Prod 289:125642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125642
Liu Z, Deng Z, Davis SJ et al (2022) Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2021. Nat Rev Earth Environ 3:217–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00285-w
Lozano R (2022a) Sustainable development and sustainability. In: En R. Lozano, Toward Sustainable Organisations. Springer International Publishing, pp 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99676-5_2
Lozano R (2022b) Tools, initiatives, and approaches used for implementing sustainability. In: Toward Sustainable Organisations: A Holistic Perspective on Implementation Efforts. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 39–74
Lozano R, Huisingh D (2011) Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. J Clean Prod 19(2):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004
Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, Delgado López-Cózar E (2018) Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J Informetr 12(4):1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Mishra HG, Pandita S, Bhat AA, Mishra RK, Sharma S (2022) Tourism and carbon emissions: a bibliometric review of the last three decades: 1990–2021. Tour Rev 77(2):636–658
Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106(1):213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Neri A, Cagno E, Lepri M, Trianni A (2021) A triple bottom line balanced set of key performance indicators to measure the sustainability performance of industrial supply chains. Sustain Prod Consum 26:648–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.018
Ortega JL (2018) Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data. Scientometrics 116(3):2123–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2838-z
Paris Agreement (2015). In Report of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (21st Session, 2015: Paris) (Vol. 4, pp. 2017).
Pereira, T H M, Martins, H. C. (2021). People, planet, and profit: a bibliometric analysis of triple bottom line theory. J Manag Sustain, 11, 64.
Pukelis, L, Bautista-Puig, N, Statulevičiūtė, G, Stančiauskas, V, Dikmener, G, & Akylbekova, D. (2022). OSDG 2.0: a multilingual tool for classifying text data by UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11252.
Repiso R, Merino-Arribas A, Cabezas-Clavijo Á (2021) El año que nos volvimos insostenibles: Análisis de la producción española en Sustainability (2020). Profesional De La información 30(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.09
Rivest M, Kashnitsky Y, Bédard-Vallée A, Campbell D, Khayat P, Labrosse I, Pinheiro H, Provençal S, Roberge G, James C (2021) Improving the Scopus and Aurora queries to identify research that supports the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2021. Elsevier Data Repository v4. https://doi.org/10.17632/9sxdykm8s4.4
Rockström J, Sukhdev P (2016) How food connects all the SDGs: a new way of viewing the Sustainable Development Goals and how they are all linked to food. Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2016-06-14-how-food-connects-all-the-sdgs.html. Accessed 27 Feb 2023
Shi S, Yin J (2021) Global research on carbon footprint: a scientometric review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 89:106571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106571
Steffen W (2009) Climate change 2009: faster change & more serious risks. Dept of Climate Change ISBN: 978-1-921298-58-5
Tremblay D, Fortier F, Boucher JF, Riffon O, Villeneuve C (2020) Sustainable development goal interactions: an analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda. Sustain Dev 28(6):1584–1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2107
Tseng ML, Chang CH, Lin CWR et al (2020) Future trends and guidance for the triple bottom line and sustainability: a data-driven bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(31):33543–33567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09284-0
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030_Agenda_for_Sustainable_Development_web.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2023
United Nations (2019). About the sustainable development goals. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/envision2030.html. Accessed 27 Feb 2023
Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth, New Society Publishers. Gabriola Island, British Columbia Canada
WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press
Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Ecol Econ Res Trends 1:1–11
Wu R, Xie Y, Wang Y et al (2022) The comparative landscape of Chinese and foreign articles on the carbon footprint using bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(34):35471–35483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18493-8
Xie Y, Li X, Hu X, Hu X (2020) The landscape of academic articles in environmental footprint family research: a bibliometric analysis during 1996–2018. Ecol Indic 118:106733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106733
Yang Y, Meng G (2019) A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese ecological footprint research hotspots and frontiers since 2000. Ecol Indic 102:650–665
Yue T, Liu H, Long R, Zhang H, Jiang W, Zhang S et al (2020) Research trends and hotspots related to global carbon footprint based on bibliometric analysis: 2007–2018. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(17):17671–17691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08158-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization and design: SA and EO
Visualization: NB, SA, and EO
Data collection: SA, CT, NB, and EO
Data analysis: SA and NB and EO and CT
Writing: SA and NB and EO and CT
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose except that NB is an unpaid member of the project OSDG API.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Baojing Gu
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
I have not submitted my manuscript to a preprint server before submitting it to Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aytac, ., Bautista-Puig, N., Orduña-Malea, E. et al. Contribution of carbon footprint research towards the triple bottom line of sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 88331–88349 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28799-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28799-w