Abstract
Solar air heater is widely used for drying and industrial processing application. Different artificial roughened surfaces and coatings over the absorber plates are used to improve their performance of solar air heater by increasing absorption and heat transfer. In this proposed work, the graphene-based nanopaint is prepared by wet chemical and ball milling method and the prepared graphene nanopaint is characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The prepared graphene-based nanopaint is coated on the absorber plate by conventional coating method. The thermal performance of the solar air heater coated with traditional black paint and graphene nanopaint is evaluated and compared. The day’s maximum energy gain by the graphene-coated solar air heater is 972.84 W, whereas traditional black paint is only 808.02 W. The average energy gain of graphene nanopaint is 655.85 W, which is 12.9% higher than the traditional black paint. The maximum thermal efficiency for solar air heater coated with graphene nanopaint is 81%. Also the average thermal efficiency of graphene-coated solar air heater is 72.5%, which has a 13.24% higher average thermal efficiency when compared to conventional black paint-coated solar air heater. The average top heat loss for solar air heater coated with graphene nanopaint is 8.48% lower than solar air heater with traditional black paint.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abdelkader TK, Zhang Y, Gaballah ES, Wang S, Wan Q, Fan Q (2019) Energy and exergy analysis of a flat-plate solar air heater coated with carbon nanotubes and cupric oxide nanoparticles embedded in black paint. J Clean Prod 250:119501
Al-Kayiem HH, Ismaeel AA, Baheta AT, Aurybi MA (2021) Performance enhancement of solar vortex power generator by Al2O3-in-black paint coating. J Clean Prod 316:128303
Balandin AA (2011) Thermal properties of graphene and nano-structured nano-structured carbon materials. Nat Mater 10:569
Chen Z, Boström T (2016) Electrophoretically deposited carbon nanotube spectrally selective solar absorbers. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 144:678–683
El Nady J, Kashyout AB, Ebrahim Sh, Soliman MB (2016) Nanoparticles Ni electroplating and black paint for solar collector applications. Alex Eng J 55:723–729
El-Sebaii AA, Al-Snani H (2010) Effect of selective coating on the thermal performance of flat plate solar air heaters. Energy 35:1820–1828
Gupta S, Rajale S, Raval F, Sojitra M, Tiwari AK, Joshi A, Singh R (2020) Comparative performance analysis of flat plate solar collectors with and without aluminium oxide-based nano-fluid. Mater Today: Proc 46(11):5378–5383
Holman JP (1989) Experimental methods for engineers. The McGraw Hill Companies, New York
Huang Y, Quyang Q, Zhang D, Zhu J, Li R, Yu H (2014) Carbon materials reinforced aluminium composites: a review. Acta Metall Sin- Engl 27:775–786
Imahori H, Matsubara Y, Iijima H, Umeyama T, Matano Y, Ito S, Niemi M, Tkachenko NV, Lemmetyinen H (2010) Effects of meso-diarylamino group of porphyrins as sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells on optical, electrochemical, and photovoltaic properties. J Phys Chem C 114(23):10656–10665
Jeong D, Lee J, Hong H, Choi D, Cho JW, Kim SK, Nam Y (2017) Absorption mechanism and performance characterization of CuO nano-structured nano-structured absorbers. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cell 169:270–279
Kabeel AE, Sathyamurthy R, Sharshir SW, Muthumanokar A, Panchal H, Prakash N, Prasad C, Nandakumar S, El-Kady MS (2019) Effect of water depth on a novel absorber plate of pyramid solar still coated with TiO 2 nano black paint. J Clean Prod 213:185–191
Karthick Kumar S, Murugesan S, Suresh S (2014) As selective solar absorbers, the preparation and characterization of CuO nano-structures on a copper substrate. Mater Chem Phys 143:1209–1214
Khanlari A, Tuncer AD, Sozen A, Aytaç I, Çiftçi E, Variyenli HI (2022) Energy and exergy analysis of a vertical solar air heater with nano enhanced absorber coating and perforated baffles. Renewable Energy 187:586–602
Khanlari A, Tuncer AD, Sözen A et al (2022) Energy and exergy analysis of a vertical solar air heater with nano-enhanced absorber coating and perforated baffles. Renew Energy 187:586–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.074
Kollanoor KR, Balachandran S, Babu S, Sudhakar S (2016) Improving the efficiency of a solar air heater by using nanoparticle coating. Nat Conf New Renew Energy Technol: 1–5
Kumar KS, Murugesan S, Suresh S (2014) As selective solar absorbers, the preparation and characterization of CuO nano-structures on a copper substrate. Materials Chem Phys 143:1209–1214
Kumar R, Verma SK, Sharma VK (2020) Performance enhancement analysis of triangular solar air heater coated with nanomaterial embedded in black paint. Mater Today: Proc 26(2):2528–2532
Lizama-Tzec FI, Herrera-Zamora DM, Arés-Muzio O, Gómez-Espinoza VH, Santos-González I, Cetina-Dorantes M, Vega-Poot AG, García-Valladares O, Oskam G (2019) Electrodeposition of selective coatings based on black nickel for flat-plate solar water heaters. Sol Energy 194:302–310
Lu Y, Chen Z (2019) Experimental study on thermal performance of solar absorber with CuO nano structure selective coating. Energy Proc 158:1303–1310
Madadi Avargani V, Zendehboudi S, Rahimi A, Soltani S (2022) Comprehensive energy, exergy, enviro-exergy, and thermo-hydraulic performance assessment of a fat plate solar air heater with different obstacles. Appl Therm Eng 203:117907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117907
Mizuno K, Ishii J, Kishida H, Hayamizu Y, Yasuda S, Futaba DN, Yumura M, Hata K (2009) A black body absorber from vertically aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6044–6047
Moffat RJ (1988) Describing the uncertainities in experimental results. Exper Therm Fluid Sci 1(1):3–17
Nazari M, Jafarmadar S, Khalilarya S (2022) Exergy and thermoeconomic analyses of serpentine tube flat-plate solar water heaters coated with CuO nanostructures. Case Stud Therm Eng 35:102072
Oztop HF, Bayrak F, Hepbasli A (2013) Energetic and exergetic aspects of solar air heating (solar collector) systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:59–83
Pandey KM, Chaurasiya R (2017) A review and analysis of the development of solar flat plate collector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:641–650
Rajendran V, Ramasubbu H, Alagar K, Ramalingam VK (2021) Performance analysis of domestic solar air heating system using V-shaped baffles—an experimental study. J Process Mech Eng 235:1705–1717
Rajendran V, Karthik S, Rajarathinam JV (2022) Environmental, economic, and performance assessment of solar air heater with inclined and winglet baffle. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(6):14337–14352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23213-3
Ramesh C, Vijayakumar M, Alshahrani S, Navaneethakrishnan G, Palanisamy R, Natrayan L, Ahamed Saleel C, Afzal A, Shaik S, Panchal H (2022) Performance enhancement of selective layer coated on solar absorber panel with reflector for water heater by response surface method: a case study. Case Stud Therm Eng 36:102093
Roro KT, Tile N, Mwakikunga B, Yalisi B, Forbes A (2012) Solar absorption and thermal emission properties of multiwall carbon nanotube/nickel oxide nanocomposite thin films synthesized by sol-gel process. Mater Sci Eng B 177:581–587
Selimefendigil F, Şirin C, Ghachem K, Kolsi L, Alqahtani T, Algarni S (2022) Enhancing the performance of a greenhouse drying system by using triple-flow solar air collector with nano-enhanced absorber coating. Case Stud Therm Eng 34:102011
Šest E, Dražič G, Genorio B, Jerman I (2018) Graphene nanoplatelets as an anti-corrosion additive for solar absorber coatings. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 176:19–29
Singh S (2022) Utilising fractional porous interface for high thermal performance of serpentine wavy channel solar air heater. Appl Therm Eng 205:118044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng
Sivakumar S, Velmurugan C, Ebenezer Jacob Dhas DS, Brusly Solomon A, Leo Dev Wins K (2020) Effect of nano cupric oxide coating on the forced convection performance of a mixed-mode flat plate solar dryer. Renew Energy 155:1165–1172
Subramani J, Sevvel P, Anbuselvam SSA (2020) Influence of CNT coating on the efficiency of solar parabolic trough collector using AL2O3 nanofluids—a multiple regression approach. Mater Today: Proc 45(2):1857–1861
Vijayakumar R, Harichandran R, Jaya Venkatesh R, Ramanan P (2022) Experimental study on the thermal performance of a solar air heater integrated with multi-geometry arrangements over the absorber plate. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:38331–38345
Yalin Lu, Chen Z (2019) Experimental study on thermal performance of solar absorber with CuO nano structure selective coating. Energy Procedia 158:1303–1310
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SKD prepared the graphene nanopaint. HR gave direction to prepare graphene nanopaint and involved in manuscript preparation. VR fabricated the solar air heater and contributed to experimentation. PR contributed to experimentation work and analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dharmaraj, S.K., Ramasubbu, H., Rajendran, V. et al. Effect of graphene nanopaint on performance of solar air heater attached with inclined and winglet baffles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 87330–87342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28646-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28646-y