Skip to main content

Willingness to pay for adopting conservation tillage technologies in wheat cultivation: policy options for small-scale farmers

Abstract

Traditional farming involves intensive tillage causing soil degradation and erosion. On the contrary, conservation tillage technologies are expensive to purchase for small-scale farmers. However, the adoption of these technologies reduces soil tillage costs which lead to reduced overall production costs. In this milieu, this study assessed the willingness to pay (WTP) for adopting conservation tillage technologies in terms of individual and cooperative payment systems using the primary data collected from 320 wheat farmers in Bangladesh. The contingency valuation method (CVM) was followed to estimate their WTP, and factors affecting WTP were identified through the logistic regression model. The results elicited farmers perceived that conservation tillage technologies would facilitate by reducing costs, timely land preparation, seed sowing and planting, appropriate positioning of seed and fertilizers, and higher soil moisture. Nevertheless, most of the farmers wanted to adopt conservation tillage technologies, while about 79% would like to pay for it. Although farmers’ average WTP for individual purchases was higher, most were interested in the cooperative systems for adopting conservation tillage machines. Farmers’ WTP for both individual and cooperative purchases was influenced by location of wheat production, farming experience, and demonstration plots. Additionally, individual payment system was affected by the amount of wheatland and training while credit affected the cooperative purchase system. Besides, the farmers would like to expand their wheat farms by approximately 73.33% after adopting conservation tillage technologies. The refusal to pay for conservation tillage technologies was mostly due to low-quality spare parts, lack of technical understanding, and unawareness of the technology. This study suggests that providing training among farmers and operators, credit support, and making machines and spare parts available in the nearest markets would support adopting conservation technologies. Besides, cooperative-based payment system should be formed to help small-scale farmers adopt conservation tillage techniques for sustainable agriculture in an environment-friendly way.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahiale ED, Balcombe K, Srinivasan C (2019) Determinants of farm households’ willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for conservation technologies in Northern Ghana. Bio-Based and Applied Economics 8(2):211–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Akter S, Gathala MK, Timsina J, Islam S, Rahman M, Hassan MK, Ghosh AK (2021) Adoption of conservation agriculture-based tillage practices in the rice-maize systems in Bangladesh. World Dev Perspect 21:100297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MM, Saha CK, Rahman A, Bhuyian MGK (2017) Manufacturing of agricultural machinery in Bangladesh: opportunities and constraints. Agric Eng Int CIGR J 19(1):122–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemayehu T (2014) Smallholder farmer’s willingness to pay for improved irrigation water: a contingent valuation study in Koga Irrigation Project, Ethiopia. J Econ Sustain Dev 5(19):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Farizo B (1999) Estimating the benefits of agri-environmental policy: econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuation studies. J Environ Planning Manage 42(1):23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan A, McCarthy N, Lipper L, Asfaw S, Cattaneo A (2014) Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 187:72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryal KP, Chaudhary P, Pandit S, Sharma G (2009) Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic products: a case from Kathmandu valley. Journal of Agriculture and Environment 10:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asrat P, Belay K, Hamito D (2004) Determinants of farmers’ willingness to pay for soil conservation practices in the southeastern highlands of Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev 15(4):423–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARI (2014) Annual Report (2013–2014), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur, pp. 250. Retrieved from, http://www.bari.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bari.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/9f0392ab_224e_4673_a91b_fbe7b16b2d20/annual_report.pdf

  • Baudeon F, Mwanza HM, Triomphe B, Bwalya M (2007) Conservation agriculture in Zambia: a case study of Southern Province. Nairobi. African Conservation Tillage Network, Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  • BBS (2019) Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Yearbook Bangladesh 2019, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. Retrieved from, http://bbs.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov.bd/page/b2db8758_8497_412c_a9ec_6bb299f8b3ab/2020-09-17-15-30-d0e641b2e659019f2aa44cbaf628caa8.pdf

  • Blanco H, Lal R (2008) Principles of soil conservation and management . © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8709-7.

  • Boz I (2016) Effects of environmentally friendly agricultural land protection programs: evidence from the Lake Seyfe area of Turkey. J Integr Agric 15(8):1903–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT (2012) Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren’t available. J Econ Perspect 26(4):27–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channa H, Chen AZ, Pina P, Ricker-Gilbert J, Stein D (2019) What drives smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya. Food Policy 85:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay S (2002) Divergence in alternative Hicksian welfare measures: the case of revealed preference for public amenities. J Appl Economet 17(6):641–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIMMYT (2012) Study into the Commercialization of Selected Agricultural Machines in Bangladesh, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Bangladesh, Dhaka.

  • Cooper RJ, Hama-Aziz ZQ, Hiscock KM, Lovett AA, Vrain E, Dugdale SJ,..., Noble L (2020) Conservation tillage and soil health: lessons from a 5-year UK farm trial (2013–2018). Soil Tillage Res 202:104648

  • CSISA-MI (2015) Groundwater management in Bangladesh: an analysis of problems and opportunities. Central System Initiative for South Asia – mechanization and Irrigation, USAID, Research Report No. 2. Dhaka.

  • Davis RK (1963) Recreation Planning as an Economic Problem. Nat Resour J 3:239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao X, Silver J, Takeshima H (2016) Agricultural mechanization and agricultural transformation (Vol. 1527). Intl Food Policy Res Inst

  • Gathala MK, Laing AM, Tiwari TP, Timsina J, Islam S, Bhattacharya PM,..., Gérard B (2020) Energy-efficient, sustainable crop production practices benefit smallholder farmers and the environment across three countries in the Eastern Gangetic Plains, South Asia. J Clean Prod 246:118982.

  • Gill MA (2006) Zero tillage wheat production in rice-wheat cropping system: evidence from farmers’ field. Pak J Agric Res 19(4):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Green CH, Tunstall SM (1991) Is the economic evaluation of environmental resources possible? J Environ Manage 33(2):123–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A, Rai SC (2015) Farmers’ willingness-to-pay towards soil and water conservation measures in agroecosystems of Chotanagpur Plateau. India Water and Environment Journal 29(4):523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JK, Roth GW, Garalejić B, Škrbić N (2018) Programs to promote adoption of conservation tillage: a Serbian case study. Land Use Policy 78:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks JR (1943) The four consumer’s surpluses. Rev Econ Stud 11(1):31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HIES (2016) Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2016, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs PR, Sayre K, Gupta R (2008) The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc 363(1491):543–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque MN, Saha SM, Imran S, Hannan A, Seen MMH, Thamid SS, Tuz-zohra F (2022) Farmers’ agrochemicals usage and willingness to adopt organic inputs: watermelon farming in Bangladesh. Environmental Challenges 7:100451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain A, Silva JAT (2013) Wheat production in Bangladesh: its future in the light of global warming. AoB Plants 5

  • Hossain ME, Islam MS, Rana MJ, Amin MR, Rokonuzzaman M, Chakrobortty S, Saha SM (2022) Scaling the changes in lifestyle, attitude, and behavioral patterns among COVID-19 vaccinated people: insights from Bangladesh. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.2022920

  • Hossain MM (2014) Impact evaluation of enhancement of agricultural production and rural employment through extension of agricultural engineering technologies (2nd revised). Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division, MoP (ed.). Bangladesh.

  • Huang Y, Tao B, Xiaochen Z, Yang Y, Liang L, Wang L,..., Ren W (2021) Conservation tillage increases corn and soybean water productivity across the Ohio River Basin. Agricultural Water Management 254:106962

  • IFAD. (2011). Smallholder conservation agriculture: rationale for IFAD involvement and relevance to the East and Southern Africa Region. International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome, Italy

  • Jat ML, Chakraborty D, Ladha JK, Rana DS, Gathala MK, McDonald A, Gerard B (2020) Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia. Nature Sustainability 3(4):336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jat HS, Datta A, Choudhary M, Yadav AK, Choudhary V, Sharma PC, ..., McDonald A (2019) Effects of tillage, crop establishment and diversification on soil organic carbon, aggregation, aggregate associated carbon and productivity in cereal systems of semi-arid Northwest India. Soil Tillage Res 190:128-138

  • Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsch R (2019) Global spread of conservation agriculture. Int J Environ Stud 76(1):29–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krystallis A, Chryssohoidis G (2005) Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic food: factors that affect it and variation per organic product type. Br Food J 107(5):320–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Li Z, Cui S, Jagadamma S, Zhang Q (2019) Residue retention and minimum tillage improve physical environment of the soil in croplands: a global meta-analysis. Soil Tillage Res 194:104292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Huang D, Ma Q, Qi W, Li H (2020) Factors influencing the technology adoption behaviours of Litchi farmers in China. Sustainability 12(1):1–1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB (1990) Comparative reliability of the dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques. J Environ Econ Manag 18(1):78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk JL (2003) Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice. Am J Agr Econ 85(4):840–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah MMA, Haque ME, Baksh ME, Hossain MI (2010) Economic analysis of power tiller operated seeder operation at farm level. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 1:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah MM, Hossain S, Duxbury JM, Lauren JG (2015) Adoption of raised bed technology in some selected locations of Rajshahi District of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agric Res 40(4):551–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah MMA, Haque ME, Wohab MA, Dixon J, Alam QM, Islam MS,..., Baksh ME (2008) Adoption impact of two wheel tractor operated seeder in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur, 1701, 46

  • Michler JD, Baylis K, Arends-Kuenning M, Mazvimavi K (2019) Conservation agriculture and climate resilience. J Environ Econ Manag 93:148–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraru PI, Rusu T (2010) Soil tillage conservation and its effect on soil organic matter, water management and carbon sequestration. J Food Agric Environ 8(3–4):309–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulimbi W, Nalley LL, Nayga Jr RM, Gaduh A (2020) Are consumers willing to pay for conservation agriculture in low-income countries? The case of white maize in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

