Skip to main content
Log in

Satellite imagery: a way to monitor water quality for the future?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitoring water at high spatial and temporal resolutions is important for maintaining water quality because the cost of pollution remediation is often higher than the cost of early prevention or intervention. In recent decades, the availability and affordability of satellite images have regularly increased, thus supporting higher-frequency and lower-cost alternative methods for monitoring water quality. The core step in satellite remote sensing detection is inverse modeling, which is used to calibrate model parameters and enhance the similarity between the model and the real system being simulated. The reflectance values measured at water quality stations are extracted from atmosphere-corrected satellite imagery for analysis. However, various external environmental, hydrological, and meteorological factors affect the evaluation results, and the results obtained with different parameters can vary. This literature review shows that nonpoint-source pollution caused by stormwater runoff can also be monitored using satellite imagery. To improve the accuracy of satellite-based water quality prediction, the temporal resolution of field measurements can be increased, thus better considering the influence of seasonality. Then, the atmospheric correction module can be improved by using available atmospheric water content products. Moreover, because water surface ripples affect reflectance, wind speed and direction should be considered when comparing water quality scenes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

For this study, all produced and analyzed data are included in the published article.

References

  • Al Bakri D, Rahman S, Bowling L (2008) Sources and management of urban stormwater pollution in rural catchments Australia. J Hydrol 356(3–4):299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alparslan E, Coskun HG, Alganci U (2010) An investigation on water quality of Darlik Dam drinking water using satellite images. Sci World J 10:1293–1306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alsharif AA, Pradhan B (2014) Urban sprawl analysis of Tripoli metropolitan city (Libya) using remote sensing data and multivariate logistic regression model. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 42(1):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (2001) A guide for best management practice (BMP) selection in urban developed areas. Reston, VA, USA: Environmental and Water Resources Institute

  • Barbini R, Colao F, Fantoni R, Palucci A, Borfecchia F, De Cecco L, Della Rocca AB, Martini S (1997) Integration of passive and lidar remote sensed data in monitoring sea water quality. Paper presented at the 7th International Symposium on Physical Measurements and Signature in Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing, Courchevel, France

  • Barsi JA, Schott JR, Palluconi FD, Hook SJ (2005) Validation of a web-based atmospheric correction tool for single thermal band instruments. Paper presented at the Earth observing systems X

  • Bhagowati B, Ahamad KU (2019) A review on lake eutrophication dynamics and recent developments in lake modeling. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 19(1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonansea M, Rodriguez MC, Pinotti L, Ferrero S (2015) Using multi-temporal Landsat imagery and linear mixed models for assessing water quality parameters in Río Tercero reservoir (Argentina). Remote Sens Environ 158:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden RC (2001) Performance Evaluation of Regional Wet Detention Ponds and Wetland for Urban Nonpoint Source Control

  • Boyer JN, Kelble CR, Ortner PB, Rudnick DT (2009) Phytoplankton bloom status: chlorophyll a biomass as an indicator of water quality condition in the southern estuaries of Florida, USA. Ecol Indic 9(6 Supplement):S56–S67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bukata RP (2005) Satellite monitoring of inland and coastal water quality: retrospection, introspection, future directions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson RE (1977) A trophic state index for lakes 1. Limnol Oceanogr 22(2):361–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Simonoff JS (2013) Handbook of regression analysis (Vol. 5): John Wiley & Sons

  • Debo TN, Reese AJ (2003) Municipal stormwater management. Am Water Works Assoc J 95(5):200

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng J, Qin B, Paerl HW, Zhang Y, Wu P, Ma J, Chen Y (2014) Effects of nutrients, temperature and their interactions on spring phytoplankton community succession in Lake Taihu. China Plos One 9(12):e113960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewidar K, Khedr A (2001) Water quality assessment with simultaneous Landsat-5 TM at Manzala Lagoon. Egypt Hydrobiologia 457(1):49–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doxaran D, Froidefond J-M, Lavender S, Castaing P (2002) Spectral signature of highly turbid waters: application with SPOT data to quantify suspended particulate matter concentrations. Remote Sens Environ 81(1):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubovyk O, Menz G, Conrad C, Kan E, Machwitz M, Khamzina A (2013) Spatio-temporal analyses of cropland degradation in the irrigated lowlands of Uzbekistan using remote-sensing and logistic regression modeling. Environ Monit Assess 185(6):4775–4790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DR, Daniel TC, Scott HD, Moore PA Jr, Murdoch JF, Vendrell PF (1997) Effect of BMP implementation on storm flow quality of two northwestern Arkansas streams. Trans ASAE 40(5):1311–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exelis Inc (2009) Atmospheric correction module: QUAC and FLAASH user’s guide. ver. 4.7. Boulder, CO, USA: Author

  • Filippi AM (2007) Derivative-neural spectroscopy for hyperspectral bathymetric inversion. Prof Geogr 59(2):236–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foltz GR, McPhaden MJ (2005) Mixed layer heat balance on intraseasonal time scales in the northwestern tropical Atlantic Ocean. J Clim 18(20):4168–4184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier PS, Page KJ (2000) Water body detection and delineation with Landsat TM data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66(12):1461–1468

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour SG (1996) The interpretation of Mallows’s Cp-statistic. J Royal Stat Soc Ser D (The Statistician) 45(1):49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelson A (1992) The peak near 700 nm on radiance spectra of algae and water: relationships of its magnitude and position with chlorophyll concentration. Int J Remote Sens 13(17):3367–3373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goegebeur M, Pauwels VR (2007) Improvement of the PEST parameter estimation algorithm through extended Kalman filtering. J Hydrol 337(3–4):436–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84(11):2809–2815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjimitsis DG, Clayton C, Hope V (2004) An assessment of the effectiveness of atmospheric correction algorithms through the remote sensing of some reservoirs. Int J Remote Sens 25(18):3651–3674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R (1998) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, 7th edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmel R, King K, Haggard B, Wren D, Sheridan J (2006) Practical guidance for discharge and water quality data collection on small watersheds. Trans ASABE 49(4):937–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden CM (1988) GOES-VAS simultaneous temperature–moisture retrieval algorithm. J Appl Meteorol 1988–2005:705–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupfer M, Hilt S (2008) Lake Restoration. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Academic Press, Oxford, UK, pp 2080–2093

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (2007) Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen E, Moss B, Bennion H, Carvalho L, DeMeester L, Feuchtmayr H., . . . Lauridsen TL (2010) Interaction of climate change and eutrophication. Clim Change Impacts Freshwater Ecosyst, 119–151

  • Jia H, Lu Y, Shaw LY, Chen Y (2012) Planning of LID–BMPs for urban runoff control: the case of Beijing Olympic Village. Sep Purif Technol 84:112–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judd CM, McClelland GH, Ryan CS (2011) Data analysis: a model comparison approach: Routledge

  • Kannel PR, Lee S, Kanel SR, Khan SP, Lee Y-S (2007) Spatial–temporal variation and comparative assessment of water qualities of urban river system: a case study of the river Bagmati (Nepal). Environ Monit Assess 129(1–3):433–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishino M, Tanaka A, Ishizaka J (2005) Retrieval of chlorophyll a, suspended solids, and colored dissolved organic matter in Tokyo Bay using ASTER data. Remote Sens Environ 99(1–2):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloiber SM, Brezonik PL, Olmanson LG, Bauer ME (2002) A procedure for regional lake water clarity assessment using Landsat multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ 82(1):38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhang X, Zhang M (2008) Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: a review and analysis. J Environ Qual 37(5):1667–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Islam MA, Gao J (2003) Quantification of shallow water quality parameters by means of remote sensing. Prog Phys Geogr 27(1):24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovric M (2011) International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu R-S, Lo S-L (2002) Diagnosing reservoir water quality using self-organizing maps and fuzzy theory. Water Res 36(9):2265–2274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller J, Connor T (2014) International stormwater BMP database. Alexandria, VA, USA: Water Environment Research Foundation

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2013a) MODIS atmosphere: water vapor. Washington, DC, USA: Author

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2013b) New Landsat finds clouds hiding in plain sight. Washington, DC, USA: Author.

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2018) MODIS total precipitable water. Washington, DC, USA: Author

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2013) Earth system research laboratory ground-based GPS meteorology. Washington, DC, USA: Author

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2018) National weather service automated surface observing system. Washington, DC, USA: Author

  • National Research Council (2000) Clean coastal waters: understanding and reducing the effects of nutrient pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • National Weather Service (2014) National weather service automated surface observing system. Silver Spring, MD, USA: Author

  • Paerl H, Fulton R, Graneli E, Turner J (2006) Ecology of harmful marine algae. Ecology of harmful algae (pp. 95–107): Springer Berlin

  • Pahlevan N, Garrett AJ, Gerace AD, Schott JR (2012) Integrating Landsat-7 imagery with physics-based models for quantitative mapping of coastal waters near river discharges. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 78(11):1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins T, Adler-Golden S, Matthew M, Berk A, Anderson G, Gardner J, Felde G (2005) Retrieval of atmospheric properties from hyper and multispectral imagery with the FLAASH atmospheric correction algorithm. Paper presented at the Remote sensing of clouds and the atmosphere X

  • Qin B, Zhu G, Gao G, Zhang Y, Li W, Paerl HW, Carmichael WW (2010) A drinking water crisis in Lake Taihu, China: linkage to climatic variability and lake management. Environ Manage 45(1):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasconi S, Gall A, Winter K, Kainz MJ (2015) Increasing water temperature triggers dominance of small freshwater plankton. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0140449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee GY, Gotham IJ (1981) The effect of environmental factors on phytoplankton growth: temperature and the interactions of temperature with nutrient limitation 1. Limnol Oceanogr 26(4):635–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roesner LA, Traina P (1994) Overview of federal law and USEPA regulations for urban runoff. Water Sci Technol 29(1–2):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer BA, Schaeffer KG, Keith D, Lunetta RS, Conmy R, Gould RW (2013) Barriers to adopting satellite remote sensing for water quality management. Int J Remote Sens 34(21):7534–7544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott JR, Barsi JA, Nordgren BL, Raqueño NG, de Alwis D (2001) Calibration of Landsat thermal data and application to water resource studies. Remote Sens Environ 78(1):108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel DA, Wang M, Maritorena S, Robinson W (2000) Atmospheric correction of satellite ocean color imagery: the black pixel assumption. Appl Opt 39(21):3582–3591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH, Schindler DW (2009) Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? Trends Ecol Evol 24(4):201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song K, Liu D, Li L, Wang Z, Wang Y, Jiang G (2010) Spectral absorption properties of colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) and total suspended matter (TSM) of inland waters. Paper presented at the Atmospheric and Environmental Remote Sensing Data Processing and Utilization VI: Readiness for GEOSS IV

  • Strecker EW, Quigley MM, Urbonas BR, Jones JE, Clary JK (2001) Determining urban storm water BMP effectiveness. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(3):144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su PW, Lo SL (2021) Using Landsat 8 imagery for remote monitoring of total phosphorus as a water quality parameter of irrigation ponds in Taiwan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(47):66687–66694

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Stormwater phase II final rule: an overview. Washington, DC, USA: Author

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Measurable goals guidance for phase II small MS4s. Washington, DC, USA: Author

  • United States Geological Survey (2004) Predicting water quality by relating Secchi-disk transparency and chlorophyll a measurements to satellite imagery for Michigan inland lakes, August 2002. Reston, VA, USA: Author

  • United States Geological Survey (2014) Frequently asked questions about the Landsat missions. Reston, VA, USA: Author

  • United States Geological Survey (2018) Landsat missions. Reston, VA, USA: Author

  • Urbonas B, Stahre P (1993) Stormwater: best management practices and detention for water quality, drainage, and CSO management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbonas B (1994) Assessment of stormwater BMPs and their technology. Water Sci Technol 29(1–2):347–353

  • Voutilainen A, Jurvelius J, Lilja J, Viljanen M, Rahkola-Sorsa M (2016) Associating spatial patterns of zooplankton abundance with water temperature, depth, planktivorous fish and chlorophyll. Boreal Environ Res 21:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xia H, Fu J, Sheng G (2004) Water quality change in reservoirs of Shenzhen, China: detection using LANDSAT/TM data. Sci Total Environ 328(1–3):195–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1993) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Geneva, Switzerland: Author

  • Wu G, de Leeuw J, Liu Y (2009) Understanding seasonal water clarity dynamics of Lake Dahuchi from in situ and remote sensing data. Water Resour Manage 23(9):1849–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, De Leeuw J, Skidmore AK, Prins HH, Liu Y (2008) Comparison of MODIS and Landsat TM5 images for mapping tempo–spatial dynamics of Secchi disk depths in Poyang Lake National Nature Reserve China. Int J Remote Sens 29(8):2183–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Weisberg PJ, Bristow NA (2012) Landsat remote sensing approaches for monitoring long-term tree cover dynamics in semi-arid woodlands: comparison of vegetation indices and spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens Environ 119:62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu SL, Kuo J-T, Fassman EA, Pan H (2001) Field test of grassed-swale performance in removing runoff pollution. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(3):168–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Wang X (2008) Quantitative remote sensing researches on water quality of the Weihe River based on SPOT-5 imagery. Proc Inf Technol Environ Syst Sci 538–542.

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by National Taiwan University (NTUCCP-110L901003 and NTU-110L8807), the NTU Research Center for Future Earth from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan, and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan (MOST110-2621-M-002–011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Po-Wen Su; writing—review and editing, Shang-Lien Lo.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shang-Lien Lo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Xianliang Yi

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, PW., Lo, SL. Satellite imagery: a way to monitor water quality for the future?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 57022–57029 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21524-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21524-z

Keywords

Navigation