Abstract
The accumulated methane in goaf during coal mining may leak into the working face under the airflow influence, which is possibly causing disasters such as methane gas excessive at the working face and seriously threatening the mine safety. This paper first established a three-dimensional numerical model of the mining area under U-shaped ventilation, introducing the gas state equation, continuity equation, momentum equation, porosity evolution equation, and permeability evolution equation to simulate the airflow field and gas concentration field in the mining area under the natural state. The reliability of the numerical simulations is then verified by the measured air volumes at the working face. The areas in the mining area where gas is likely to accumulate are also delineated. Subsequently, the gas concentration field in goaf under the gas extraction state was theoretically simulated for different locations of large-diameter borehole. The maximum gas concentration in goaf and the gas concentration trend in the upper corner were analyzed in detail, and the critical borehole location (17.8 m from the working face) was determined as the optimum location for gas extraction from the upper corner. Finally, a gas extraction test was carried out on-site to evaluate the application effect. The results show that the measured airflow rate has a small error with the simulated results. The gas concentration in the area without gas extraction is high, with the gas concentration in the upper corner being over 1.2%, which is greater than the critical value of 0.5%. The maximum reduction in gas concentration was 43.9%, effectively reducing the gas concentration in the extraction area after employing a large borehole to extract methane gas. The gas concentration in the upper corner and the distance of the borehole from the working face are expressed as a positive exponential function. The field engineering results show that the implementation of the large borehole at a distance of less than 17.8 m from the working face can control the gas in the upper corner to less than 0.5%, effectively reducing the risk of gas in the upper corner. The numerical simulation work in this paper can provide some basic support for the design of an on-site borehole to extract gas from the mining void and reduce the gas hazard in coal mines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Boyer F, Lapuerta C, Minjeaud S et al (2010) Cahn-Hilliard/Navier-Stokes model for the simulation of three-phase flows. Transp Porous Media 82(3):463–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9408-z
Braack M, Schieweck F (2011) Equal-order finite elements with local projection stabilization for the Darcy-Brinkman equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(9–12):1126–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.06.034
Byon C, Kim SJ (2013) The effect of the particle size distribution and packing structure on the permeability of sintered porous wicks. Int J Heat Mass Transf 61:499–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.02.025
Cao J, Li W (2017) International Journal of Mining Science and Technology Numerical simulation of gas migration into mining-induced fracture network in the goaf. Int J Min Sci Technol 27(4):681–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.05.015
Cheng H, Zhang N, Yang Y et al (2018) 3-D dynamic evolution analysis of coal-rock damaged field and gas seepage field during the gas extraction process. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 56:444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.06.015
Cheng C, Cheng X, Yu R et al (2021a) The law of fracture evolution of overlying strata and gas emission in goaf under the influence of mining. Geofluids 2021:2752582
Cheng Z, Pan H, Zou Q et al (2021b) Gas flow characteristics and optimization of gas drainage borehole layout in protective coal seam mining: a case study from the shaqu coal mine, Shanxi Province, China. Nat Resour Res 30(2):1481–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09775-4
Duan H, Wang Y, Xiao Q et al (2022) Gas extraction technology and application of near horizontal high directional drilling. Energy Rep 8:1326–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.051
Font B, Weymouth GD, Nguyen VT, Tutty OR (2021) Deep learning of the spanwise-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. J Comput Phys 434:110199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110199
Hao T, Jin Z, Li F (2012) International symposium on safety science and engineering in China, 2012 optimization of goaf gas drainage parameters based on numerical simulation studying fracture in overlying strata. Procedia Eng 43:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.046
Jeon S, Byon C (2016) Effect of meniscus on the permeability of mono-layered and multi-layered packed spheres. Appl Therm Eng 107:1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.076
Jin K, Cheng Y, Ren T et al (2018) Experimental investigation on the formation and transport mechanism of outburst coal-gas flow: Implications for the role of gas desorption in the development stage of outburst. Int J Coal Geol 194:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.05.012
Kang X, Tang M, Jiang M et al (2022) Study on gas migration law of mining coal seam under the influence of normal fault. Geofluids 2022:9726379. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9726379
Li D (2019) Hydraulic drill hole reaming technology with large flow and draining of coal mine gas. Int J Min Sci Technol 29(6):925–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.06.003
Li Z, Gu R, Zhang X et al (2014) Simulation of gas migration in 3D goaf based on RNG k-ε turbulence model. J China Coal Soc 39(5):880–885
Li L, Qin B, Liu J et al (2021) Influence of airflow movement on methane migration in coal mine goafs with spontaneous coal combustion. Process Saf Environ Prot 156:405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.10.015
Li J, Li X, Liu C, Zhang N (2022) Study on the air leakage characteristics of a goaf in a shallow coal seam and spontaneous combustion prevention and control strategies for residual coal. PLoS One 17(6):e0269822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269822
Liu J, Shen M, Chen S, Yang M (2021a) Influence of roadway cross-section shape on gas explosion shock wave law in U-type ventilation working faces. Shock Vib 2021:5893179. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5893179
Liu P, Fan J, Jiang D, Li J (2021b) Evaluation of underground coal gas drainage performance: mine site measurements and parametric sensitivity analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot 148:711–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.054
Liu W, Chu X, Xu H et al (2022) Migration behavior of two-component gases among CO2, N2 and O2 in coal particles during adsorption. Fuel 313:123003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123003
