Abstract
The coupling of ever-increasing consumption of fossil fuels around the globe with the decrease in the availability of fossil fuel supplies has led to an increased cost of energy commodities, which together with ever-expanding requirements for reducing the level of environmental pollutions has resulted in an ever-increasing deal of attention to alternative transportation schemes such as electric vehicles (EVs). Since decades ago, national governments and environmental activists have initiated various efforts towards reducing atmospheric pollutions. A part of such effort has been focused on reducing the use of internal combustion vehicles and rather replacing them with EVs. In this research, we attempt to fill in this research gap by presenting a mathematical model for minimizing the sum of traveled distance and recharging cost of EVs per a given period and then solving it by simulated annealing (SA) algorithm. Results of the proposed algorithm were then compared to those of coding in GAMS for 30 different sample problems with different counts of customers, EVs, and charging stations. Numerical results indicated good efficiency of the metaheuristic algorithm in terms of processing time and solution quality. Indeed, with the SA algorithm, the processing time was seen to increase gradually with increasing the problem complexity, while the rate of increase in processing time was much steeper with the GAMS.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.





Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that the data are not available and can be presented upon the request of the readers.
References
Baldacci R, Boschetti MA (2007) A cutting-plane approach for the twodimensionalorthogonal non-guillotine cutting problem. Eur J Oper Res 183:1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.060
Baldacci R, Bartolini E, Mingozzi A (2011) An exact algorithm for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Oper Res 59(2):414–426. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23013178
Basso R, Kulcsár B, Egardt B, Lindroth P, Sanchez-Diaz I (2019) Energy consumption estimation integrated into the electric vehicle routing problem. Transp Res Part d: Transp Environ 69:141–167
Beltrami EJ, Bodin LD (1974) Networks and vehicle routing for municipal waste collection. Networks, 4(1), pp.65–94.s, 65, 111–127.
Breunig U, Baldacci R, Hartl RF, Vidal T (2019) The electric two-echelon vehicle routing problem. Comput Oper Res 103:198–210
Dominik G, Schneider M (2015) Routing a mixed fleet of electric and conventional vehicles. Eur J Oper Res 245(1):81–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.049
Francis P, Smilowitz K (2006) Modeling techniques for periodic vehicle routing problems. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 40(10):872–884
Froger A, Mendoza JE, Jabali O, Laporte G (2019) Improved formulations and algorithmic components for the electric vehicle routing problem with nonlinear charging functions. Comput Oper Res 104:256–294
Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872
Hiermann G, Hartl RF, Puchinger J, Vidal T (2019) Routing a mix of conventional, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicles. Eur J Oper Res 272(1):235–248
Jie W, Yang J, Zhang M, Huang Y (2019) The two-echelon capacitated electric vehicle routing problem with battery swapping stations: formulation and efficient methodology. Eur J Oper Res 272(3):879–904
Kancharla SR, Ramadurai G (2020) Electric vehicle routing problem with non-linear charging and load-dependent discharging. Expert Syst Appl 160:113714
Keskin M, Çatay B (2016) Partial recharge strategies for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 65:111–127
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680
Koyuncu I, Yavuz M (2019) Duplicating nodes or arcs in green vehicle routing: a computational comparison of two formulations. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 122:605–623
Lu CC, Yan S, Huang YW (2018) Optimal scheduling of a taxi fleet with mixed electric and gasoline vehicles to service advance reservations. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 93:479–500
Macrina G, Laporte G, Guerriero F, Pugliese LDP (2019) An energy-efficient green-vehicle routing problem with mixed vehicle fleet, partial battery recharging and time windows. Eur J Oper Res 276(3):971–982
Macrina G, Pugliese LDP, Guerriero F, Laporte G (2019) The green mixed fleet vehicle routing problem with partial battery recharging and time windows. Comput Oper Res 101:183–199
Mao H, Shi J, Zhou Y, Zhang G (2020) The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and multiple recharging options. IEEE Access 8:114864–114875
Masmoudi MA, Hosny M, Demir E, Genikomsakis KN, Cheikhrouhou N (2018) The dial-a-ride problem with electric vehicles and battery swapping stations. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 118:392–420
Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67
Montoya A, Guéret C, Mendoza JE, Villegas JG (2017) The electric vehicle routing problem with nonlinear charging function. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 103:87–110
Normasari NME, Yu V, Bachtiyar VF, Sukoyo, C (2019) A simulated annealing heuristic for the capacitated green vehicle routing problem. Math Prob Eng 2019:1–18
Paz J, Granada-Echeverri M, Escobar J (2018) The multi-depot electric vehicle location routing problem with time windows. Int J Ind Eng Comput 9(1):123–136
Pelletier S, Jabali O, Laporte G (2018) Charge scheduling for electric freight vehicles. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 115:246–269
Poonthalir G, Nadarajan R (2018) A fuel efficient green vehicle routing problem with varying speed constraint (F-GVRP). Expert Syst Appl 100:131–144
Raeesi R, Zografos KG (2020) The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and synchronised mobile battery swapping. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 140:101–129
Rajan CCA (2010) Hybridizing evolutionary programming, simulated annealing and tabu search method to solve the unit commitment problem. J Electr Eng 10(1):8–8
Revesz RL, Howard PH, Arrow K, Goulder LH, Kopp RE, Livermore MA, Sterner T (2014) Global warming: improve economic models of climate change. Nature 508(7495):173–175
Schiffer M, Walther G (2018) Strategic planning of electric logistics fleet networks: a robust location-routing approach. Omega 80:31–42
Schneider M, Stenger A, Goek D (2014) The electric vehicle-routing problem with time windows and recharging stations. Transp Sci 48(4):500–520
Vincent FY, Redi AP, Yang CL, Ruskartina E, Santosa B (2017) Symbiotic organisms search and two solution representations for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Appl Soft Comput 52:657–672
Vincent FY, Redi AANP, Hidayat YA, Wibowo OJ (2017) A simulated annealing heuristic for the hybrid vehicle routing problem. Appl Soft Comput 53:119–132
Wang Y, Bi J, Guan W, Zhao X (2018) Optimizing route choices for the travelling and charging of battery electric vehicles by considering multiple objectives. Transp Res Part d: Transp Environ 64:246–261
Wang Z, Ye K, Jiang M, Yao J, Xiong NN, Yen GG (2022) Solving hybrid charging strategy electric vehicle based dynamic routing problem via evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 68:1–18
Xiao Y, Zuo X, Kaku I, Zhou S, Pan X (2019) Development of energy consumption optimization model for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows. J Clean Prod 225:647–663
Zhang S, Gajpal Y, Appadoo SS, Abdulkader MMS (2018) Electric vehicle routing problem with recharging stations for minimizing energy consumption. Int J Prod Econ 203:404–413
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Maryam Elahi (ME) has contributed to the methodology, investigation, project administration, validation, data collection, and software. Soroush Avakh Darestani (SAD) contributed to the conceptualization, writing — review and editing, visualization, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
The authors declare that they agree with the participation of the journal.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they agree with the publication of this paper in this journal.
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
- EVRPTW:
-
: electric vehicle routing problem with time window.
- GVRP:
-
: green vehicle routing problem.
- G-VRPPD:
-
: green-vehicle routing problem with pickup and delivery.
- HVRP:
-
: hybrid vehicle–routing problem.
- EVRP:
-
: electric vehicle–routing problem.
- DARP-EV:
-
: dial-a-ride problem with electric vehicle.
- MDVLRPTW:
-
: multi-depot electric vehicle–location routing problem with time windows.
- EFV-CSP:
-
: electric freight vehicle charge scheduling problem.
- F-GVRP:
-
: fuel efficient green vehicle–routing problem.
- LRPIF:
-
: location-routing problem with intra-route facilities.
- 2sEVRP:
-
: two-stage electric vehicle–routing problem.
- E-VRP-NL:
-
: electric vehicle–routing problem with non-linear charging.
- H2E-FTW:
-
: hybrid heterogeneous electric fleet–routing problem with time window
- BEVRP:
-
: battery electric vehicle routing.
- 2E-EVRP-BSS:
-
: two-echelon capacitated electric vehicle–routing problem with battery swapping stations.
- MFGVRP:
-
: mixed-fleet green vehicle–routing problem.
- GMFVRPPRTW:
-
: green mixed fleet vehicle–routing problem with partial battery recharging and time windows.
- CGVRP:
-
: capacitated green vehicle–routing problem.
- PEVRP:
-
: periodic electric vehicle–routing problem.
- DFC:
-
: design for changeability.
- BS:
-
: battery substitute.
- TD:
-
: time dependent.
- H:
-
: hybrid.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elahi, M., Avakh Darestani, S. Modeling a periodic electric vehicle–routing problem considering delivery due date and mixed charging rates using metaheuristic method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 69691–69704 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20776-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20776-z