Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of technological progress and income per capita on carbon dioxide emission: the moderating role of economic freedom

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change in context of environmental issues is pushing most of the countries to set the goals in order to achieve carbon neutrality and sustainable development. The recognition of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) thirteen (13) is aided by the objective of this study which is to take an urgent action to combat climate change. In this context, this study investigates the effect of technological progress, income, and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emission by taking into consideration the moderating effect of economic freedom in 165 global countries from 2000 to 2020. The study employed ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects (FE), and two-step system generalized method of moments for analysis. The findings reveal that economic freedom, income per capita, foreign direct investment, and industry increase carbon dioxide emission while technological progress reduces emission in global countries. Surprisingly, economic freedom indirectly increases the level of carbon emissions by technological progress; however, economic freedom indirectly decreases the level of carbon emissions by income per capita. In this regard, this study favors clean eco-friendly technologies and seeks methods for development without harming the environment. Furthermore, the findings of this study have considerable policy suggestions for the sample countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data used in the analysis are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Abdel-Gadir S (2020) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth nexus in Oman: evidence from ARDL approach to cointegration and causality analysis. Eur J Soc Sci. https://www.europeanjournalofsocialsciences.com/

  • Acheampong AO (2018) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: what causes what and where? Energy Econ 74:677–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Acheampong AO et al (2019) Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa? Sci Total Environ 677:436–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acheampong AO, Boateng EB (2019) Modelling carbon emission intensity: application of artificial neural network. J Clean Prod 225:833–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeleye BN et al (2021) Energy use and the role of per capita income on carbon emissions in African countries. PloS One 16(11):e0259488

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adesina KS, Mwamba JWM (2019) Does economic freedom matter for CO2 emissions? Lessons from Africa. J Dev Areas 53(3)

  • Ahmad N et al (2023) The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: evidence from China. Technology in Society 72:102184

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-mulali U et al (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali W et al (2016) The dynamic linkage between technological innovation and carbon dioxide emissions in Malaysia: an autoregressive distributed lagged bound approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6(3):389–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado R, Toledo E (2017) Environmental degradation and economic growth: evidence for a developing country. Environ Dev Sustain 19(4):1205–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Amesheva I (2017) Environmental degradation and economic development in China: an interrelated governance challenge. Law Dev Rev 10(2):425–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Andlib Z, Khan A (2021) The role of information and communication technologies (ICT) in environmental quality: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Int J Econ Environ Geol 12(2):80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler W et al (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N et al (2010) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69(11):2255–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae JH et al (2017) Determinants of CO2 emission for post-Soviet Union independent countries. Clim Policy 17(5):591–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhsh K et al (2017) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. J Environ Manage 196:627–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakirtas I, Cetin MA (2017) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(22):18273–18283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti R et al (2020) Modeling the impact of technological innovation on environmental efficiency: a spatial panel data approach. Geogr Anal 52(2):231–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen J (2004) Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energy Econ 26(1):123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M et al (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energ 111:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov C (2016) Economic freedom and economic crises. Eur J Political Econ 45:11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov C (2020) "Economic freedom and the CO2 Kuznets curve

  • Buonanno P et al (2003) Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto. Resour Energy Econ 25(1):11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson F, Lundström S (2001) Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO2 emissions. Department of Economics, Goteborg University, Goteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederborg J, Snöbohm S (2016) Is there a relationship between economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions?

  • Chen J et al (2020) Effects of technological changes on China’s carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153:119938

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L (2022) How CO2 emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(1):457–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y et al (2019) Exploring the effects of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on China’s CO2 emissions: evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renew Energ 140:341–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z et al (2018) Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China’s provinces. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2935–2946

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien F et al (2021) The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: a step towards sustainable environment. Renew Energ 177:308–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe P, Ji Y (2020) Structural reforms, animal spirits, and monetary policies. Eur Econ Rev 124:103395

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vita G et al (2015) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in a tourism development context. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(21):16652–16663

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2018) Production technology and carbon emission: long-run relation with short-run dynamics. J Appl Econ 21(1):106–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodman D (2009) Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environ Urban 21(1):185–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehigiamusoe KU, Lean HH (2019) Effects of energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development on carbon emissions: evidence from heterogeneous income groups. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(22):22611–22624

