Abstract
This research aimed at examining the nexus among urbanization, energy use, foreign direct investment (FDI), economic growth, and environmental sustainability in Turkey. Time-series data from 1970 to 2017 were used in the analysis, and ecological footprint was used as an indicator for environmental sustainability. The aim was to investigate the long-run nexus among the indicators and contribute to the literature in several ways. One of these contributions is to empirically investigate this relationship with the residual augmented least squares (RALS) augmented Dickey-Fuller ADF for stationarity test and RALS-EG (residual augmented least squares–Engle and Granger) for the long-run steady-state relationship of investigated variables. Together with, fully modified OLS (ordinary least squares) model has been employed to observe the long-run effect and the significance of the investigated variables on environmental sustainability. The results revealed that the long-run relationship exists and the long-run coefficients show statistically significant effects on environmental sustainability. In the long run, urbanization and energy usage degrade the environment and reduce environmental quality, although FDI inflow and gross domestic product (GDP) growth contribute 0.22% and 8.03% to environmental sustainability in Turkey, respectively. The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis is not valid in this model and U-shaped relationship was found between increasing economic performance and the ecological footprint. The causality results reflect that urbanization has feedback causality with energy use. The study suggests that to achieve sustainable urbanization, policymakers in Turkey should execute well-planned urbanization programs, create an energy conservation policy, and encourage green industries to ensure a sustainable increase in environmental quality for Turkey.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Data Availability
The details about the data given in main text and will be made available upon request.
References
Abdouli M, Kamoun O, Hamdi B (2018) The impact of economic growth, population density, and FDI inflows on CO2 emissions in BRICTS countries: does the Kuznets curve exist? Empir Econ 54(4):1717–1742
Adebayo TS, Rjoub H, Akinsola GD, Oladipupo SD (2021) The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res :1–12
Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K (2020a) Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy 67: 101677
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S (2020b) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55: 102064
Akadiri AC, Saint Akadiri S, Gungor H (2019) The role of natural gas consumption in Saudi Arabia’s output and its implication for trade and environmental quality. Energy Policy 129:230–238
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy 84:382–389
Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709
Alola AA, Donve UT (2021) Environmental implication of coal and oil energy utilization in Turkey: is the EKC hypothesis related to energy? Manage Environ Quali Int J
Asongu SA, Agboola MO, Alola AA, Bekun FV (2020) The criticality of growth, urbanization, electricity and fossil fuel consumption to environment sustainability in Africa. Sci Total Environ 712:136376
Bachri AA, Normelani E (2020) FDI, Income, and environmental pollution in Indonesia. Int J Energy Econ Policy 10(6):383
Balcilar M, Bekun FV, Uzuner G (2019) Revisiting the economic growth and electricity consumption nexus in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(12):12158–12170
Balcilar M, Gupta R, Pierdzioch C (2016) Does uncertainty move the gold price? New evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test. Resour Policy 49:74–80
Bekun FV, Emir F, Sarkodie SA (2019) Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. Sci Total Environ 655:759–765
Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:587–595
Bușu C, Bușu M (2017) How does renewable energy impact carbon emissions? An Eu level analysis. In 11th International Management Conference “The role of management in the economic paradigm of the XXIst century (pp. 502–510)
Çetin M, Ecevit E (2015) Urbanization, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Sub-Saharan countries: a panel cointegration and causality analysis. J Econ Develop Stud 3(2):66–76
Cetin M, Ecevit E (2017) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions under the structural breaks: empirical evidence from Turkish economy. Int J Econ Perspect 11(1)
Cetin M, Ecevit E, Yucel AG (2018a) The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(36):36589-36603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3526-5
Cetin M, Ecevit E, Yucel AG (2018b) Structural breaks, urbanization and CO2 emissions: evidence from Turkey. J Appl Econ Bus Res 8(2):122–139
Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:138–154
Charfeddine L (2017) The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov switching equilibrium correction model. Energy Econ 65:355–374
Danish UR, Khan SUD (2019) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996
Destek MA (2021) Deindustrialization, reindustrialization and environmental degradation: evidence from ecological footprint of Turkey. J Clean Prod 296:126612
Destek MA, Ozsoy FN (2015) Relationships between economic growth, energy consumption, globalization, urbanization and environmental degradation in Turkey. Int J Energy Stat 3(04):1550017
Dogan E (2014) Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4(2):154
Emir F, Bekun FV (2019) Energy intensity, carbon emissions, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: new insights from Romania. Energy Environ 30(3):427–443
Ertugrul HM, Cetin M, Seker F, Dogan E (2016) The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecol Ind 67:543–555
Fan Y, Liu LC, Wu G, Wei YM (2006) Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26(4):377–395
Gasimli O, Naradda Gamage SK, Shihadeh F, Rajapakshe PSK, Shafiq M (2019) Energy, trade, urbanization and environmental degradation Nexus in Sri Lanka: bounds testing approach. Energies 12(9):1655
Godil DI, Sharif A, Agha H, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: new insights from QARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(19):24190–24200
Gökmenoğlu K, Taspinar N (2016) The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. J Int Trade Econ Dev 25(5):706–723
Haug AA, Ucal M (2019) The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: nonlinear relationships. Energy Econ 81:297–307
