Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Production planning approaches: a review from green perspective

  • Recent Advances in Viable and Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an increasing concern about incorporating green criteria into production planning approaches. Production planning models that ignore green parameters may generate outcomes that are unfriendly to the environment. The relevant literature has suggested a flourishing trend towards the integration of green parameters into production planning approaches. The earlier reviews have most commonly analyzed the green production planning approaches from an “energy efficiency” perspective. Literature on the integration of other green criteria is also available. However, such studies are rarely reviewed. Along with “energy efficiency,” the study in hand reviews the production planning strategies from another green perspective which is “low-carbon emissions.” The first objective of this study is to review the medium and short-term production planning approaches from the aforementioned green criteria and provide a classification scheme. Second, new research avenues are identified to facilitate researchers in incorporating green schemes in production planning approaches. This study explored various databases for articles published on green production planning approaches. Consequently, 84 articles published between 2011 and 2022 were considered for the review. This review pointed out that most of the studies on green production planning considered “energy efficiency” and studies on “carbon emissions” were overlooked. Furthermore, green concepts were mostly integrated into the short-term production planning level and comparatively few studies were found for the medium-term. This study will help researchers to analyze green production planning in terms of modeling approaches, objective functions, uncertainties, solution approaches, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abedi M, Chiong R, Noman N, Zhang R (2020) A multi-population, multi-objective memetic algorithm for energy-efficient job-shop scheduling with deteriorating machines. Expert Syst Appl 157:113348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Absi N, Dauzère-Pérès S, Kedad-Sidhoum S, Penz B, Rapine C (2013) Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints. Eur J Oper Res 227:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghezzaf E-H, Van Landeghem H (2002) An integrated model for inventory and production planning in a two-stage hybrid production system. Int J Prod Res 40:4323–4339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbalik A, Rapine C (2014) Single-item lot sizing problem with carbon emission under the cap-and-trade policy, 2014 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), pp 030–035

  • Amelian SS, Sajadi SM, Navabakhsh M, Esmaelian M (2022) Multi-objective optimization for stochastic failure-prone job shop scheduling problem via hybrid of NSGA-II and simulation method. Expert Syst 39:e12455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiri MF, Behnamian (2020) Multi-objective green flowshop scheduling problem under uncertainty: estimation of distribution algorithm. J Clean Prod 251:119734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés FN, Etchepare RM, Aguayo MM, Valenzuela M (2022) A mixed-integer programming model for an integrated production planning problem with preventive maintenance in the pulp and paper industry. Eng Optim 1–8

  • Bänsch K, Busse J, Meisel F, Rieck J, Scholz S, Volling T, Wichmann MG (2021) Energy-aware decision support models in production environments: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind Eng 159:107456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck FG, Biel K, Glock CH (2019) Integration of energy aspects into the economic lot scheduling problem. Int J Prod Econ 209:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biel K, Glock CH (2016) Systematic literature review of decision support models for energy-efficient production planning. Comput Ind Eng 101:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi ND, Kumawat PK, Keshari AK (2021) Energy and carbon-constrained production planning with parametric uncertainties. IFAC-PapersOnLine 54:560–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che A, Zeng Y, Lyu K (2016) An efficient greedy insertion heuristic for energy-conscious single machine scheduling problem under time-of-use electricity tariffs. J Clean Prod 129:565–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheaitou A, van Delft C, Dallery Y, Jemai Z (2009) Two-period production planning and inventory control. Int J Prod Econ 118:118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S-H, Liou Y-C, Chen Y-H, Wang K-C (2019) Order acceptance and scheduling problem with carbon emission reduction and electricity tariffs on a single machine. Sustainability 11:5432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi Y-C, Xirouchakis P (2014) A production planning in highly automated manufacturing system considering multiple process plans with different energy requirements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:853–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui W, Lu B (2020) A bi-objective approach to minimize makespan and energy consumption in flow shops with peak demand constraint. Sustainability 12:4110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai M, Tang D, Giret A, Salido MA, Li WD (2013) Energy-efficient scheduling for a flexible flow shop using an improved genetic-simulated annealing algorithm. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 29:418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2013) International energy outlook U.S. Energy information administration. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/0484(2013).Pdf

