Abstract
Climate change in context of environmental issues is pushing most of the countries to set the goals in order to achieve carbon neutrality and sustainable development. The recognition of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) thirteen (13) is aided by the objective of this study which is to take an urgent action to combat climate change. In this context, this study investigates the effect of technological progress, income, and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emission by taking into consideration the moderating effect of economic freedom in 165 global countries from 2000 to 2020. The study employed ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects (FE), and two-step system generalized method of moments for analysis. The findings reveal that economic freedom, income per capita, foreign direct investment, and industry increase carbon dioxide emission while technological progress reduces emission in global countries. Surprisingly, economic freedom indirectly increases the level of carbon emissions by technological progress; however, economic freedom indirectly decreases the level of carbon emissions by income per capita. In this regard, this study favors clean eco-friendly technologies and seeks methods for development without harming the environment. Furthermore, the findings of this study have considerable policy suggestions for the sample countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data used in the analysis are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
Abdel-Gadir S (2020) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth nexus in Oman: evidence from ARDL approach to cointegration and causality analysis. Eur J Soc Sci. https://www.europeanjournalofsocialsciences.com/
Acheampong AO (2018) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: what causes what and where? Energy Econ 74:677–692
Acheampong AO et al (2019) Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa? Sci Total Environ 677:436–446
Acheampong AO, Boateng EB (2019) Modelling carbon emission intensity: application of artificial neural network. J Clean Prod 225:833–856
Adeleye BN et al (2021) Energy use and the role of per capita income on carbon emissions in African countries. PloS One 16(11):e0259488
Adesina KS, Mwamba JWM (2019) Does economic freedom matter for CO2 emissions? Lessons from Africa. J Dev Areas 53(3)
Ahmad N et al (2023) The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: evidence from China. Technology in Society 72:102184
Al-mulali U et al (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323
Ali W et al (2016) The dynamic linkage between technological innovation and carbon dioxide emissions in Malaysia: an autoregressive distributed lagged bound approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6(3):389–400
Alvarado R, Toledo E (2017) Environmental degradation and economic growth: evidence for a developing country. Environ Dev Sustain 19(4):1205–1218
Amesheva I (2017) Environmental degradation and economic development in China: an interrelated governance challenge. Law Dev Rev 10(2):425–450
Andlib Z, Khan A (2021) The role of information and communication technologies (ICT) in environmental quality: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Int J Econ Environ Geol 12(2):80–86
Antweiler W et al (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908
Apergis N et al (2010) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69(11):2255–2260
Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–51
Bae JH et al (2017) Determinants of CO2 emission for post-Soviet Union independent countries. Clim Policy 17(5):591–615
Bakhsh K et al (2017) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. J Environ Manage 196:627–632
Bakirtas I, Cetin MA (2017) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(22):18273–18283
Benedetti R et al (2020) Modeling the impact of technological innovation on environmental efficiency: a spatial panel data approach. Geogr Anal 52(2):231–253
Bentzen J (2004) Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energy Econ 26(1):123–134
Bhattacharya M et al (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energ 111:157–167
Bjørnskov C (2016) Economic freedom and economic crises. Eur J Political Econ 45:11–23
Bjørnskov C (2020) "Economic freedom and the CO2 Kuznets curve
Buonanno P et al (2003) Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto. Resour Energy Econ 25(1):11–34
Carlsson F, Lundström S (2001) Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO2 emissions. Department of Economics, Goteborg University, Goteborg
Cederborg J, Snöbohm S (2016) Is there a relationship between economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions?