Luo H, Quintard M, Debenest G, Laouafa F (2012) Properties of a diffuse interface model based on a porous medium theory for solid-liquid dissolution problems. Comput Geosci 16(4):913–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-012-9295-1
Ma D, Qin B, Gao Y et al (2021) An experimental study on the methane migration induced by spontaneous combustion of coal in longwall gobs. Process Saf Environ Prot 147:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.046
Ma Y, Shu L, Li H et al (2022) Numerical investigation of safety strategy for gas disaster prevention in successive panels using upper protective layer mining: a case study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(7):4408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074408
Qin Z, Yuan L, Guo H, Qu Q (2015) Investigation of longwall goaf gas flows and borehole drainage performance by CFD simulation. Int J Coal Geol 150–151:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.08.007
Schatzel SJ, Karacan CÖ, Dougherty H, Goodman GVR (2012) An analysis of reservoir conditions and responses in longwall panel overburden during mining and its effect on gob gas well performance. Eng Geol 127:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.01.002
Shi Z, Ye D, Hao J et al (2022) Research on gas extraction and cut flow technology for lower slice pressure relief gas under slice mining of extra-thick coal seam. ACS Omega 7:24531–24550. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c02255
Song Z, Wu D, Jiang J, Pan X (2019) Thermo-solutal buoyancy driven air flow through thermally decomposed thin porous media in a U-shaped channel: towards understanding persistent underground coal fires. Appl Therm Eng 159:113948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113948
Sun Y, Rui H (2019) Stability and convergence of the mark and cell finite difference scheme for Darcy-Stokes-Brinkman equations on non-uniform grids. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 35(2):509–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22311
Tang M, Jiang B, Zhang R et al (2016) Numerical analysis on the influence of gas extraction on air leakage in the gob. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.006
Wang G, Wu M, Wang R et al (2017) Height of the mining-induced fractured zone above a coal face. Eng Geol 216:140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.11.024
Wang G, Xu H, Wu M et al (2018) Porosity model and air leakage flow field simulation of goaf based on DEM-CFD. Arab J Geosci 11(7):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3499-1
Whittles DN, Lowndes IS, Kingman SW et al (2006) Influence of geotechnical factors on gas flow experienced in a UK longwall coal mine panel. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(3):369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.07.006
Xia T, Zhou F, Wang X et al (2016) Controlling factors of symbiotic disaster between coal gas and spontaneous combustion in longwall mining gobs. Fuel 182:886–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.090
Xu H, Wang G, Guo Y et al (2020) Theoretical, numerical, and experimental analysis of effective extraction radius of coalbed methane boreholes by a gas seepage model based on defined criteria. Energy Sci Eng 8(3):880–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.557
Xu H, Qin Y, Wu F et al (2022a) Numerical modeling of gas extraction from coal seam combined with a dual-porosity model: finite difference solution and multi-factor analysis. Fuel 313:122687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122687
Xu H, Qin Y, Yang D et al (2022b) Modeling of diffusion kinetics during gas adsorption in a coal seam with a dimensionless inversion method. Fuel 326:125068
Yuan L (2016) Strategic thinking of simultaneous exploitation of coal and gas in deep mining. J China Coal Soc 41(1):1–6
Zhai X, Wang B, Jiang S, Zhang W (2019) Oxygen Distribution and Air Leakage Law in Gob of Working Face of U plus L Ventilation System. Math Probl Eng 8356701. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8356701
Zhang X, Pan Y (2022) Preparation, properties and application of gel materials for coal gangue control. Energies 15:557. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020557
Zhang X, Zou J (2022) Research on collaborative control technology of coal spontaneous combustion and gas coupling disaster in goaf based on dynamic isolation. Fuel 321:124123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124123
Zhang Y, Zhang X, Li C et al (2011) Procedia engineering methane moving law with long gas extraction holes in goaf. Procedia Eng 26:357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2179
Zhang L, Yang M, Luo H (2022) Parameter optimization and application of gas extraction technology by buried pipes in goaf of multi-roadway U-type working face parameter optimization and application of gas extraction technology by buried pipes in goaf of multi-roadway U-type working Fa. Combust Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2022.2101367
Zhao P, Zhuo R, Li S et al (2019) Research on the effect of coal seam inclination on gas migration channels at fully mechanized coal mining face. Arab J Geosci 12(18):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4742-0
Zhou A, Zhang M, Wang K et al (2020) Airflow disturbance induced by coal mine outburst shock waves: a case study of a gas outburst disaster in China. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 128:104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104262
Zou J, Zhang R, Zhou F, Zhang X (2023) Hazardous area reconstruction and law analysis of coal spontaneous combustion and gas coupling disasters in goaf based on DEM-CFD. ACS Omega 8:2685–2697. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07236
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No.: 51874315; 52074303) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project No.: 2021YJSAQ24). The corresponding author Dr. Hao Xu gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the China Scholarship Council (No.: CSC 202106430046).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Fengjie Zhang: data curation, formal analysis, resources, methodology, writing—original draft. Hao Xu: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, writing—review & editing. Yueping Qin: project administration, visualization, supervision. Mingyan Guo: investigation, visualization. Shudong He: resources, investigation. Kai Wang: resources, investigation. Yongtao Shi: resources, investigation. Zhencai Xiang: resources, investigation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Shimin Liu
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, F., Xu, H., Qin, Y. et al. Numerical simulation and investigation of methane gas distribution and extraction in goaf with U-type ventilation of working face. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 59510–59527 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26707-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26707-w