Abstract
Long-term and high-intensity application of inorganic fertilizer leads to a strong variation of soil characteristics. The changes in soil chemical and biological properties can significantly affect the yield of Eucalyptus plantation. However, the mechanism of soil chemical properties affecting wood volume mediated by biological factors is not clear. The purpose of this study was to identify which soil properties were affected by different fertilization intensities and to disentangle the dominant factors affecting Eucalyptus volume. After clear felling evergreen broad-leaved forest, a Eucalyptus plantation was established that was coppiced every 5 years and fertilized every year. Within this plantation, areas with different treatments were established. These treatments were a 5-year growth period (low); two times 5-year growth period (medium); and three times 5-year growth period (high). In each treatment area and in a nearby evergreen broad-leaved forest (EBLF Control), five sample plots per treatment were set up. Various biological and chemistry analyses (18 in total) were related to determining the most important path and index for optimizing Eucalyptus plantation. The analysis of variance of enzyme activity and microbial biomass showed that the soil biological characteristics decreased over 10 years of plantation, and the enzyme activity was close to the state of EBLF control in medium, while the microbial biomass failed to return to its original state during continuous planting. Redundancy analysis results show that there was a strong correlation in chemical indicators and biological characteristics. Partial least square structural equation model showed that total phosphorus, nitrate nitrogen, urease, catalase, and microbial biomass nitrogen and phosphorus were the most influential soil biochemical factors, and the indirect effect of chemical properties on volume was achieved by microorganisms through enzyme activity. Continuous planting and large-scale application of inorganic fertilizer would lead to a decrease in plantation yield and fertilizer utilization efficiency and would affect the microbial biomass and enzyme activity by destroying the stability of soil chemical properties.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Achat DL, Deleuze C, Landmann G, Pousse N, Ranger J, Augusto L (2015) Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth – a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag 348:124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.042
Acosta-Martinez V, Lascano R, Calderon F, Booker JD, Zobeck TM, Upchurch DR (2011) Dryland cropping systems influence the microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a semiarid sandy soil. Biol Fertil Soils 47:655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0565-1
Aon MA, Colaneri AC (2001) II. Temporal and spatial evolution of enzymatic activities and physico-chemical properties in an agricultural soil. Appl Soil Ecol 18:255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-1393(01)00161-5
Araujo AS, Borges CD, Tsai SM, Cesarz S, Eisenhauer N (2014) Soil bacterial diversity in degraded and restored lands of northeast Brazil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106:891–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0258-5
Araujo ASF, Silva EFL, Nunes LAPL, Carneiro RFV (2010) The effect of converting tropical native savanna to Eucalyptus grandis forest on soil microbial biomass. Land Degrad Dev 21:540–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.993
Arevalo-Gardini E, Canto M, Alegre J, Loli O, Julca A, Baligar V (2015) Changes in soil physical and chemical properties in long term improved natural and traditional agroforestry management systems of cacao genotypes in Peruvian Amazon. PLoS One 10:e0132147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132147
Behera N, Sahani U (2003) Soil microbial biomass and activity in response to Eucalyptus plantation and natural regeneration on tropical soil. For Ecol Manag 174:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00057-9
Berg B, Matzner E (1997) Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ Rev 5:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-5-1-1
Bond CR, Maguire RO, Havlin JL (2006) Change in soluble phosphorus in soils following fertilization is dependent on initial Mehlich-3 phosphorus. J Environ Qual 35:1818–1824. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0404
Bonner MTL, Shoo LP, Brackin R, Schmidt S (2018) Relationship between microbial composition and substrate use efficiency in tropical soil. Geoderma 315:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.026
Borg I, Groenen P (2006) Modern multidimensional scaling: theory and applications. J Educ Meas 40:277–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01108.x
Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1982) Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 14:319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(82)90001-3
Bu Y, Takano T, Liu S (2019) The role of ammonium transporter (AMT) against salt stress in plants. Plant Signal Behav 14:1625696. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2019.1625696
Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Stromberger ME, Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN, Zoppini A (2013) Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol Biochem 58:216–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009
Cao J, Ying Z, Nong B (2005) Analysis of fertilizer application techniques for Eucalyptus fast-growing forest in Guangxi. Guangxi Forestry Science, 35-36. 10.19692/j.crki.gfs.2005.01.009
Cen J Y (2007) Study on two-way tree volume dynamic model of eucalyptus plantations in Guangxi [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD2007&filename=HNNB200701021&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=H70A6XkPpVAD3hDtpDWky6x-2CB-anzp4BpD-o3ufDkYg3iapDOA_jC1Le0_MkK0
Chen C, Ou Y (2009) A comparison of catalysis between catalase and magnesium dioxide in the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. J Guangdong Education Institute 29:67–71
Chen F, Zheng H, Zhang K, Ouyang Z, Li H, Wu B, Shi Q (2013a) Soil microbial community structure and function responses to successive planting of Eucalyptus. J Environ Sci (China) 25:2102–2111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(12)60319-2
Chen FL, Zheng H, Zhang K, Ouyang ZY, Wu YF, Shi Q, Li HL (2013b) Non-linear impacts of Eucalyptus plantation stand age on soil microbial metabolic diversity. J Soils Sediments 13:887–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0669-3
Chen H, Chuanhan CAFB (1993) Soil enzyme activity and soil fertility in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation. Forest Research 6, 321-321. 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1993.03.016
Cheng F, Peng X, Zhao P, Yuan J, Zhong C, Cheng Y, Cui C, Zhang S (2013) Soil microbial biomass, basal respiration and enzyme activity of main forest types in the Qinling Mountains. PLoS One 8:e67353. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067353
Cromer RN, Jarvis PG (1990) Growth and biomass partitioning in Eucalyptus grandis seedlings in response to nitrogen supply. Funct Plant Biol 17:503–515. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9900503
Daniels MB, Delaune P, Moore PA Jr, Mauromoustakos A, Chapman SL, Langston JM (2001) Soil phosphorus variability in pastures: implications for sampling and environmental management strategies. J Environ Qual 30:2157–2165. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.2157
Ding H, Hai-Bo HU, Wang RC (2007) The relationships between soil enzyme activity and soil physical-chemical properties or microbial biomass in semi-arid area. J Nanjing Forest Univ, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2007.02.004
Douka CE, Xenoulis AC, Paradellis T (1983) Interaction between microorganisms, chemical composition and environment in salt-affected soils. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 28:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02877387
Esposito Vinzi V, Trinchera L, Squillacciotti S, Tenenhaus M (2008) REBUS-PLS: a response-based procedure for detecting unit segments in PLS path modelling. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind 24:439–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.728
Etten EV (2005) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using canoco. Aust Ecol 30:486–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01433.x
Falin C, Kai Z, Dan X, Aiping WU, Youzhi LI, Dongsheng Z, Hua Z, Ackermann K, Kai Z, Dan X, Aiping WU, Youzhi LI, Dongsheng Z, Hua Z (2019) Impacts of litter decomposition of Eucalyptus on soil microbial community: a microcosm study. Acta Pedol Sin 56:432–442. https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb201804200092
Gama-Rodrigues EF, Barros NF, Viana AP, Santos GA (2008) Alterações na biomassa e na atividade microbiana da serapilheira e do solo, em decorrência da substituição de cobertura florestal nativa por plantações de eucalipto, em diferentes sítios da Região Sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 32:1489–1499. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-06832008000400013
Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) Corrigendum to “Editorial Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance” [LRP 46/1-2 (2013) 1–12]. Long Range Plan 47:392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.016
Hardiyanto EB, Nambiar EKS (2014) Productivity of successive rotations of Acacia mangium plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia: impacts of harvest and inter-rotation site management. New For 45:557–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9418-8
Harrison AF (1983) Relationship between intensity of phosphatase activity and physico-chemical properties in woodland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 15:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(83)90124-4
Hortensius D, Welling R (2008) International standardization of soil quality measurements. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 27:387–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629609369563
Hou SL, Freschet GT, Yang JJ, Zhang YH, Yin JX, Hu YY, Wei HW, Han XG, Lu XT (2018) Quantifying the indirect effects of nitrogen deposition on grassland litter chemical traits. Biogeochemistry 139:261–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0466-6
Huang R, McGrath SP, Hirsch PR, Clark IM, Storkey J, Wu L, Zhou J, Liang Y (2019) Plant-microbe networks in soil are weakened by century-long use of inorganic fertilizers. Microb Biotechnol 12:1464–1475. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13487
Jia L, Xiaolin Z, Jianhua C, Shuoxing W, Yuxin TA, Min Z, Yi J (2017) Effect of soil nutrient on the litter decompositionof Eucalyptus plantation interplanting herbage. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology. 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.022
Jia X, Zhong Y, Liu J, Zhu G, Shangguan Z, Yan W (2020) Effects of nitrogen enrichment on soil microbial characteristics: from biomass to enzyme activities. Geoderma 366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114256
Johnson JL, Temple KL (1964) Some variables affecting the measurement of “Catalase Activity” in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 28:207–209. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800020024x
Kou TJ, Lam SK, Chen DL, Yu WW (2018) Soil urease and catalase responses to ozone pollution are affected by the ozone sensitivity of wheat cultivars. J Agron Crop Sci 204:424–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12268
Li G, Zhang Z, Shi LL, Zhou Y, Yang M, Cao JX, Wu SH, Lei GC (2018) Effects of different grazing intensities on soil C, N, and P in an alpine meadow on the QinghaiTibetan Plateau, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112584
Li H, Xiang D, Wang C, Li X, Lou Y (2012) Effects of epigeic earthworm (Eisenia fetida) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus intraradices) on enzyme activities of a sterilized soil–sand mixture and nutrient uptake by maize. Biol Fertil Soils 48:879–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0679-0
Li Na CJ, Liming T, Binglin P, Zhou Qihua W, Jianli WH (2009) Preliminary research effect of different fertilization methods and fertilizing amount on Eucalyptus growth. Guangxi Forestry Science 038:102–106
Li Y, Hu J, Wang S, Wang S (2004) Function and application of soil microorganisms in forest ecosystem. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 15:1943–1946. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v24n01_09
Liu D, Huang YM, Sun HY, An SS (2018a) The restoration age of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation impacts soil microbial biomass and microbial community structure in the Loess Plateau. CATENA 165:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.02.001
Liu J, Wu LC, Chen D, Li M, Wei CJ (2017) Soil quality assessment of different Camellia oleifera stands in mid-subtropical China. Appl Soil Ecol 113:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.01.010
Liu J, Wu LC, Chen D, Yu ZG, Wei CJ (2018b) Development of a soil quality index for Camellia oleifera forestland yield under three different parent materials in Southern China. Soil Tillage Res 176:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.013
Lopez DMS, Arturi MF, Goya JF, Perez CA, Frangi JL (2020) Eucalyptus grandis plantations: effects of management on soil carbon, nutrient contents and yields. J For Res 31:601–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0850-z
Lu K (1999) Analytical methods of soil and agricultural chemistry. China Agriculture Scientech Press, Beijing,China, 308-315 pp
Madeira M, Pereira JS (1990) Productivity, nutrient immobilization and soil chemical properties in an Eucalyptus globulus plantation under different irrigation and fertilization regimes. Water Air Soil Pollut 54:621–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02385159
Madejon P, Alaejos J, Garcia-Albala J, Fernandez M, Madejon E (2016) Three-year study of fast-growing trees in degraded soils amended with composts: effects on soil fertility and productivity. J Environ Manag 169:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.050
Maheswaran J, Attiwill PM (1987) Loss of organic matter, elements, and organic fractions in decomposing Eucalyptus microcarpa leaf litter. Can J Bot 65:2601–2606. https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-350
Makoi J, Ndakidemi PA (2008) Selected soil enzymes: examples of their potential roles in the ecosystem. Afr J Biotechnol 7:181–191. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb07.590
May PB, Douglas LA (1976) Assay for soil urease activity. Plant Soil 45:301–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00011156
McCune B, Grace JB (2020) MRPP (Multi-response Permutation Procedures) and related techniques. In McCune BA (ed) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, pp 188–197. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308353265_MRPP_multi-response_permutation_procedures
Möller K (2015) Effects of anaerobic digestion on soil carbon and nitrogen turnover, N emissions, and soil biological activity. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0284-3
Rahman KMA, Zhang D (2018) Effects of fertilizer broadcasting on the excessive use of inorganic fertilizers and environmental sustainability. Sustainability 10:759
Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2016) Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: the importance-performance map analysis. Ind Manag Data Syst 116:1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/Imds-10-2015-0449
Ross DJ (1990) Measurements of microbial biomass c and n in grassland soils by fumigation-incubation procedures: influence of inoculum size and the control. Soil Biol Biochem 22:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(90)90102-6
Schinner F, von Mersi W (1990) Xylanase-, CM-cellulase- and invertase activity in soil: an improved method. Soil Biol Biochem 22:511–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(90)90187-5
Silva PHM, Poggiani F, Libardi PL, Gonçalves AN (2013) Fertilizer management of eucalypt plantations on sandy soil in Brazil: initial growth and nutrient cycling. For Ecol Manag 301:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.033
Sinha S, Masto RE, Ram LC, Selvi VA, Srivastava NK, Tripathi RC, George J (2009) Rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species in a coal mining ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1824–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.11.022
Siyi D, Jiyun S, Qingpeng Y (2015) Effects of thinning and pruning on soil microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activities in chinese fir plantation. J Central South Univ Forest Technol 35:75–79. https://doi.org/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.06.014
Sokal RR (1979) Testing statistical significance of geographic variation patterns. J Syst Zool 28:227–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412528
Soumare A, Sall SN, Sanon A, Cissoko M, Hafidi M, Ndoye I, Duponnois R (2016) Changes in soil Ph, polyphenol content and microbial community mediated by Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Appl Ecol Environ Res 14:1–19. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1403_001019
ter Braak CJF (1989) CANOCO — an extension of DECORANA to analyze species-environment relationships. Hydrobiologia 184:169–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02392953
Tsiknia M, Tzanakakis VA, Oikonomidis D, Paranychianakis NV, Nikolaidis NP (2014) Effects of olive mill wastewater on soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2739–2749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5272-4
Tu J, Wang B, McGrouther K, Wang H, Ma T, Qiao J, Wu L (2016) Soil quality assessment under different Paulownia fortunei plantations in mid-subtropical China. J Soils Sediments 17:2371–2382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1478-2
Tu J, Qiao J, Zhu ZW, Li P, Wu LC (2018) Soil bacterial community responses to long-term fertilizer treatments in Paulownia plantations in subtropical China. Appl Soil Ecol 124:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.036
Wang QK, Wang SL, Liu YX (2008) Responses to N and P fertilization in a young Eucalyptus dunnii plantation: microbial properties, enzyme activities and dissolved organic matter. Appl Soil Ecol 40:484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.07.003
Wang T, Guo Y, Su J, Xu C (2020) Effects of Syringa pinnatifolia var. alanshanica on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities and microbial diversity. J Beijing Forest Univ 42:91–101. https://doi.org/10.12171/j.1000-1522.20180365
Wang Y, Zheng J, Xu Z, Abdullah KM, Zhou Q (2019) Effects of changed litter inputs on soil labile carbon and nitrogen pools in a eucalyptus-dominated forest of southeast Queensland, Australia. J Soils Sediments 19:1661–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02268-9
Wu X (2003) Determination of site & nutrient productivity parameters for eucalyptus forest. Sci Silvae Sin 39:71–77. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2003.02.012
Xu, J (2014) The 8th forest resources inventory results and analysis in China. Forestry Economics. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD2014&filename=LYJJ201403003&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=LYrs24EbjAbDdCyQBVxIOacrfB6ph1qQL1yeAA2ZzkOBVpyNdE3bCOqrFUmxM-1
Xu Y, Du A, Wang Z, Zhu W, Li C, Wu L (2020) Effects of different rotation periods of Eucalyptus plantations on soil physiochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial biomass and microbial community structure and diversity. For Ecol Manag 456:117683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117683
Xu Y, Ren S, Liang Y, Du A, Li C, Wang Z, Zhu W, Wu L (2021) Soil nutrient supply and tree species drive changes in soil microbial communities during the transformation of a multi-generation Eucalyptus plantation. Appl Soil Ecol 166:103991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103991
Yang S, Jun WU, Tan H, Liu Y, Xiong L, Zhou L, Xie R, Huang G, Zhao Q (2013) Variation of soil fertility in Eucalyptus robusta plantations after controlled burning in the red soil region and its ecological evaluation. Acta Ecol Sin 33:7788–7797. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201304270835
Yang SD, Rong-Tan LI, Tan HW, Zhou LQ, Xie RL, Huang JS, University G (2016) Differences of soil biological characteristics and bacterial diversity of sugarcane fields in red soil region affected by long-term single chemical fertilization and chemical organic combined application. J Plant Nutri Fertil. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.15506
Yue LI, Zhang J, Yijian LI, Pan S, Han Y, Yang Q, Zhang X (2010) Canonical correlations of soil nutrients,microorganism and enzyme activity of coastal protective forest in Shanghai. Ecol Environ Sci 19:360–366. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.02.020
Zeng SC, Jacobs DF, Sloan JL, Xue L, Li Y, Chu SS (2013) Split fertilizer application affects growth, biomass allocation, and fertilizer uptake efficiency of hybrid Eucalyptus. New For 44:703–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9371-y
Zhang D, Zhang J, Yang W, Wu F (2012) Effects of afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis on soil physicochemical and microbiological properties. Soil Res 50:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr11104
Zhang JS, Guo JF, Chen GS, Qian W (2005) Soil microbial biomass and its controls. J For Res 16:327–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02858201
Zhang TA, Luo YQ, Chen HYH, Ruan HH (2018) Responses of litter decomposition and nutrient release to N addition: a meta-analysis of terrestrial ecosystems. Appl Soil Ecol 128:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.04.004
Zhu L, Tang Y, Weng Y, Huang K, Wang J, Zhao J, Wu L (2020a) Effects of burning harvested residues on the archaeal and bacterial communities of Eucalyptus urophylla substituting native vegetation. Appl Soil Ecol 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103796
Zhu L, Wang J, Weng Y, Chen X, Wu L (2020b) Soil characteristics of Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis plantations under different management measures for harvest residues with soil depth gradient across time. Ecol Indic 117:106530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106530
Zhu LY, Wang XH, Chen FF, Li CH, Wu LC (2019a) Effects of the successive planting of Eucalyptus urophylla on soil bacterial and fungal community structure, diversity, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity. Land Degrad Dev 30:636–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3249
Zhu Y, Ling WU, Peng W, Hu DU, Liu Y, Lan X, Song M (2019b): Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of C,N,and P of leaves,litter and soil in Eucalyptus plantations at different stand ages in Guangxi. J Central South Univ Forest Technol. 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.06.014
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the staff from the Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for Non-Wood Forest Trees of the National Ministry of Education. We appreciate the assistance provided by the staff of the state-owned Daguishan Forest Farm and Guangxi Di Yuan Zhi Ben Fertilizer Industry Co. LTD for their contributions to our study.
Funding
This study was funded by the China National Key Research and Development Program during the 13th Five-year Plan Period (Grant No. 2016YFD0600505), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M693577), and Outstanding Youth Scholar Program of Education Department of Hunan Province (Grant No. 20B605).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis, and article review and revision were performed by Zhengye Wang, Lingyue Zhu, Gerty Gielen, Hailong Wang, Sheng Lu, Lijun Chen, Lichao Wu, Qinzhan Wu, Kangting Huang, Jianke Wen, and Xiuhai Wang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhengye Wang and Lingyue Zhu, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• High-intensity inorganic fertilizer affects soil and stand volume in Eucalyptus plantations.
• Nitrate nitrogen, urease, catalase, and microbial biomass nitrogen and phosphorus were the most influential soil biochemical factors.
• Chemical properties indirectly affect the biomass by biological characteristics.
• Inorganic fertilizers’ ratio and main chemical properties’ roles can be investigated.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(PDF 184 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Zhu, L., Gielen, G. et al. Potential effects of soil chemical and biological properties on wood volume in Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis hybrid plantations and their responses to different intensity applications of inorganic fertilizer. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 773–787 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22238-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22238-y