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan H et al (2018) Technological innovation, infrastructure and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ARDL and Granger causality approach. Asian Econ Financ Rev 8(7):964–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhadi M et al (2015) Economic freedom and productivity growth in resource-rich economies. World Dev 72:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzin YH, Bond CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ 81(1):213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh R, Lise W (2005) Carbon taxes: a drop in the ocean, or a drop that erodes the stone? The effect of carbon taxes on technological change. Ecol Econ 54(2-3):241–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill FL et al (2018) The critical review of the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). Int J Energy Econ Policy 8(1):167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez M et al (2019) Evaluating the energy consumption inequalities in the one belt and one road region: implications for the environment. Energies 12(7):1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub- Saharan Africa’s Βig 10 electricity generators. Renew Energ 123:36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Apergis N (2019) The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade. Lat Am Econ Rev 28:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40503-019-0063-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J et al (2018) Impact of R&D technology spillovers on carbon emissions between China’s regions. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 47:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin L et al (2017) The impact of technological progress in the energy sector on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis from China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(12):1505

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi P, Beck K (2018) Democracy and carbon dioxide emissions: assessing the interactions of political and economic freedom and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Res Soc Sci 39:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kais S, Sami H (2016) An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty eight countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1101–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu ST (2014) International tourism, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: the case of Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 36:180–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan I et al (2021) Analyzing renewable and nonrenewable energy sources for environmental quality: dynamic investigation in developing countries. Math Probl Eng 2021:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan S et al (2019) Energy consumption, environmental degradation, economic growth and financial development in globe: dynamic simultaneous equations panel analysis. Energy Rep 5:1089–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulin J, Johansson Sevä I (2019) The role of government in protecting the environment: quality of government and the translation of normative views about government responsibility into spending preferences. Int J Sociol 49(2):110–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Law SH, Azman-Saini WNW (2012) Institutional quality, governance, and financial development. Econ Gov 13(3):217–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Oh D-W (2015) Economic growth and the environment in China: empirical evidence using prefecture level data. China Econ Rev 36:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Bae J (2018) Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. J Clean Prod 172:178–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X et al (2021a) The corruption-emissions nexus: do information and communication technologies make a difference? Util Policy 72:101244

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X et al (2021b) China carbon neutrality target: revisiting FDI-trade-innovation nexus with carbon emissions. J Environ Manage 294:113043

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood MT et al (2022) The relevance of economic freedom for energy, environment, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(4):5396–5405

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT et al (2021) The trade-off between economic growth and environmental quality: does economic freedom asymmetric matter for Pakistan? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(31):41912–41921

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon F (2014) Economic freedom (Fraser Institute and Heritage Foundation). In: Michalos AC (ed) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_819

  • Mert M, Bölük G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(21):21669–21681

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK et al (2016) Economic growth and carbon emissions. Econ Model 53:388–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning L, Wang F (2018) Does FDI bring environmental knowledge spillovers to developing countries? The role of the local industrial structure. Environ Resource Econ 71(2):381–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2018) The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy 160:1115–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapsikevicius J et al (2021) The impact of economic freedom on economic and environmental performance: evidence from European countries. Sustain 13(4):2380

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauf A et al (2018a) Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(32):32066–32080

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rauf A et al (2018b) Nexus between industrial growth, energy consumption and environmental deterioration: OBOR challenges and prospects to China. In: 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (IEIS). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):33387–33398

    Google Scholar 

  • Samargandi N (2017) Sector value addition, technology and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:868–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Seker F et al (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Soytas U et al (2007) Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62(3-4):482–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C-W et al (2021) Towards achieving sustainable development: role of technology innovation, technology adoption and CO2 emission for BRICS. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(1):277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah KM, Uddin K (2021) The relationships between economic growth and cropland changes in Bangladesh: an evidence based on annual land cover data. Environ Chall 5:100252

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman O et al (2022) Examining the Interaction effect of control of corruption and income level on environmental quality in Africa. Sustain 14(18):11391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vural G (2020) How do output, trade, renewable energy and non-renewable energy impact carbon emissions in selected sub-Saharan African countries? Resour Policy 69:101840

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wei W (2020) Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: the optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies. Energy Econ 87:104510

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S et al (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JD et al (2016) Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? PLoS One 11(10):e0164733

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Abban OJ, Boadi AD et al (2022) The effects of energy price, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions, and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in Europe: a spatial econometrics approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:63782–63798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20179-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:943–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N et al (2016) Carbon emissions dynamics, efficiency gains, and technological innovation in China’s industrial sectors. Energy 99:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H et al (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the journal editor and anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestion on the improvement of quality of this paper

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Formal analysis was done by Yasir Ali; formal writing and proof reading were done by Hayat Khan.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayat Khan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Description of variable and symbols
Table 8 Variance inflation factor

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, ., Khan, H. The effect of technological progress and income per capita on carbon dioxide emission: the moderating role of economic freedom. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 88563–88576 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28687-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28687-3

Keywords

Navigation