  • Naorem A, Jayaraman S, Udayana SK, Singh NAK (2021) Can conservation agriculture deliver its benefits in arid soils?: an overview. Conservation Agriculture: A Sustainable Approach for Soil Health and Food Security 267–287

  • Nazu SB, Khan MA, Saha SM, Hossain ME, Rashid MHA (2021) Adoption of improved wheat management practices: an empirical investigation on conservation and traditional technology in Bangladesh. J Agric Food Res 4:100143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntshangase NL, Muroyiwa B, Sibanda M (2018) Farmers’ perceptions and factors influencing the adoption of no-till conservation agriculture by small-scale farmers in Zashuke. KwaZulu-Natal Province Sustainability 10(2):555

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Conor RM, Johannesson M, Johansson PO (1999) Stated preferences, real behaviour and anchoring: some empirical evidence. Environ Resour Econ 13(2):235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil V, Veettil PC (2018) Experimental evidence of risk attitude of farmers from risk-preference elicitation in India. 30th International Conference of Agricultural Economics, 28 July-2 August 2018, Vancouver.

  • Pheap S, Lefevre C, Thoumazeau A, Leng V, Boulakia S, Koy R,..., Tivet F (2019) Multi-functional assessment of soil health under Conservation Agriculture in Cambodia. Soil Tillage Res 194:104349

  • Rahman S, Hasan MK (2009) Wheat in Bangladesh: yield growth, production performance and determinants. In: Davies S, Evans G (eds) Soybean and Wheat Crops: Growth. Fertilization and Yield, Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 203–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Aravindakshan S, Hoque MA, Rahman MA, Gulandaz MA, Rahman J, Islam MT (2021) Conservation tillage (CT) for climate-smart sustainable intensification: assessing the impact of CT on soil organic carbon accumulation, greenhouse gas emission and water footprint of wheat cultivation in Bangladesh. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 10:100106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha SM, Pranty SA, Rana MJ, Islam MJ, Hossain ME (2022) Teaching during a pandemic: do university teachers prefer online teaching? Heliyon 8(1):e08663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanaullah AB, Ullah I (2021) Challenges and prospects of farm mechanization in Pakistan: a case study of rural farmers in District Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 37(1):167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad M, Hussain M, Farooq M, Farooq S, Jabran K, Nawaz A (2017) Economic assessment of conventional and conservation tillage practices in different wheat-based cropping systems of Punjab. Pakistan Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24(31):24634–24643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Xie Y, Wang C, Yue J, Yao Y, Li X,..., Guo T (2016) Effects of different soil conservation tillage approaches on soil nutrients, water use and wheat-maize yield in rainfed dry-land regions of North China. Eur J Agron 81:37-45

  • Shee A, Azzarri C, Haile B (2020) Farmers’ willingness to pay for improved agricultural technologies: evidence from a field experiment in Tanzania. Sustainability 12(1):216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sseguya H, Robinson DS, Mwango HR, Flock JA, Manda J, Abed R, Mruma SO (2021) The impact of demonstration plots on improved agricultural input purchase in Tanzania: implications for policy and practice. Plos one 16(1):e0243896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana S, Khan MA, Hossain ME, Prodhan MMH, Saha SM (2022) Yield gap, risk attitude, and poverty status of aman rice producers in climate-vulnerable coastal areas of Bangladesh. J Agric Sci Technol 24(1):83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Li Q, Zhang X, Wei K, Chen L, Liang W (2012) Effects of conservation tillage on soil aggregation and aggregate binding agents in black soil of Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research 124:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Zhou Q, Gan S, Wang L (2018) Factors affecting farmers’ willingness to pay for adopting vegetable residue compost in North China. Acta Ecol Sin 38(6):401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are grateful to Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System (BAURES) for their financial support in conducting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shahnaz Begum Nazu was responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and writing the first draft of the manuscript. Sourav Mohan Saha along with Md. Emran Hossain was responsible for data curation, formal analysis, and manuscript editing. Sadika Haque handled data curation and proofreading. Md Akhtaruzzaman Khan was responsible for supervision, preliminary analysis, and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Akhtaruzzaman Khan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors of this manuscript have agreed to authorship, approved the manuscript, and given consent for submission and subsequent publication of the manuscript. The authors of this manuscript also assure that they follow the Springer publishing procedures and agree to publish it as any form of access article confirming to subscribe access standards and licensing.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Baojing Gu

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nazu, S.B., Saha, S.M., Hossain, M.E. et al. Willingness to pay for adopting conservation tillage technologies in wheat cultivation: policy options for small-scale farmers. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 63458–63471 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20306-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20306-x

Keywords

  • Conservation tillage
  • Technology adoption
  • Cooperative
  • Willingness to pay
  • Wheat farming
  • Bangladesh