Ibrahiem DM, Hanafy SA (2020) Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: an empirical analysis. Manage Environ Qual Int J
Katircioğlu S, Katircioğlu S (2018) Testing the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters, 25(11), 741–746.relationships. Energy Econ 81:297–307
Koyuncu T, Beşer MK, Alola AA (2021) Environmental sustainability statement of economic regimes with energy intensity and urbanization in Turkey: a threshold regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res :1–14
Lin S, Wang S, Marinova D, Zhao D, Hong J (2017) Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO2 emissions in non-high income countries: Empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. J Clean Prod 166:952–966
Murshed M, Elheddad M, Ahmed R, Bassim M, Than ET (2021) Foreign direct investments, renewable electricity output, and ecological footprints: do financial globalization facilitate renewable energy transition and environmental welfare in Bangladesh? Asia Pac Financ Mark :1–46
Nasreen S, Anwar S, Ozturk I (2017) Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:1105–1122
Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M (2020) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res :1–13
Ozatac N, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N (2017) Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(20):16690–16701
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025
Pata UK (2018a) The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey: evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(8):7740–7747
Pata UK (2018b) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779
Pata UK (2018c) The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy 160:1115–1123
Pata UK (2019) Environmental Kuznets curve and trade openness in Turkey: bootstrap ARDL approach with a structural break. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(20):20264–20276
Pata UK, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2021) Exploring the impact of tourism and energy consumption on the load capacity factor in Turkey: a novel dynamic ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res :1–13
Philip LD, Sertoglu K, Saint Akadiri S, Olasehinde-Williams G (2021a) Foreign direct investment amidst global economic downturn: is there a time-varying implication for environmental sustainability targets? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(17):21359–21368
Philip LD, Emir F, Alola AA (2021b) The asymmetric nexus of entrepreneurship and environmental quality in a developing economy. Int J Environ Sci Technol :1–12
Sabir S, Qayyum U, Majeed T (2020) FDI and environmental degradation: the role of political institutions in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(26):32544–32553
Saint Akadiri S, Alola AA, Olasehinde-Williams G, Etokakpan MU (2020) The role of electricity consumption, globalization and economic growth in carbon dioxide emissions and its implications for environmental sustainability targets. Sci Total Environ 708: 134653
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871
Sarkodie SA, Adams S (2018) Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Sci Total Environ 643:1590–1601
Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:347–356
Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Muzaffar AT, Ahmed K, Jabran MA (2016) How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:83–93
Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I., & Sinha, A. (2020). Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57, 102138.
Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88(1):376–382
Tupy M (2015) Urbanization is good for the Environment. https://www.cato.org/blog/urbanization-good-environment
Udemba EN (2019) Triangular nexus between foreign direct investment, international tourism, and energy consumption in the Chinese economy: accounting for environmental quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(24):24819–24830
Udemba EN, Agha CO (2020) Abatement of pollutant emissions in Nigeria: a task before multinational corporations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(21):26714–26724
Udemba EN, Güngör H, Bekun FV (2019) Environmental implication of offshore economic activities in Indonesia: a dual analyses of cointegration and causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(31):32460–32475
Udemba EN (2020) A sustainable study of economic growth and development amidst ecological footprint: new insight from Nigerian Perspective. Sci Total Environ 732:139270
Udemba EN, Magazzino C, Bekun FV (2020) Modeling the nexus between pollutant emission, energy consumption, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: new insights from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(15)
Udemba EN (2021) Mitigating environmental degradation with institutional quality and foreign direct investment (FDI): new evidence from asymmetric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res :1–15
Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996
Wang Y, Li L, Kubota J, Han R, Zhu X, Lu G (2016) Does urbanization lead to more carbon emission? Evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Appl Energy 168:375–380
Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2144–2159
Xu B, Lin B (2015) Carbon dioxide emissions reduction in China’s transport sector: a dynamic VAR (vector autoregression) approach. Energy 83:486–495
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Introduction and literature: Lucy Davou Philip, data and methodology & results and conclusion: Asst. Prof. Dr. Firat Emir, supervise the project: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Kamil Sertoglu. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors are giving their ethical approval and consent for this paper to be published in your Journal if found publishable.
Consent for publication
The authors are giving their consent for this paper to be published in your Journal if found publishable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Emir, F., Philip, L.D. & Sertoglu, K. Assessing the influence of urbanization and energy on carbon emissions of Turkey: evidence using the new RALS analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 57905–57917 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19953-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19953-x
Keywords
- Urbanization
- Energy consumption
- Ecological footprint
- Turkey
- RALS analysis
- Environmental sustainability
JEL Classification
- Q57
- Q43
- O18