Abstract
Industrial digital transformation is a key engine to help developing countries reduce pollution and carbon emissions. We used the composite system synergy model (CSSM) and modified entropy weight method to measure the degree of synergy between pollution and carbon emissions control (SPCEC) and the level of industrial digitization in each province and city based on the Chinese inter-provincial panel data from 2011 to 2020. We then used the two-way fixed effects and panel quantile regression models to test the heterogeneous influence of industrial digitization on the SPCEC. We found that: (1) industrial digitization had a positive contribution to the SPCEC. (2) Digitization of industry contributes more to the SPCEC level than the digitization of agriculture and services. (3) The promotion of SPCEC by industrial digitization is significant in the western region, but not in the eastern, central and northeastern regions. (4) In provinces and municipalities with lower level of SPCEC, the contribution of industrial digitization to the SPCEC is higher. This paper reveals the impact of industrial digitization on the SPCEC and can provide a policy reference for the realization of the SPCEC from the perspective of the integration of industry and digitization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Notes
The calculation process of using the composite system synergy model is not reported here for space reasons, and interested readers can request it from the authors.
References
Bartik TJ (2009) How do the effects of local growth on employment rates vary with initial labor market conditions? Upjohn Institute Working Paper 9–148
Berkhout F, Hertin J (2004) De-materialising and re-materialising: digital technologies and the environment. Futures 36(8):903–920
Bunse K, Vodicka M, Schöensleben P, Brülhart M, Ernst FO (2011) Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management-gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. J Clean Prod 19(6–7):667–679
Che S, Wang J (2022) Digital economy development and haze pollution: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–17
Dong MJ, Li G, Liang YM (2012) The sources of China’s environmental total factor productivity. J Quant Tech Econ 2:2–20
Hampton SE, Strasser CA, Tewksbury JJ, Gram WK, Budden AE, Batcheller AL, Duke CS, Porter JH (2013) Big data and the future of ecology. Front Ecol Environ 11(3):156–162
IEA (2021) Global Energy Review 2021: assessing the effects of economic recoveries on global energy demand and CO2 emissions in 2021
Ishida H (2015) The effect of ICT development on economic growth and energy consumption in Japan. Telemat Inform 32(1):79–88
Jia R, Shao S, Yang L (2021) High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: a spatial difference-in-differences approach. Energy Econ 99:105271
Li GH, Zhou XL (2021) Can promoting the digital economy improve environmental pollution in China: a quasi-natural experiment based on the ‘Broadband China’ strategy. Macroeconomics 7:146–160
Li J, Chen L, Chen Y, He J (2021) Digital economy, technological innovation, and green economic efficiency—empirical evidence from 277 cities in China. Manag Decis Econ 6:29
Li JM, Luo N (2020) Has the opening of high-speed rail improved the level of urban air pollution. China Econ Quart 19:1335–1354
Li L, Yang H, Liu J (2014) Evaluation study on comprehensive developing ability of regional manufacturing industry in China based on the empirical analysis of manufacturing industry in east, middle and west China. China Soft Sci 2:121–129
Li Z, Wang J (2022) The dynamic impact of digital economy on Carbon emission reduction: evidence city-level empirical data in China. J Clean Prod 351:131570
Lu H, Song C, Lingling L (2021) Digital economy, innovation environment and urban innovation capabilities. Sci Res Manag 42(4):35
Ma Q, Tariq M, Mahmood H, Khan Z (2022) The nexus between digital economy and carbon dioxide emissions in China: the moderating role of investments in research and development. Technol Soc 68:101910
May G, Stahl B, Taisch M, Kiritsis D (2017) Energy management in manufacturing: from literature review to a conceptual framework. J Clean Prod 167:1464–1489
Moyer JD, Hughes BB (2012) ICTs: do they contribute to increased carbon emissions? Technol Forecast Soc 79(5):919–931
OECD (2014) Measuring the digital economy: a new perspective. OECD Publishing
Powell D (2022) Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. Empir Econ 1–17
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Nair M, Bennett SE (2019) Sustainable economic growth in the European Union: the role of ICT, venture capital, and innovation. Rev Financ Econ 1:34–62
Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):71–102
Shahbaz M, Li J, Dong X, Dong K (2022) How financial inclusion affects the collaborative reduction of pollutant and carbon emissions: the case of China. Energy Econ 107:105847
Shi D, Ding H, Wei P, Liu J (2018) Can smart city construction reduce environmental pollution. China Ind Econ 6:117–135
Shobande OA (2021) Decomposing the persistent and transitory effect of information and communication technology on environmental impacts assessment in Africa: evidence from Mundlak Specification. Sustainability 13(9):4683
Wang J, Zhu J, Luo X (2021) Research on the measurement of China’s digital economy development and the characteristics. J Quant Tech Econ 38(7):26–42
Wang J, Zou GP, Shi XJ (2013) The impact of institutional change on China’s economic growth: an empirical study based on VAR model. China Ind Econ 6:70–82
Wang M, Huang Y (2015) China’s environmental pollution and economic growth. China Econ Quart 14(2):557–578
Wen H, Lee CC, Song Z (2021) Digitalization and environment: how does ICT affect enterprise environmental performance? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(39):54826–54841
Wu CX (2021) Research on the synergistic effect of low-carbon economy in China. J Manag World 37(8):105–117
Wu H, Hao Y, Ren S (2020) How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: evidence from China. Energy Econ 91:104880
Xiao X, Qi YD (2019) Value dimension and theoretical logic of industrial digital transformation. Reform 8:61–70
Xu W, Zhou J, Liu C (2022) The impact of digital economy on urban carbon emissions: based on the analysis of spatial effects. Geogr Res 41:111–129
Yi H, Zhao L, Qian Y, Zhou L, Yang P (2022a) How to achieve synergy between carbon dioxide mitigation and air pollution control? Evidence from China. Sust Cities Soc 78:103609
Yi M, Liu Y, Sheng MS, Wen L (2022b) Effects of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: new evidence from China. Energy Policy 171:113271
Yi XJ, Zhou L (2018) Does digital financial inclusion significantly influence household consumption? Evidence from household survey data in China. J Financial Res 11(461):47–67
Yuan YJ, Xie RH (2014) Research on the effect of environmental regulation to industrial restructuring-empirical test based on provincial panel data of China. China Ind Econ 8:57–69
Zhang J, Wang B, Latif Z (2019) Towards cross-regional sustainable development: the nexus between information and communication technology, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions. Sustain Dev 27(5):990–1000
Zhang W, Liu X, Wang D, Zhou J (2022) Digital economy and carbon emission performance: evidence at China’s city level. Energy Policy 165:112927
Zhang Y, Ma S, Yang H, Lv J, Liu Y (2018) A big data driven analytical framework for energy-intensive manufacturing industries. J Clean Prod 197:57–72
Zhu HL, Wang CJ (2021) Industry digitalization against the strategic background of the new development paradigm: theory and countermeasures. Finance Trade Econ 42(3):14–27
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences of China. The project is a late-stage project funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China in 2022 and is entitled Research on the Impact of the Digital Economy on the Synergistic Governance of Pollution and Carbon Reduction. In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge the editor and the anonymous referees for their valuable comments on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript. The specific contributions are as follows. Conceptualization: YH, YY; Methodology: YY; Formal analysis and investigation: YY, RC and YH; Writing—original draft preparation: YY, YH; Writing—review and editing: HW, RC and MY; Resources: MY and HW; Supervision: YH, YY and RC.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to participate
All authors participated in this article.
Consent for publication
All authors have given consent to the publication of this article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V.V.S.S. Sarma
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, Y., Cheng, R., Wang, H. et al. Industrial digitization and synergy between pollution and carbon emissions control: new empirical evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 36127–36142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24540-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24540-1