Abstract
The thermal power industry takes the important social responsibility of energy conservation and environmental protection. The carbon emissions made by the thermal power industry are affected by the industrial structure. In this paper, the carbon emission of thermal power generation is divided into three links: energy combustion, desulfurization process, and power transportation. The total carbon emission of thermal power in 11 provinces in western China from 2000 to 2017 is calculated. Combined with industrial reform, this paper constructs a panel data fixed effect model to systematically analyze the interactive response relationship between thermal power carbon emission and industrial structure in the western region. The research shows that due to the continuous expansion of hydropower, wind power, and other new energy power generation scale and the improvement of energy efficiency in the western region, the growth trend of thermal power carbon emission has slowed down since 2010. The industrial development pattern is the main driving force of regional economic development, and the secondary industry in the western region is the main driving factor of thermal power carbon emission. High quality economic development in the western region can be promoted through technological upgrading, new energy development, and industrial multi-mode operation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ali R, Bukhsh K, Yasin MA (2019) Impact of urbanization on co2 emissions in emerging economy: evidence from Pakistan. Sustain Cities Soc 48:101553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101553
Alves MR, Moutinho V (2013) Decomposition analysis and innovative accounting approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996–2009 in Portugal. Energy 57(1):775–787
Amin NAS, Talebian-Kiakalaieh A (2017) Reduction of CO2 emission by INCAM model in Malaysia biomass power plants during the year 2016. Waste Manage 73:256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.019
Aunedi M, Pantaleo AM, Kuriyan K et al (2020) Modelling of national and local interactions between heat and electricity networks in low-carbon energy systems. Appl Energy 276:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115522
Berg P, Boland A (2014) (2014) Analysis of ultimate fossil fuel reserves and associated CO2, emissions in IPCC scenarios. Nat Resour Res 23(1):141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-013-9207-7
Bolognese M, Crema L (2020) Solar thermal technologies for low-carbon industrial processes: dynamic modelling, techno-economic analysis and environmental impact. Proceedings 58:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/WEF-06911
Guo F, Meng S, Sun R (2021) The evolution characteristics and influence factors of carbon productivity in China’s industrial sector: from the perspective of embodied carbon emissions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:50611–50622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14271-0
Javadi MA, Ahmadi MH, Khalaji M (2019) Exergetic, economic, and environmental analyses of combined cooling and power plants with parabolic solar collector. Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 39 (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13322
Jones N (2013) Climate assessments: 25 years of the IPCC. Nature 501(7467):298–299. https://doi.org/10.1038/501298a
Kavuma C, Dieu H, Sandoval D (2020) Reducing carbon dioxide emission generated by thermal power plants with solar power on the Uganda’s electricity grid. International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Energy, Environment and Climate Change (ICUE).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUE49301.2020.9307064
Li S, Cheng L (2019) Carbon dioxide emissions stimulation and analysis based on city industrial structure and DMSP-OLs nighttime light data. IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp 1853–1856. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8898092
Li W, Long R, Zhang L, He Z (2020) Greenhouse gas emission transfer of inter-provincial electricity trade in china. Int J Environ Res Public Health 22:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228375
Li X (2021) Study on the impact of energy rebound effect on carbon emission reduction at different stages of urbanization in china. Ecol Ind 120:106983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106983
Li Z, Zhou Q (2021) Research on the spatial effect and threshold effect of industrial structure upgrading on carbon emissions in china. J Water Clim Change 12:3886–3897. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.216
Maity S, Paul S, Karbouj H et al (2020) Optimal sizing and placement of wind farm in a radial distribution network considering reliability, operational, economic and environmental factors. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 99:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3032370
Mi ZF, Pan SY, Yu H, Wei YM (2014) Potential impacts of industrial structure on energy consumption and CO2 emission: a case study of Beijing. CEEP-BIT Working Papers, 103:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.011
Mishra MK, Khare N, Agrawal AB (2015) Scenario analysis of the CO2 emissions reduction potential through clean coal technology in India’s power sector: 2014–2050. Energy Strategy Rev 7:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2015.03.001
Mori T, Yamamoto J, Akiyama Y et al (2020) Removal of iron oxide scale from feed-water in thermal power plant by high-gradient magnetic separation: scale-up effect. IEEE Trans Magn 56(12):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2020.3030624
Nematchoua MK (2020) From existing neighborhoods to net-zero energy and nearly zero carbon neighborhoods in the tropical regions. Sol Energy 211:244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.062
Newell GR, Jaffe BA, Stavins NR (1999) The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quart J Econ 114(3):941–975. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556188
Ong C, Deprés G, Hollebecq J, Hishamudin M, Kamaruddin N, Anugerah AR et al (2020) Quantifying the effect of landscape structure on transport costs for biorefinery of agricultural and forestry wastes in malaysia. GCB Bioenergy 12:910–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12740
Prakash V, Ghosh S, Kanjilal K (2020) Costs of avoided carbon emission from thermal and renewable sources of power in India and policy implications. Energy 200:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117522
Shakouri B, Khoshnevis Yazdi S, Ghorchebigi E (2017) Does tourism development promote CO2 emissions? Anatolia 28(3):444–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2017.1335648
Singh U, Rao AB, Chandel MK (2017) Economic implications of CO2 capture from the existing as well as proposed coal-fired power plants in India under various policy scenarios. Energy Procedia 114:7638–7650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1896
Song M, Qu W (2015) Gray correlation analysis and path optimization of the industrial structure adjustment of undeveloped resources area in northwest: taking Yan’an city as an example. J xi’an Univ Finance Econ 28(5):40–45. https://doi.org/10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.2015.05.007
Tong X, Li X, Tong L (2018) “How can industrial structure affect carbon emissions: facilitating or inhibiting? Research based on spatial panel econometric models: Direct effects and spatial spillover,” The 30th Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), 840: 1561–1566
Wang H (2015) The industrial structure adjustment and environmental improvement - from the case of Suzhou River change. Appl Mech Mater 737(5):980–983. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.737.980
Wang S, Liu X (2017) China’s city-level energy-related CO2 emissions: spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces. Appl Energy 200:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.085
Wang XH (2019) Calculation and policy responses of thermal power carbon emissions in 1995–2015 in Shaanxi province. China. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(4):8435–8448. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_84358448
Win EP, Win KK, Bellingrath-Kimura SD et al (2020) Greenhouse gas emissions, grain yield and water productivity: a paddy rice field case study based in Myanmar. Greenh Gases: Sci Technol 10(5):884–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2011
Zhang C, Chen P (2021) Industrialization, urbanization, and carbon emission efficiency of Yangtze River Economic Belt—empirical analysis based on stochastic frontier model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:66914–66929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15309-z
Funding
This research was supported by National Social Science Fund of China [Grant Number: 21BZZ102].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xiaohui Wang reviewed relevant literature and supervised the work and acquired fund for the research. Lei Zhu provided most of the writing, review and editing, and made the original draft preparation. Jing Zhao developed the conceptualization and research methodology. Yan Li performed research methodology and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors confirm:
That the work described has not been published before;
That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere;
That its publication has been approved by all co-authors;
That its publication has been approved by the responsible authorities at the institution where the work is carried out.
The authors agree to publication in Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Zhu, L., Li, Y. et al. Research on the interactive response relationship between thermal power carbon emission and industrial structure in Western China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 84690–84701 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21686-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21686-w