Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the economic premium of electric vehicle charging points: a hedonic price analysis in Beijing, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electric vehicle charging points (EVCPs) are the foundation of the EV industry and are conducive to low-carbon transportation development. Research on EVCPs mainly focus on operation profits and layout, while no study assesses their economic premium. Aiming at providing a reference for the installation of EVCPs, this study employs a hedonic price model to evaluate the economic premium of CPs, based on apartment transactions and complex data on CPs in 2015 and 2016 in Beijing. The primary findings indicate the economic premium of CPs is significantly positive in both housing sale and rental markets. However, the impact of CPs on housing prices is heterogeneous in terms of complex floor area ratio and location. Specifically, the premium effect of CPs is more significant in larger complex and complex in the suburb. Following the above conclusions, we provide several policy pathways to promote the construction of CPs and their scientific location layout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Data source website: http://www.beijing.gov.cn/fuwu/lqfw/ztzl/xytxms/11/202006/t20200610_1921186.html.

  2. Data source: http://zjw.beijing.gov.cn/bjjs/fwgl/wyglxx/wyglxx/391449/index.shtml and http://zjw.beijing.gov.cn/bjjs/xxgk/xwfb/317878/index.shtml.

  3. The CP data from the Commission was no longer updated after 2017.

  4. Beijing is a typical monocentric city. Although the scale of the city has been expanding in recent decades, the urban area within the 2nd ring road has historically been the central city, which is home to the majority of government offices, central business districts, and shopping plazas. Thus, the distance to the 2nd ring road can be viewed as the measure of distance to the downtown area.

References

  • Ahn K, Jang H, Song Y (2020) Economic impacts of being close to subway networks: a case study of Korean metropolitan areas. Res Transp Econ 83:100900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae CHC, Jun MJ, Park H (2003) The impact of Seoul’s subway Line 5 on residential property values. Transp Policy 10(2):85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajic V (1983) The effects of a new subway line on housing prices in metropolitan Toronto. Urban Stud 20(2):147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball MJ (1973) Recent empirical work on the determinants of relative house prices. Urban Stud 10(2):213–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman A, Qin P, Yang J (2020) How costly are driving restrictions? Contingent valuation evidence from Beijing. J Environ Econ Manag 104:102366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt K, Ruta G, Sarraf M (2005) Estimating the cost of environmental degradation. In: Report of the Word Bank Environment Department. Chapter 6. Hedonic Prices Method, pp. E38–E50

  • Cervero R, Kang CD (2011) Bus rapid transit impacts on land uses and land values in Seoul, Korea. Transp Policy 18(1):102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Liu W, Yin Y (2017) Deployment of stationary and dynamic charging infrastructure for electric vehicles along traffic corridors. Transport Res Part C: Emerg Technol 77:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark DE, Herrin WE (2000) The impact of public school attributes on home sale prices in California. Growth Chang 31(3):385–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie J, Davis L, Greenstone M, Walker R (2015) Environmental health risks and housing values: evidence from 1,600 toxic plant openings and closings. Am Econ Rev 105(2):678–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong J, Liu C, Lin Z (2014) Charging infrastructure planning for promoting battery electric vehicles: an activity-based approach using multiday travel data. Transport Res Part C: Emerg Technol 38:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin RA, Sung CH (1990) Specification of hedonic regressions: non-nested tests on measures of neighborhood quality. J Urban Econ 27(1):97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follain JR, Jimenez E (1985) Estimating the demand for housing characteristics: a survey and critique. Reg Sci Urban Econ 15(1):77–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Zhao H (2015) Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective. Appl Energy 158:390–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman S, Jenn A, Tal G, Axsen J, Beard G, Daina N, Witkamp B (2018) A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 62:508–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess DB, Almeida TM (2007) Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York. Urban Studies 44(5-6):1041–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2020) Global EV Outlook 2020. https://webstore.iea.org/global-ev-outlook-2020 (Accessed 15 June 2020)

  • Kiel KA, McClain KT (1995) House prices during siting decision stages: The case of an incinerator from rumor through operation. J Environ Econ Manag 28(2):241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihm A, Trommer S (2014) The new car market for electric vehicles and the potential for fuel substitution. Energy Policy 73:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74(2):132–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Jin C, Jansen SJ, van der Heijden H, Boelhouwer P (2021) Residential satisfaction of private tenants in China’s superstar cities: the case of Shenzhen, China. Cities 118:103355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yu B (2019) Peaking CO2 emissions for China’s urban passenger transport sector. Energy Policy 133:110913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Qiu Y, Liu P, He P (2022) Benefits of sustainable transportation infrastructure: evidence from the housing market response to electric vehicle charging stations in California. Pengfei and He, Pan, Benefits of sustainable transportation infrastructure: evidence from the housing market response to electric vehicle charging stations in California (February 28, 2022)

  • Linneman P (1980) Some empirical results on the nature of the hedonic price function for the urban housing market. J Urban Econ 8(1):47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma SC, Fan Y (2020) A deployment model of EV charging piles and its impact on EV promotion. Energy Policy 146:111777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak HY, Rong Y, Shen ZJM (2013) Infrastructure planning for electric vehicles with battery swapping. Manag Sci 59(7):1557–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Y, Gao L, Zhang J, Wang J (2020) Valuing urban air quality: a hedonic price analysis in Beijing, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(2):1373–1385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Y, Sohngen B, Babb T (2018a) Valuing urban wetland quality with hedonic price model. Ecol Indic 84:535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Y, Zhao X, Lin L, Gao L (2018b) Capitalization of urban green vegetation in a housing market with poor environmental quality: evidence from Beijing. J Urban Plann Dev 144(3):05018011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Y, Gao L, Zhang W, Yang FA (2021) Do homeowners benefit when coal-fired power plants switch to natural gas? Evidence from Beijing, China. J Environ Econ Manag 110:102566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mi Z, Sun X (2021) Provinces with transitions in industrial structure and energy mix performed best in climate change mitigation in China. Commun Earth Environ 2(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey P, Weldon P, O’Mahony M (2016) Future standard and fast charging infrastructure planning: an analysis of electric vehicle charging behaviour. Energy Policy 89:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulley C (2014) Accessibility and residential land value uplift: identifying spatial variations in the accessibility impacts of a bus transitway. Urban Stud 51(8):1707–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson SB, Michalek JJ (2013) Cost-effectiveness of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle battery capacity and charging infrastructure investment for reducing US gasoline consumption. Energy Policy 52:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82(1):34–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi-Barzani P, Rajabi-Ghahnavieh A, Kazemi-Karegar H (2014) Optimal fast charging station placing and sizing. Appl Energy 125:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Román TG, Momber I, Abbad MR, Miralles AS (2011) Regulatory framework and business models for charging plug-in electric vehicles: infrastructure, agents, and commercial relationships. Energy Policy 39(10):6360–6375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder A, Traber T (2012) The economics of fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Energy Policy 43:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shojaabadi S, Abapour S, Abapour M, Nahavandi A (2016) Simultaneous planning of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging stations and wind power generation in distribution networks considering uncertainties. Renew Energy 99:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R (1978) A note on the value of crime control: evidence from the property market. J Urban Econ 5(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian C, Peng Y, Wen H, Yue W, Fang L (2020) Subway boosts housing values, for whom: a quasi-experimental analysis. Res Transport Econ, 100844

  • Voith R (1991) Transportation, sorting and house values. Real Estate Econ 19(2):117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Liu AA, Qin P, Linn J (2020a) The effect of vehicle ownership restrictions on travel behavior: evidence from the Beijing license plate lottery. J Environ Econ Manag 99:102269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Zhang L, Dong W (2020b) Economic benefit analysis of charging models based on differential electric vehicle charging infrastructure subsidy policy in China. Sustain Cities Soc 59:102206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu JL, Jia Q, Hu HQ (2021) Charging infrastructure construction from the perspective of new infrastructure. Energy Rep 7:224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria F, Fatine FA (2021) Towards the hedonic modelling and determinants of real estates price in Morocco. Soc Sci Human Open 4(1):100176

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Niu N, Li H, Wang Z, He W (2021) Could fast battery charging effectively mitigate range anxiety in electric vehicle usage? Evidence from large-scale data on travel and charging in Beijing. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 95:102840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao HR, Guo S, Fu LW (2014) Review on the costs and benefits of renewable energy power subsidy in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 37:538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Zhang L, Yang M, Chai J, Li S (2020) Pricing for private charging pile sharing considering EV consumers based on non-cooperative game model. J Clean Prod 254:120039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Wang K, Dong X, Dong K (2022) Is smart transportation associated with reduced carbon emissions?. The case of China. Energy Econ 105:105715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Dong ZY, Xu Y, Meng K, Zhao JH, Qiu J (2014) Electric vehicle battery charging/swap stations in distribution systems: comparison study and optimal planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(1):221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Wang P (2019) Study on indirect network effects on the construction of electric vehicle charging piles based on game theory analysis. Energy Procedia 158:3853–3858

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 71803192 and 71703166).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by CZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LG and YM, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingdan Mei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, L., Zhao, C. & Mei, Y. Assessing the economic premium of electric vehicle charging points: a hedonic price analysis in Beijing, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 84546–84561 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21735-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21735-4

Keywords

Navigation