Abstract
The mismatch between the supply and demand of ecosystem services has become a critical cause of the decline of urban ecological security. Studying the supply–demand matching of ecosystem services and exploring its association with urban spatial governance are imperative for ensuring sustainable urbanization. Taking Suzhou City as a case, the supply and demand values and matching degrees of five selected ecosystem services were assessed. Additionally, we explored the relationship between ecosystem services and urban spatial governance, with a focus on urban functional zoning. The findings indicate that first, the supply value of water production, food production, carbon sequestration, and tourism and leisure fall short of the demand value, while the supply value of air purification exceeds the demand value. The spatial matching of supply and demand shows a typical circular structure, with areas in short supply predominantly located in the downtown area and its vicinity. Second, the degree of coupling coordination between the supply–demand ratio of selected ecosystem services and the intensity of ecological control is low. Urban functional zoning can affect the supply–demand relationship of selected ecosystem services, and intensified development efforts can exacerbate the mismatch between supply and demand. Third, research on the supply–demand matching of selected ecosystem services can facilitate the assessment and regulation of urban functional zoning. Urban spatial governance can be regulated based on land use, industry, and population, with a focus on achieving a better supply–demand matching of ecosystem services. Through the analysis, this paper is aimed to provide reference for mitigating urban environmental problems and formulating sustainable urban development strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53(12):1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:Ihieoa]2.0.Co;2
Asabere SB, Acheampong RA, Ashiagbor G, Beckers SC, Keck M, Erasmi S, Schanze J, Sauer D (2020) Urbanization, land use transformation and spatio-environmental impacts: analyses of trends and implications in major metropolitan regions of Ghana. Land Use Policy 96:104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104707
Bagstad KJ, Villa F, Batker D, Harrison-Cox J, Voigt B, Johnson GW (2014) From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol Soc 19(2):64. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06523-190264
Bai X (2007) Integrating global environmental concerns into urban management: the scale and readiness arguments. J Ind Ecol 11(2):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1202
Balzan MV, Caruana J, Zammit A (2018) Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state. Land Use Policy 75:711–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.025
Baró F, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E, Frantzeskaki N (2015) Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: a quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecol Ind 55:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.013
Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, Vizcaino P, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E (2016) Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 57:405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006
Boithias L, Acuna V, Vergonos L, Ziv G, Marce R, Sabater S (2014) Feb 1). Assessment of the water supply:demand ratios in a Mediterranean basin under different global change scenarios and mitigation alternatives. Sci Total Environ 470–471:567–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.003
Bulkeley H (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change. Ann Rev Environ Resour 35(1):229–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Ind 21:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
CastánBroto V, Bulkeley H (2013) A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Glob Environ Chang 23(1):92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
CecilioRebola L, Pandolfo Paz C, Valenzuela Gamarra L, Burslem DFRP (2021) Land use intensity determines soil properties and biomass recovery after abandonment of agricultural land in an Amazonian biodiversity hotspot. Sci Total Environ 801:149487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149487
Chaudhary S, McGregor A, Houston D, Chettri N (2018) Reprint of: Environmental justice and ecosystem services: a disaggregated analysis of community access to forest benefits in Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 29:316–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.009
Chen J, Jiang B, Bai Y, Xu X, Alatalo JM (2019a) Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation. Sci Total Environ 650(Pt 1):1426–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.126
Chen W, Chi G, Li J (2019b) The spatial association of ecosystem services with land use and land cover change at the county level in China, 1995–2015. Sci Total Environ 669:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.139
Chen Z, Wang J-N, Ma G-X, Zhang Y-S (2013) China tackles the health effects of air pollution. The Lancet 382(9909):1959–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62064-4
China Air Quality Online Monitoring and Analysis Platform (2018) Monthly statistical data of Suzhou weather and air quality index in 2017, 12 January. https://www.aqistudy.cn/historydata/monthdata.php?city=%E8%8B%8F%E5%B7%9E. Accessed 20 Sept 2020
Cobbinah PB, Poku-Boansi M, Peprah C (2017) Urban environmental problems in Ghana. Environ Dev 23:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.05.001
Cortinovis C, Geneletti D (2018) Ecosystem services in urban plans: what is there, and what is still needed for better decisions. Land Use Policy 70:298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.017
Costanza R (2020) Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability. Ecosyst Serv 43:101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101096
Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot Rd, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Belt Mvd (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Cumming GS, Buerkert A, Hoffmann EM, Schlecht E, von Cramon-Taubadel S, Tscharntke T (2014) Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature 515(7525):50–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13945
Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC
De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7(3):260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
Duku E, DzorgbeMattah PA, Angnuureng DB (2022) Assessment of wetland ecosystem services and human wellbeing nexus in sub-Saharan Africa: empirical evidence from a socio-ecological landscape of Ghana. Environ Sustain Ind 15:100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100186
Estoque RC, Murayama Y (2012) Examining the potential impact of land use/cover changes on the ecosystem services of Baguio city, the Philippines: a scenario-based analysis. Appl Geogr 35(1–2):316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.08.006
Euliss NH, Smith LM, Liu S, Feng M, Mushet DM, Auch RF, Loveland TR (2010) The need for simultaneous evaluation of ecosystem services and land use change. Environ Sci Technol 44(20):7761–7763
Fan J, Li P (2009) The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. J Geog Sci 19(5):515–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-009-0515-0
Feng Q, Zhao W, Duan B, Hu X, Cherubini F (2021) Coupling trade-offs and supply-demand of ecosystem services (ES): a new opportunity for ES management. Geogr Sustain 2(4):275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.11.002
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574
Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Collier MJ, Kendal D, Bulkeley H, Dumitru A, Walsh C, Noble K, van Wyk E, Ordóñez C, Oke C, Pintér L (2019) Nature-based solutions for urban climate change adaptation: linking science, policy, and practice communities for evidence-based decision-making. Bioscience 69(6):455–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz042
Gallardo-Saavedra S, Redondo-Plaza A, Fernández-Martínez D, Alonso-Gómez V, Morales-Aragonés JI, Hernández-Callejo L (2022) Integration of renewable energies in the urban environment of the city of Soria (Spain). World Dev Sustain 1:100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100016
Haas J, Ban Y (2014) Urban growth and environmental impacts in Jing-Jin-Ji, the Yangtze, River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 30:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.12.012
Han T, Lu H, Lü Y, Zhu Y, Fu B (2023) Crop switching could be a win-win solution for improving both the productivity and sustainability in a typical dryland farming region-Loess Plateau, China. J Clean Prod 384:135456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135456
He J, Martin A, Lang R, Gross-Camp N (2021) Explaining success on community forestry through a lens of environmental justice: local justice norms and practices in China. World Dev 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105450
Hegetschweiler KT, de Vries S, Arnberger A, Bell S, Brennan M, Siter N, Olafsson AS, Voigt A, Hunziker M (2017) 2017/01/01/). Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: a review of European studies. Urban For Urban Green 21:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002
Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57(2):209–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
Huang M, Xiao Y, Xu J, Liu J, Wang Y, Gan S, Lv S, Xie G (2022) A review on the supply-demand relationship and spatial flows of ecosystem services. J Resour Ecol 13(5):925–935. https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.05.016
IEA (2018) China’s carbon emissions per capita in 2017, 20 May. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=CHINAREG&fuel=CO2%20emissions&indicator=CO2%20emissions%20per%20capita. Accessed 22 Sept 2020
Jie F (2015) Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica 70(2):186–201. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201502002
Jie F (2017) Perspective of China’s Spatial Governance System after 19th CPC National Congress. Bull Chinese Acad Sci 32(4):396–404. https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2017.04.010
Jim CY, Chen WY (2008) Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). J Environ Manag 88(4):665–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.035
Jones L, Norton L, Austin Z, Browne AL, Donovan D, Emmett BA, Grabowski ZJ, Howard DC, Jones JPG, Kenter JO, Manley W, Morris C, Robinson DA, Short C, Siriwardena GM, Stevens CJ, Storkey J, Waters RD, Willis GF (2016) Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 52:151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014
Koroso NH, Zevenbergen JA, Lengoiboni M (2020) Urban land use efficiency in Ethiopia: an assessment of urban land use sustainability in Addis Ababa. Land Use Policy 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105081
Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, Fohrer N (2012) Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 29(3):521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008
Lam ST, Conway TM (2018) 2018/09/01/). Ecosystem services in urban land use planning policies: a case study of Ontario municipalities. Land Use Policy 77:641–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.020
Larondelle N, Lauf S (2016) Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales. Ecosyst Serv 22:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.008
Lauf S, Haase D, Kleinschmit B (2014) Linkages between ecosystem services provisioning, urban growth and shrinkage – a modeling approach assessing ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecol Ind 42:73–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.028
Li J, Fang W, Wang T, Qureshi S, Alatalo J, Bai Y (2017) Correlations between socioeconomic drivers and indicators of urban expansion: evidence from the heavily urbanised Shanghai metropolitan area, China. Sustainability 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071199
Li J, Jiang H, Bai Y, Alatalo JM, Li X, Jiang H, Liu G, Xu J (2016) Indicators for spatial–temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: a case study of the Taihu River Basin, China. Ecol Ind 60:1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.002
Liu D, Feng Q, Zhang J, Zhang K, Tian J, Xie J (2021) Ecosystem services analysis for sustainable agriculture expansion: rice-fish co-culture system breaking through the Hu Line. Ecol Ind 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108385
Liu L, Liu C, Wang C, Li P (2019) Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: a case study of Lanzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica 74(9):1921–1937. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201909016
Liu L, Wu J (2022) Scenario analysis in urban ecosystem services research: progress, prospects, and implications for urban planning and management. Landsc Urban Plan 224:104433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104433
Liu OY, Russo A (2021) Assessing the contribution of urban green spaces in green infrastructure strategy planning for urban ecosystem conditions and services. Sustain Cities Soc 68:102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102772
Luederitz C, Brink E, Gralla F, Hermelingmeier V, Meyer M, Niven L, Panzer L, Partelow S, Rau A-L, Sasaki R, Abson DJ, Lang DJ, Wamsler C, von Wehrden H (2015) A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research. Ecosyst Serv 14:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.001
Lyu R, Zhang J, Xu M, Li J (2018) Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem services and their temporal relations: a case study in Northern Ningxia, China. Land Use Policy 77:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.022
MA (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
MA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trend: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Ma L, Jin F, Song Z, Liu Y (2013) Spatial coupling analysis of regional economic development and environmental pollution in China. J Geog Sci 23(3):525–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1026-6
Martinez-Lopez J, Bagstad KJ, Balbi S, Magrach A, Voigt B, Athanasiadis I, Pascual M, Willcock S, Villa F (2019) Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models. Sci Total Environ 650(Pt 2):2325–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.371
McDonald RI, Kareiva P, Forman RTT (2008) The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 141(6):1695–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.025
Meng S, Huang Q, Zhang L, He C, Inostroza L, Bai Y, Yin D (2020) Matches and mismatches between the supply of and demand for cultural ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: a case study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China. Ecosyst Serv 45:101156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101156
Min Z, Chaolin G (2002) Rural-urbanization: “south jiangsu model” compared with “pearl river model.” Econ Geogr 22(4):482–486
Ministry of Ecological Environment of China (2019) Annual report of China’s motor vehicle environmental management in 2018, 2 July. http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk15/201806/t20180601_630215.html. Accessed 18 Sept 2020
Mooney HA, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A (2013) Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(Suppl 1):3665–3672. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107484110
Müller F, Burkhard B (2007) An ecosystem based framework to link landscape structures, functions and services. In. Mander Ü, Wiggering H, Helming K (Eds.), Multifunctional Land Use. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_3
Nedkov S, Burkhard B (2012) Flood regulating ecosystem services—mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecol Ind 21:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022
Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C (2013) National parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosyst Serv 4:104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Kopperoinen L, Maes J, Schägner JP, Termansen M, Zandersen M, Perez-Soba M, Scholefield PA, Bidoglio G (2014) Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol Ind 45:371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018
Peng J, Tian L, Liu Y, Zhao M, Hu YN, Wu J (2017) Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: thresholds identification. Sci Total Environ 607–608:706–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.218
Pukowiec-Kurda K (2022) The urban ecosystem services index as a new indicator for sustainable urban planning and human well-being in cities. Ecol Ind 144:109532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109532
Ribeiro PJG, Pena Jardim Gonçalves LA (2019) Urban resilience: a conceptual framework. Sustain Cities Soc 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
Rimal B, Sharma R, Kunwar R, Keshtkar H, Stork NE, Rijal S, Rahman SA, Baral H (2019) Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 38:100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100963
Sakakibara Y, Owa K (2005) Urban-rural temperature differences in coastal cities: influence of rural sites. Int J Climatol 25(6):811–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1180
Schirpke U, Candiago S, EgarterVigl L, Jager H, Labadini A, Marsoner T, Meisch C, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2019) Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 651(Pt 1):928–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235
Schröter M, Barton DN, Remme RP, Heina L (2014) Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecol Ind 36:539–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018
Schulp CJE, Lautenbach S, Verburg PH (2014) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: demand and supply of pollination in the European Union. Ecol Ind 36:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.014
Semmens DJ, Diffendorfer JE, Bagstad KJ, Wiederholt R, Oberhauser K, Ries L, Semmens BX, Goldstein J, Loomis J, Thogmartin WE, Mattsson BJ, López-Hoffman L (2018) Quantifying ecosystem service flows at multiple scales across the range of a long-distance migratory species. Ecosyst Serv 31:255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.002
Serna-Chavez HM, Schulp CJE, van Bodegom PM, Bouten W, Verburg PH, Davidson MD (2014) A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol Ind 39:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
Shadbahr J, Ebadian M, Gonzales-Calienes G, Kannangara M, Ahmadi L, Bensebaa F (2022) Impact of waste management and conversion technologies on cost and carbon footprint - case studies in rural and urban cities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 168:112872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112872
Shi Y, Shi D, Zhou L, Fang R (2020) Identification of ecosystem services supply and demand areas and simulation of ecosystem service flows in Shanghai. Ecol Ind 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106418
Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC, Arneth A, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Kaplan JO, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Venevsky S (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob Change Biol 9(2):161–185. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x
Song M, Jin G, Yan W (2021) Which pro-environmental farming behaviors should be priorities for funding? An approach based on matching ecosystem services (ESs) demand and supply. J Environ Manag 297:113368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113368
Song X-P, Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Tyukavina A, Vermote EF, Townshend JR (2018) Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature 560(7720):639–643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9
Stürck J, Poortinga A, Verburg PH (2014) Mapping ecosystem services: the supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecol Ind 38:198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010
Suzhou Local Records Compilation Committee (2020) Records of Suzhou, 12 June. http://dfzb.suzhou.gov.cn/dfzk/database_books.aspx?cid=1. Accessed 13 Sept 2020
Suzhou Municipal Bureau of Tourism (2018) Report on the development of Suzhou tourism industry in 2017, 11 February. http://wglj.suzhou.gov.cn/szwhgdhlyj/ndbg/list.shtml. Accessed 19 Sept 2020
Suzhou Municipal People’s Government (2014) Implementation opinions of Suzhou main functional areas, 20 May. http://www.suzhou.gov.cn/szsrmzf/szyw/201411/8OXS5N29RK25IDRX3U5Q31H96HQM3834.shtml. Accessed 20 Sept 2020
Suzhou Price Bureau (2017) Notice on price adjustment of tap water in Suzhou City, 5 September. http://www.suzhou.gov.cn/szsrmzf/jgzc/201609/QWA045HL9879XHCYLJWYW0IBOPKBEAZ1.shtml. Accessed 13 Sept 2020
Suzhou Price Monitoring Center (2017) Suzhou price online, 8 August. http://ms.suzhou.com.cn/life. Accessed 20 Sept 2020
Suzhou Statistics Bureau (2019) Suzhou statistical yearbook, 10 September. http://navi.cnki.net/knavi/YearbookDetail?pcode=CYFD&pykm=YYTRE. Accessed 13 Sept 2020
Suzhou Water Affairs Bureau (2018) Suzhou water resources bulletin in 2017, 8 June. http://water.suzhou.gov.cn/slj/tjsj/201806/7595bf9c885b4eca998661495192ae38.shtml. Accessed 18 Sept 2020
UN (2023) Generating power, 2 February. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/climate-solutions/cities-pollution. Accessed 2 Feb 2023
UN DESA (2019) 2018 Revision of world urbanization prospects, 16 May. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed 16 Sept 2020
Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM (2013) Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol Complex 15:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Cons 139(3–4):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
Wang Z (2018) Evolving landscape-urbanization relationships in contemporary China. Landsc Urban Plan 171:30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.010
Watson RT (2005) Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science-policy interface. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1454):471–477. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1601
Wei H, Fan W, Wang X, Lu N, Dong X, Zhao Y, Ya X, Zhao Y (2017) Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: a review. Ecosyst Serv 25:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017
Weiskopf SR, Rubenstein MA, Crozier LG, Gaichas S, Griffis R, Halofsky JE, Hyde KJW, Morelli TL, Morisette JT, Muñoz RC, Pershing AJ, Peterson DL, Poudel R, Staudinger MD, Sutton-Grier AE, Thompson L, Vose J, Weltzin JF, Whyte KP (2020) Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States. Sci Total Environ 733:137782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782
Willis C (2015) 2015/07/01/). The contribution of cultural ecosystem services to understanding the tourism–nature–wellbeing nexus. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 10:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.06.002
Wu X, Liu S, Zhao S, Hou X, Xu J, Dong S, Liu G (2019) Quantification and driving force analysis of ecosystem services supply, demand and balance in China. Sci Total Environ 652:1375–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.329
Xu Y, Xu X, Tang Q (2016) Human activity intensity of land surface: concept, methods and application in China. J Geog Sci 26(9):1349–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1331-y
Xu Z, Peng J, Dong J, Liu Y, Liu Q, Lyu D, Qiao R, Zhang Z (2022) Spatial correlation between the changes of ecosystem service supply and demand: an ecological zoning approach. Landsc Urban Plan 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104258
Yang H-J, Gou X-H, Yin D-C, Du M-M, Liu L-Y, Wang K (2022a) Research on the coordinated development of ecosystem services and well-being in agricultural and pastoral areas. J Environ Manag 304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114300
Yang L, Zhang S, Yin L, Zhang B (2022b) Global occupation of wetland by artificial impervious surface area expansion and its impact on ecosystem service value for 2001–2018. Ecol Ind 142:109307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109307
Zhai T, Zhang D, Zhao C (2021) How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate environmental injustice in different cities in the Yellow River Basin? A case of integrating ecosystem service supply, demand and flow. Sustain Cities Soc 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103341
Zhan D, Kwan M-P, Zhang W, Fan J, Yu J, Dang Y (2018) Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities 79:92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025
Zhang H, Fan J, Cao W, Harris W, Li Y, Chi W, Wang S (2018) 2018/10/15/). Response of wind erosion dynamics to climate change and human activity in Inner Mongolia, China during 1990 to 2015. Sci Total Environ 639:1038–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.082
Zhang X, Ren W, Peng H (2022a) Urban land use change simulation and spatial responses of ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios: a case study of Wuhan, China. Ecol Ind 144:109526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109526
Zhang X, Wang Y, Yuan X, Shao Y, Bai Y (2022b) Identifying ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance for sustainable land management in China’s Loess Plateau. Land Use Policy 123:106423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106423
Zhang Z, Peng J, Xu Z, Wang X, Meersmans J (2021) Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: a case study of the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecosyst Serv 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101274
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 42271251).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization, methodology, and original draft were written by Feng Sun. Review, editing, and funding acquisition were performed by Jinhe Zhang. Visualization was completed by Yuhua Xu. Project administration was performed by Wenjie Hu. Data curation was performed by Yu Cao. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, F., Zhang, J., Xu, YH. et al. Analysis of the relationship between supply–demand matching of selected ecosystem services and urban spatial governance: a case study of Suzhou, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 79789–79806 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27088-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27088-w