Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate sustainability performance, stock returns, and ESG indicators: fresh insights from EU member states

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is believed that sustainable practices like environmental, social, and governance mechanisms help in providing a sustainable outlook for both companies and the governments. Such practices have their long-term impact on the stock returns and sustainable performance dynamics. This research aims to investigate the dynamic relationship between ESG indicators, stock returns, and sustainable performance reflected through economic, environmental, and social dimensions during 2010–2018. Panel data has been collected from various listed companies working in EU member states and analyzed through advanced panel estimations. The study findings inferred a significant and positive impact of all three measures of sustainable practices as reflected by targeted firms in the EU region on economic, environmental, and social dimensions of performance. On the other hand, those firms reporting higher ESG disclosure in their annual reports confirm better stock returns. Finally, study findings reveal that ESG dynamics provide a valuable contribution in creating some sustainable edge under the theoretical foundation of different theories. The study findings would greatly support providing a meaningful model for the listed firms to focus on their ESG indicators for higher performance in EES and stock returns. Finally, the current study expects to stimulate more theoretical and empirical work on ESG and EES. Future studies are suggested to consider the relationship between the stated variables regarding pre- and post-pandemic duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  • Abdul Rahman R, Alsayegh MF (2021) Determinants of corporate environment, social and governance (ESG) reporting among Asian firms. Journal of Risk Financial Management 14(4):167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad B, Da L, Asif MH, Irfan M, Ali S, Akbar MIUD (2021a) Understanding the antecedents and consequences of service-sales ambidexterity: a motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) framework. Sustainability 13(17):9675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad N, Ullah Z, Arshad MZ, waqas Kamran, H., Scholz, M., & Han, H. (2021b) Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: the mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustainable Production Consumption 27:1138–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsayegh MF, Abdul Rahman R, Homayoun S (2020) Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability 12(9):3910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin Kumar N, Smith C, Badis L, Wang N, Ambrosy P, Tavares R (2016) ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: a new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance Investment 6(4):292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baran M, Kuźniarska A, Makieła ZJ, Sławik A, Stuss MM (2022) Does ESG reporting relate to corporate financial performance in the context of the energy sector transformation? Evidence from Poland Energies 15(2):477

    Google Scholar 

  • Barringer BR, Harrison J (2000) Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships. J Manag 26(3):367–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassen A, Kovács AM (2020) Environmental, social and governance key performance indicators from a capital market perspective. In Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik (pp. 809–820): Springer.

  • Brooks C, Oikonomou I (2018) The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: a review of the literature in accounting and finance. Br Account Rev 50(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Titman S, Zhan X, Zhang W (2020) ESG preference, institutional trading, and stock return patterns. Retrieved from

  • Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Akram W, Adeel S, Irfan M, Jan I (2021) Addressing the effect of climate change in the framework of financial and technological development on cereal production in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 288:125637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Kumar A, Zhang C (2020) Dynamic ESG Preferences and asset prices. Available at SSRN 3331866.

  • Chien F, Anwar A, Hsu C-C, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Sinha A (2021) The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol Soc 65:101587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouaibi S, Chouaibi J, Rossi M (2021) ESG and corporate financial performance: the mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business

  • Chupradit S, Yannan D, Kamran HW, Soudagar SS, Shoukry AM, Khader JA (2021) Measuring technical efficiency associated with environmental investment: does market competition and risk matters in banking sector. Environmental Science Pollution Research 28(47):66575–66588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Madaleno M, Inglesi-Lotz R, Taskin D (2022a) Race and energy poverty: evidence from African-American households. Energy Economics 108:105908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Majeed MT, Luni T (2022c) Are clean energy and carbon emission allowances caused by bitcoin? A novel time-varying method. J Clean Prod 347:131089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Majeed MT, Luni T (2022b) Analyzing the nexus of COVID-19 and natural resources and commodities: evidence from time-varying causality. Resources Policy, 102694.

  • Ehigiamusoe KU, Majeed MT, Dogan E (2022) The nexus between poverty, inequality and environmental pollution: evidence across different income groups of countries. J Clean Prod 341:130863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Khoury R, Nasrallah N, Alareeni B (2021) ESG and financial performance of banks in the MENAT region: concavity–convexity patterns. Journal of Sustainable Finance Investment 1–25

  • Fang Z, Razzaq A, Mohsin M, Irfan M (2022) Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China. Technol Soc 68:101844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi A, Glaum M, Kaiser S (2018) ESG performance and firm value: the moderating role of disclosure. Glob Financ J 38:45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero-Ferrero I, Fernández-Izquierdo MÁ, Muñoz-Torres MJ (2016) The effect of environmental, social and governance consistency on economic results. Sustainability 8(10):1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A (2015) ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance Investment 5(4):210–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giese G, Lee L-E, Melas D, Nagy Z, Nishikawa L (2019) Foundations of ESG investing: how ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management 45(5):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSIA GSIA (2019) Global Sustainable Investment Review 2014. In

  • Hafiz WK, Omran A, Mohamed-Arshad SB (2019) Risk management, capital adequacy and audit quality for financial stability: assessment from commercial banks of Pakistan. Asian Economic Financial Review 9(6):654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handayani MKY, Sus. (2019) The effect of ESG performance on economic performance in the high profile industry in Indonesia. Journal of International Business Economics 7(2):112–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Gai Z, Yan G, Wu H, Irfan M (2021) The spatial spillover effect and nonlinear relationship analysis between environmental decentralization, government corruption and air pollution: evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 763:144183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irfan M, Hao Y, Panjwani MK, Khan D, Chandio AA, Li H (2020) Competitive assessment of South Asia’s wind power industry: SWOT analysis and value chain combined model. Energ Strat Rev 32:100540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Carroll A (2017) Capturing advances in CSR: developed versus developing country perspectives. In B. E. A. E. Review (Ed.), (Vol. 26, pp. 321–325)

  • Jinru L, Changbiao Z, Ahmad B, Irfan M, Nazir R (2021) How do green financing and green logistics affect the circular economy in the pandemic situation: key mediating role of sustainable production. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 1–21

  • Khan SAR, Razzaq A, Yu Z, Miller S (2021) Industry 4.0 and circular economy practices: A new era business strategies for environmental sustainability. Business Strategy the Environment 30(8):4001–4014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Park MS, Wier B (2012) Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Account Rev 87(3):761–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocmanová A, Šimberová I (2014) Determination of environmental, social and corporate governance indicators: framework in the measurement of sustainable performance. Journal of Business Economics Management 15(5):1017–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • La Torre M, Mango F, Cafaro A, Leo S (2020) Does the esg index affect stock return? evidence from the eurostoxx50. Sustainability 12(16):6387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madaleno M, Dogan E, Taskin D (2022) A step forward on sustainability: the nexus of environmental responsibility, green technology, clean energy and green finance. Energy Economics 109:105945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J, Jansson J, Isberg S, Nordvall A-C (2014) Customer satisfaction with socially responsible investing initiatives: the influence of perceived financial and non-financial quality. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 19(4):265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Serafeim G, Kramer M (2019) Where ESG fails. Institutional Investor 16(2)

  • Raimo N, Caragnano A, Zito M, Vitolla F, Mariani M (2021) Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: the effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management 28(4):1412–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaq A, An H, Delpachitra S (2021a) Does technology gap increase FDI spillovers on productivity growth? Evidence from Chinese outward FDI in Belt and Road host countries. Technological Forecasting Social Change 172:121050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaq A, Sharif A, Najmi A, Tseng M-L, Lim MK (2021b) Dynamic and causality interrelationships from municipal solid waste recycling to economic growth, carbon emissions and energy efficiency using a novel bootstrapping autoregressive distributed lag. Resources, Conservation Recycling 166:105372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman A, Zhang D, Chandio AA, Irfan M (2020) Does electricity production from different sources in Pakistan have dominant contribution to economic growth? Empirical evidence from long-run and short-run analysis. Electr J 33(3):106717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen R, Hinze A-K, Hardeck I (2016) Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. J Bus Econ 86(8):867–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramade W, Schoenmaker D (2018) Royal Philips: a sustainable finance case study. Erasmus Platform for Sustainable Value Creation

  • Shahzad F, Yannan D, Kamran HW, Suksatan W, Nik Hashim NAA, Razzaq A (2021) Outbreak of epidemic diseases and stock returns: an event study of emerging economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 1–20

  • Shair F, Shaorong S, Kamran HW, Hussain MS, Nawaz MA, Nguyen VC (2021) Assessing the efficiency and total factor productivity growth of the banking industry: do environmental concerns matters? Environmental Science Pollution Research 28(16):20822–20838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao L, Zhang H, Irfan M (2021) How public expenditure in recreational and cultural industry and socioeconomic status caused environmental sustainability in OECD countries?. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 1–18

  • Taliento M, Favino C, Netti A (2019) Impact of environmental, social, and governance information on economic performance: evidence of a corporate ‘sustainability advantage’from Europe. Sustainability 11(6):1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanveer A, Zeng S, Irfan M, Peng R (2021) Do perceived risk, perception of self-efficacy, and openness to technology matter for solar PV adoption? An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Energies 14(16):5008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarmuji I, Maelah R, Tarmuji NH (2016) The impact of environmental, social and governance practices (ESG) on economic performance: evidence from ESG score. International Journal of Trade, Economics 7(3):67

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manag J 40(3):658–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DJ (2010) Measuring corporate social performance: a review. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):50–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Hao Y, Irfan M (2021) Energy consumption structural adjustment and carbon neutrality in the post-COVID-19 era. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 59:442–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Du Q, Razzaq A, Shang Y (2022) How volatility in green financing, clean energy, and green economic practices derive sustainable performance through ESG indicators? A sectoral study of G7 countries. Resour Policy 75:102526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuaningsih L, Febrianti RAM, Hafiz WK (2021) Climate change and energy consumption patterns in Thailand: time trends during 1988–2013. International Journal of Energy Economics Policy 11(1):571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zioło M, Filipiak BZ, Bąk I, Cheba K (2019) How do environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors impact on public finance performance? Risk, efficiency, and public financial system perspectives. Paper presented at the The International Conference Finance and Sustainability

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China

    Changyou Ye & Xiaowei Song

  2. School of Mathematics, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China

    Yuhe Liang

Authors
  1. Changyou Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaowei Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuhe Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C. Ye: Conceptualization, writing—original draft, formal analysis, data handling, and methodology. X. Song: Supervision, funding acquisition. Y. Liang: Writing—review and editing and variable construction.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaowei Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, C., Song, X. & Liang, Y. Corporate sustainability performance, stock returns, and ESG indicators: fresh insights from EU member states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 87680–87691 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20789-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20789-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation