Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nitrogen loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields with the proportion of controlled-release urea and conventional urea rates under alternate wetting and drying irrigation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD) can reduce non-point source pollution from paddy fields by mitigating field water depth. However, the influence of compounding modes of polymer-coated urea (PCU) and conventional urea (CU) on nitrogen (N) loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields under AWD conditions remains unclear. To address this question, in this study, a 2-year field experiment was set up with three N management treatments: (a) 100% CU (N1), (b) 60% PCU + 40% CU (N2), and (c) 100% PCU (N3), at an equivalent N rate of 240 kg ha−1 that was applied to traditional continuously flooded (CI) and AWD systems. The results of this experiment showed a high-risk period of N loss from the paddy fields within 7 d after basal fertilization and 5 days after tillering fertilization. AWD reduced irrigation frequencies by 3.5 times and total input of irrigation water by 38.1%, increasing water utilization from precipitation by 44.4% than CI and reducing the volume of runoff by 46.1% and leaching water by 22.1%. This reduced the total N (TN) loss through runoff and leaching under AWD. In the N2 and N3 treatment groups, N concentration in floodwater decreased from 33.8 to 24.9%, TN loss via runoff decreased by 35.3 to 25.0%, and leaching decreased by 41.7 to 30.3% from the paddy field compared to N1. With the same N mode, AWD showed a higher N uptake (from jointing to maturity stage) and rice yield compared to CI. Besides, N2 and N3 had higher N uptake compared to N1 under the two irrigation regimes. Moreover, the AWDN3 and AWDN2 treatments resulted in the lowest and second-lowest loss of TN via runoff (2.21 to 2.66 kg ha−1) and leaching (8.14 and 10.21 kg ha−1), respectively, from the paddy fields and had the relatively high N uptake in rice in the maturity stage. Remarkably, compared with N3, N2 had a comparable grain yield under CI; however, it showed a higher yield under AWD, suggesting that there is a positive interaction in the rice yield between the AWD and compounding N (PCU + CU) fertilization practice. Thus, AWD coupled with N2 could be recommended as a useful approach to reduce N loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields, which could increase the grain yield of middle-season rice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The obtained data will be available upon request.

References

  • Amin MG, Akter A, Jahangir MMR, Ahmed T (2021) Leaching and runoff potential of nutrient and water losses in rice field as affected by wetting and drying irrigation. J Environ Manag 297:113402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belder P, Bouman BAM, Cabangon RJ, Lu G, Quilang EJP, Li Y, Spiertz JHJ, Tuong TP (2004) Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agric Water Manag 65:193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai H, Chen Q (2000) Rice research in China in the early 21st century. Chin Rice Res News 8:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao XC, Wu LL, Lu RH, Zhu LF, Zhang JH, Jin QY (2020) Irrigation and fertilization management to optimize rice yield, water productivity and nitrogen recovery efficiency. Irrig Sci 39:235–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrijo DR, Lundy ME, Linquist BA (2017) Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Res 203:173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien SH, Prochnow LI, Cantarella H (2009) Recent developments of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts. Advan Agron 102:267–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampitti IA, Vyn TJ (2013) Grain nitrogen source changes over time in maize: a review. Crop Sci 53(2):366–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coskun D, Britto DT, Shi W, Kronzucker HJ (2017) Nitrogen transformations in modern agriculture and the role of biological nitrification inhibition. Nat Plants 3:17074

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding WC, Xu XP, He P, Ullah S, Zhang JJ, Cui ZL, Zhou W (2018) Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency through alternative fertilization options for rice in China: a meta-analysis. Field Crop Res 227:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Z, Chen JX, Zhai S, Ding XH, Zhang HZ, Sun SC, Tian XF (2021) Optimal blends of controlled-release urea and conventional urea improved nitrogen use efficiency in wheat and maize with reduced nitrogen application. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:1103–1111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) Rice market monitor (RMM), volume XXI. Issue No. 1. Available at. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=FAO+Rice+Market+Monitor+%28RMM%29%2C+Volume+XXI%2C+Issue+No.+1&btnG=

