Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate environmental investment and sustainable development: based on the perspective of Marxist ecological civilization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses the sample of all A-share listed companies in China’s securities market except insurance and financial enterprises from 2009 to 2021 to construct a long panel data, and explores whether the environmental investment of enterprises will promote their long-term sustainable development in China’s unique and superior institutional and cultural environment from the perspective of Marxist ecological civilization. On the basis of controlling measurement errors, omitted variables, and endogenous problems of mutual causality to ensure the robustness of the research results, and further distinguishing the heterogeneous effects of environmental investment and sustainable development of enterprises in different degrees of market-oriented environment, the empirical study shows that (1) there is a significant positive relationship between environmental investment and sustainable development of enterprises. That is to say, environmental investment can help enterprises obtain social capital, alleviate resource constraints, enhance their market performance, and thus help their sustainable development in the future; (2) environmental protection investment has a significant positive impact on the sustainable development of enterprises in the mature market environment, while in the relatively backward market environment, environmental protection investment has no significant role in promoting the sustainable development of enterprises. This paper enriches the literature on corporate environmental investment, makes a preliminary test of the implementation effect of sustainable development in China, and provides more detailed empirical evidence for the government to further guide the implementation and implementation of corporate environmental responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Murshed M et al (2022) How do green energy technology investments, technological innovation, and trade globalization enhance green energy supply and stimulate environmental sustainability in the G7 countries? Gondwana Res 112:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albarrak MS, Elnahass M, Salama A (2019) The effect of carbon dissemination on cost of equity. Bus Strateg Environ 28(6):1179–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulos I, Kounetas K, Tzelepis D (2012) Environmental performance and technical efficiency, is there a link?: The case of Greek listed firms. Int J Product Perform Manag 61(1):6–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkaraan F, Albitar K, Hussainey K, Venkatesh VG (2022) Corporate transformation toward industry 4.0 and financial performance: the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technol Forecast Soc Chang (175-Feb.)

  • Baldini M, Maso LD, Liberatore G, Mazzi F, Terzani S (2018) Role of country- and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. J Bus Ethics 150(1):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belin J, Guille M (2008) R&d and innovation in France: what kind of financing for defense enterprises?

  • Cajias M, Fuerst F, Mcallister P, Nanda A (2014) Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers? Int J Strateg Prop Manag 18(1):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KS, Dang V, Yan I (2012) Chinese firms’ political connection, ownership, and financing constraints. MPRA Paper 115(2):164–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YC, Hung M, Wang Y (2017) The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: evidence from China. Soc Sci Electron Publ 65(1):169–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strateg Manag J 35(1):1–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens S, Feijen E, Laeven L (2007) Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. CEPR Discus Pap 88(3):554–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull R, Li W, Sun B, Xu LC (2015) Government connections and financial constraints: evidence from a large representative sample of Chinese firms. J Corp Finan 32:271–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliwa Y, Aboud A, Saleh A (2019) ESG practices and the cost of debt: evidence from EU countries. Crit Perspect Account 8:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Envelope Z, Envelope J, Envelope A (2022) How do natural resources, digitalization, and institutional governance contribute to ecological sustainability through load capacity factors in highly resource-consuming economies? Resour Policy 79:103068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoul SE, Guedhami O, Kwok C, Mishra DR (2011) Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? J Bank Finance 35(9):2388–2406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giese G, Lee LE, Melas D, Nagy Zoltán, Nishikawa L (2019) Foundations of esg investing: how esg affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. J Portf Manag 45(5):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss A, Roberts GS (2011) The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. J Bank Finance 35(7):1794–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadlock CJ, Pierce JR (2010) New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the kz index. Rev Financ Stud 23(5):1909–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammami A, Zadeh MH (2019) Audit quality, media coverage, environmental, social, and governance disclosure and firm investment efficiency: evidence from Canada. Int J Account Inf Manag 28(1):45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Chen C (2022) The spatial spillover and threshold effect of green finance on environmental quality: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(12):17487–17498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, Robert D (2000) Exploring the linkage between investment in manufacturing and environmental technologies. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(2):127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Yang Z, Zhang F, Zhang N (2022a) Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s environmental protection tax law. Energy Econ 109:106000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Jain V, Sharma P et al (2022b) The role of sustainable development goals to eradicate the multidimensional energy poverty and improve social wellbeing’s. Energ Strat Rev 42:100885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo W, Guo X, Zhong S, Wang J (2019) Environmental information disclosure quality, media attention and debt financing costs: evidence from Chinese heavy polluting listed companies. J Clean Prod 231(SEP.10):268–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min JH, Kim B, Ha S et al (2015) The relationship between firms’ environmental, social, governance factors and their financial performance: an empirical rationale for creating shared value. Korean Manag Sci Rev 32(1):113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavelin S, Porter LA (2008) The corporate social performance content of innovation in the U.K. J Bus Ethics 80(4):711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiris D, Evans J (2010) The relationship between environmental social governance factors and U.S. stock performance. J Invest 19(3):104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyro WC, De Almeida CMVB, Pinto Jr MJA, Contador JC, Giannetti BF, De Lima AF et al (2022) Industry 4.0 implementation: the relevance of sustainability and the potential social impact in a developing country. J Clean Prod 337

  • Schuler DA, Cording M (2006) A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Acad Manag Rev 31(3):540–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serafeim G, Yoon A (2022) Stock price reactions to ESG news: the role of ESG ratings and disagreement. Soc Sci Electron Publ 2:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer M, Szado E (2019) Environmental, social, and governance practices and perceived tail risk. Account Finance 60(4):4195–4224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Chang H, Dinara G et al (2022) Economic performance, investment in energy resources, foreign trade, and natural resources volatility nexus: evidence from China’s provincial data. Renewable Energy 78:102913

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2004) The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. Eur Manag J 22(5):557–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hu L, Fan G (2021) Report on China’s Provincial Marketization Index. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Li Y, Liu X et al (2022) Enterprise characteristics and external influencing factors of sustainable innovation: based on China’s innovation survey. J Clean Prod 372:133461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XD, Zeng SX, Zou HL, Shi JJ (2014) The impact of corporate environmental violation on shareholders’ wealth: a perspective taken from media coverage. Bus Strateg Environ 25(2):73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Qin X, Liu L (2020) The interaction effect between ESG and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability 12(5):1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Marxism, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, 400074, China

    Yong Ye

  2. School of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China

    Yi Yang & Xiaowei Song

  3. Shangqiu Medical College, Shangqiu, Shandong, 476299, China

    Yi Yang

Authors
  1. Yong Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaowei Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yong Ye, Yi Yang, and Xiaowei Song: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, formal analysis, and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Y., Yang, Y. & Song, X. Corporate environmental investment and sustainable development: based on the perspective of Marxist ecological civilization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 89022–89035 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28508-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28508-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation