Abstract
With ecological civilization becoming an increasingly high profile topic, terms such as carbon neutrality and carbon markets have entered the research landscape. Carbon prices are the core of carbon markets. After analyzing the eight carbon trading markets in China, this paper finds that carbon prices are poorly balanced, i.e., they vary widely between pilots. Regional carbon prices show a discrete distribution, and regions with better carbon market development do not have a spatial demonstration effect on neighboring regions. Therefore, in the initial stage of China’s unified carbon trading market, the mandatory control threshold amount should be lowered to allow more enterprises can participate in emission reduction. Reliance on nonclean energy should be weakened, investment in environmental protection and emission reduction should be strengthened, the proportion of carbon offset in forestry should be increased, and a carbon tax should be gradually introduced. The paper’s overall aim is to bridge regional barriers and narrow differences to achieve a smooth transition from pilot regions to national and global carbon markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data and materials are available from the authors upon request.
References
Alberola E, Chevallier J, Cheze B (2008) Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–2007. Energy Policy 36(2):787–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.029
Atola P, Ollikainen M, Toppinen A (2013) Impact of the carbon price on the integrating european electricity market. Energy Policy 61:1236–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.036
Balietti AC (2016) Trader types and volatility of emission allowance prices: evidence from EU ETS Phase I. Energy Policy 98(11):607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.006
Cai WG, Li GP (2018) Research on corporate ecological innovation strategies under the framework of carbon trading. Chin Manag Sci 26(12):168–176
Carla M, Ivan E (2011) The determinant of Italian domestic tourism: a panel date analysis. Tourism Manage 33(3):603–610. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.12.016
Chen XH, Wang ZJ (2010) An empirical study on European carbon emissions trading price mechanism. Sci Technol Progress Policy 27(19):142–147 (In Chinese)
Chen DH, Pan YC, Wu CY (2016a) Study on China’s marginal CO2 emission reduction costs and regional differences. China Popul Resour Environ 26(10):86–93 (In Chinese)
Chen X, Liu M, Liu Y (2016b) Drivers of carbon trading prices and structural breakpoints: an empirical study based on seven carbon trading pilots in China. Econ Iss 11:29–35. https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2016.11.007
Chevallier J (2011a) A model of carbon price interactions with macroeconomic and energy dynamics. Energy Econ 33(6):1295–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.012
Chevallier J (2011b) Evaluating the carbon-macroeconomy relationship: evidence from threshold vector error-correction and Markov-switching VAR models. Econ Model 28(6):2634–2656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.08.003
Daskalakis G, Markellos RN (2009) Are electricity risk premia affected by emission allowance prices? Evidence from the EEX. Nord Pool and Powernext Energy Policy 37(7):2594–2604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.010
Du ZP, Liu FC (2018) Research on regional carbon emission rights prices and their influencing factors in China: an empirical analysis based on GA-BP-MIV model. Price Theory Pract 06:42–45 (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19851/j.cnki.cn11-1010/f.2018.06.011
Fang GC, He Y, Tian LX (2021) Evolutionary game analysis of carbon emission reduction by government and enterprises driven by carbon trading. China Manag Sci 1–12 (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.12.016
Fu ZH et al (2018) Selecting the opportunity to introduce carbon tax while actively promoting carbon trading. Public Financ Res 04:2–19 (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19477/j.cnki.11-1077/f.2018.04.001
Hai XH, Yang BC (2014) Research on the dynamic relationship between the EU emissions trading system and the fossil energy market. Resour Sci 36(07):1442–1451 (In Chinese)
He ZK, Liu GB, Zhao XJ, Wang MH (2013) Overview of Gaussian process regression methods. Control Decis 28(8):1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2013.08.018
Lesage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall /CRC, New York
Liu Q (2022) Theoretical basis and system construction of carbon tax under “dual carbon” target. J HuaZhong Univ Sci Technol 36(02):108–116. https://doi.org/10.19648/j.cnki.jhustss1980.2022.02.11
Lv JY, Fan XY, Wu HN (2021) Parametric sensitivity analysis of the factors influencing the price of carbon emission rights in China. Soft Sci 35(05):123–130. https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2021.05.19
Pedro VA, Luc A, Daniel AB (2013) Testing for spatial error dependence in probit models. Lett Spat Resour Sci 6(2):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-012-0089-9
Peng WS (2021) Path selection, challenges and opportunities for China to achieve carbon neutrality. Shanghai Finance 06:2–7 (In Chinese)
Wu HJ, Zhang ZG (2020) The causes of the downturn in China’s carbon trading prices: theoretical models and empirical analysis. Management Modernization 40(06):75–81. https://doi.org/10.19634/j.cnki.11-1403/c.2020.06.017
Wu HJ, Zhang ZG (2021) The price characteristics of China’s carbon market and its cause analysis: horizontality, equilibrium and stability. World Forestry Res 34(03):123–128. https://doi.org/10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2021.0030.y
Yu JM, Mallory ML (2014) Exchange rate effect on carbon credit price via energy markets. J Int Money Financ 47:145–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.04.010
Zhang QL, Yang C, Men M (2012) Research and enlightenment of dynamic interdependence between international carbon market and energy market: based on the Dcc-Mvgarch model. Econ Rev 5:112-122+160. https://doi.org/10.19361/j.er.2012.05.012
Zhang YJ, Sun YF (2016) The Dynamic volatility spillover between European carbon trading market and fossil energy market. J Cleaner Prod 112:2654–2663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.118
Zhao LH, Hu C (2016) Research on the influencing factors of my country’s carbon emissions trading price: an empirical analysis based on structural equation model. Price Theory Pract 07:101–104 (In Chinese)
Zheng YH, Li BJ (2016) Analysis of factors influencing the price of carbon emission allowance trading in China. Coop Econ Tech 10:132–134. https://doi.org/10.13665/j.cnki.hzjjykj.2016.10.067
Zhu BZ (2019) A multiscale analysis for carbon price drivers. Energy Econ 78(2):202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.007
Zhu BZ, Wei YM (2013) Carbon price forecasting with a novel hybrid ARIMA and least squares support vector machines methodology. Omega 41(3):517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.06.005
Zhu BZ, Wang P, Wei YM (2012) Multi-scale analysis of influencing factors of carbon market price based on EMD. Econ Dev 6:92–97 (In Chinese)
Zou YS, Wei W (2013) Research on influencing factors of spot price of carbon emissions certified emission reduction (CER). J Financ Res 10:142–153 (In Chinese)
Funding
We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China for the support of the project “A Method for Measuring Ecological Civilization with Threshold and Level Two-Index” (no. 71673136) and the project of the Ministry of Education of China for Research on Major Topics in Philosophy and Social Sciences (no. 19JZD023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Huijuan Wu: methodology, investigation, data collection and analysis, writing—original draft. Zhiguang Zhang: conceptualization, funding acquisition and manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• The price of the eight carbon trading pilots in China presents discrete distribution, and the regional differences are too large to form an integrated national and international carbon market.
• The driving demonstration effect of high-cluster pilot area on low-cluster pilot area has not yet formed.
• Regional emission reduction policies and environmental protection input have spatial spillover effects on carbon prices.
• It is the first time to use the method of geographical economics to discuss the differences and driving factors of carbon pilot regions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Zhang, Z. Regional differences in carbon trading prices and their spatially driven mechanisms: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 82799–82811 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21613-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21613-z