Chen J et al (2020) Effects of technological changes on China’s carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153:119938
Chen L (2022) How CO2 emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(1):457–467
Chen Y et al (2019) Exploring the effects of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on China’s CO2 emissions: evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renew Energ 140:341–353
Cheng Z et al (2018) Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China’s provinces. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2935–2946
Chien F et al (2021) The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: a step towards sustainable environment. Renew Energ 177:308–317
Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81
De Grauwe P, Ji Y (2020) Structural reforms, animal spirits, and monetary policies. Eur Econ Rev 124:103395
De Vita G et al (2015) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in a tourism development context. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(21):16652–16663
Dinda S (2018) Production technology and carbon emission: long-run relation with short-run dynamics. J Appl Econ 21(1):106–121
Dodman D (2009) Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environ Urban 21(1):185–201
Ehigiamusoe KU, Lean HH (2019) Effects of energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development on carbon emissions: evidence from heterogeneous income groups. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(22):22611–22624
Fan H et al (2018) Technological innovation, infrastructure and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ARDL and Granger causality approach. Asian Econ Financ Rev 8(7):964–985
Farhadi M et al (2015) Economic freedom and productivity growth in resource-rich economies. World Dev 72:109–126
Farzin YH, Bond CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ 81(1):213–235
Gerlagh R, Lise W (2005) Carbon taxes: a drop in the ocean, or a drop that erodes the stone? The effect of carbon taxes on technological change. Ecol Econ 54(2-3):241–260
Gill FL et al (2018) The critical review of the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). Int J Energy Econ Policy 8(1):167–174
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377
Hafeez M et al (2019) Evaluating the energy consumption inequalities in the one belt and one road region: implications for the environment. Energies 12(7):1358
Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub- Saharan Africa’s Βig 10 electricity generators. Renew Energ 123:36–43
Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Apergis N (2019) The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade. Lat Am Econ Rev 28:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40503-019-0063-7
Jiao J et al (2018) Impact of R&D technology spillovers on carbon emissions between China’s regions. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 47:35–45
Jin L et al (2017) The impact of technological progress in the energy sector on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis from China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(12):1505
Joshi P, Beck K (2018) Democracy and carbon dioxide emissions: assessing the interactions of political and economic freedom and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Res Soc Sci 39:46–54
Kais S, Sami H (2016) An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty eight countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1101–1110
Katircioglu ST (2014) International tourism, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: the case of Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 36:180–187
Khan I et al (2021) Analyzing renewable and nonrenewable energy sources for environmental quality: dynamic investigation in developing countries. Math Probl Eng 2021:1–12
Khan S et al (2019) Energy consumption, environmental degradation, economic growth and financial development in globe: dynamic simultaneous equations panel analysis. Energy Rep 5:1089–1102
Kulin J, Johansson Sevä I (2019) The role of government in protecting the environment: quality of government and the translation of normative views about government responsibility into spending preferences. Int J Sociol 49(2):110–129
Law SH, Azman-Saini WNW (2012) Institutional quality, governance, and financial development. Econ Gov 13(3):217–236
Lee S, Oh D-W (2015) Economic growth and the environment in China: empirical evidence using prefecture level data. China Econ Rev 36:73–85
Liu X, Bae J (2018) Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. J Clean Prod 172:178–186
Liu X et al (2021a) The corruption-emissions nexus: do information and communication technologies make a difference? Util Policy 72:101244
Liu X et al (2021b) China carbon neutrality target: revisiting FDI-trade-innovation nexus with carbon emissions. J Environ Manage 294:113043
Mahmood MT et al (2022) The relevance of economic freedom for energy, environment, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(4):5396–5405
Majeed MT et al (2021) The trade-off between economic growth and environmental quality: does economic freedom asymmetric matter for Pakistan? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(31):41912–41921
McMahon F (2014) Economic freedom (Fraser Institute and Heritage Foundation). In: Michalos AC (ed) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_819
Mert M, Bölük G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(21):21669–21681
Narayan PK et al (2016) Economic growth and carbon emissions. Econ Model 53:388–397
Ning L, Wang F (2018) Does FDI bring environmental knowledge spillovers to developing countries? The role of the local industrial structure. Environ Resource Econ 71(2):381–405
Pata UK (2018) The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy 160:1115–1123
Rapsikevicius J et al (2021) The impact of economic freedom on economic and environmental performance: evidence from European countries. Sustain 13(4):2380
Rauf A et al (2018a) Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(32):32066–32080
Rauf A et al (2018b) Nexus between industrial growth, energy consumption and environmental deterioration: OBOR challenges and prospects to China. In: 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (IEIS). IEEE
Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):33387–33398
Samargandi N (2017) Sector value addition, technology and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:868–877
Seker F et al (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:347–356
Soytas U et al (2007) Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62(3-4):482–489
Su C-W et al (2021) Towards achieving sustainable development: role of technology innovation, technology adoption and CO2 emission for BRICS. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(1):277
Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454
Ullah KM, Uddin K (2021) The relationships between economic growth and cropland changes in Bangladesh: an evidence based on annual land cover data. Environ Chall 5:100252
Usman O et al (2022) Examining the Interaction effect of control of corruption and income level on environmental quality in Africa. Sustain 14(18):11391
Vural G (2020) How do output, trade, renewable energy and non-renewable energy impact carbon emissions in selected sub-Saharan African countries? Resour Policy 69:101840
Wang H, Wei W (2020) Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: the optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies. Energy Econ 87:104510
Wang S et al (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371
Ward JD et al (2016) Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? PLoS One 11(10):e0164733
Wu J, Abban OJ, Boadi AD et al (2022) The effects of energy price, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions, and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in Europe: a spatial econometrics approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:63782–63798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20179-0
Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:943–951
Zhang N et al (2016) Carbon emissions dynamics, efficiency gains, and technological innovation in China’s industrial sectors. Energy 99:10–19
Zhu H et al (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the journal editor and anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestion on the improvement of quality of this paper
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Formal analysis was done by Yasir Ali; formal writing and proof reading were done by Hayat Khan.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, ., Khan, H. The effect of technological progress and income per capita on carbon dioxide emission: the moderating role of economic freedom. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 88563–88576 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28687-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28687-3