  • Garnett T, Conn V, Kaiser BN (2009) Root based approaches to improving nitrogen use efficiency in plants. Plant Cell Environ 32:1272–1283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GRiSP (2013) Rice Almanac, 4th edn. Global Rice Science Partnership. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños (Philippines), p 283

  • Guo JJ, Fan JL, Zhang FC, Yan SC, Zheng J, Wu Y, Li J, Wang YL, Sun X, Liu XQ, Xiang YZ, Li ZJ (2021) Blending urea and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer increases dryland maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency while mitigating ammonia volatilization. Sci Total Environ 790:148058

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper P, Zhou Y, Coventry DR, McDonald GK (2014) Use of nitrogen fertilizer in a targeted way to improve grain yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency. Agron J 107(3):903–915

    Google Scholar 

  • IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) (2017) Rice knowledge bank (accessed on 22 March, 2017 at http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/submergedsoils/index.php/ice-growing-environments/lesson-2

  • Ishfaq M, Farooq M, Zulfiqar U, Hussain S, Akbar N, Nawaz A, Anjum SA (2020) Alternate wetting and drying: a water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system. Agric Water Manag 241:106363

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam SMM, Gaihre YK, Biswas JC, Jahan MS, Singh U, Adhikary SK, Satter MA, Saleque MA (2018) Different nitrogen rates and methods of application for dry season rice cultivation with alternate wetting and drying irrigation: fate of nitrogen and grain yield. Agric Water Manag 196:144–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Jat RA, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL, Singh P, Dhaka SR, Dhaka BL (2012) Recent approaches in nitrogen management for sustainable agricultural production and eco-safety. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58:1033–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju XT, Xing GX, Chen XP, Zhang S, Zhang L, Liu X, Cui ZL, Yin B, Christie P, Zhu Z, Zhang FS (2009) Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. PANS 106:3041–3046

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ke J, Chen TT, Xu CH, Zhu TZ, Wu H, He HB, You CC, Zhu DQ, Wu LQ (2021) Effects of different application methods of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of indica-japonica hybrid rice in pot-seedling mechanically transplanted. Acta Agron Sin 47(7):1372–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran JK, Khanif YM, Amminuddin H, Anuar AR (2010) Effects of controlled release urea on the yield and nitrogen nutrition of flooded rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:811–819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JL, Li YE, Wan YF, Wang B, Waqas MA, Cai WW, Guo C, Zhou SH, Su RS, Qin XB, Gao QZ, Wilkes A (2018) Combination of modified nitrogen fertilizers and water saving irrigation can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase rice yield. Geoderma 315:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang XQ, Chen YX, Nie ZY, Ye YS, Tian GM, Wang GH, Tuong TP (2013) Mitigation of nutrient losses via surface runoff from rice cropping systems with alternate wetting and drying irrigation and site-specific nutrient management practices. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:6980–6991

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LJ, Chen TT, Wang ZQ, Zhang H, Yang JC, Zhang JH (2013) Combination of site-specific nitrogen management and alternate wetting and drying irrigation increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in super rice. Field Crops Res 154:226–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthayy S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Marberly GF (2014) An overview of global rice production, supply, trade and consumption. Ann New York Acad Sci 1324:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng SZ, Yang SH, Xu JZ, Luo YH, Hou HJ (2011) Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching losses from paddy fields with different water and nitrogen managements. Paddy Water Environ 9:333–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Sun YJ, Jiang MJ, Xu H, Qin J, Yang ZY, Ma J (2014) Effects of water management and slow/controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on biomass and nitrogen accumulation, translocation, and distribution in rice. Acta Agron Sin 40(5):859–870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi DL, Wu QX, Zhu JQ (2020) Nitrogen and phosphorus losses from paddy fields and the yield of rice with different water and nitrogen management practices. Sci Rep 10:9734

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu HN, Yang SH, Jiang ZW, Xu Y, Jiao XY (2022) Effect of irrigation and fertilization management on rice yield and nitrogen loss: a meta-analysis. Plants 11:1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao DG, Li Y, Yang P, Gao D (2015) Analysis on nitrogen utilization and environmental effects under water-saving irrigation in paddy field. J Hydraul Eng 46(2):146–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiertz JHJ (2010) Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:43–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Analysis of covariance. principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun YJ, Ma J, Sun YY, Xu H, Yang ZY, Liu SJ, Jia XW, Zheng HZ (2012) The effects of different water and nitrogen managements on yield and nitrogen use efficiency in hybrid rice of China. Field Crops Res 127:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Mi WH, Su LJ, Shan YY, Wu LH (2019) Controlled-release fertilizer enhances rice grain yield and N recovery efficiency in continuous non-flooding plastic film mulching cultivation system. Field Crops Res 231:122–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZQ, Zhang WY, Beebout SS, Zhang H, Liu LJ, Yang JC, Zhang JH (2016) Grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice as influenced by irrigation regimes and their interaction with nitrogen rates. Field Crops Res 193:54–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Xue C, Pan X, Chen F, Liu Y (2018) Application of controlled-release urea enhances grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Front Plant Sci 9:999

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu QX, Zhu JQ, Yan J, Huang C (2016) Morphology of middle-season hybrid rice in Hubei Province and its yield under different waterlogging stresses. Chin J AgroMeteor 37(2):188–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu GW, Lu DK, Wang HZ, Li YJ (2018) Morphological and physiological traits of rice roots and their relationships to yield and nitrogen utilization as influenced by irrigation regime and nitrogen rate. Agric Water Manag 203:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu YQ, Su BL, Wang HQ, He JY, Yang YX (2020) Analysis of the water balance and the nitrogen and phosphorus runoff pollution of a paddy field in situ in the Taihu Lake basin. Paddy Water Environ 18:385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Wu QX, Qi DL, Zhu JQ (2022) Rice yield, water productivity, and nitrogen use efficiency responses to nitrogen management strategies under supplementary irrigation for rain-fed rice cultivation. Agric Water Manag 263:107486

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang SH, Peng SZ, Xu JZ, He Y, Wang Y (2013) Effects of water saving irrigation and controlled release nitrogen fertilizer managements on nitrogen losses from paddy fields. Paddy Water Environ 13:71–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye YS, Liang XQ, Chen YX, Liu J, Gu JT, Guo R, Li L (2013) Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in late-season rice. Effects on dry matter accumulation, yield, water and nitrogen use. Field Crops Res 144:212–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye YS, Liang XQ, Jin Y, Zhao Y, Fu CD (2014) Dynamic variation and runoff loss of nitrogen in surface water of paddy field as affected by water-saving irrigation and controlled-release fertilizer application. J Soil Water Conserv 28(5):105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang FL, Wu MQ, Xia Y, Zhai LM, Duan XL, Fan XP, Xiong GY, Liu DB, Gao I (2019) Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus in surface water of paddy field in Jianghan Plain. Acta Pedolo Sini 56(5):1214–1224

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WY, Xu YJ, Wang ZQ, Liu LJ, Zhang H, Gu JF, Zhang JH, Yang JC (2021) Alternate wetting and drying irrigation combined with the proportion of polymer-coated urea and conventional urea rates increases grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies in rice. Field Crops Res 268:108165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the reviewers who participated in the review, as well as MJEditor (www.mjeditor.com) for providing English editing services during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors are also thankful to Ms. Chen Pan and Mr. Yu Yang for providing the assistance in field investigation and nitrogen content measurements.

Funding

This work has been supported by State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, China (2020NSG05), the National Natural Science Fund of China (U21A2039), and the Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, China (KF202008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.L.Q. and J.Q.Z. were involved in acquisition and analysis of data for the work. D.L.Q. was involved in the design of the work and wrote this paper. X.G.W. revised it critically for important intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongliang Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zhihong Xu

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, D., Zhu, J. & Wang, X. Nitrogen loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields with the proportion of controlled-release urea and conventional urea rates under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 61741–61752 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26480-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26480-w

Keywords

Navigation