Skip to main content
Log in

Research on odor characteristics of typical odorants of railway vehicle products

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Odor annoyance was a kind of environmental air pollution. Compared to other indoor environments, vehicle interior materials were not well studied. Especially, there had been little research on odor character of the railway vehicles. This study applied the OAV method to identify the key odorants of railway vehicle materials and discussed the characteristics of these odorants through Weber Fechner law and a dual variable method. The result showed that for single odorant, Weber Fechner law can be used to estimate the perceived intensity of an odor gas sample at different concentration levels. The odorant with smaller slope had significant tolerance to human. For the mixtures of odorants, the overall intensity of the mixture is generally dominated by the strongest odor intensity of the individual substance in the mixture, and positive interaction effect can be observed in mixtures whose intensities had little difference. But there was a kind of odorants, such as methacrylate, in which a very small variation in the concentration of mixtures can affect its odor intensity largely. Meanwhile, the odor intensity modification coefficient was an effective way to identify and evaluate odor interaction effect. The interaction potential of the studied odorants from strong to weak was methacrylate, dibutyl-amine, nonanal, 2-ethyl hexanol. The odor interaction potential and odor nature should be paying much attention in the improvement of odor in railway vehicle product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Renzhe Li, lirenzhemail@163.com], upon reasonable request.

References

  • Abraham MH, Sa´nchez-Moreno R, Cometto-Muniz JE et al (2012) An algorithm for 353 odor detection thresholds in humans. Chem Senses 37:207–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham S, Joslyn S, Suffet IH (2015) Treatment of odor by a seashell biofilter at a wastewater treatment plant. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 65:1217–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius K, Brown AS, van der Veen AMH (2016) Suitability of different containers for the sampling and storage of biogas and biomethane for the determination of the trace-level impurities. A Review. Analytica Chimica Acta 902:22–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp J, Herbig J, Gutmann R, Hansel A (2008) On the use of Tedlar bags for breath-gas sampling and analysis. J Breath Res 2:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X-K, Feng L-L, Luo H-L, Cheng H-M (2014) Analyses on influencing factors of airborne VOCs pollution in taxi cabins. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:12868–12882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chien Y-C (2007) Variations in amounts and potential sources of volatile organic chemicals in new cars. Sc Total Environ 382:228–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curren J, Hallis SA, Snyder CL, Suffet IH (2016) Identification and quantification of nuisance odors at a trash transfer station. Waste Manage 58:52–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faber J, Brodzik K, Gołda-Kopek A, Łomankiewicz D (2013) Air pollution in new vehicles as a result of VOC emissions from interior materials. Pol J Environ Stud 2(6):1701–1709

    Google Scholar 

  • Hau KM, Connell DW (1998) Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for odor thresholds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Indoor Air 8(1):23–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawko C, Verriele M, Hucher N et al (2021) A review of environmental odor quantification and qualification methods: the question of objectivity in sensory analysis. Sci Total Environ 795:148862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirota K, Sakai H, Washio M, Kojima T (2004) Application of electron beams for the treatment of VOC streams. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:1185–1191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CC, Horng SH, Liao P-N (2003) Stability of trace-level volatile organic compounds stored in canisters and Tedlar bags. Aerosol Air Qual Res 3(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D-D, Guo H-Q (2018) Relationships between odor properties and determination of odor concentration limits in odor impact criteria for poultry and dairy barns[J]. Sci Total Environ 630:1484–1491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger SR, McRae JF, Bava CM et al (2013) A Mendelian trait for olfactory sensitivity affects odor experience and food selection. Curr Biol 23:1601–1605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH (2010) Experimental demonstration of masking phenomena between competing odorants via an air dilution sensory test. Sensors 10:7287–7302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YH, Kim KH, Jo SH et al (2012) Comparison of storage stability of odorous VOCs in polyester aluminum and polyvinyl fluoride Tedlar® bags. Anal Chim Acta 712:162–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolasińska P, Dymerski T, Namieśnik J (2015) Use of sensory analysis methods to evaluate the odor of food and outside air. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45:2208–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R-Z, Zhong Y, Guan L-L et al (2019) Odor traceability of a railway vehicle cab and its interior materials. Electric Locomotives Mass Transit Veh 6:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R-Z, Zhong Y, Guan L-L et al (2020) Research on volatile organic compounds source traceability of a railway vehicle indoor air. Indust Saf Environ Protect 12:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R-Z, Zhong Y, Guan L-L et al (2021) Study on the pollution level of VOCs in the cab of EMU. China Railway 4:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R-Z, Zhong Y, Guan L-L (2022) Analysis of odor of seals for rail transit vehicles. Indust Safety Environ Protect 1:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y-B, Feng M, Wang Y-X (2023) Subjective and objective odor evaluation of adhesives for rail vehicles. Adhesive 1:37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang B, Yu X, Mi H-P, Liu D, Huang Q-Q, Tian M (2019) Health risk assessment and source apportionment of VOCs inside new vehicle cabins: a case study from Chongqing, China. Atmos Pollut Res 10:1677–1684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandalakis M, Stephanou EG, Horii Y, Kannan K (2008) Emerging contaminants in car interiors: evaluating the impact of airborne PBDEs and PBDD/Fs. Environ Sci Technol 42:6431–6436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mouli-Castillo J, Bartlett S, Murugan A et al (2020) Olfactory appraisal of odorants for 100% hydrogen networks. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:11875–11884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata Y (2003) Measurement of odor threshold by triangle odor bag method. Odor measurement review. Office of Odor, Noise and Vibration, Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of Environment, Tokyo (Japan), pp 118–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicell JA (2009) Assessment and regulation of odour impacts. Atmos Environ 43:196–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oiamo TH, Luginaah IN, Baxter J (2015) Cumulative effects of noise and odour annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life. Soc Sci Med 146:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren L-Y, Ma J, Lv Y, Tong Q-G, Guo H-Y (2021) Characterization of key off-odor compounds in thermal duck egg gels by GC-olfactometry-MS, odor activity values, and aroma recombination. LWT-Food Sci Technol 143:111182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman SS, Williams CM (2005) Science of odor as a potential health issue. J Environ Qual 34:129–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su X-F, Wang X-X, Wang Y-X et al (2023) Study on odor release effect of adhesive bonded components. Adhesive 2:40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Danguin T, Sinding C, Romagny S, et al (2014) The perception of odor objects in everyday life: a review on the processing of odor mixtures. Frontiers in Psychol 5:504(1–19)

  • Ton van Harreveld AP (2003) Odor concentration decay and stability in gas sampling bags. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabue S, Kerr B, Bearson B, Ziemer C (2011) Swine odor analyzed by odor panels and chemical techniques. J Environ Qual 40:1510–1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-X, Huang X-F, Lan Q et al (2021) Study on the pleasure of floor cloth of a railway vehicle. Guangdong Chem Indust 22:102–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisel CP (2005) Automobile, bus, and rail passenger air quality. HDB Env. Chem, Vol 4, Part H:317–334

  • Wu C-D, Liu J-M, Zhao P, Piringer M, Schauberger G (2016) Conversion of the chemical concentration of odorous mixtures into odour concentration and odour intensity: a comparison of methods. Atmos Environ 127:283–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xing L-Q, Wang L-C, Zhang R (2018) Characteristics and health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds emitted from interior materials in vehicles: a case study from Nanjing, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:14789–14798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi Q, Liu J-M, Wang G-H, Zhang Y-N (2013) Evaluation of indoor air quality based on qualitative, quantitative and olfactory analysis. Chin Sci Bull 58(9):986–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S-C, Cai L-S, Koziel JA et al (2010) Field air sampling and simultaneous chemical and sensory analysis of livestock odorants with sorbent tubes and GC–MS/olfactometry. Sensors Actuators B 146:427–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Renzhe Li, Yuan Zhong and Lingling Guan. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Renzhe Li and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renzhe Li.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate

All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript, also agree to submit it as a research article to the Environmental Science and Pollution Research for consideration of publication.

Consent for publication

All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript, and also agree to submit it as a research article to the Environmental Science and Pollution Research for consideration of publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no relevant financial or non-financial interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, R., Zhong, Y. & Guan, L. Research on odor characteristics of typical odorants of railway vehicle products. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 78216–78228 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27858-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27858-6

Keywords

Navigation