  • Ekin T (2018) Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 179:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esra K (2021) Stochastic lot sizing problem with carbon emission constraints. Gazi Univ J Sci 34(1):148–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang K-T, Lin BM (2013) Parallel-machine scheduling to minimize tardiness penalty and power cost. Comput Ind Eng 64:224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang K, Uhan N, Zhao F, Sutherland JW (2011) A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction. J Manuf Syst 30:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foumani M, Smith-Miles K (2019) The impact of various carbon reduction policies on green flowshop scheduling. Appl Energy 249:300–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahm C, Denz F, Dirr M, Tuma A (2016) Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: a review and research framework. Eur J Oper Res 248:744–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehan M, Castanier B, Lemoine D (2014) Integration of maintenance in the tactical production planning process under feasibility constraint. IFIP International conference on advances in production management systems. Innovative and Knowledge-Based Production Management in a Global-Local World 438:467–474

  • Gholizadeh H, Fazlollahtabar H, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Dulebenets MA (2021) Preventive maintenance for the flexible flowshop scheduling under uncertainty: a waste-to-energy system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–20

  • Ghosh A, Jha J, Sarmah S (2017) Optimal lot-sizing under strict carbon cap policy considering stochastic demand. Appl Math Model 44:688–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glock CH, Hochrein S (2011) Purchasing organization and design: a literature review. Bus Res 4:149–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong X, De Pessemier T, Joseph W, Martens L (2016) A power data driven energy-cost aware production scheduling method for sustainable manufacturing at the unit process level. IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), pp 1–8

  • Hajej Z, Rezg N (2020) An optimal integrated lot sizing and maintenance strategy for multi-machines system with energy consumption. Int J Prod Res 58:4450–4470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Chiong R, Li W, Dhakal S, Cao Y, Zhang Y (2021) Multiobjective optimization of energy-efficient job-shop scheduling with dynamic reference point-based fuzzy relative entropy. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 18:600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Z, Chu C, Yu Y (2012) Optimization of production planning for green manufacturing. 9th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), pp 193–196

  • Jiang T, Zhu H, Liu L, Gong Q (2022) Energy-conscious flexible job shop scheduling problem considering transportation time and deterioration effect simultaneously. Sustain Comput: Inform Syst 35:100680

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Liao X, Zhang R, Lin Q (2020) Energy-saving production scheduling in a single-machine manufacturing system by improved particle swarm optimization. Math Probl Eng 2020:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson AK, Fiske S, Hubacek K, Li J, McGovern T, Rick T, Schor JB, Solecki W, York R, Zycherman A (2019) Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 10:e554

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebbar G, El Abbassi I, Darcherif M, El Barkany A (2020) Scheduling problems with energy consideration: state of the art and opportunities. In E3S Web of Conferences (vol 170, p 01006). EDP Sciences

  • Li M, Lei D (2021) An imperialist competitive algorithm with feedback for energy-efficient flexible job shop scheduling with transportation and sequence-dependent setup times. Eng Appl Artif Intell 103:104307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Huang W, Wu R, Guo K (2020) An improved artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective low-carbon flexible job shop scheduling problem. Appl Soft Comput 95:106544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Wang Y, Zhang Z-H, Sun Y (2019) Energy efficient production planning and scheduling problem with processing technology selection. Comput Ind Eng 132:260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin W, Yu D, Zhang C, Liu X, Zhang S, Tian Y, Liu S, Xie Z (2015) A multi-objective teaching−learning-based optimization algorithm to scheduling in turning processes for minimizing makespan and carbon footprint. J Clean Prod 101:337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G-S, Zhou Y, Yang H-D (2017a) Minimizing energy consumption and tardiness penalty for fuzzy flow shop scheduling with state-dependent setup time. J Clean Prod 147:470–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Zhan M, Chekem FO, Shao X, Ying B, Sutherland JW (2017b) A hybrid fruit fly algorithm for solving flexible job-shop scheduling to reduce manufacturing carbon footprint. J Clean Prod 168:668–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Wang L, Kong L, Li F, Li J (2019) A hybrid genetic algorithm for minimizing energy consumption in flow shops considering ultra-low idle state. Procedia CIRP 80:192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovins A (2017) Energy efficiency. Energy Econ 1:234–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Gao L, Li X, Pan Q, Wang Q (2017) Energy-efficient permutation flow shop scheduling problem using a hybrid multi-objective backtracking search algorithm. J Clean Prod 144:228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo S, Zhang L, Fan Y (2019) Energy-efficient scheduling for multi-objective flexible job shops with variable processing speeds by grey wolf optimization. J Clean Prod 234:1365–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, El Baz D, Xue R, Hu J (2020) Solving the dynamic energy aware job shop scheduling problem with the heterogeneous parallel genetic algorithm. Futur Gener Comput Syst 108:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masmoudi O, Yalaoui A, Ouazene Y, Chehade H (2015) Lot-sizing in flow-shop with energy consideration for sustainable manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48:727–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masmoudi O, Delorme X, Gianessi P (2019) Job-shop scheduling problem with energy consideration. Int J Prod Econ 216:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masmoudi O, Yalaoui A, Ouazene Y, Chehade H (2016) Multi-item capacitated lot-sizing problem in a flow-shop system with energy consideration. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49:301–306

  • Mirzapour Al-e-hashem SMJ, Baboli A, Sazvar Z (2013) A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions. Eur J Oper Res 230:26–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzapour Al-e-hashem S, Baboli A, Aryanezhad M, Sazvar Z (2011) Aggregate production planning in a green supply chain by considering flexible lead times and multi breakpoint purchase and shortage cost functions. 41th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE41) 641–647

  • Modarres M, Izadpanahi E (2016) Aggregate production planning by focusing on energy saving: a robust optimization approach. J Clean Prod 133:1074–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Módos I, Šucha P, Hanzálek Z (2021) On parallel dedicated machines scheduling under energy consumption limit. Comput Ind Eng 159:107209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari H, Hasani A (2017) An energy-efficient multi-objective optimization for flexible job-shop scheduling problem. Comput Chem Eng 104:339–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nour A, Galal NM, El-Kilany KS (2017) Energy-based aggregate production planning for porcelain tableware manufacturer in Egypt. Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Rabat, Morocco, pp 2351–2358

  • Peng L, Yang M, Xiao R (2021) An integer programming model for flow shop scheduling under TOU and tiered electricity price. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 692(2):022105

  • Piroozfard H, Wong KY, Wong WP (2018) Minimizing total carbon footprint and total late work criterion in flexible job shop scheduling by using an improved multi-objective genetic algorithm. Resour, Conserv Recycl 128:267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plitsos S, Repoussis PP, Mourtos I, Tarantilis CD (2017) Energy-aware decision support for production scheduling. Decis Support Syst 93:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purohit AK, Choudhary D, Shankar R (2015) Inventory lot-sizing under dynamic stochastic demand with carbon emission constraints. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 189:193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purohit AK, Shankar R, Dey PK, Choudhary A (2016) Non-stationary stochastic inventory lot-sizing with emission and service level constraints in a carbon cap-and-trade system. J Clean Prod 113:654–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakovitis N, Li D, Zhang N, Li J, Zhang L, Xiao X (2022) Novel approach to energy-efficient flexible job-shop scheduling problems. Energy 238:121773

  • Rapine C, Penz B, Gicquel C, Akbalik A (2018) Capacity acquisition for the single-item lot sizing problem under energy constraints. Omega 81:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodammer FA, White KP (1988) A recent survey of production scheduling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodoplu M, Arbaoui T, Yalaoui A (2020) A fix-and-relax heuristic for the single-item lot-sizing problem with a flow-shop system and energy constraints. Int J Prod Res 58:6532–6552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubaiee S, Yildirim MB (2019) An energy-aware multiobjective ant colony algorithm to minimize total completion time and energy cost on a single-machine preemptive scheduling. Comput Ind Eng 127:240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saber RG, Ranjbar M (2022) Minimizing the total tardiness and the total carbon emissions in the permutation flow shop scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res 138:105604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadjadi SJ, Oroujee M, Aryanezhad M (2005) Optimal production and marketing planning. Comput Optim Appl 30:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt G, Wilhelm WE (2000) Strategic, tactical and operational decisions in multi-national logistics networks: a review and discussion of modelling issues. Int J Prod Res 38:1501–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz S, Schönheit M, Neufeld JS (2022) Multi-objective carbon-efficient scheduling in distributed permutation flow shops under consideration of transportation efforts. J Clean Prod 365:132551

  • Shaw K (2017) Fuzzy multi-objective, multi-item, multi-supplier, lot-sizing considering carbon footprint. Int J Math Oper Res 11:171–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Lee H, Ryu K, Cho Y, Son Y-J (2019) A two-phased perishable inventory model for production planning in a food industry. Comput Ind Eng 133:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrouf F, Ordieres-Meré J, García-Sánchez A, Ortega-Mier M (2014) Optimizing the production scheduling of a single machine to minimize total energy consumption costs. J Clean Prod 67:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotos ME (2015) GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance. Available at https://ghgprotocol.org/scope_2_guidance

  • Stavins RN (2008) A meaningful US cap-and-trade system to address climate change. Harv Envtl l Rev 32:293

    Google Scholar 

  • Su Q, Yang W, Liu Y (2017) Optimization of carbon emission considering production planning at enterprise level. J Clean Prod 162:635–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasgetiren MF, Yüksel D, Gao L, Pan Q-K, Li P (2019) A discrete artificial bee colony algorithm for the energy-efficient no-wait flowshop scheduling problem. Procedia Manuf 39:1223–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touil A, Echchatbi A, Charkaoui A, Mousrij A (2019) Uncertain chance-constrained model for energy consumption in the permutation flow shop. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52:152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia JF, Pradenas L (2019) An aggregate production planning mathematical model, under a peak-demand electrical control policy. Int J Plan Sched 3:68–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Peng Z-p (2020) Solving energy-efficient distributed job shop scheduling via multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with decomposition. Swarm Evol Comput 58:100745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Jiang Z, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wang Y (2018a) A two-stage optimization method for energy-saving flexible job-shop scheduling based on energy dynamic characterization. J Clean Prod 188:575–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wang X, Yu J, Ma S, Liu M (2018b) Bi-objective identical parallel machine scheduling to minimize total energy consumption and makespan. J Clean Prod 193:424–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gao L, Li X, Li P, Tasgetiren MF (2020) Energy-efficient distributed permutation flow shop scheduling problem using a multi-objective whale swarm algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 57:100716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Sheng B, Lu Q, Yin X, Zhao F, Lu X, Luo R, Fu G (2021) A novel multi-objective optimization algorithm for the integrated scheduling of flexible job shops considering preventive maintenance activities and transportation processes. Soft Comput 25:2863–2889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Zhou X, Tian G, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Wu P, Zhang C, Liu C, Li Z (2022) Multi objective low-carbon hybrid flow shop scheduling via an improved teaching-learning based optimization algorithm. Scientia Iranica. https://doi.org/10.24200/SCI.2022.58317.5665

  • Wu X, Sun Y (2018) A green scheduling algorithm for flexible job shop with energy-saving measures. J Clean Prod 172:3249–3264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Xiao F, Zhang C, He Y, Liang Z (2018) The green capacitated multi-item lot sizing problem with parallel machines. Comput Oper Res 98:149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Shen X, Li C (2019) The flexible job-shop scheduling problem considering deterioration effect and energy consumption simultaneously. Comput Ind Eng 135:1004–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Zheng Y, Yu Y, Zhang L, Lin X, Li B (2021) A branch and bound algorithm for a parallel machine scheduling problem in green manufacturing industry considering time cost and power consumption. J Clean Prod 320:128867

  • Xie J, Gao L, Pan Q-k, Tasgetiren MF (2019) An effective multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm for energy efficient distributed job shop scheduling. Procedia Manuf 39:1194–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani M, Kabirifar K, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Mojtahedi M (2021) Production scheduling of off site prefabricated construction components considering sequence dependent due dates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16285-0

  • Yildirim MB, Mouzon G (2011) Single-machine sustainable production planning to minimize total energy consumption and total completion time using a multiple objective genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 59:585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin L, Li X, Gao L, Lu C, Zhang Z (2017) A novel mathematical model and multi-objective method for the low-carbon flexible job shop scheduling problem. Sustain Comput: Inform Syst 13:15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Che A, Wu X (2018a) Bi-objective scheduling on uniform parallel machines considering electricity cost. Eng Optim 50:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z, Hong M, Man Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Liu H (2018b) Multi-object optimization of flexible flow shop scheduling with batch process—consideration total electricity consumption and material wastage. J Clean Prod 183:925–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Chiong R (2016) Solving the energy-efficient job shop scheduling problem: a multi-objective genetic algorithm with enhanced local search for minimizing the total weighted tardiness and total energy consumption. J Clean Prod 112:3361–3375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Xu L (2013) Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. Int J Prod Econ 144:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Yin GG, Boukas E-K (2001) Optimal control of a marketing-production system. IEEE Trans Autom Control 46:416–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Liu K, Luo X, Chen Q, Li W (2015) A multi-period mathematical model for simultaneous optimization of materials and energy on the refining site scale. Appl Energy 143:238–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Liu Q, Zhou Y, Ying B (2017) Integrated optimization of cutting parameters and scheduling for reducing carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 149:886–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Yan J, Zhang Y, Yan S (2019) Optimization for energy-efficient flexible flow shop scheduling under time of use electricity tariffs. Procedia CIRP 80:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H-L, Qian B, Sun Z-X, Hu R, Liu B, Guo N (2018) Single-machine green scheduling to minimize total flow time and carbon emission. International Conference on Intelligent Computing, 52, pp 670–678

  • Zhao S, Wang L, Zheng Y (2014) Integrating production planning and maintenance: an iterative method. Ind Manage Data Syst 114(2):162–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X-L, Wang L (2016) A collaborative multiobjective fruit fly optimization algorithm for the resource constrained unrelated parallel machine green scheduling problem. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst 48:790–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Deng Q, Zhang L, Hu X, Lin W (2020a) Low carbon flexible job shop scheduling problem considering worker learning using a memetic algorithm. Optim Eng 21:1691–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Jiang T, Wang Y (2020b) Discrete African Buffalo Optimization Algorithm for the Low-carbon Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem. J Adv Manuf Syst 19:837–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Jiang T, Wan Y, Deng G (2021) Multi-objective discrete water wave optimization algorithm for solving the energy-saving job shop scheduling problem with variable processing speeds. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(6):10617–10631

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Skudai, Malaysia

    Muhammad Qasim, Kuan Yew Wong & Mohd Syahril Ramadhan Mohd Saufi

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Jalozai Campus, University of Engineering and Technology, 25000, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Muhammad Qasim

Authors
  1. Muhammad Qasim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuan Yew Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohd Syahril Ramadhan Mohd Saufi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Muhammad Qasim—Literature survey, analysis, writing, reviewing, and revising the manuscript.

Kuan Yew Wong—Conceptualization, supervision, writing, reviewing, and revising the manuscript.

Mohd Syahril Ramadhan Mohd Saufi—Reviewing and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Qasim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qasim, M., Wong, K.Y. & Saufi, M.S.R.M. Production planning approaches: a review from green perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 90024–90049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24995-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24995-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation